- Joined
- May 6, 2019
Removing the gun charge is actually subtly but majorly important. Removing it means the gun was legal and will make jurors -much- more likely to ignore the provocation argument.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Oh my god, that ALONE might be a huge turnaround for this case. Now any Anti-Kyle people don't have the "He illegally had the gun" argument to cling to the entire time.
You know they won't.Left Twitter can get fucked! Now they can stop screaming about "ILLEGAL WEAPON!"
Yeah, now they can't argue that it was illegal for him to possess it. The law was written poorly but they determined that the defense was correct with their interpretation.Please explain: does that mean that Kyle was ok to carry the AR-15? If so what does that mean?
I'm behind, was there some claim that it was an SBR or was there some OAL requirement?Just measure the fucking gun now you fucking boomers
No, just withhold suicides prevention and give them fentanyl pills.Law Twitter on suicide watch.
Yes, he was legally carryingPlease explain: does that mean that Kyle was ok to carry the AR-15? If so what does that mean?
and now they cant imply that him having a gun was provocation either because you know thats what they wanted.Yeah, now they can't argue that it was illegal for him to possess it. The law was written poorly but they determined that the defense was correct with their interpretation.
People threatening his children, probably.Judge is holding himself back a lot more than usual. Wonder what's really on his mind.
Neither. Prosecution overcharged intentionally and didn't bother to read the statutory requirement. They just didn't care that it was meant only for SBR's or SBS's.I'm behind, was there some claim that it was an SBR or was there some OAL requirement?
Not that it matters, gun charge dismissed which was the thing I thought Kyle could definitely be convicted for if they acquitted him for self defense.
The Pros kept harping on that for like no reason that I can determine.I'm behind, was there some claim that it was an SBR or was there some OAL requirement?
Not that it matters, gun charge dismissed which was the thing I thought Kyle could definitely be convicted for if they acquitted him for self defense.
The prosecution wanted to argue it because they're fucking slimy to see if they could get a guilty verdict.I'm behind, was there some claim that it was an SBR or was there some OAL requirement?
Not that it matters, gun charge dismissed which was the thing I thought Kyle could definitely be convicted for if they acquitted him for self defense.
Okay, but he still crossed state lines, which as we know is a grave offense that can never be forgiven. Sorry chuds, but this border hopper is going to the big house. /sneedLeft Twitter can get fucked! Now they can stop screaming about "ILLEGAL WEAPON!"