Kyle Rittenhouse Legal Proceedings - Come for the trial, stay for….

[obsdj]

Can someone fill me in on why the car dealer matters?

It's believed by some that they informally hired some wannabes with guns to protect their car lot, but they're scared shitless of their liability in the bloodbath that occurred.

 

[Only A Retard Sometimes]

Bunch of tech illiterate boomers in there isnt it.

 

[waffle]

Judge getting cranky at brown man's evasion.

 

[GeorgeHWBush]

They do, and he's worthless.

They do but he’s being questioned rn

 

[Spicey McHaggis]

So why doesn’t the loo-master general want to give them info? What’s his part in all this?

Because he's trying to avoid liability in a civil lawsuit for certain, and probably is committing insurance fraud.

 

[Pizza Munch]

Are they going to try and impeach him?

 

[Prj4MW8iPT3vmFM2rzDc]

Man I'm frustrated with Chirafisi they could've taken soy viking for a spin...

Oh well.

What more could he really do given the evidence and the guy saying (whether he was lying on the stand or not) that he lied in the post.

There's not to many more places to take it and its up to the jury at that point to decide if he lied in the past or is lying now.

Either he admitted that he's a liar and cannot be trusted to tell the truth or he told the truth previously and is lying now. Its a "i'm a liar" tautology.

 

[Only A Retard Sometimes]

He speaks perfect fucking english in the video lololololololololololololol

 

[gaystoner]

slimey immigrant

 

[Some JERK]

I love how Pajeet is up there all "I no understand the qVestion.... I no understand hard English... me so confused" and on the tape he's clearly like "Shit, dude... all my cars are fucked up."

 

[GeorgeHWBush]

Because he's trying to avoid liability in a civil lawsuit for certain, and probably is committing insurance fraud.

Oh shid lmao, I almost feel bad for him

 

[Meat Target]

Can they recall Grosskreutz and confront him about that Facebook post?

 

[murdered meat bag]

Defense could've made him look like an ass on the stand with the right questions. They should've prepped for him to bullshit.

you can't really prep for a liar unless you have evidence to prove the conversation objectively. they'll double down the lie, like he did, and that's it.

only a CNN watching tard is going to believe it on face value. everyone else will see that the story doesn't make sense. and now doubt has been cast over both of them. As far as i can see anyway.

 

[Only A Retard Sometimes]

>clearly says he lost 2.5 million in inventory in a video
>did you say that?
>I guess so.

 

[Hyro]

I love all these little side trials, the prosecutions dodgy activity yesterday and insurance poo today

 

[Spicey McHaggis]

The face of "fuck me, my insurance claim is dead"

 

[AnOminous]

Explained this to a family member last night. Equivalent of a small sledgehammer

They use these because they're objects it isn't inherently criminal to possess. That's why you see so many antifags carrying around skateboards but never riding them. Sort of like Clanton's bike lock, it's a seemingly innocuous object, but can be deadly used as such.

It's still considered assault with a deadly weapon if you actually get charged with assaulting someone with it, and they can also throw in a weapons possession charge in some jurisdictions if the purpose of possessing it was for use as a weapon, which is usually fairly easily proven by the fact you did in fact use it as such illegally.

 

[Dumb Bitch Smoothie]

What more could he really do given the evidence and the guy saying (whether he was lying on the stand or not) that he lied in the post.

There's not to many more places to take it and its up to the jury at that point to decide if he lied in the past or is lying now.

Either he admitted that he's a liar and cannot be trusted to tell the truth or he told the truth previously and is lying now. Its a "i'm a liar" tautology.

Touché.
I still think they could've gotten him to slip up and say some goofy shit with a little more prodding.

 

[Don't @ Me]

Can they recall Grosskreutz and confront him about that Facebook post?

It would probably be the same as when they asked Jacob. He never said it, and Jacob lied.

 

[ProtonMailManTheSequel]

What more could he really do given the evidence and the guy saying (whether he was lying on the stand or not) that he lied in the post.

There's not to many more places to take it and its up to the jury at that point to decide if he lied in the past or is lying now.

Either he admitted that he's a liar and cannot be trusted to tell the truth or he told the truth previously and is lying now. Its a "i'm a liar" tautology.

"Were you lying then or are you lying now?!?" is how the professionals often ask it.