- Joined
- Oct 29, 2021
@TamarYaelBatYah no response that time? A pity, perhaps Marshal Methers will respond to me with a battle rap. </3
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
She cited some stuff, yeah. But those citations are bad, and accompanied with not more than "they are mean because I said so, therefore do much seal, goy!" She failed to meet the burden, IMO. The rights shown in Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc., 435 U.S. 589 (1978 ), B.R. v. F.C.S.B., No. 21-1005 (4th Cir. 2021), Co. Doe v. Public Citizen, 749 F.3d 246, 2014 WL 1465728, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 7113 (4th Cir. 2014), all which clearly specify just how important our "constitutional and common-law rights of access to judicial records and documents" are.I just glanced at it but did she site any case law other than her own? Like even if it was incorrectly cited or she came to a conclusion that the court didn't, was there anything other than her failed lawsuits before her cited?
Something like that, yeah. This was a bad bad filing on her part."I exist, therefore crime" was what I got from it.
Seven deadly sins are a Christian concept.Mel said:I thought you Christians believe all sin was equal in the eyes of Elohim?
I’m not where I can clip it out. But Item 4 is a real gem. To paraphrase “In my 10 years of filing continuous lawsuits, both the ones you’ve found, and the ones you haven’t I have NEVER had anyone look at my Court Records!”New docs.
Give it time, we'll find out.What other Judgements are out there?
This dumb bitch capitalizing the word stalkers just makes meNew docs.
I am giddy with anticipation as to the other cases she has. @talk talk talk needs to complete our timelineYour latest filing is spectacular in how much good it does for Null and Hardin. What Courts Not of Record Mel? What other Judgements are out there?
Honestly, as a layman I'd feel like if somene specifically points out thing like that, it'd be the thing I'd pay extra close attention to - I get the strong "Pay no attention to that man behind the curtain" -vibes here.hances are this is the only part of your filing that the Judge will pay any attention to. And that’s not a good thing
Fellow layman, essentially that's the nail on the head here. She is in such deep shit that you don't even need to study law in an outside setting, say during a summer, to understand she keeps fucking up. Of course that's then super entertaining to watch. I just like cow poking too much for my own good, but so far, if anything I've just established myself as a sheep dog barking at her.Honestly, as a layman I'd feel like if somene specifically points out thing like that, it'd be the thing I'd pay extra close attention to - I get the strong "Pay no attention to that man behind the curtain" -vibes here.
I’m not where I can clip it out. But Item 4 is a real gem. To paraphrase “In my 10 years of filing continuous lawsuits, both the ones you’ve found, and the ones you haven’t I have NEVER had anyone look at my Court Records!”
I think someone else already put dibs on the fake pew pews.@Null im willing to buy any seized firearms via private purchase between private citizens for a reasonable price once you start collecting debt from this madwoman.
I'd like dibs before you start the great mountain jew charity auction for getting your court fees back.
We’ve seen videos of Marshall trying to do a brake job. What makes you think his skills at maintaining a firearm are any better? A vintage gun found in the sand on Normandy Beach or Saipan probably would be in better shape than one owned by these morons.@Null im willing to buy any seized firearms via private purchase between private citizens for a reasonable price once you start collecting debt from this madwoman.
I'd like dibs before you start the great mountain jew charity auction for getting your court fees back.
Back off. I called dibs on the fake pew pews back when she claimed to have pew pews@Null im willing to buy any seized firearms via private purchase between private citizens for a reasonable price once you start collecting debt from this madwoman.
I'd like dibs before you start the great mountain jew charity auction for getting your court fees back.
Only barely. Give it time, Russ will start thinking that responding to his lawsuit is malice and evil too.Today's filings proved one major thing..Russell Greer is not the most deranged Frivolous litigation anymore.
Seriously, if you want the Farms to stop paying attention to you, stop screaming into the Internet Void for us to find
You have committed a crime, just like hundreds of people who never get arrested for crimes they commit.We haven't commited a crime, therefore no arrest.
That's not what moving goal posts is.You're moving goal posts again
You never state facts, you gaslight and spread misinformation.I'm just stating facts, Mel. And the best part? Your court cases show that you know I'm right.
You continue to fail to understand that we laugh at you because of the constant oversharing you do on this site, we pity your children for having a mother like you. You don't understand what social abuse is or what libel is in the United States. The only reality you hate is your own. The only hate is your own as you projected it upon us. You're a sick pathetic woman. I would feel sorry for you if you didn't choose this for yourself.
Those aren't "intimate details". Like I said, you're a dweeb with a lame sex life.Mel, you told us all your fetishes, you told us your favorite positions, you told us about how much you worship your boy toy's dick, Mel, you've shared eveything about your sex life with us, including when and how you lost your virginity.
She cited some stuff, yeah. But those citations are bad, and accompanied with not more than "they are mean because I said so, therefore do much seal, goy!" She failed to meet the burden, IMO. The rights shown in Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc., 435 U.S. 589 (1978 ), B.R. v. F.C.S.B., No. 21-1005 (4th Cir. 2021), Co. Doe v. Public Citizen, 749 F.3d 246, 2014 WL 1465728, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 7113 (4th Cir. 2014), all which clearly specify just how important our "constitutional and common-law rights of access to judicial records and documents" are.
Tldr: Hardin responded therefore he did it with Malice and to hurt me, Hardin unnecessarily included my IFP petition, everything KiwiFarms does must be super evil and criminal, don't listen to Hardin , he is irrelevant and so are his arguments, Null bad because Andrew bad, since Kiwi must be do crime, therefore document look be crime, therefore bad, and even more Kiwi Bad
That's all that's in her motions. Needless to say it's a mess, and she is wrong about everything. 90% of that document is essentially just "kiwi bad" and accusing us of crimes she didn't manage to prove.
Firstly, why do you call that girl "Marshall's daughter"?@TamarYaelBatYah Do you think Marshall thinks his daughter looks happier without him in the picture? Do you wish your kids looked as happy as Marshall's daughter looks now?
Same ole tired worn out argument that has already been refutedFellow layman, essentially that's the nail on the head here. She is in such deep shit that you don't even need to study law in an outside setting, say during a summer, to understand she keeps fucking up. Of course that's then super entertaining to watch. I just like cow poking too much for my own good, but so far, if anything I've just established myself as a sheep dog barking at her.
Her posting to here however shows that she is not taking this seriously either. Which is fine as a defense against a frivolous lawsuit, but it's also HORRIBLE for the prosecuting side to be doing every little thing they accuse the defense of, and more somehow.
View attachment 2691772
I don't know why she thinks that what she has seen matters. For all she knows everyone has asked for a copy. Despite her saying you need good cause, you really don't. It's the same as with Pacer, really, just takes a bit more time. Btw, they aren't required to notify her if her cases are asked, so really, she couldn't know if anyone had ever asked.
Bahaha. You think you're so smart about the law but you quote communist principles like thinking CPS visits can bar your 2nd Amendment rights?! Ahahhaa. Your stupidity. Just priceless!Plus given Marshall’s prior domestic assault and resisting arrest history, and the happy couples apparently multiple encounters with CPS are firearms even permitted in the household? I would bet no. But to her credit I would also assume Melinda is simply lying about having them.