Kyle Rittenhouse Legal Proceedings - Come for the trial, stay for….

What do you think will happen?

  • Guilty on all charges

    Votes: 282 8.8%
  • Full Acquittal

    Votes: 1,077 33.7%
  • Mistral

    Votes: 264 8.3%
  • Mixture of verdicts

    Votes: 479 15.0%
  • Minecraft

    Votes: 213 6.7%
  • Roblox

    Votes: 132 4.1%
  • Runescape

    Votes: 203 6.3%
  • Somehow Guilty Of Two Mutually Exclusive Actions

    Votes: 514 16.1%
  • KYLE WILL SUBMIT TO BBC

    Votes: 35 1.1%

  • Total voters
    3,199
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Yeah, a lot of commenters on various social media sites insist Kyle is fake crying. It’s truly disgusting.

The key for me is that it seemed almost like an unconscious reaction, ie a mental/emotional breakdown due to recall of extremely stressful events. It wasn't emotional so much as his system suddenly being flooded with adrenaline and fear, which is obvious when you consider that he was hyperventilating and struggling to breathe

I like to try and place myself in their shoes in earnest, to see if I can understand their viewpoint or see the case from other angles. Then I remember I'm not insane or ignorant of basic procedure (regardless of it being in another jurisdiction).

I initially thought it was a breakdown like you see people have in funerals and the like. Go from suddenly alright to breaking down crying, but on re-evaluation it does seem to be a panic attack, especially because of the hyperventilating. An already tense situation combined with probably the first time he's ever had to openly re-run that scenario out loud in incredible detail. That people are incapable of seeing a panic attack and just dismiss it as "fake crying" because of politics is just pathetic. It's not even sickening, just pathetic.
If you compared the emotional state of Kyle Rittenhouse in his testimony and Alec Baldwin in his first interview since the on-set shooting via social media, you would be told the famous Hollywood actor is more distraught over what happened than a seventeen-year-old kid who was chased by "mostly peaceful protesters".
 
motherfucker
Kyle Rittenhouse's crocodile tears broke the internet Wednesday.

In a nauseatingly melodramatic performance he choked back snot as he appeared to sob about how he feared for his life the day he shot and killed two people at a Black Lives Matter demonstration in Kenosha, Wisconsin.

Defense attorney Mark Richards tried to paint Rittenhouse as a misunderstood honorable, patriotic Boy Scout who simply liked to shoot guns.

Rittenhouse is anything but.

"I'm sorry, I don't know much about ammo," Rittenhouse said, though he brought an AR-15 rifle and shot and killed two people. During Wednesday's testimony, Rittenhouse acknowledged he had not only lent body armor to a friend, but also regularly drove around with body armor in the trunk of his vehicle.

In a dramatic turn, Prosecutor Thomas Binger was scolded by Judge Bruce Schroeder after trying to impeach Rittenhouse's contradictory testimony about what led to the events on the day of the killings.

Regardless of how Rittenhouse tries to twist his story – or twist his sad face into tears – his innocent kid act shouldn't fool anyone. The facts speak for themselves.

On Aug. 25, 2020, Rittenhouse drove from his home state of Illinois to a Black Lives Matter protest in Wisconsin. Hundreds of people had taken to the streets to protest the police shooting of a 29-year old Black man, Jacob Blake, who was paralyzed from the waist down. Rittenhouse, then 17, fatally shot Joseph Rosenbaum, 36, and Anthony Huber, 26, and wounded Gaige Grosskreutz, 27.



Screenshot 2021-11-11 11.01.09.png
 
People had an emotional conclusion that they have held onto for over a year now. Rittenhouse went to Kenosha looking for trouble and hunted down civil rights protestors because he was a white supremacist. Oh and he was such a little bitch that his mommy drove him across state lines to the protest that night. NONE of that is true. But people believe it because it fits their preconceived notions.

Everyone still believes that and nothing will change their views, even the direct facts. It doesn't help that the media is FLAT OUT LYING about the case,
The news media isn't lying about Kyle rittenhouse, he is a racist white surpremacist you bigot. And how dare you support such a murderer. Also black people cannot be racist and yes I am raising my wife's boyfriend's son. Yes I stand up for trans rights and you should too bigot. ~ le gay Reddit user

Okay jokes aside.
The media is 100% lying because they don't want the narrative of peaceful BLM protesters being ruined. It's fairly evident to anyone with a 3 digit IQ that they're obviously lying.
 
I actively want Binger's career destroyed. He is a threat to any semblance of integrity or fairness in the judicial system.
It's rare that any lawyer acts the way Binger acts in a courtroom. His future, I think, depends on how Judge Schroeder feels about him. If he walks into the courtroom and tries to pull that "argue with the judge and talk down to him" shit again, his ass is grass. What Binger established today, not yesterday, is that he's not just a sleazeball. He's a sleazeball who thinks he can give lip to the judge. The fact Schroeder was screaming at him at points says it all, he has been doing his utmost to restrain himself from issuing a directed verdict and then doing everything in his personal power to sink the prosecutors's careers.

I'm pretty sure (might be wrong though?) tomorrow they're going to start off by bringing in an expert to give his opinion on the pinch-and-zoom shit Binger wanted to do. Given how adamant Binger was that he was beyond any doubt right, and given that the defense has their own witness who can say the opposite of whatever Binger's guy will... I think things are going to get interesting tomorrow morning.
 
I just realized this judge has been reading up on pertinent case law (he corrects Kyle's lawyer when he cites a case that took place in Kenosha). I assume he's doing so for various reasons; judges don't do this unless they want to make their rulings based on state and federal law, rulings and precedent to make them hard to appeal, or to preclude the Feds from coming in (not that it would make any difference to the exceptional Biden DOJ but it might to a federal judge).

I have a gut feeling this judge is sympathetic to Kyle, a Boy Scout-kind of kid who wandered into a riot full of violent commie thugs, pedos and low life criminals and got in over his head. He didn't set out to kill anyone and in Wisconsin you're allowed to defend yourself, lethally if necessary, to prevent injury or serious bodily harm. You can even shoot someone over property (although I don't know about any rulings over that one).

He's also clearly pissed off over Binger acting like a moron in a case that's given world wide coverage, making him and Wisconsinites look like a bunch of dumb country boys, incapable of conducting a proper trial. That's why Binger's conduct pisses him off as well as the grounds of appeal it opens up. Binger's basis for prosecuting Kyle is overreaching in and of itself so when you listen to his demands about bringing evidence that's already be deemed inadmissible it just makes this judge even more upset with him.
 
motherfucker




View attachment 2706319
Remember these people are the ones destroying your country. They are the ones who want your kids raped, and you dead and they think it's funny. I find it pretty ironic how they label themselves human rights activists when in reality they're anything but that.
 
It's rare that any lawyer acts the way Binger acts in a courtroom. His future, I think, depends on how Judge Schroeder feels about him. If he walks into the courtroom and tries to pull that "argue with the judge and talk down to him" shit again, his ass is grass. What Binger established today, not yesterday, is that he's not just a sleazeball. He's a sleazeball who thinks he can give lip to the judge. The fact Schroeder was screaming at him at points says it all, he has been doing his utmost to restrain himself from issuing a directed verdict and then doing everything in his personal power to sink the prosecutors's careers.

I'm pretty sure (might be wrong though?) tomorrow they're going to start off by bringing in an expert to give his opinion on the pinch-and-zoom shit Binger wanted to do. Given how adamant Binger was that he was beyond any doubt right, and given that the defense has their own witness who can say the opposite of whatever Binger's guy will... I think things are going to get interesting tomorrow morning.
Oh yeah. Schroeder gave Binger a ton of rope on the zoom function of an iPhone camera. And he walked right into it. "It's like a magnifying glass your honor!"

He was straight up lying to the court with that shit.
 
I know you guys cant rate me autistic, but if rittenhouse gets off does he have any chance at a lawsuit against the msm for libel/slander? Similar to the nick sandmann case.

Or what about against that alcoholic fucktard gaige grosskreutz for coming at him with the gun?

Edit: likely hopeless optimism and wishful thinking on my part i know
 
Last edited:
It's fairly evident to anyone with a 3 digit IQ that they're obviously lying.
What scares me is I don't think this is true. We have many smart people, some extremely smart that will not change their position on this. They are dug in. No facts will change their opinion. You can say that makes them not smart, but I think this problem is completely different from intelligence once you get to like 95iq.
 
Remember these people are the ones destroying your country. They are the ones who want your kids raped, and you dead and they think it's funny. I find it pretty ironic how they label themselves human rights activists when in reality they're anything but that.
In Current Year, it's safe to assume that anyone who bloviates poetic about how they stand for Equity™️, Human Rights™️, Empathy™️, etc. is really a glutton for indulging in the most inhuman forms of cruelty and unfairness.

The Powers of Darkness are getting cranky.
 
I know you guys cant rate me autistic, but if rittenhouse gets off does he have any chance at a lawsuit against the msm for libel/slander? Similar to the nick sandmann case.

Or what about against that alcoholic fucktard gaige grosskreutz for coming at him with the gun?
No sadly. The Media will just say they were believing Binger, and at the end of the day there are two dead bodies so Binger can argue he was duty bound to prosecute. Kyle has no civil actions. The money raised in his defense will have to be compensation enough. What has not been spent will have to be used to serve the rest of his life
 
What scares me is I don't think this is true. We have many smart people, some extremely smart that will not change their position on this. They are dug in. No facts will change their opinion. You can say that makes them not smart, but I think this problem is completely different from intelligence once you get to like 95iq.
I'd argue that IQ has an inverse bell curve effect with regards to changing minds. The extremes on both end of the curves are either too stupid, or too smart to cling tenaciously to any one position without solid foundations. The ones in the middle, however, are capable of (flawed) reasoning to justify just about any position they hold dear, even in the face of reality.
 
Oh yeah. Schroeder gave Binger a ton of rope on the zoom function of an iPhone camera. And he walked right into it. "It's like a magnifying glass your honor!"

He was straight up lying to the court with that shit.
Most mind-boggling thing is that Binger knows the defense has an expert to call bullshit on his lie and he's intent on pressing it anyways. Chiafrisi outright said "just fyi judge, earlier on in the case I specifically asked an expert about this and he said it's not kosher at all" but Binger was having none of that. He needed to do that pinch-and-zoom shit to make it seem like Kyle was raising his gun.
 
The ones in the middle, however, are capable of (flawed) reasoning to justify just about any position they hold dear, even in the face of reality.
Hell, I'd argue that it's the normal response from the average, neurotypical human being to change his mind in response to group pressure in order to keep the peace in the tribe, even if the group conclusion is totally delusional.

There's comparative little biological advantage to tenaciously sticking to a rational, evidence-based conclusion if it gets you ostracized.
 
Most mind-boggling thing is that Binger knows the defense has an expert to call bullshit on his lie and he's intent on pressing it anyways. Chiafrisi outright said "just fyi judge, earlier on in the case I specifically asked an expert about this and he said it's not kosher at all" but Binger was having none of that. He needed to do that pinch-and-zoom shit to make it seem like Kyle was raising his gun.
On that pinch-and-zoom shit, did anything stick? Kyle didn't seem to have a clue what Binger was getting at. Or was Binger just trying to score another "gotcha" about pointing a gun at Yellow Pants Man?
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Pocket Dragoon
I'd argue that IQ has an inverse bell curve effect with regards to changing minds. The extremes on both end of the curves are either too stupid, or too smart to cling tenaciously to any one position without solid foundations. The ones in the middle, however, are capable of (flawed) reasoning to justify just about any position they hold dear, even in the face of reality.
That's pretty much the midwit meme in a nutshell.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back