- Joined
- Apr 23, 2018
rackets is almost impressive in how often he's wrong.BUT DADDY RACKETS SAID TO OBJECT MORE !!!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
rackets is almost impressive in how often he's wrong.BUT DADDY RACKETS SAID TO OBJECT MORE !!!
Kinda gotta reiterate it when the pros said in closing "the crowd was full of heroes"I could be wrong but I feel it's a mistake for defense to keep focusing on the riots in the framing of destruction of property, fires, etc.
Rational people would put 2+2 and say "well, that type of situation has a higher than average chance of turning violent, which would lead someone to believe they needed to be able to defend themselves."
But a lot of people these days don't believe lethal force in defense of property is legal, it is even in fact specifically illegal in many states. It's already been a point of contention in this trial.
So why isn't defense doing more in closing arguments, where they have more leash and more freedom to speak, to spell that out for the jury? "Mr. Rittenhouse was in a scenario which was quickly devolving and was in a national backdrop of many other riots which had descended into violence and even murder. Young children and senior citizen bystanders were injured or killed in several other riots. This wasn't just a threat to property, there was a real danger that it could become violent at any moment, and agitants such as Rosenbaum were fomenting that violence"
That was in response to the question of if it was the first time being shown.While this case has been lax on that, adverse statements are normally exceptions when said by the parties (complaining witnesses and defendants)
It's because the know paper beats rock.Sigh...
Not even addressing the nigger reprobates on that nigger hoodie of fail, but...
Nigger: On one knee, arm stretched out and up making a fist = It's AWWWWWW RIGHT!
Normal taxpayer: Does same thing, but straightens the fist out = HATE SPEECH! HATE SPEECH OMFG REEEEEE THROW HIM UNDER THE JAIL!
The author of the script was probably not a native German speaker, since the whole show has been in English, and sacrificed strict vocabulary for more natural sounding names.Ritter is a middle age term for Reiter (Rider). Though it is hard to understand whether Rittenhouse is derivative of Ritter, I've never seen the German name "Rittenhaus" and google gives me no results, so it's possible that Rittenhouse is a weird version of a different name. Like "Vergessen" (Forgotten) turned to "Ferguson".
Rosenbaum means "tree of roses". Pink Tree would be "Rosabaum".
Let him squirm. Let him see how it feels.Binger’s about to snap and grab that gun again if the defense keeps talking much longer...
He also said "shit" right before that lmao"mother effer"
Come on man you've already dropped the hard R multiple times.
He should have objected more, so says a lot more than one grifting lawyer.rackets is almost impressive in how often he's wrong.
Swish with vodka when stressed. Good move.Binger washing the taste of Hard R's dick out of his mouth.
View attachment 2719476
I mean, he could only claim that for the obvious effect of making Kyle look like the goofy "kid that has nothing to hide"-image (that they achieved).Oh hey, confirmation that it was Rittenhouse's choice to go up on the witness stand.