- Joined
- Jul 25, 2019
Yeah, I'd have used a different tone, but I agree.That’s unironically good. An American were this is a given is an america I want to live in.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yeah, I'd have used a different tone, but I agree.That’s unironically good. An American were this is a given is an america I want to live in.
You're going to have to point me to the former since I can't find it. For the latter, the FBI agent testimony was thrown out and the curfew charge was struck as a result.So where is the female firearms expert in all of this and where is the glowie that got impeached?
Good summary, I can't quote or reply to your post for some reason.
How so?It’s not too late actually.
Weapon's charge is mostly tanked at this point.im upping my bet to 1500
he gets self defense, but he has the weapons charge.
released on time served.
the actual bet is he gets self defense, but gets another smaller charge.Weapon's charge is mostly tanked at this point.
So it was it about creating doubt in the jury’s minds? Ah I see. That makes sense. Now the onus is on the defense to prove otherwise. Because if they don’t, the jury will have it in the back of their heads that Kyle provoked the situation, and therefore has no claim of self defense.Potter was the "taser taser taser!" cop
Not in an of itself, but it opened up jury instructions to provocation, namely, that if you provoke an attack you no longer have a right to self defense.
The actual blob in question is too hard to argue beyond a reasonable doubt, but now jurors who were looking for a way to bury Kyle now have "provocation" in their head, and now have a reason to project their "he crossed state lines to threaten people with a gun!" insanity onto Kyle.
I'm not as blackpilled as the others here. I find it virtually impossible that 12 jurors will unanimously agree to provocation, and thus a murder conviction. Remember, Kyle still has presumption of innocence that he didn't threaten anyone, and virtually all testimony and video footage show Kyle being at best indifferent, and often times offering medical aid. And that blob photo is so retarded that all it takes is one nearsighted juror to say "yo I can't see shit" to put reasonable doubt.So it was it about creating doubt in the jury’s minds? Ah I see. That makes sense. Now the onus is on the defense to prove otherwise. Because if they don’t, the jury will have it in the back of their heads that Kyle provoked the situation, and therefore has no claim of self defense.
I can see why now people on the thread are panicking.
TBH I’m not sure how the defense would refute this, because it would just further bury it deeper into the minds of the jury. Doubt has been created about his purity of intent, and that…that might not sink him on its own but it will not help him.
There's plenty of evidence that Kyle wasn't provoking anyone. The question just shouldn't be there in the first place.So it was it about creating doubt in the jury’s minds? Ah I see. That makes sense. Now the onus is on the defense to prove otherwise. Because if they don’t, the jury will have it in the back of their heads that Kyle provoked the situation, and therefore has no claim of self defense.
I can see why now people on the thread are panicking.
TBH I’m not sure how the defense would refute this, because it would just further bury it deeper into the minds of the jury. Doubt has been created about his purity of intent, and that…that might not sink him on its own but it will not help him.
The judge is adopting jury instructions which tell the jury to convinct only if Kyle's rifle was an SBR.Why's that?
My kingdom for a horrifying rating.Kek, that's the first thing I see when I open the site
The fact these things are out there and people are still sperging about "how anime promotes pedophilia and sexual deviancy" makes me lose all the little faith I had in the humanity.
Holy shit, when actual literal ghouls find you an unsympathetic and objectionable "victim" you know you fucked up in life.I'll be honest, I was still kind of on the fence about the case. But I think I've found some moral paragons that are capable of setting me straight on this divisive issue.
View attachment 2712441
Richards is. You didn't think he'd let someone else do it, did you?Chirafisi better be doing the closing arguments because Richards is a total fucking moron. Why the fuck did Kyle even hire him, who recommended him?
I find Chirafisi 1000% more compelling than Richards. But I have no idea how big of an impact the whole "Richards talks like a parody of a Kenosha resident" has. If the whole argument that the prosecutor has is "Kyle CROSSED STATE LINES" to "attack OUR GUMMUNITY" - maybe it really is better for the jury.Richards is. You didn't think he'd let someone else do it, did you?