Kyle Rittenhouse Legal Proceedings - Come for the trial, stay for….

What do you think will happen?

  • Guilty on all charges

    Votes: 282 8.8%

  • Full Acquittal

    Votes: 1,077 33.7%

  • Mistral

    Votes: 264 8.3%

  • Mixture of verdicts

    Votes: 479 15.0%

  • Minecraft

    Votes: 213 6.7%

  • Roblox

    Votes: 132 4.1%

  • Runescape

    Votes: 203 6.3%

  • Somehow Guilty Of Two Mutually Exclusive Actions

    Votes: 514 16.1%

  • KYLE WILL SUBMIT TO BBC

    Votes: 35 1.1%
  • Total voters
    3,199
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
It's going to come down to an argument of whether someone being present with a gun is provoking others into assaulting him or not. Which feels similar to what happened with the Zimmerman case. There you had the defense pointing out how Trayvon had to double back and assault Zimmerman who was standing by his truck waiting for police, which probably helped convince the jury that Zim did nothing wrong.

I figure it'll be similar here where the defense needs to explain how Kyle was the one first assaulted that caused the whole altercation.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Uranus Pink and zachs fair
Alter Ego said:
Is it safe to say that this thread will be doomposting for the entire weekend?
Click to expand...
Not doomposting, because the initial reaction eventually gives way to resignation that it will all hinge on closing arguments... in a case where every single person is some degree of exceptional.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Feels
Reactions: Exterminatus, RiverFalcon, derpherp2 and 1 other person
Pizza Munch said:
Wait really? I thought he said if the law says it isn’t needed he won’t
Click to expand...
That's for one of the lesser charges, I think.
Either way, we can partially blame the defense for cucking to that bullshit. So many easy weak points to hit.

"Best evidence" was an "enhancement" (meaning zoom-zoomed in fucking picture) of an upscaled image (probably a sub 1080p camera on the drone being AI upscaled to 4K) where the Fatso can't even make out one of the key subjects in the scene.

"Hey, Judge, you had to sit through over half a dozen replays of a blurry ass video that is literally being stretched by this television. What are we doing here? The prosecution has nothing."
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Pizza Munch
karadion said:
The problem of jury is that they're unpredictable at times. OJ Simpson was clearly guilty as hell and yet they didn't care and just voted not guilty because they wanted to go home.
Click to expand...
The problem is that the provocation instruction makes the jury think there was provocation so any Karen’s on the jury will think that a big scary gun was provocation even though it clearly isn’t.
 
simpleanon said:
On the provocation issue: Defense never should've let it through, though between "muh pixels" and Rosenbaum on video yelling "Shoot me Nigger", convincing the jury that Kyle was actually the one who provoked Rosenbaum is an uphill battle imo. Unless the jury is exceptional, pozzed or intimidated.

Ah.
Click to expand...
To hammer this in, during the trial the prosecution JUST got info about how one of the jurors got doxed.

Again.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: DelusionTree, Spicey McHaggis, zachs fair and 1 other person
karadion said:
The problem of jury is that they're unpredictable at times. OJ Simpson was clearly guilty as hell and yet they didn't care and just voted not guilty because they wanted to go home.
Click to expand...
That trial was also 8 months. The defense essentially sieged the jury into submission there, which this Judge isn't having in this case. Honestly, I surprised at the speed of this trial.
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
Reactions: Oxous and Meat Target
Now he is on CNN next. The liberals really want self defense to be weakened in time for the 2022 midterms and 2024 presidential election.

edition.cnn.com

Survivor of Rittenhouse shooting tries to clarify statement about gun - CNN Video

In an interview with CNN's Anderson Cooper, the lone survivor shot by Kyle Rittenhouse in Kenosha, Wisconsin, Gaige Grosskreutz, attempts to clarify his testimony and comments on "Good Morning America" about whether he pointed a gun at Rittenhouse.
edition.cnn.com edition.cnn.com

Zetton285 said:
There are people in this world who think merely holding the gun is provocation. I don't trust these retards.
Click to expand...
Most of those kind of folks are found in Europe and really deep blue areas of California and New York.

If anything goes bad for Kyle, its intimidation.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: diskboomer
Dr. Pasquale said:
Its funny how quickly the thread changes. All of a sudden there are doomposters everywhere
Click to expand...
I just hope if he does get dunked on, this thread doesn't go the way the 2020 election thread did with "Here's why Kyle going to prison isn't actually a bad thing/Hehe, it's a good thing I totally didn't support Kyle, or else I'd be real embarrassed right now."
 
  • Feels
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: THEY STOLE MY FORESKIN, m1ddl3m4rch, FunPosting101 and 4 others
Did the judge say the provocation question was going to be in his instructions or that he would consider it?
 
Zetton285 said:
I think mistrial is the absolute best case scenario right now.
Click to expand...
I think mistrial is the most likely. Best case will always be full aquittal. I'm interested in what will happen if the Jury goes, "So he isn't guilty of murder but they gave us these lesser charges so we'll say he was guilty of x". I can totally see female jurors doing that, especially if they want to be like, "He doesn't deserve to rot in prison but he should be punished for acting recklessly." Or as a means of getting a juror saying guilty to conceed to not guilty on the big charges at least.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: derpherp2 and Freshly Baked Socks
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back