- Joined
- Aug 19, 2019
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Reading these replies is so depressing. These people don’t know a single thing about the case, and are proud of their ignorance. It’s not even a subject of debate in court, saying he “kneels down and fires into the crowd” is just a bald faced lie. They read the lying press headlines, and the lie is ingrained in their brain. “Kyle was a mass shooter.” They refuse to watch the video that blatantly shows the opposite, because in their world, they already know the absolute truth and nothing can change their mind. Here’s a thought experiment: will this actual, by definition FAKE NEWS get a little fact-check disclaimer on twitter? This is why journalists get the rope first, in minecraft.View attachment 2697657View attachment 2697660
From the replies. 4000 retweets, zero truth to the claim. They are determined to live in a fantasy world forever when it comes to things like this.
View attachment 2697671![]()
Home -
WELCOME TOThe New Marketing The world is moving fast into places that no one dreamed possible. Your business needs a digital footprint, a web presence, and a social media heartbeat, to stay in the game. We are experienced in all that and more. Social MediaAd CopyCatalog ManagementContent...ironcontent.com
That account that is intentionally spreading lies about Rittenhouse is ran by Stephen Vicinanza, apparent embedded developer turned sjw grifter.
Just like above, these people have no idea what they're talking about. "He not from her! Why he need an ar17! To wash graffiti!"
And yet you're too lazy to do the first two yourself.>Not using archive links
>Not downloading the videos
>not finding a way to PHYSICALLY send the info to the courts
Shit attempt. If word got out to this twitter user, they are immediately going to go full-on "SHUT IT DOWN!!" mode.
Also lol at faxing anything in current year
But the blackpilled? the blackpill its like becoming a berserker: you know you're fucked, you're dead, so theres no need to contain yourself, to stand down because theres no hope anyway and you're fucked so you go all-out for a last time.
And those shot were white presenting transblacksYou forgot: Kyle the spic pretended to be white.
Lautenberg is what placed the misdemeanor dv disability into law, but the way out is similar. It's going to be slightly different in every state and probably impossible in some.Except doesn't DV fall under Lautenberg? I don't think there's any real way to get 2A rights back from any DV conviction, even after being expunged; in that the .gov says it's technically possible, but actually it's not going to happen. I've heard of people filing motions to offices that don't even have any staff, etc.
And if it happened with the antifa medic, pretty much that means someone pulled strings for him that aren't available to normal citizens.
how can you convict him?
With my anti-police movement? No!multiple police officers giving testimony
He works for a marketing agency?View attachment 2697657View attachment 2697660
From the replies. 4000 retweets, zero truth to the claim. They are determined to live in a fantasy world forever when it comes to things like this.
View attachment 2697680
View attachment 2697671![]()
Home -
WELCOME TOThe New Marketing The world is moving fast into places that no one dreamed possible. Your business needs a digital footprint, a web presence, and a social media heartbeat, to stay in the game. We are experienced in all that and more. Social MediaAd CopyCatalog ManagementContent...ironcontent.com
That account that is intentionally spreading lies about Rittenhouse is ran by Stephen Vicinanza, apparent embedded developer turned sjw grifter.
Just like above, these people have no idea what they're talking about. "He not from her! Why he need an ar17! To wash graffiti!"
Holding a firearm in trust for a minor is legal, and theoretically what he testified to in court shouldn't be a straw purchas - but good luck.Can someone help me understand the legality or non legality of the firearm that Kyle Rittenhouse possessed.
My understanding currently, is that Kyle gave his buddy money to purchase the rifle, "for him". However, possession of the rifle was never transferred to him, as his friend had it at all times and only gave it to Kyle when they went shooting and when he went to Kenosha (never crossed state lines). I understand he's (the friend, not Kyle) on trial for what's essentially, a straw purchase leading to death.
So far, this trial is a slam dunk for the defense. Kyle approaching the police, then being pepper sprayed and reprimenaded, along with multiple police officers giving testimony that Kenosha was essentially a warzone, and Kyle saying he's going to get the police after the shooting of Hubert..how can you convict him?
They don’t want to be wrongView attachment 2697657View attachment 2697660
From the replies. 4000 retweets, zero truth to the claim. They are determined to live in a fantasy world forever when it comes to things like this.
View attachment 2697680
View attachment 2697671![]()
Home -
WELCOME TOThe New Marketing The world is moving fast into places that no one dreamed possible. Your business needs a digital footprint, a web presence, and a social media heartbeat, to stay in the game. We are experienced in all that and more. Social MediaAd CopyCatalog ManagementContent...ironcontent.com
That account that is intentionally spreading lies about Rittenhouse is ran by Stephen Vicinanza, apparent embedded developer turned sjw grifter.
Just like above, these people have no idea what they're talking about. "He not from her! Why he need an ar17! To wash graffiti!"
report him now as many people you can judge the lawyers I dont care email them if you have to.George Floyd’s nephew, Cortez Rice states he knows people taking photos of the jurors during the Rittenhouse trial with the goal to dox them if they do not convict. Regardless if the claim is true or not, Rice/BLM is attempting to tamper with the jury.
I certainly hope so. To those who don't know, Chevron is a case that is the embodiment of what is called judicial deference, specifically deference to the decisions of administrative agencies in interpreting the statutes they are tasked with enforcing or carrying out.Chevron v. NRDC will probably not be good law by the end of the year though, and that will change even more gun shit than the pending NYC case will.
I cannot imagine the thought process of anyone that has watched the video footage and still believes Kyle is guilty of anything. These people are not human, they have been so broken by the media circus that they would defend a child rapist, a wifebeater, and a violent criminal trying to kill a kid, simply because their politics are right and Kyle's aren't. They have been programmed to the extent that they will literally refuse to believe their own eyes over the official narrative. If the media told people the sky wasn't blue, they would ask you for a source when you pointed up.
George Floyd’s nephew, Cortez Rice states he knows people taking photos of the jurors during the Rittenhouse trial with the goal to dox them if they do not convict. Regardless if the claim is true or not, Rice/BLM is attempting to tamper with the jury.
Some were even saying 'he walked around with a rifle yelling at protesters, what did he think was going to happen?' Either they don't know what he was actually saying or communists think yelling if anyone needs medical or 'Friendly! Friendly!' is telegraphing an imminent attack because the only reason any of them would ever say it is in perfidy.This was how I felt about Jan 6. Lots of cases. Lots of people are just misinformed and will never be informed, on purpose. They have a better dedication to having their outrage addiction quenched rather than the truth. That reddit thread posted earlier is a good sign of that. Look how many posts say Rittenhouse "crossed state lines!" These people haven't watched the footage, and don't know how the justice system works.
He'd know, they did that during the Chauvin trial, too.
View attachment 2697657View attachment 2697660
From the replies. 4000 retweets, zero truth to the claim. They are determined to live in a fantasy world forever when it comes to things like this.
View attachment 2697680
View attachment 2697671![]()
Home -
WELCOME TOThe New Marketing The world is moving fast into places that no one dreamed possible. Your business needs a digital footprint, a web presence, and a social media heartbeat, to stay in the game. We are experienced in all that and more. Social MediaAd CopyCatalog ManagementContent...ironcontent.com
That account that is intentionally spreading lies about Rittenhouse is ran by Stephen Vicinanza, apparent embedded developer turned sjw grifter.
Just like above, these people have no idea what they're talking about. "He not from her! Why he need an ar17! To wash graffiti!"
Not seen this one, but earlier, they have mentioned that it's got a shot at succeeding, but is a very rare thing and is always highly unlikely.He needed the "AR-17" because of pavement apes and commie soycucks running around rioting and looting.
Apparently these three generally agree that there might be a direct verdict involved and Kyle will get acquitted.
I listened to the NYT podcast about it where the female jewish journalist ("Integrity? What's that?"). She lies throughout, shocker. But she also claims that Rittenhouse shot Rosenbaum because someone else in the crowd fired a "warning shot." I've seen this repeated on reddit, too. She uses this to bury the fact that Rosenbaum was going for Rittenhouse's gun. She also makes sure to describe Rittenhouse as "aggressively offering medical aid." It's such a hit job and full of bullshit. I'm sure people who don't want to think too hard just slurp up what the journos say.Some were even saying 'he walked around with a rifle yelling at protesters, what did he think was going to happen?' Either they don't know what he was actually saying or communists think yelling if anyone needs medical or 'Friendly! Friendly!' is telegraphing an imminent attack because the only reason any of them would ever say it is in perfidy.
Lol in what universe is that a statement that even makes sense."aggressively offering medical aid."
I was hoping for "embodiment of utter corruption and cuntyness" but then looked into the cited case, and realised I was getting NRDC mixed up with the current Dozinger travesty of justice.Chevron is a case that is the embodiment of what is called judicial deference