Kyle Rittenhouse Legal Proceedings - Come for the trial, stay for….

What do you think will happen?

  • Guilty on all charges

    Votes: 282 8.8%
  • Full Acquittal

    Votes: 1,077 33.7%
  • Mistral

    Votes: 264 8.3%
  • Mixture of verdicts

    Votes: 479 15.0%
  • Minecraft

    Votes: 213 6.7%
  • Roblox

    Votes: 132 4.1%
  • Runescape

    Votes: 203 6.3%
  • Somehow Guilty Of Two Mutually Exclusive Actions

    Votes: 514 16.1%
  • KYLE WILL SUBMIT TO BBC

    Votes: 35 1.1%

  • Total voters
    3,199
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Sims.png
 
Your strange hate boner for the grifter is more lulzy than their behaviour.
I dislike grifters in general. But it's the fact they all are stumbling over themselves to condemn Richards the most. But they do it so good damned sloppily that I have to question if any of them have actually done anything in court.
 
It's literally what I predicted. Judge being held up as based, yells about media and prosecutor, admits that the prosecutor broke multiple ethical rules, and the list goes on. All his screaming and bickering was for show like always.
From what I've seen the judge was just naive since the start.

He didn't take the journalist propaganda seriously, so he didn't sequester the jury, didn't police his every statement knowing what journalists do, then he reads the news, doesn't understand why it's so twisted, and still thinks his little rant can fix it, as if the journalists would just go "oh that makes sense".
 
He hasn't immediately reviewed the motion to dismiss and thrown Binger out to sleep with the fishes? BIASED, EXCEPTIONAL JUDGE, EVERYTHING IS HORRIBLE, KYLE IS FUCKED!
I think he needs to have done more than just let the jury watch the video now, after all opportunity for argument is gone. I don't think he's biased, or even incompetent, but that was a bad call. There should have been a lengthy, serious jury instruction to do everything possible to fix what the judge himself called a "grave constitutional violation." Those aren't words uttered lightly, so throwing up his hands literally minutes later and basically saying "well whatever" doesn't cut it.
the only difference is someone will call you a Cuck Fag for doomposting
and unlike twitter, you dont get banned for it.
That's kind of actually a big difference.
 
I dislike grifters in general. But it's the fact they all are stumbling over themselves to condemn Richards the most. But they do it so good damned sloppily that I have to question if any of them have actually done anything in court.
Yeah we got that the first 30 times you sperged about them. Just ignore the shekel goblins and their remoras.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lodoss Warrior
Will you stupid fucks calm down and be patient? This isn’t the end of the world and it’s no assurance than Kyle is screwed. Really, it’s like you guys can only acknowledge what is currently happening, you change your tunes so quick at the literal drop of a hat.
I was always a doomer from the start. It's not my fault that this Judge is allowing this trial to go on without mistrial with prejudice which is making me raise my eyebrow.

You optimistic fags and muh Rekieta fags keep lingering on this rumor of 2 jurors being "holdouts." Have you ever thought that the two Jurors are actually the people want to vote not guilty?
 
He's a Judge, a fair Judge, doing his god given job, despite the clownishness of the case.
He's in a tough spot. It would be better if the jury decided (and that is how I prefer it to be honest) even if there's evidence of a mistrial. It would be better for Kyle's future if a jury of his peers acquitted him. I think he knows that Kyle should be innocent and that's how he wants the jury to go. He wants them to come to this conclusion on their own without him interfering in any of their deliberations. The prosecution fucked this up and now the judge has to deal with it. If the prosecution forces the judge's hand on this, they know the media will blame the judge and not their idiocy that was clearly exhibited for anyone watching.
If y'all are listening to Rekieta- take it with a grain of salt. They're commentators and not in the position the judge is in. It's easy for them (and all of us) to say "just make it a mistrial reeeeeeee!! it's obvious the judge is an idiot reeeee!!!"
 
Yeah we got that the first 30 times you sperged about them. Just ignore the shekel goblins and their remoras.
I mean, I think I have referred to Rikieta's panel twice. Total. Mostly it's me going at Barnes but that's because the man is fucking scumshit and his work and my work intersected enough that I have developed a rather burning personal hatred of the man.
 
Rikieta was fucking wrong, so this is incorrect.

Also, I'd be really curious just how much of every single person on this panel is them being absolute blowhards. I'd really like to sift through -their- stuff with a fine-toothed comb.

And given I am less than friendly to Richards, the fact I am growing hostile to all the lawyers on this panel is... a feat.
i watch trials fairly often...and holy shit can i not stand the rackets stream. The constant posturing and pseudo intelligence on display is fascinating. Like none of you are perfect and the most knowledgeable on the panel was Barnes..whos a grade A Egomaniac.
 
"Oh yeah, dat boy gon get big bubba's veiny throbbing black cock in his boipucci *licks lips*"
Jesus, the examples of Mutt's Law going on here could fill up a few pages in it's own thread. Cool it with that cuck shit.
You just know Null has his trigger finger on a nigger rape meme for the front page if Kyle is sent up the river.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back