Kyle Rittenhouse Legal Proceedings - Come for the trial, stay for….

What do you think will happen?

  • Guilty on all charges

    Votes: 282 8.8%
  • Full Acquittal

    Votes: 1,077 33.7%
  • Mistral

    Votes: 264 8.3%
  • Mixture of verdicts

    Votes: 479 15.0%
  • Minecraft

    Votes: 213 6.7%
  • Roblox

    Votes: 132 4.1%
  • Runescape

    Votes: 203 6.3%
  • Somehow Guilty Of Two Mutually Exclusive Actions

    Votes: 514 16.1%
  • KYLE WILL SUBMIT TO BBC

    Votes: 35 1.1%

  • Total voters
    3,199
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Credit where it's due
I think Schroeder realized that the defence abused his lack of technical knowledge
They literally mentioned something of that nature thursday/friday!
 
1637176329154.png


You can't tell me this isn't a man used to watching his woman take it from a stranger in their marital bed.
 
They are outright lying under oath and being called on it by the clerks. If this isn't a mistrial then it's absolute lunacy.

Both prosecutors need to be smacked with investigation and sanctions by the bar association. Up to and including disbarment.

This is a murder trial, not an "oopsie", someone's life/freedom is on the line.
 
Last edited:
So is anything going to happen or is Cookie Schroeder gonna blueball everyone again?
 
Kraus argued that it was the woman's fault that the video got compressed, that it's the same file as the HD version, but it was altered on her computer. The woman argues that that can't be true, the two files have different names, they were never the same file, the HD was altered on the state's end, and they sent her the compressed version under a different title.
Ok but how did they even realise one video was compressed more than the other and that it's not just a reencoding of the same file?
 
Kraus argued that it was the woman's fault that the video got compressed, that it's the same file as the HD version, but it was altered on her computer. The woman argues that that can't be true, the two files have different names, they were never the same file, the HD was altered on the state's end, and they sent her the compressed version under a different title.
Seems likely that at some point, some exceptional person sent it as an MMS, which does tend to get downscaled since it's for phone to phone communications and not for FUCKING EVIDENCE. And then they used the exceptional version somehow.
 
  • Like
Reactions: spider_expert
how the fuck do cunts get high paid court work and still unable to work an android phone or simple software?
why is there not an airgap server holding all digital evidence?
This country is filled with cheap lazy fucks and cunts in charge.

Its like how Japan's minister of technology didn't know how a computer worked.

Most of them just outsource the work while promoting degenerate bull to their kids.

Boomers really nuked America hard.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back