- Joined
- Mar 24, 2019
Which you have a 50% chance of Sleepy Richards doing.Have some hope, it ain't over til it's over. We still have another day for closing arguments.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Which you have a 50% chance of Sleepy Richards doing.Have some hope, it ain't over til it's over. We still have another day for closing arguments.
Just a guess but it makes more sense the more I think about it: Bingo ball thing for selecting the 12 deliberating jurors?What is that?
I said earlier in the thread, but they do not need 12 shit libs on the jury. They only need 1 shit lib and 11 braindead normies.I think a lot of doomers need to realize that conviction requires unanimous approval of the jury.
If just one person isn't a window-licking tard who guzzled the prosecution's shit arguments uncritically, no conviction.
There is no way this doesn't end in acquittal or mistrial via hung jury. I'd wager money on it.
You know somewhere some tard on Twitter is seething and making this about race for no fucking reason.It should be illegal to doompost when the people in the courtroom are having way too much fun spinning this box on camera.
View attachment 2710965
Not just the jury but also the people outside of the trial trying to intimidate the jury, or threatening them after the fact.Right but the one non-exceptional individual will need a spine to stand up to the constant badgering of the other 11
Richard's embarrassing ass will put the nail in the coffinHave some hope, it ain't over til it's over. We still have another day for closing arguments.
Likely fairly high. I seriously doubt most jurors don't do their own research into the case despite jury instructions.What are the odds at least one of the jurors know that Rosenbaum was a convicted anal rapist of preteen boys and went out into Kenosha that night on a quest to violently conquer some teenage bussy?
Yeah, the jury being completely naive to a case as high-profile as this is a great ideal but functionally impossible in reality.Likely fairly high. I seriously doubt most jurors don't do their own research into the case despite jury instructions.
one more day till Kenosha burns by BLM/Antifa.Have some hope, it ain't over til it's over. We still have another day for closing arguments.
Retarded take. Women tend to be more empathetic to younger defendants, like Kyle. Especially when a pedophile and a woman beater were the aggressors. They have a maternal instinct, and Kyle looks and sounds especially young.Shower thought: The pedo's girlfriend said he had meds for bipolar and that might seem like a W for the defense to give credence to him acting so erratically... but with a majority white female jury it'll only make them more simpatetic because half of them probably are diagnosed with bipolar, or BPD and are under the same meds she mentioned
You mean more than they already have?MSM, Reddit and Twitter are going to attempt to frame Rittenhouse as guilty
The fuck happened?
Which cuts both ways.Yeah, the jury being completely naive to a case as high-profile as this is a great ideal but functionally impossible in reality.
It's like Twelve Angry Men, but backwards.I said earlier in the thread, but they do not need 12 shit libs on the jury. They only need 1 shit lib and 11 braindead normies.