- Joined
- Aug 21, 2015
You defend the weirdest parts of the posts, how is that more important than the paedo bit?
Why won't you tell me how many pairs of Velcro shoes you own?
Wizchan / Assigned Male Accidental Merger
- Thread starter Null
- Start date
-
🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
- Status
You defend the weirdest parts of the posts, how is that more important than the paedo bit?
Why won't you tell me how many pairs of Velcro shoes you own?
- Joined
- Apr 22, 2014
Is that really the reason why you keep coming back though? Or is it that you're extremely manipulative and the idea of being in a situation that you are unable to control fills you with a deep sense of anxiety, thus you keep coming back to this thread using multiple methods to try and gain control of the situation? Let's examine some of your posts because from what I'm reading you fit pretty well into the definition of psychopathy.
Sex in a relationship typically is communicative, in that both parties both wish to pleasure themselves and pleasure their partner. This makes sense from an empathetic standpoint as we wish to show the other person how we feel about them and feel safe enough to expose ourselves to some degree of vulnerability. What you have described here is the desire for someone to serve you unconditionally purely for your pleasure and nothing else; what you are attracted to is not them as a person but the opportunity to dominate them psychologically to the point where they perceive something harmful (a daughter being sexually abused by their father) as pleasurable. This line is almost spoken verbatim in this interview with a psychopath that sexually abused his own daughter. This is why paedophiles are sexually attracted to children; they are easier to manipulate and provide the psychopath an opportunity to act without being caught.
Now I think it's fair to say that you're not exactly in control of the discussion in this thread; every claim that you are making is being rebutted with a large collection of evidence which shows your contradictions with no way of being able to deny their authenticity. Of course accepting their authenticity would require you to concede control of this situation, which I think both of us know isn't going to happen. So let's look at some ways you're attempting to control this situation whilst avoiding accepting the moral implications for what you have said and done:
The first couple of sentences here show just how sensitive your ego is to accepting you did something wrong. Instead of accepting that our refusal to believe you are not a danger to the public is understandable given your previous actions, you have denied that you should accept repercussions for your actions and instead be given a second chance. Saying sorry and expecting forgiveness is not an acceptable consequence for what you have done; you deserve an extremely harsh punishment and no amount of repenting will ever undo the damage that you have done. Any person that practices the same actions as you also deserves to be treated in such a way and any belief that you should be exempt because you "made an honest mistake" is both extraordinarily arrogant and completely dismissive of the trauma any sexual abuse victim goes through.
Why is why from the third sentence onward you try your next tactic to control this situation; manipulating people into guilt. This in itself shows that you are at least cognitively aware of the difference between right and wrong which as humans, we always want to do right. Making someone upset is usually associated with being wrong and something we actively try to avoid, however instead of accepting how you did something wrong instead you are trying to turn the tables here by saying that if we agree that making people upset is usually a bad thing, we have upset you and therefore have done something wrong. In this way you avoid taking responsibility yourself and place it upon us, which is further demonstrated in your weak attempt at appealing to moral superiority:
Forgiveness is usually seen as a positive trait and one we are normally encouraged to emulate. By attempting to present yourself as someone capable of forgiveness, you are attempting to establish a new moral high ground in the hopes that we will try to better you by practicing forgiveness upon you, this relieving you from the responsibility of your actions. What you forget however is that in order to practice forgiveness, you first have to be the victim of wrongdoing, thus revealing once again your victim complex and how you actually have not achieved moral superiority, but instead are once again prioritising your selfishness and refusing to accept negative consequences for you actions.
Then there's your last ditch attempt at trying to control the situation:
Here's your ultimate dismissal of anyone else's feelings so as to protect your own; it's our problem that we're angry and not yours, so we should stop trying because you will never give us the satisfaction of admitting your wrong. That's why you keep coming back here, because you have justified to yourself that by making us angry you are in control of us, even though really you'd like us to go away because our criticism of you makes it more difficult to distance yourself from the actions you committed. The biggest irony here is that you don't even have control over yourself and that just by quickly looking through your autistic shitposting, I have a better understanding of who you are then yourself.
Which I find hilarious.
- Joined
- Feb 26, 2015
1) No. I'm a grammar sperg. Affect is a verb, effect is a noun. And that's all I'm going to say.
2) If you think that's our main problem with you, you're delusional. And a childfucker, but that's a given.
James Terry Mitchell Jr
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Oct 10, 2015
No. A "little" is an adult that likes childish stuff (coloring and toys etc.) there are many on tumblr that post cute stuff.
James Terry Mitchell Jr
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Oct 10, 2015
I don't have any but I would wear them. And I see Velcro shoes all over town.
- Joined
- Apr 27, 2015
Ah, so you stalk retards.
- Joined
- Aug 21, 2015
So you live in a town of speds? Interesting.
James Terry Mitchell Jr
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Oct 10, 2015
Tell that to the ACLU.
HighwayOverpass
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Oct 17, 2015
James, the reason this isn't convincing anyone that you're not a pedophile, is that thinking adults and children should have the option to fuck each other is NOT something somebody who isn't a pedophile would think of. People who are not pedophiles are disgusted by the very idea of adults and kids fucking each other.
I know you're autistic but god damn at least most autistic people are able to pick up on things that're told to them fifty times. You're thicker than molasses. If you have a 124 IQ then dogs must have one of 150 since they know not to do something when it's told to them repeatedly.
Either a sexuality or... what? Nice sentence structure, numb nuts.
Also, spoken like a true pedophile.
Still trying to tell us that a 9 year old took advantage of a 16 year old, huh? Somehow I remain unconvinced. I thought it was "beautiful" and you "don't regret it."
James Terry Mitchell Jr
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Oct 10, 2015
Wtf is a sped?
- Joined
- Aug 21, 2013
shorthand for Special Ed, i.e. exceptional individuals or autists
- Joined
- Feb 25, 2015
- Joined
- Aug 21, 2015
How dare you beat me at my own quote, you sneaky ninja
- Joined
- Sep 14, 2015
The ACLU website has nothing on defending the rights of pedophiles.
James Terry Mitchell Jr
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Oct 10, 2015
Sorry. Either a sexual preference or a mental illness I got distracted and forgot to finish that thought. If it is a mental illness it deserves to be treated with free mental health care.
Not any more than rape laws would.
It is well known they defend nambla.
- Joined
- Sep 24, 2015
J
JU 199
Guest
kiwifarms.net
Well yeah, they should. Were talking about defenseless children here.
You would already know that though, wouldn't you?
- Joined
- Aug 29, 2015
And you managed to pick one sentence from my comment and misinterpret it. Congratulations.
Edit: Just to make it perfectly clear for you, that wasn't the main point of that post, that isn't the main point of what my problem is with this person. You must be a piece of work to think otherwise, or maybe you didn't read the rest of my posts if that's the conclusion you managed to draw.
HighwayOverpass
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Oct 17, 2015
Mental illness is damn right. And not only should it be treated but they should be locked away in an asylum for life. Just like you should be.
Good job totally ignoring everything that puts a big red "pedophile" sign above your head though.
- Joined
- Feb 25, 2015
Presented without comment
- Status