- Joined
- Feb 27, 2019
SHOR THROUGH THE HEARTImagine getting shot in the heart by a dork wearing socks with crocs, even people with a humiliation fetish would find that embarrassing.
AND YOU'RE TO BLAME
YOU GIVE CROCS
A BAD NAME
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
SHOR THROUGH THE HEARTImagine getting shot in the heart by a dork wearing socks with crocs, even people with a humiliation fetish would find that embarrassing.
The Rittenhouse case is very interesting for so many reasons. The legal proceedings, the shit in court pulled by the state, the media slander campaign and how passionate people on both sides argue their view, where Kyle is either America's greatest hero or history's greatest villain.View attachment 2724923
![]()
![]()
𝐖𝐢𝐥𝐥𝐨𝐰🔪 on Twitter: "both of them are obviously guilty but we …
archived 17 Nov 2021 12:16:57 UTCarchive.md
I think the reason why so many trannies are mad and giving bad takes is that Kyle killed a fellow pedo
If I wanted cancer I would have just gone to a black-owned nuclear plant.My kingdom for the Horrifying rating
Fire Analysis I actually have quite a bit of first hand knowledge of. And I know who and where they do the actual science regarding it. And as long as nobody is trying to pull CSI/NCIS tv show levels of crap with "magic chemical fire formulas" etc, it's actually rather easy to do at least a fairly basic analysis of a fire. As long as there is not a total devastation of your scene from an extremely high temperature fire it's pretty easy and straightforward to read a fire scene. It is very easy to determine point of origin. It's fairly easy to work out the temperatures of the fire at various points. It's not difficult to trace the path and spread of fire throughout a building. You can generally pretty easily determine the nature of the origin, be it electrical, petro chemical, mice with matches, etc. And much of that is simply putting the scene back together and figure out potential ignition sources. And yeah all of it is largely backed up by peer reviewed sciene. Fire Engineering is a thing. Among the big labs doing Fire Testing are the NFPA, NASA, the NTSB, Several National Labs, Underwirter Labs, Other Labs that work for the Insurance Industry. It's just there isn't a lot of classic "Academic" work on the subject. It's primarily Industrial and Government Transportation industries. Although one of my University Chem Professors was scary good with High Temperature stuff and could make fire do shit that you would have to see to believe. His specialty was Solid Rocket Fuel.
This isn't to say that Fire Analysis doesn't occasionally get abused by prosecutors. The best examples is claims of who and how million acre western wild fires get started. Yeah, no. Just nope. Unless somebody saw them start the fucking thing, 99% of any forensic analysis of that shit is pure fanfiction. At best you might be able to find the point of origin and determine if it was a campsite? Or you can kind of tell if it was a lightning strike as those look very different than fires started by stoned hobos smoking weed.
The Cameron Todd Willingham case really damaged a lot of people's faith in fire science. Even though it happened decades ago and science continues to advance, the fact that that guy was executed on what was later believed by many to be flimsy or fabricated evidence really did a number on fire cases, especially in the eyes of people who are already predisposed to disbelieve forensic evidence.
Fire science is called science, but most often the "science" is in name only. Most "expert" witnesses called to the stand, have no background in science, often they're firefighters with a 2 year degree who have been firefighters for a while. And the things they attest to have have no basis in science. They haven't been formally trained in the scientific method, they've never conducted scientific experiments on fire forensics on peer review. Their "expert testimony" consists of some layman firefighter saying based on what I've seen I can conclude "x" is what happened. And these expert witness testimonies have been proven hokum fantasy through exoneration again and again.
that would be fine and dandy, if the budget didnt include shit like 100 dollar staplers.Rare yes, but glowies got a budget they have to use up and justify and demand even more money.
Everyone of those likes is not a real like. Most of these check marks are being astroturfed by thousands of BlueAnon bots. That's why twitter's algorithms are clogged with thousands upon thousands of accounts created within the last four years that repeat themselves and say the same shit over and over again.Mind you - each of these Twitter accounts (many with blue check marks) have thousands and thousands of likes. Each of those likes is an actual person. And yes, the death threats on kyles life has already begun.
View attachment 2725025View attachment 2725026View attachment 2725027View attachment 2725028View attachment 2725029View attachment 2725030View attachment 2725031
This one just made me laugh tho.
View attachment 2725045
Haha Haha here is a video of that chubby white supremacist being interrogated
the last 15 or so mins of this video are hard to watch. he’s hyperventilating just like he did on the witness stand. “i did nothing wrong” “why did he have to do that?”
after seeing him smeared all over mainstream media for the past year, this shit makes me livid.
That's not confirmed yet.So what’s it looking like, I heard 3 people in the jury are not being swayed
I think if there was a mistrial declared then the judge would dismiss the case with prejudice. If he doesn't then 100% the state is coming back at Kyle.So interesting conversation has been happening in the commentator sphere over if the state would pursue a retrial if this ends in a mistrial.
My gut says yes because the mob is out for blood right now, but a second trial may be really hard to win. Especially since they have so many state witnesses basically helping the defense. Their biggest piece of video footage literally has the manufacturer listing on their own website, "this video program can't be used for evidence."
The only counter I have to that thought is that a different judge may allow in the Proud Boys diner visit and that'll allow them to paint him even further as a Neo-Nazi.
Something fun to bounce around as we get ready to start back up this morning.
The official rumor is 2, the way they're acting, one side has a major advantage, so likely no more than 3.So what’s it looking like, I heard 3 people in the jury are not being swayed
That would be them bloating it so they don't get a budget cut.that would be fine and dandy, if the budget didnt include shit like 100 dollar staplers.
It's not a question of what they can do. It's a question of what they want to do. We now live in a nation where our top "law enforcement" agency's policy is "riots good, self-defense bad." We can thank Black Hitler and the nogger-loving trash who elected him for this.So glad our government has the capability to fly things like THIS:
View attachment 2725073
Over a riot, and yet simultaneously cannot keep a car dealership from getting burned down.
Jack Posobiec tweeted out that two people were holding out because they're afraid of getting doxed and shit. He claims to have gotten this information from a U.S. Marshall and while the jury was still in deliberations. I call bullshit. Some U.S. Marshall is privy to the particulars of jury deliberations and is feeding details to Posobiec and nobody else? Doesn't make sense.So what’s it looking like, I heard 3 people in the jury are not being swayed
Doesn't he keep the same judge or am I thinking of something else?The only counter I have to that thought is that a different judge may allow in the Proud Boys diner visit and that'll allow them to paint him even further as a Neo-Nazi.
They don't know anything about it because they have been brainwashed into believing it is irremediably racist. The only way to get "justice" to them is by mob rule. If the mob says he's guilty then he should be found guilty the actual facts of the case be damned. it's why they hold up murders and pedophiles as heroes. They were part of the mob and regardless of whatever else they may have been doing that makes them good. They hate Kyle and need him punished because he showed them the reality of their revolution. It will never happen. Fuck these commie faggots.And none of these leftist morons knows a single fucking thing about the case, the """victims""", the """murderer""" or even just the most fundamental aspects of the US legal system. They antagonize the judge, cause he upheld the constitution. It just blows my mind.
Maybe they just wanted to go over the instructions day 1, then go over videos today? If the holdouts is true, it might be worth using the footage to convince them after the instructions are clarified.What do you guys make of the jury not asking to review any of the video the first day?
it means they have seen the video from every angle from both sides of the case 40+ times now and probably have it etched into their retinas.What do you guys make of the jury not asking to review any of the video the first day?