DarksydePhil / TheyCallMeDSP / Phil Burnell - General Discussion

Status
Not open for further replies.
"I'm putting so much effort to make my stream not a muted dull fest, so......

GIVE ME MONEYYYYYYY"

Screenshot_20211107-113833_Samsung Internet.jpg
 
So he's sticking with this look like a complete flaming fucktard who probably can't wipe his own ass by still claiming he just found out that he can't buy the GTA TRILOGY separately rather than say he doesn't want to play it.
I'm genuinely fascinated that he assumed the 'Remastered Collection' would allow for the games to be purchased separately. There's no reason to believe that as no previous collection, including the myriad he has played, had that option. The fact that they're offering SA for free, separately, anywhere, is remarkable to me. But that seems to be what Phil expected?

Spyro, Crash, Mario... all of these collections recently released and were played by Phil. None allowed for independent purchases. He's smokescreening because he mishandled his money.
 
I'm genuinely fascinated that he assumed the 'Remastered Collection' would allow for the games to be purchased separately. There's no reason to believe that as no previous collection, including the myriad he has played, had that option. The fact that they're offering SA for free, separately, anywhere, is remarkable to me. But that seems to be what Phil expected?

Spyro, Crash, Mario... all of these collections recently released and were played by Phil. None allowed for independent purchases. He's smokescreening because he mishandled his money.

what makes it more of an oddity for weeks he talked about which one he'll play first 3 or VC so he was at least aware that it was a package deal, now he doesn't want to play it and he's upset it's not ala carte which like you say, no other collection has done this.

All 3 games are lackluster by modern standards and played primarily for the nostalgia. They'll all be equally boring and unwatchable, especially with you at the wheel, Phil.

ya know that's why I'm hesitant about it, it seems like a "for it's time" sort of game, also this close to Black Friday something tells me this is one of those "wait didn't that just come out" sales
 
1) The whole pigsplaining licensed music was a trip.

2) On the '' you better step the fuck up and shower me in tips 'case I leave in the music''. How much is he losing if the ahn demand videos gets claimed? with a CPM of let's say 2 and if he's lucky 1000 views that's a whopping 2 bucks. So when {REDACTED] promised to cover it, that's really not impressive.
 
Last edited:
cant afford to buy games for the business.....

WANTS TO BUY ALCHOHAL FOR CHRISTMAS.

successful business over here


Fucking hell.. Hes still doing his jealousy segment. for a guy who claims he wants to avoid drama, he keeps talking shit. imagine if any of these streamers did what keem did, id love to see the piggy squirm
You'd think that if he was in such financial distress that he can't afford a game that he has spent the past month acting like it'll save him, he'd be focused on now and not planning for an event that he hasn't even reached yet.
 
1) The whole pigsplaining licensed music was a trip.

2) On the '' you better step the fuck up and shower me in tips 'case I leave in the music''. How much is he loosing if the ahn demand videos gets claimed? with a CPM of let's say 2 and if he's lucky 1000 views that's a whopping 2 bucks. So when {REDACTED] promised to cover it, that's really not impressive.
Even worse is that getting SA for free basically covers the cost of not making revenue on several videos.
The idea that he pass any savings along to his audience by improving their experience is out of question for Phil.
 
He makes no secret that he prefers tips because of the immediate access to them versus Superchats, but it's still hilarious to hear him pushing them as being something that 'helps the channel a lot in the long-term'. When has anything ever helped him in the long-term? There's ALWAYS an immediate crisis. It's not like it makes a difference when the time comes that he actually receives that money, he's 100% still going to be be asking for immediate help. It's that kind of obvious stuff that baffles me when nobody who gives him money, especially via Superchats, questions him about it.
 
Methinks Phil was not included in the SuperThanks program because his channel engagement is too low. He's now operating on the premise that if he can drive engagement, YT will enable his new scam avenue.
Hmm, as long as YT isn't viewing his begging as "fundraising" I cannot imagine why he would not be able to qualify:

Eligibility for individual videos

Super Thanks is not available for the following types of videos:
  • Age-restricted
  • Unlisted
  • Private
  • Made for kids
  • Videos with Content ID claims
  • Videos with YouTube Giving fundraisers
  • Live streams or Premieres, while live (available on archived VODs afterwards)
see https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/10879035#zippy=,eligibility

However this passage could be a problem, if YT would actually give a shit (which they don't as we all know):

Super Thanks isn’t a crowdfunding
or donation tool. Options to fundraise on YouTube can be found here. You‘re responsible for understanding and fully complying with all applicable laws. This includes whether you can enable, offer, send, and receive money from Super Thanks.

see https://support.google.com/youtube/...ligibility,availability,super-thanks-policies

In the end, the tards are going to give him his rightfully earned gambling money in any way he demands from them, so what.
 
Your first mistake is believing what's he's saying. There's no chance he cannot afford to buy the collection, he is just choosing not to for some autistic mental gymnastic reasons or simply to use as a begging crutch.
The leaks stressed him out, that means he must be whaling even harder in Champions now. He's getting a new wrestler every day.
 
Super Thanks isn’t a crowdfunding or donation tool.
Ok I'm super dense and don't speak corporate tech, but how in the fuck does that even make sense?

It's a way to give money to a khantent creator, donate money to them if you will.

Daves autistic (and wrong) use of the word crowdfunding might be biting him in the ass here?

Edit: @Comma @Piece of Peace or other masters of money/economy tism please help if you can.
 
Ok I'm super dense and don't speak corporate tech, but how in the fuck does that even make sense?

It's a way to give money to a khantent creator, donate money to them if you will.

Daves autistic (and wrong) use of the word crowdfunding might be biting him in the ass here?
I think there are weird tax implications for the literal definition of 'donation' so YT treads carefully with their boilerplate legal language.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back