- Joined
- Aug 22, 2014
The problem is the human brain CRAVES a simple solution. They don't want a mountain of evidence to pour over to prove a point. They want that one, magic, silver bullet solution that can explain everything with one motion. And people will see those idiot lawyers fighting over this blurry ass photo and subconsciously attribute more worth/importance to it by merit of how strongly they're fighting over it. Which will cause them to be like, "Oh shit, maybe this DOES show what the prosecution says it shows" despite every other bit of video evidence, testimony, and anything else showing the complete opposite.
And I posit the exact opposite if we're only appealing to intellectual laziness here. The jury is gonna look at that one single photo and think "What the fuck", and depending on the closure arguments and rebuttals? Taking into account the shit on cross, the MILES of difference in how both sides were handled and behaved in their cases? I'd have more good faith in simply not wanting to bother with this garbage and voting for the genuinely charismatic young man who held up in cross over the pedophile and the two fork-tongued jews circling shit around and talking about nothing.
The ONLY point where that falls apart? Is if the Jury has been intimidated or infected. That's an entirely different problem entirely, out of control, and one that hell NEEDS to be raised and screamed over as loudly as possible from ANYONE who values the right to self defense.