- Joined
- Jan 8, 2020
Wait how did the defense find out about this other video?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Iirc the Bigfoot photo was BECAUSE of the low res, which more than likely means they held the HD back in bad faith because a clearer image shows something that ruins their theory"they gave us a lower resolution version of the video" seems like a very small thing. i doubt the court will just kill the entire case over such a minor thing. at most the prosecution gets a slap on the wrist.
Null's just mad that people care more about this than his pet projects. If he had it his way, we'd be 800 pages deep in Chris' latest jailhouse schizo letter or relitigating the merits of some shitcoin instead of focusing on the case that could literally redefine the right of self defense in this country.There's a faggy group of "radical centrists" and leftists on the T&H supporters boards who bitch and moan at Null about "muh neonazis in AH", as if they aren't spergs too.
We are so fuckedBrady violation. Blatantly. In direct opposition to the court.
Will the court do their job?
View attachment 2724292
View attachment 2724295
View attachment 2724290
I called this out with my own viewing group during the closing arguments, when the prosecution briefly accidentally showed windows explorer. The file sizes were wrong for SD video. "Gosh, it sure would be bad if they were using the HD video during closing, because those file sizes are... odd for 30 seconds of potato-cam."
View attachment 2724298
Reminder.
![]()
![]()
It was submitted during the jury instruction.*Wait how did the defense find out about this other video?
Slip of the lip by the dumbfuck on the other team.Wait how did the defense find out about this other video?
Because certain hotspots are fucking horrid top down. Don't get caught doing a crime in New Orleans.If it's so simple, why does it happen so often? I hope this case enlightens those who didn't even know that prosecutors are elected (except for the ones who watched Law & Order), and they get thrown out next election cycle.
It's clear you watched large portions, if not all, of the trial. It's also clear who hasn't.Iirc the Bigfoot photo was BECAUSE of the low res, which more than likely means they held the HD back in bad faith because a clearer image shows something that ruins their theory
You just have to subscribe, you fucking autist. How do you not know how Youtube works?I just don't like that he keeps your freedom of speech locked behind a paywall. But very lawyerly so he fits the stereotype and continues it unfortunately.
It is insane to me that the prosecution is willing to go that far for this case, is Binger such a brain dead ideologue that he's willing to risk serious prison time to score a win? Has he done this before and it's never been caught until now cause this trial is being watched worldwide? He showed up to court with that gay star wars pin, so you know he's one of those "reeeesistance" types. It's pretty scary that there are people like that high up in the food chain that are willing to do evil shit so long as their side is the one that wins.Throwing it is one thing, throwing it by doing a Brady violation is another. Because that's probably the quickest single way to ensure you never work in law again.
Look, we all know that the DNC has magic blasting out their ass, the magic of fixing elections.he magically lost.
No, I hate youtube. I don't use it's censored chats. But if it really is just clicking the sub button then I'm completely wrong and he should be killed less.You just have to subscribe, you fucking autist. How do you not know how Youtube works?
I just don't like that he keeps your freedom of speech locked behind a paywall. But very lawyerly so he fits the stereotype and continues it unfortunately.
Holy fuck this is so obvious. I did briefly think the footage shown by the prosecutor during close was a bit clearer, but I just thought I was being dumb and just imagining things.Brady violation. Blatantly. In direct opposition to the court.
Will the court do their job?
View attachment 2724292
View attachment 2724295
View attachment 2724290
I called this out with my own viewing group during the closing arguments, when the prosecution briefly accidentally showed windows explorer. The file sizes were wrong for SD video. "Gosh, it sure would be bad if they were using the HD video during closing, because those file sizes are... odd for 30 seconds of potato-cam."
View attachment 2724298
Reminder.
![]()
![]()
This isn't just mistrial worthy, this is one of the few things that actually make appeals courts -pissed-. Brady violations are one of the -very- few things that are consistently, as in almost all cases, successfully appealed and often appealed -with prejudice-.
He just got it, and it was only properly revealed... yesterday. This might be why Agent 47 was grinning ear to ear.
So based on how much of a colossal fuckup this appears to be, could the judge theoretically open court tomorrow and immediately throw the case out with prejudice before anything else happens? Because based on what you're describing, it sounds like where we're going now that this complaint is out in the press.Here's the thing, a bulletproof appeal is grounds for an immediate mistrial if the trial is still ongoing. This was just revealed yesterday. This is... basically unignorable by the judge.
The AR15 is proven to be super effective against domestic abusers and child rapists.If we're taking bets, I'm guessing reckless endangerment which will be turned over on appeal and never mentioned by MSM.
I only own a Colt revolver. Time to expand.