Kyle Rittenhouse Legal Proceedings - Come for the trial, stay for….

What do you think will happen?

  • Guilty on all charges

    Votes: 282 8.8%
  • Full Acquittal

    Votes: 1,077 33.7%
  • Mistral

    Votes: 264 8.3%
  • Mixture of verdicts

    Votes: 479 15.0%
  • Minecraft

    Votes: 213 6.7%
  • Roblox

    Votes: 132 4.1%
  • Runescape

    Votes: 203 6.3%
  • Somehow Guilty Of Two Mutually Exclusive Actions

    Votes: 514 16.1%
  • KYLE WILL SUBMIT TO BBC

    Votes: 35 1.1%

  • Total voters
    3,199
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
I demand kittens for this thread. Why because they're cute.
I would like to humbly submit this floofy Samoyed. He's not mine but he has floppy ears therefore Kyle is innocent:
charlie.jpg
 
Watch this interview:

He didn't want to be center of the trial, he said his relationship with Alex Jones would have not benefitted Kyle. He was not part of the court team he planned.
I watched the video after it with Rackets where he said he wanted to use the team to lessen Richards et als roles.

And so far he has taken credit for every smart thing they've done.

When I said being at the centre of things I was not specifically referring to trail. Rather he'd be the one directing everything.

If his relationship with Jones was damaging to Kyle he would not have been brought on to help in the court of public opinion. Because if Jones is damaging the last thing you want helping your public image is people connected to him.
 
I watched the video after it with Rackets where he said he wanted to use the team to lessen Richards et als roles.

And so far he has taken credit for every smart thing they've done.

When I said being at the centre of things I was not specifically referring to trail. Rather he'd be the one directing everything.

If his relationship with Jones was damaging to Kyle he would not have been brought on to help in the court of public opinion. Because if Jones is damaging the last thing you want helping your public image is people connected to him.
The media would smear Barnes as a “pro insurrection”
 
It'd be pretty pointless, I'm afraid. That niggerfaggot Earl Warren's judgement on NYT v Sullivan made it effectively impossible to sue THE CONSCIENCE OF ARE NATION even when they're provably lying about everything.
NYT just made it official. After the enforcement of the Alien and Sedition Act by the Adams administration to attack his political enemies like Jefferson was so disastrously unpopular that it literally destroyed the Federalist Party, nobody ever really tried that again except in times of (real and declared) war, when constitutional rights, shall we say, get treated rather differently.

It was already nakedly obvious that talking shit about politicians, even absolute bullshit, was protected. And when the Federalists under Adams tried to stop that by jailing people for talking shit about them, not only didn't it shut them up, but they talked even more shit from behind bars.

The Anti-Federalists swept the elections and the Federalists never recovered.

Note, what were called the Anti-Federalists under Jefferson were a lot closer to current judicial conservatives like the Federalist Society.

And a major difference then is newspapers were often openly partisan without any pretense of objectivity. People were a lot more hands-on, too, if the local Fed/Anti-Fed newspaper talked too much shit, a mob would show up and smash their printing press. It was just the government that was forbidden from doing that.
 
Gehenna, a Stealth Juror is a recent concept, and its used by those who profile potential jury pools for trial lawyers. It has not been around forever, as the business of profiling juries has not been around forever. It's something that came about in the last 30 years or so.

There will always be a juror that slips by during selection, a lawyer only gets so many free voir dires (one where he can dismiss a potential juror without stating why). Its essential that you get jurors sympathetic to your client or at least truly impartial ones.
Recent concept vs doesn't exist is a hell of a cope. You claimed Barnes just made it up, which he clearly didn't. FFS stop making me defend that faggot Barnes.. pls?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back