US Joe Biden News Megathread - The Other Biden Derangement Syndrome Thread (with a side order of Fauci Derangement Syndrome)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Let's pretend for one moment that he does die before the election, just for the funsies. What happens then? Will the nomination revert to option number 2, aka Bernie Sanders? Or will his running mate automatically replace him just the way Vice-President is supposted to step in after the Big Man in the White House chokes on a piece of matzo? Does he even have a running mate yet?
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: Billy Beer, Splinters RCVD, GenderCop and 22 others
Click to expand...
CarlosDanger said:
This is going to get spicy. This was posted less than an hour after the CNN article basically said there is a war(which we knew) between Biden and Harris.
View attachment 2717349
Click to expand...
I read an interesting theory that this story was orchestrated by advisors in the White House who are concerned that Biden isn't going to be in any shape to run again in 2024. However, that would make Kamala the presumptive frontrunner, and they don't think she can win the election. So, they're trying to publicly weaken her so that Mayor Pete or basically anybody else can get the nomination instead.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: the fall of man, spiritofamermaid, Isaac Clarke and 8 others
Kamala can't catch a break


archive.md

Charlie Spiering on Twitter: "Announcer: “Please welcome Heather Kurt…

archived 16 Nov 2021 13:37:07 UTC
archive.md archive.md

Screenshot 2021-11-16 21.37.22.png

 
  • Like
Reactions: spiritofamermaid, Yamma Damma, Isaac Clarke and 6 others
Corpun said:
I find it a shame we will likely never see insider reports on what this administration is like. The TDS crowd ate up all sorts of leaks, fake and gay or true and honest and they were out there all the time.
Click to expand...
its also because the right values the individual and freedom vs order and social cohesion, so the GOP naturally has way more turncoats who believe they're the jimmy stewart of the party. meanwhile the left understands sacrificing their personal values for the greater good (AKA unions) Plus the left has the media who successfuly cover up their rogue agents. Obama basically made huge examples out of tons of whistle blowers. Case in point David P Weber, when he didn''t agree with the Bush admin or attend their pray services, like you would expect of Republicans they just shrugged it off and let him be. When David didn't play ball with the Obama boys, Ari Gold's brother sent him a dead fish wrapped in newspaper. And them came the cover stories about him raping co workers, his wife divorcing him. him being seen as a right wing gun nut, him being nearly put in jail as well all for doing his job and noting the connection between the FTC head and Bernie Madoff as well as others in the obama admin. which mind you, from what we know of the DNC finances the rest of the decade was actually helping them more than anything else. knowing your party has a major issue with getting fucked by donors should mean a thank you to the person discovering this stuff not the opposite.
MysticLord said:
  1. How did shutting off the internet work during the Arab Spring?
  2. The feds don't control red state governments, their control will only decrease, and they rely on red states and counties for food, minerals, and water - things slightly more important than internet.
I wish they would shut down the internet and start [fedpost]ing us. I've been waiting years for kickoff.

I heard about that, but that will take like a year to have an effect. I'll laugh when soybean oil atrazine bread costs as much as organic bread.

And like I said, when moms can't get their kids bread, the moms start rioting. They shriek for the men to fix things. If the feds kill the moms, then they are done. It might not happen right away, but they're done.

The uniparty is already past the high point of their power. They have no where to go but down.

Libtards have names and addresses just like chuds do. Anything they do to us can much more easily be done to them. If they attack us, they lose by default.
Click to expand...
how did the moms feel about their little daughters being forced into school with big black bucks? Even Eisenhower admittred he would be anti-his only government's policies if it was his own daughters being forcing into de-segregated schools. Yet look at modern day america. it didn't fucking matter, unless these moms start going full Timmy it will never fucking matter.
JustSomeDong said:
Let us seek the words of one of the Founding Fathers, and perhaps we shall find some insight.

View attachment 2718729
Click to expand...
How did John Adams feel about the bill of rights and what were his views on the freedom of speech Null loves so much?
Drag-on Knight 91873 said:
As MysticLord pointed out, cutting off the internet hurts them more than it hurts us. For us, we can't find new porn and come to Kiwi Farms. For them, they lose a vital source of propaganda. Any ability to influence a narrative goes away and thus, the ability to inflict TDS.
Click to expand...
hey dumbass who controls the news media? they cut the internet everyone will just have to watch late night tv live instead of on youtube.
 
  • Dislike
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: spiritofamermaid, LurkNoMore, Walrus and Carpenter and 5 others


Just casual competition, with Ol' Xi here, guys. No need to be concerned. We won't fight China, boys. You can count on that. No need for strength and toughness.

Also, nitpick of the century here, but when the attendance sheet has all of these names, and the star of the US is just "The President," uhhh...

FERuUYaXwAYeVEM.jpeg


When even Xi is listed name, title, and all, it makes me schizo out and think "The President" is some Big Brother-type shit. Biden was also present, but "The President" was there too. Fuck, can the asterisk beside his name grow any larger?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Informative
  • Feels
Reactions: spiritofamermaid, Luck Skeleton, Shrek and 14 others

Biden Got His Bipartisan Win. Now, Reality Sets In.​

Michael D. Shear
Tue, November 16, 2021, 5:44 AM
https://sneed.yimg.com/ny/api/res/1.2/3CmbCZ8rHftPrAj.nkBipw--/YXBwaWQ9aGlnaGxhbmRlcjt3PTY0MDtoPTQwNg--/https://sneed.yimg.com/uu/api/res/1.2/iJrcpbnR7CHjwrNmdCD5OA--~B/aD01MjkxO3c9ODM0ODthcHBpZD15dGFjaHlvbg--/https://media.zenfs.com/en/the_new_york_times_articles_158/ab4ff047783af20785fb1cec651c920e
President Joe Biden signs the $1 trillion infrastructure bill into law at the White House on Monday, Nov. 15, 2021. (Doug Mills/The New York Times)
WASHINGTON — For more than an hour Monday, President Joe Biden enjoyed the kind of political moment he had eagerly sought and long promised, surrounded by a bipartisan cast of lawmakers on the South Lawn of the White House for the signing of landmark legislation forged through compromise at both ends of Pennsylvania Avenue.
But after completing the signing ceremony for the $1 trillion infrastructure bill, Biden returns to a much harsher reality: historically low approval ratings, unified Republican opposition to the centerpiece of his domestic policy, growing alarm in his party about the prospect of losing control of Congress next year and a surprising surge in inflation.
The president and his aides are hoping that the highly choreographed event will begin to allow Biden to find his footing. They are betting that the bipartisan victory will allow him to project sustained progress in confronting the nation’s problems — not just being different from former President Donald Trump.
Sign up for The Morning newsletter from the New York Times
“I truly believe that 50 years from now, historians are going to look back at this moment and say, ‘That is the moment America began to win the competition for the 21st century,’ ” Biden said, standing before hundreds of mayors, governors, lawmakers and others with the White House gleaming on a brisk and sunny Washington afternoon behind him.
To chants of “Joe! Joe! Joe!” Biden called the infrastructure bill “proof that despite the cynics, Democrats and Republicans can come together and deliver results.”
But the president and his top advisers also understand the uncertainty in the country’s deeply polarized electorate, the difficult battles yet to come on Capitol Hill and the often fleeting nature of political victories in the age of 280-character messages on Twitter and vanishing stories on Instagram.
Will Monday’s victory be the steppingstone that Biden needs for a political turnaround, proving to voters that they got what they expected when they put him in office last year? Or will it be a blip in time, destined to be quickly forgotten among the Washington rancor that is on the way in the days ahead?
“It is a victory in which Biden’s leadership really mattered,” said Matt Bennett, a senior executive for Third Way, a Democratic-leaning group that presses lawmakers in both parties to work together. “That could signal that this is the beginning of a real virtuous circle for him.”
But Bennett, who attended the signing ceremony, added that the real test for Biden will be “shaping the public narrative on the enormous benefits of the infrastructure act that is being signed today.”
“That is going to require enormous discipline on the part not only of the president,” he said, “but also congressional Democrats.”
The outcome could help determine the fate of Biden’s presidency and the course of the Democratic Party as lawmakers prepare to defend their slim majorities in the House and the Senate in next year’s midterm elections.
Sen. Rob Portman, R-Ohio, one of 10 senators who worked to shape the infrastructure compromise, praised Biden and Democrats in Congress.
“This is what can happen when Republicans and Democrats decide we’re going to work together to get something done,” said Portman, who is not running for reelection. (Biden later called Portman “a hell of a good guy,” adding that he could only say that without hurting him politically because of the senator’s decision not to seek another term.)
Monday’s signing ceremony was the culmination of a long effort for Biden. In the Senate, the legislation passed by a lopsided vote of 69-30, with even Sen. Mitch McConnell, the Republican leader and a chief Biden critic, voting yes. In the House, Biden wooed a bigger-than-expected group of Republicans to support the effort to repair the nation’s crumbling roads, bridges and airports.
That has been a bipartisan talking point for years; even Trump repeatedly proclaimed that it was “Infrastructure Week” in Washington, only to see little progress.
“This is a great accomplishment,” House Speaker Nancy Pelosi told the crowd Monday. “And there’s more to come.”
That was clearly the message Biden wanted to send. His White House staff developed the event with the kind of stagecraft usually reserved for political conventions or campaign events. Flags from each state flapped in the background as Biden, flanked by Vice President Kamala Harris and a union worker from North Carolina, strode to the lectern as “Hail to the Chief” played.
Now, the challenge for the president is to convince voters that passage of the legislation actually matters to their lives — that it is not just a Washington abstraction, debated in the halls of Congress but with little impact on them.
That effort begins in earnest immediately.
The ceremony Monday will be followed by a burst of presidential travel aimed at showing the American people real examples of how the new law will pump money into the economy and provide good-paying jobs by upgrading roads, bridges, lead pipes, broadband and other infrastructure.
On Tuesday, Biden is expected to travel to New Hampshire, where he will speak at a bridge over the Pemigewasset River, which is in critical need of rehabilitation. The next day, he will visit a General Motors electric vehicle assembly plant in Detroit to showcase the billions of dollars to be spent on upgrading electric charging stations around the country.
“Now is an opportunity for the president, the vice president, our Cabinet,” Jen Psaki, the White House press secretary, said Monday, “to be out in the country, connecting the agenda, the impacts on people’s lives, moving beyond the legislative process to talk about how this is going to help them. And we’re hoping that’s going to have an impact.”
History suggests the president and his team have their work cut out for them.
Former President Barack Obama campaigned around the country during his first term in office, telling Americans that the Affordable Care Act would “bend the cost curve” for health insurance and improve coverage. But early glitches in the Obamacare website and opposition from the newly formed Tea Party made the law toxic in many places for many years.
After Trump passed tax cuts early in his tenure, he hosted a similar celebration (though without the bipartisan sheen) and then failed to sell it to the broader public. Throughout his tenure, the tax cuts remained a largely partisan victory.
During his campaign for president, Biden promised that he would be able to win the support of Republicans and Democrats for his policies. That message resonated with voters after four years in which Trump clashed spectacularly with Democrats.
But much of Biden’s legislation so far has been passed with little support from the opposing party. His $1.9 trillion pandemic relief package was passed in the Senate and the House without any Republican support. And his $1.85 trillion social spending plan, known as Build Back Better, is likely to pass with only Democratic votes.
At home, the president still faces deeply divisive issues such as what to do about the border, clashes about racial sensitivity in schools, prison reform and voting rights. And overseas, Biden will be confronted with the need to rein in China and Russia, continue to repair relationships with allies and fight terrorism.
In his remarks Monday, though, Biden was all smiles.
“As I look out on this crowd today, I see Democrats and Republicans, national leaders, local leaders, all elected officials, labor leaders, businesses,” Biden said, clearly relishing the moment of victory in a tumultuous year.
“Most of all,” he said, “I see fellow Americans, I see America. Let’s remember this day. Let’s remember we can come together. Most of all, let’s remember what we’ve got done for the American people when we do come together.”
© 2021 The New York Times Company
Click to expand...
Article Archive
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: spiritofamermaid, Isaac Clarke, Vyse Inglebard and 2 others
Honka Honka Burning Love said:
You aren't there to piss people off you are there to represent your voters.
Click to expand...
If your voters have no way to get you out of power, then you are there for whatever you want. In this case to represent the interests of your donors, foreign and domestic.
Kramer on the phone said:
how did the moms feel about their little daughters being forced into school with big black bucks? Even Eisenhower admittred he would be anti-his only government's policies if it was his own daughters being forcing into de-segregated schools. Yet look at modern day america. it didn't fucking matter, unless these moms start going full Timmy it will never fucking matter.
Click to expand...
They rioted - once during integration, again during bussing - but since their party didn't have their back and the media was unopposed and running interference they retreated and enacted de facto segregation.

There was an alternative, an escape route, and the federal government and media were vastly more powerful and competent than they are today. They are purging all their competent people, and leaving only members of the email class and literal government dependents to enforce their will. All the people who actually keep society functioning are chuds. If the chuds simply stop going to work for a month the gibs shut down, and will stay shut down for years.

Food stamps don't matter if there's no food to buy. Section 8 housing and utilities subsidies don't matter if the power shuts off because all the linesmen and power plant workers and coal miners and oil pipeline workers quit due to vaccine mandates. Drones and planes don't matter if the jet fuel runs out after a week. Military bases don't matter if the Sodexho trucks stop arriving and food runs out after 2 weeks because all the truckers quit and parked their semis on the freeway.

Nukes, chemical weapons, and biological weapons don't matter because as soon as any of our rivals see that we're using them on our own people, they will nuke Washington DC while it's distracted.

The uniparty has literally no way out of this, not even through. Their behaviour is not that of a competent opponent but instead that of a dying parasite or predator. They know that they are losing strength, they know that we only need to quit our jobs and wait them out, and they are lashing out because that's all they can do. They're torturing the 1/6 boomers in DC because they can't reach us, and they need to hurt someone to temporarily assuage their feelings of powerlessness.

You alt-right or neon-nazi (or whatever you call yourselves) types are very curious. You've done nothing with your lives, you have no proof of your skills, yet you demand that normal people immediately put you in power despite this, and despite there being less odious and more viable alternatives. Alternatives that have proven themselves effective, no less.

Most normal people are conservative about what they know best, and they defer to the experts on what they don't until they have no other choice. They will not go from 0 to 60 towards political violence immediately because why try 60 MPH when you haven't tried everything between it and 0 first?

Why spend energy on an extreme solution that isn't guaranteed to work and which will produce blowback when you can try a less extreme solution? Trying other things doesn't mean that political violence isn't an option, it just means you're trying other less risky things first.

If you really want a revolution, you must go to war with the army you have. Right now you nave normies (which descends from the 4chan initialism NORP: Normal Ordinary Respectable Person, aka the opposite of a channer). A normie just wants to live reasonably well, get laid, have kids, and be content. They don't want a glorious suicidal last stand to save bizarre, dysgenic, 1/8 Mexican White Nationalists.

So if you want normies to become political, and to become violent, you must first show them that there is no option but political violence. You do this by speedrunning all the non-political and non-violent solutions first. After normies see for themselves that non-political non-violent solutions are not possible, they will turn to the task of political violence.

The great part about this method is that you can simply try to fix things in a neutral peaceful fashion, which is totally legal by the way, and do it with the intention of stirring up right wing death squads, and there's nothing that the authorities can do to stop you. Sure, they can send the FBI to arrest you and put you in the Jan 6 gulag with the rest of the boomers, but that is just more evidence that politically neutral and peaceful reform is impossible. By using violence against you they make you into a martyr, which empowers your violent ideology.

Satanists are 100% correct that power requires literal human sacrifices; however they missed the part where you must be the sacrificial lamb to gain power for yourself. If you want power, you must do all the work, suffer for other people, show to them there there is no option, and then be tormented by agents of evil.

You must prove yourself, here just like everywhere else.

If you don't believe me, consider the phenomena of Boomer-waffen: constantly enraged normie boomers for whom political discourse means making death threats at the slightest insult or disagreement. That we even have a word for the phenomena indicates that it is a force, and the uniparty as haphazardly shitting all over these people's lives and boxing them in with no escape. These people will not lay down and die, especially after they saw what happened to all the patriotic boomers from 1/6 who surrendered to the secret police and are now being tortured in a gulag in Washington DC.

Kramer on the phone said:
hey dumbass who controls the news media? they cut the internet everyone will just have to watch late night tv live instead of on youtube.
Click to expand...
Libtards control the news media and every other institution. And they're living up to their name: they really are retards. They are making enormous, unforced errors out of a purely emotional motivation to crush the chuds. What they don't realize is that they are standing on the chuds, that the chuds are all around them; the chuds are a sleeping giant, and we are a tiny fly buzzing around them.

We don't have the numbers or the skill to do violence effectively, so instead we buzz around the libtards and troll them, which provokes them into slapping the face of the sleeping giant on which they are camped. As their strikes become more powerful, the giant will stir and mutter, which will confuse and terrify the libtards. The worst thing that could happen for us is if they stop beating the giant, and it goes back to sleep. We don't want that, because the giant is our best hope of beating the libtards. Instead, we must double down and harass the libtards everywhere and every way we can, until they are so frothy with rage that they attack everything in sight in an attempt to make the emotional and psychological pain we inflict stop.

Our goal is and can only be to wake the giant. Once that's done our goal should be to survive, because it's just as likely to eat us as it is the libtards.

Have you seen late night TV? It's unwatchable. It's unfunny boring shit, and the only time they have any energy or drive it's when they're trying to hurt the chuds.

Besides, no one who is sincerely awakened to what's going on and who's behind it ever becomes "un-redpilled". Those who do are lying, grifting, or legally compelled. It doesn't matter if the internet goes away because no one forgets a betrayal, and because Americans are hard-hearted people who do not forgive or forget insults.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Dislike
Reactions: spiritofamermaid, make_it_so, Randall Fragg and 10 others
www.axios.com

Biden administration plans imminent booster expansion to all adults

Only slightly more than a third of adults 65 and older have gotten a booster shot.
www.axios.com www.axios.com

It seems that Little Lord Fuckpants is about to mandate the booster shot.

I’m vaxxed but I’m not sure I want to take third shot. My wife took the booster and her face swelled up like I’d punched her. I’m not jumping up and down for this one.
 
  • Feels
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: Chief Areola, spiritofamermaid, Luck Skeleton and 17 others
  • Informative
  • Like
  • Feels
Reactions: spiritofamermaid, Luck Skeleton, Yamma Damma and 7 others
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back