Kyle Rittenhouse Legal Proceedings - Come for the trial, stay for….

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What do you think will happen?

  • Guilty on all charges

    Votes: 282 8.8%
  • Full Acquittal

    Votes: 1,077 33.7%
  • Mistral

    Votes: 264 8.3%
  • Mixture of verdicts

    Votes: 479 15.0%
  • Minecraft

    Votes: 213 6.7%
  • Roblox

    Votes: 132 4.1%
  • Runescape

    Votes: 203 6.3%
  • Somehow Guilty Of Two Mutually Exclusive Actions

    Votes: 514 16.1%
  • KYLE WILL SUBMIT TO BBC

    Votes: 35 1.1%

  • Total voters
    3,199
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
This rant is genuinely pissing me off. Just gonna set aside that minor little issue of the prosecution withholding evidence now, are we?
He's resolving their specific questions in order and even said "let's not get ahead of ourselves", the point of whether they're actually asking for the drone footage hasn't been reached yet.
 
Wait, what's going on?
Jury had a question: if we watch video is it in private or in the courtroom
Prosecution and Defense agree in the courtroom (with no one there)
Defense brings up that they filed a mistrial based on the video being passed over from pros to defense being the wrong size/length.. also correct video wasn't given until evidence is closed
mistrial also based on the image editing software website says the software is "for investigative purposes only, not for court evidence"
Also don't want them to ask to view the video in question because of these problems
Judge: rambles about public scrutiny.. really wants jury to make decision
Judge: how many times should they be able to watch it
Binger: as much as they want
Richards: only a certain number of times, would put emphasis on evidence
Judge: we'll see what the rule is and do it by the book

ETA: judge seems affected by media coverage scrutinizing him
ETA: judge also says he hasn't read mistrial request yet
 
Last edited:
I don't Wisconsin procedure. Has anyone who has commented on whether, if there's a mistrial because of a hung jury, the judge can rule it is with prejudice because of prosecutorial misconduct?
Jesus H. Christ, we have a literal Bradley violation here and the judge is completely sidestepping it.

:stress:
I don't see how the judge can say, his own words, that something is a "grave constitutional violation" and then just cuck on actually doing anything about it.
 
He's cucking and he's STILL going to be pilloried in the media and probably subjected to malicious investigation.
Never underestimate a right-winger's desire to be respected by his enemies.
Left-wing law doesn't give a fuck if you hate them; hell, they live off it.

This is why you always vote "guilty", baby.
 
For all the talks about the judge being biased towards Kyle, he has been painfully passive, and caved multiple times to Binger's requests
You have to understand to leftists that live and die by the blue checkmark, anything less than the judge sentencing Kyle to immediate execution 10 minutes into the trial means he's an alt-right biased Trump supporter Nazi fascist
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back