Illogical. If it was impossible then there would be no laws about Israelite on Israelite violence \ crime in the Torah. And as we established before such laws do exist.
I didn't say it wasn't
possible, I said it wasn't
condoned.
Why on earth should she? She was magically able to do something that the vast majority of all female life on earth does, so she has done all the contributing that she ever plans to do, we must all bend over and worship her magic uterus, as it it absolute unique in doing what almost every uterus does. Now shut up and pay her for breathing.
And that's your own "uterus envy" at work there in your head. You're an incomplete woman, because you've never given birth, so you devalue the miracle and greatness of giving birth to compensate for the loss in your life of never having accomplished that. You will never be able to hold the stature of a woman who has given birth. You're like a tree that grows no fruit.
It really doesn't matter how many women have performed the miracle and greatness of giving birth. Replication of the process doesn't diminish it's value. Many stars shine bright in the sky and yet every single one provides beauty in the night sky.
So she has yet to introduce evidence that disputes the 6 kids by 6 different men claim. That is the sign of someone contributing to society if I have ever seen it
It's irrelevant if my children have 1 biological father, or 2, or 3, or 4, or 5, or 6. Why would I need to prove anything about how many biological fathers they have?
If you're hung up on the issue of blended families, that's on you. You're stuck in the Dark Ages or something.
Melinda is really focused on her Uterus today. Sorry Mel, nobody here wants to have sex with you.
I'm not sure if you missed sex education class, but the penis goes into the vagina,
not the uterus.
Mel, you calling anonymous strangers narcissists
I made it perfectly clear that I do NOT call people "Narcissist" because I'm not a clinical pscyhologist who has diagnosed anyone. You can't call someone a "Narcissist" unless they have in fact been diagnosed with NPD.
I have slipped once or twice when typing in a hurry and said "Narcissist",
or did it "eye for eye", but that's not the norm for me. I say "narcissistic" because I can observe narcissistic traits in a person. As a general rule, I do NOT say a person is a "Narcissist". That requires a clinical diagnosis from a trained and licensed psychologist.
You're the most obvious narcissist on the Farms
That's just your opinion because
usually people these days just throw around the term "Narcissist" when they have conflict with others. It has no real substance when you fling it around without facts.
Its obvious to everyone that you have no possible basis for it. Everyone can read what you're responding to and your dumb opinion doesn't erase anyone's memory of what they just read. You're just not that special or persuasive. It's just your go-to response to anyone who disagrees with you. Because, as a raging narcissist you have to always be right about everything. Only a Mason, narcissist or non-member of your ridiculous Jew-LARP cult could possibly disagree with your version of reality.

gaslighting
To the contrary. Anytime I've pointed out someone's narcissistic traits here, I've pointed to the very incident in which they did the very thing I'm calling out. I point out facts.
Surrounding yourself with stupid people for years, coupled with your innate narcissism has left you with an unrealistic estimate of your own intelligence. I've had the privilege to interact with truly intelligent, capable people. I have a pretty good sense of a person's relative intelligence. You aren't in that class, Mel. You don't rate. You're actually pretty average. I think you choose obvious idiots like Marshall as company to bolster your narcissistic self image. You aren't smart enough to go over the heads of normal people and your ego wouldn't countenance having to interact as an equal with other average thinkers.

narcissistic narrative
"Normal people"? lol. Yeah, that's what you want in life. Is to connect with "normal people". haha, IDIOT
It's just further proof that Melinda is pulling the strings.
Lol. I stand 5'4"
under Marshall (who is 5'10") and you think I can control him? haha
Your definition of a "scholar" tends to be anyone who agrees with your crayon scribble exegesis, though. That doesn't really cut it.
Proof of claim?
People of the same ethnicity can't hate each other? People can't grow to hate each other?
My point still stands. You're fucking delusional and your brain is broken.
The Torah forbids hatred between Israelites. So like I said, you have no point and you are the one who is delusional.
@TamarYaelBatYah No, later birth order kids don't wean faster. Why would they? Mom's less motivated to cut them off and they like that baby spot. You act like you're the only person to have a big family. Also, did you gender bend me again?
They wean faster because there are more children vying for mom's attention. Also, the younger children run off to play with the older children for emotional gratification, meaning they don't seek as much attention from the mama.
Generally speaking.
I know there are other large families out there (especially in the older generations of SW VA!). You mentioned the West Coast though. Average family size in California, Washington, and Oregon is smaller.
Generally speaking.
Melinda, we talked about this. You need to contribute to society before you get to act better than people. You haven't proven your contribution to society yet so you can't act better than people
According to who? What moral law states that?
You know Melinda if your greatest achievement is giving birth there are shithouse rats vastly more accomplished than you, more hygienic too.
Ah, I see you have uterus envy too.
Bringing a
human life into the world is much greater than bringing a rat into the world.
A human is higher in the value scale.
Also, animal and insect birth is not as difficult as human birth. A human passing through a female pelvis is more complex. The only animals that come close to the complexity of human birth is apes and monkeys, and even still the female human pelvis has more work to do than any insect or mammal. A rat just plops them out. A human has to rotate through the pelvis and expand the cervix.
You are a poor nobody whose entire survival, and the survival of her kids, depends on the good will of the government, and an abusive husband that you left 10 times already but totally are super in love with. Your every waking moment is consumed with thoughts of us. First thing you think after sex is about us. I see plenty to improve in your life.
That's borderline a "narcissistic narrative" but ultimately, just your opinion, which is irrelevant in the big scheme of things.
You are still a failure, you are still poor, and the same applies to your kids, and will apply to them, and your husband.
What's wrong with being low income/poor? You clearly have a central focus on money in your life.
So did Moulay Ismail (
reported to have had at least 1,171 children), and he only contributed to society with murder
A man cannot bring human life into the world, because they don't have a uterus. They can only deposit semen into a female body, at which point, the female uterus takes over.
Also, congrats, you are proud of doing something
47%-
62% of Men have done (father a child), and something
most of US women has done.
Doesn't matter how many women do it, it's still powerful, great and miraculous. Do people go "oooh" and "awe" when someone does a gymnastics routine, sings a song well, etc? Frequency doesn't diminish value.
How can you create life without the sperm, which is the thing that is vital for the uterus to even pretend to be able to create life? Mel, creation of life is a two-person job. You need both a woman, and a man to create a child. Simple.
Creation is a two-person job, but the female has the overall major role in bringing forth life and sustaining it. Men play a minimal role in the process. Hence the root of "uterine envy" which manifests as the male desire to try to dominate and control women, and demean or devalue the process of birth.
https://dictionary.apa.org/womb-envy