Wizchan / Assigned Male Accidental Merger

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

Move to Lolcow Subforum?


  • Total voters
    42
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Then you might as well cut it off, cause that ain't happening.
I'm a hopeless optimist.

You do realize without any hormones in your body, you will become unhealthy and be in danger for a myriad of medical problems, yes?

Then again, this is the same person who thinks he'll be able to attract a woman...
Why would lack of hormones do that?
 
This quote here perfectly summarises why you are a danger to the public.

The reason why humans have become so successful as a species is that unlike most other living organisms, we have developed empathetic emotions and protect each other as opposed to compete for resources. Given that we're able to treat a myriad of physical ailments most people now recognise that in order for humanity to succeed, focusing on our emotional health has possibly for the first time become more important than focusing on our physical health.

For pretty much anyone who has contact with children will tell you, we have an instinctive approach on making sure that we sacrifice our own needs to make sure that children are given the appropriate nurturing to become physically and emotionally healthy. You wouldn't let a child carry a heavy box you need quickly taken to your car because they don't have the physical strength to carry it safely, for example. Emotions are extremely complex even for adults, so we make sure children have a secure understand of what an emotion is and how to express it before moving on to introducing more complex emotional and moral situations. At the age of six, being able to recognise and express emotions such as "tired" or "anxious" can be difficult, which is why we simply the world around them to help them form an understanding of the confusing world around them.

The fact that you expect children to comprehend, let alone express such a complicated concept as sexuality is extremely concerning and signals that there is something very wrong with your understanding of others emotional needs. Not only have you used a magnitude of fallacious logic to incorrectly justify your actions, you sacrificed a child's needs to satisfy your own selfishness. That is a textbook definition of child abuse. Most people form relationships based on a mutual relationship of physical and emotional attractiveness, which as adults we seek relationships with other adults because we know that they for the most part have an understanding of the complex emotional needs required in a romantic relationship. The fact that you believe that a 14 year old has the ability to fulfill the emotional needs of an adult signals that you yourself have an extremely stunted emotional capacity which has led to you lacking in understanding into how damaging your actions and behaviours are.

Children that have been introduced into sexual behaviours become extremely traumatised by these events because they are forced into trying to understand something they are cognitively unable to do so. This can lead into very long-term self-esteem and attachment issues when as they grow older they develop new perceptions on the events which they were unfairly subjected to. Instead of accepting that you have engaged in extremely disgusting and damaging behaviour, painting yourself as the victim shows that you are very likely to commit the same actions again because you are unable to empathise with other people, no matter how many times you claim that you find children sexually unattractive.

We have every right to be angry with you because your actions go against our natural instincts to protect and help the vulnerable. You are not a victim; you have defiled a social contract that most people have an unspoken understanding of and deserve every repercussion that comes your way.
*rates winner intensely*

If I don't think about me who will?

See? This is the problem. You are a problem. No one cares because you only care about *you*. No one will care if you only care about yourself.
 
No I would not. I only like adult women. However if it were legal and a child approached me I would likely tell their parents and if they were okay with it I would date her but it would be a very long time before anything happens and even then she would have to be minimum 14 for me to fuck her.

What the fuck kind of parents would give the ok for their little girl to date a creepy pedo that wants to cut his balls off?
 
Last edited:
Why would lack of hormones do that?

Believe it or not, your hormones do more than just put hair on your filthy face and make you sound like a twat. Hormones in both sexes aid in things like bone density, red blood cell production and can even affect your sleeping patterns. A quick google search can tell you all that you need. You have the internet in the palm of your greasy hands. Instead of looking at watermelon boobed child porn, you should educate yourself.
 
No. It's because my penis is a woman. As are my balls my stomach and my right index finger. I would have named her Moira but I'm saving that for if I ever get married and we have a daughter. It is one of Wendy's middle names in Peter Pan and I fell in love with the name as soon as I heard it. I named my penis after Molly O'Brien on Star Trek. (I know I know "NERD ALERT" but I just really love the name.)
Any other famous cows who save a name for their future daughter? I know there's one-just can't think of him.
EDIT: Yeah, that was uncalled for. While that trait's the same, they're in completely different categories of cow. Chris's funny, this guy's just horrifying in every way.
 
Last edited:
  • Disagree
Reactions: BILLY MAYS
No. It's because my penis is a woman. As are my balls my stomach and my right index finger. I would have named her Moira but I'm saving that for if I ever get married and we have a daughter. It is one of Wendy's middle names in Peter Pan and I fell in love with the name as soon as I heard it. I named my penis after Molly O'Brien on Star Trek. (I know I know "NERD ALERT" but I just really love the name.)
Get your filthy fucking paedophile paws off of Star Trek - and naming your dick after a child character? Oh, no, I'm not surprised at all.

For those who are unfamiliar with Star Trek, Molly O'Brien is born in the series The Next Generation and we never see her past ten years old, as in Deep Space Nine she is approximately six or seven by it's conclusion. Kind of puts it into some disgusting perspective, huh?
 
No. It's because my penis is a woman. As are my balls my stomach and my right index finger. I would have named her Moira but I'm saving that for if I ever get married and we have a daughter. It is one of Wendy's middle names in Peter Pan and I fell in love with the name as soon as I heard it. I named my penis after Molly O'Brien on Star Trek. (I know I know "NERD ALERT" but I just really love the name.)
Also: TRANS BODY PARTS! The newest Tumblr craze! Why be all trans non-binary when you can specify that your toes are all different types of voidgender--and they all need their own pronouns!
(But seriously, why the fuck are your specifically-male genitals women? This makes less sense than usual!)
 
this greasy fat fuck somehow was recommended to me to friend on facebook a while back. :( When I saw the name pop up, I was in disbelief, but clicking on the name made me realize facebook tried to recommend me to friend a child rapist.

maybe James Terry Mitchell Jr. should not only castrate himself, but throw in a hanging too. Fucking pedophile. If you don't do anything, your prison mates sure will. Pick your poison.
 
this greasy fat fuck somehow was recommended to me to friend on facebook a while back. :( When I saw the name pop up, I was in disbelief, but clicking on the name made me realize facebook tried to recommend me to friend a child rapist.

maybe James Terry Mitchell Jr. should not only castrate himself, but throw in a hanging too. Fucking pedophile. If you don't do anything, your prison mates sure will. Pick your poison.
They won't have the ability to. At least, without assistance. They won't let him near the others. That's exactly why. (Though, when I was watching a show that dealt with interviewing prisoners, one prisoner managed to drag his cell's sink a long distance to kill a pedophile that was flaunting what he had done. That day, everyone was in an uproar and he was extremely close to doing so, but was stopped short by guards. The guards let him get that far because they hadn't liked it either.)
 
They won't have the ability to. At least, without assistance. They won't let him near the others. That's exactly why. (Though, when I was watching a show that dealt with interviewing prisoners, one prisoner managed to drag his cell's sink a long distance to kill a pedophile that was flaunting what he had done. That day, everyone was in an uproar and he was extremely close to doing so, but was stopped short by guards. The guards let him get that far because they hadn't liked it either.)
Yep. No matter where you are, one thing is true for every prison. Guards and inmates equally loathe rapists, especially if the victim was a child. They'll make sure they give rapists a hard time.
 
Yep. No matter where you are, one thing is true for every prison. Guards and inmates equally loathe rapists, especially if the victim was a child. They'll make sure they give rapists a hard time.
I'm surprised that they actually stopped him from hitting him. (Though, he was pretty banged up, so he wouldn't hit the pedophile that badly. He was bloody because of how he ripped it from the wall)

Sad thing is that he did the same thing that James is doing, except he's not in prison.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back