Kyle Rittenhouse Legal Proceedings - Come for the trial, stay for….

[Kermit Jizz]

BTW what happened with the nigger who threatened to dox the jury? did the glowniggers do their job for once or he's still free and doing that shit?

>implying it wasn't a glownigger

 

[JoyfulDarter]

Yes, he wanted the Child to potentially be knocked out by a known Child rapist, near a dark alley, in the middle of a riot.

This sounds like a wonderful plan.

Only a homophobic anti-semitic Nazi wouldn't allow his supply 17 year old body to be ravished by this tiny jewish pedophile.

 

[Popcorn Teeth]

Serious question, but does this kind of overly-detailed analysis and reasoning when talking about events that happened over the span of seconds ever actually convince anybody? It's like some sort of a cancerous post-session analysis of a D&D encounter gone sour, complete with the laughable "No Honor" defense like a fucking tryhard Dark Souls 3 pvper

 

[Astro Galactic Megalul]

It's hard to watch. I just want to strangle the motherfucker. I just assume jury isn't literally braindead and has recollection of what they've seen throughout the trial. And that defense is hopefully effective in countering this in their statement.

 

[KiwiFuzz]

How the fuck are you supposed to know that the pedo had a fractured pelvis?

And moreover, how are you supposed to know that the pedo doesn't have a concealed gun that he's about to whip out and blast you with?

If I was strapped and some dude was chasing me, I'd assume the other dude was strapped too, 'cause what kind of crazy-ass motherfucker chases a dude with an AR? Either he's a crazy-ass motherfucker or he's strapped or both.

 

[Matt Damon]

does this kind of overly-detailed analysis and reasoning when talking about events that happened over the span of seconds ever actually convince anybody?

It gives any juror who already wants Rittenhouse to be guilty something to hang their argument on.

 

[Cool Dog]

>implying it wasn't a glownigger

IIRC said nigger was just another ghetto trash that happened to be related to fentanyl george so I doubt he even finished primary school let alone got into fed training

So I take it got memoryholed or what?

 

[FlappyBat]

Serious question, but does this kind of overly-detailed analysis and reasoning when talking about events that happened over the span of seconds ever actually convince anybody? It's like some sort of a cancerous post-session analysis of a D&D encounter gone sour, complete with the laughable "No Honor" defense like a fucking tryhard Dark Souls 3 pvper

It gives a fig leaf of modesty to people who want to convict him anyways.

 

[AnOminous]

Hahahahaja binger shows a picture of patrick swayze in roadhouse, comparing joseph rosenbaum to patrick swayze hahahahaha

JOSEPH "THE COOLER" ROSENBAUM

Should have used a still from Donnie Darko.

Because he played a pedophile in that.

 

[mr.moon1488]

Serious question, but does this kind of overly-detailed analysis and reasoning when talking about events that happened over the span of seconds ever actually convince anybody? It's like some sort of a cancerous post-session analysis of a D&D encounter gone sour, complete with the laughable "No Honor" defense like a fucking tryhard Dark Souls 3 pvper

Hard to say because most cases like this never actually go to court because most rational and on the level prosecutors would go nolle prosequi as soon as a case like this hit their desk.

 

[Probably An Autist]

Doesn't matter. Richards will get up and say "look, my client may be guilty on all charges, but..."

 

[Kermit Jizz]

Yes, he wanted the Child to potentially be knocked out by a known Child rapist, near a dark alley, in the middle of a riot.

This sounds like a wonderful plan.

The lefts reasoning for self defense is some bizarre utilitarian clusterfuck.

"If you defend yourself someone dies. If you don't defend yourself you don't know if you'll be killed. Therefore you are obligated to let the assaults happen and hope for the no death scenario".

This is a combination of disregarding individual liberties and thinking violent criminals lives are worth as much as everyone elses's.

 

[Some JERK]

I don't know how you screw up the closing if you're the defense. Did Binger prove any of the shit he just said? Because he has to prove it. Being possible isn't enough. You have to know beyond a reasonable doubt that everything happended exactly as Binger is saying it did. Grainy Bigfoot photos and conjecture about what dead people were really thinking as opposed to what they said doesn't cut it.

 

[MugolEx]

LAUNCH TIME > BREAK TIME

 

[TheGreatDodongus]

So the thing with the Richards objection situation, is he's basically doing the worst possible tactic, of objecting to some, minor things, but then not objecting to much more grievous offenses.
This plants a seed in a jury's head.

"If he objected to something as minor as the contents of the bag, but then didn't say anything about self defense being invalid against the unarmed, then I guess there must be some truth to that."

 

[Bibendum]

I want to know if the jury will be sequestered since the judge hasn't mentioned it. If not the jurors are going to go home, flip on television and drown in a deluge of anti-Kyle propaganda.

Not likely, even though they should have been. I could see this changing if protestors were to start amassing significantly near the courthouse, but otherwise, almost certainly not.

 

[Nobunaga]

The sheer mental gymnastics in saying, "...brought great dishonor by bringing a gun to a fistfight" is unreal to me.

They basically don't have a case and are purely going for gotcha emotional appeals.

What is this, fucking feudal japan?
Are they digging nobunaga corpse to call him a pussy for using fucking guns?

 

[TheBest]

So everything he said in that closing so far has been disproven. How this man became a prosecutor is beyond me.

 

[Basement Dwelling Dork]

A duel of fates

 

[Gehenna]

I don't know how you screw up the closing if you're the defense. Did Binger prove any of the shit he just said? Because he has to prove it. Being possible isn't enough. You have to know beyond a reasonable doubt that everything happended exactly as Binger is saying it did.

The idea is to argue enough emotively to override any consideration of the facts. Keep in mind that the jury doesn't actually -remember- the evidence, so summarization could nudge over those who were on the edge. Even if false.