Kyle Rittenhouse Legal Proceedings - Come for the trial, stay for….

[HTTP Error 404]

Why do people pretend chimpouts are what the founding fathers meant by ‘assembly’?

The snarky answer is "why do people pretend dindu-nuffins are what the founding fathers meant by 'people'?"

 

[Meat Target]

Barnes and Baconator

I'm not saying Barnes is a bad lawyer, nor am I gonna defend Richards. But Barnes using every opportunity to remind us how he has been denied his right to be the star of the trial really bugs me.

 

[Ralph Barnhardt]

look at what bluearmed devil was responding to and you’ll see the context

You're gonna have to link it because I don't see him in any part of those quotes nor do I see you replying to him.

 

[Puff]

Regarding alternates, under what circumstances can holdouts be replaced with different jurors from the pool?

Only if it is determined outside influence swayed them

 

[Gehenna]

Well they never got to talk about anything. its just 2 Karens fighting about who is supposed to read the instructions. this whole lets watch the evidence again is a desperate play to escape.

I am leaning toward this being a hail mary pass, and I'll explain why in brief.

The first thing asked for was the first six pages. This would be the Self-defense instructions and the core Pedobaum charge. This one took the longest by far, indicating significant argument and debate. The judge was very clear, if the pedobaum charge is self-defense, everything else likely is after even if they have to gauge each independently.

We then got the call for the rest of the instructions, indicating some sort of breakthrough.

Since then, we had a call for video evidence of Lefty. There is a significant gap here, but I think I can guess why. I'd propose the Karen's did what Karen's do, realize they are losing so they move the goalposts to another fight. So each individual charge becomes a battle. Eventually though, they run out of room.

Cue the call for the drone footage, the only ace in the whole for the prosecution. The only way to try to regain footing with the original Pedobaum charge.

 

[George Lucas]

Regarding alternates, under what circumstances can holdouts be replaced with different jurors from the pool?

It’s when a jury member can’t be there, like they get sick or die or something.

 

[Leave_Fargut]

Should've brought on the Ralpha-male and his pet Guntfield.

"THEY SAYIN ITS MURDER BUT ITS NAWT TROO. I BET THAT PEDO ROSENBONG WAS BEIN PROVOKED BY THAT KID DIDDLER JOSHUA CONNER MOON"

 

[ProtonMailManTheSequel]

The founding fathers weren't factoring in niggers and women either, so it's a fair misunderstanding.

The founding fathers quite rightly valued blacks above the rest of us.

 

[Astro Galactic Megalul]

Only if it is determined outside influence swayed them

What if they mysteriously acquire brain damage?

 

[Random Internet Person]

You said that in response to this, correct?

Am I missing how that's you saying you don't want that?

I’m more saying that the more things go to shit, the more things like “Roof Koreans”, “stopping a criminal’s reign of terror under pumping them full of lead”, an “American Troubles”, “going after journalists and media people”, and the idea that “Kyles will spring up all over America and do the jobs the police won’t” get more romanticized, and the more people will take any chance to to live out those idealized fantasies. And the realities could just be so much worse

 

[MadStan]

I'm usually a cocky cunt when it comes to court proceedings and generally pick em real well as to results.

But this one is just...well fuck I don't know. I've seen evidence that could throw a juror one way or the other and a hell of a lot of it depends on interpretation of the defendant as a person (character).

I'm going to go out on a limb and say most charges will be determined but the jury will hang on one, maybe 2 - enough for the prosecution to retry on that undetermined charge.

 

[Happy Fish]

Why do people pretend chimpouts are what the founding fathers meant by ‘assembly’?

Reminder these are the guys who dressed up like indians to violently fuck up tea shipments.

 

[Oxous]

Will Schroeder be doing a poll in an hour to get the jury's thoughts on continuing like yesterday?

 

[Snickerdoodle]

I have no idea how you lot are watching Nick’s stream. I don’t mind Nick, but holy shit does he invite some really fucking annoying people onto his platform.

I've never really been a fan or watched his shit til the last few days. I'm happy to see him with 100K viewers. I really wasn't a fan of his or had interest in his content, but the fact that this specific guy who invented shartgate and even possibly better, definitely makes me feel happy and kind of excited.

 

[Kermit Jizz]

I'm usually a cocky cunt when it comes to court proceedings and generally pick em real well as to results.

But this one is just...well fuck I don't know. I've seen evidence that could throw a juror one way or the other and a hell of a lot of it depends on interpretation of the defendant as a person (character).

I'm going to go out on a limb and say most charges will be determined but the jury will hang on one, maybe 2 - enough for the prosecution to retry on that undetermined charge.

This is something id like a lawfag to clear up. If the jury acquits on some charges but hangs on others, only the hung ones can be retried correct?

 

[Allanon]

Why do people pretend chimpouts are what the founding fathers meant by ‘assembly’?

The founding fathers believed in violent protests up to and including a violent revolution if the goverment were determined to be too corrupt and broken too far from the constitution to be recovered by lawful means. People who imply you can't be a legitimate protest unless you're peacefully standing around waving signs and doing nothing else while the people you protest look out their window and make faces at you are incorrect. Burning down cities and looting businesses while forgetting to even make demands of your government, however, does not count as a protest or assembly of any kind. It's the literal definition of a violent riot. No matter where you stand on protests and assemblies, the BLM riots don't qualify as a protest. "End racism" is not a thing the government can just slam a hammer down and achieve. It'd be like rioting because there are no free commercial flights to the Andromeda galaxy, except that demand could actually be worked toward and one day realized. Even if it were possible to one day make people only consider other humans by the character of their person and nothing else, BLM can't actually make up its mind about what it wants when it says 'end racism', so it can never be satisfied.

 

[GuntPunt]

Is there a maximum time on jury deliberation?

 

[Gehenna]

This is something id like a lawfag to clear up. If the jury acquits on some charges but hangs on others, only the hung ones can be retried correct?

I believe that is accurate, yes.

 

[Astro Galactic Megalul]

I am leaning toward this being a hail mary pass, and I'll explain why in brief.

The first thing asked for was the first six pages. This would be the Self-defense instructions and the core Pedobaum charge. This one took the longest by far, indicating significant argument and debate. The judge was very clear, if the pedobaum charge is self-defense, everything else likely is after even if they have to gauge each independently.

We then got the call for the rest of the instructions, indicating some sort of breakthrough.

Since then, we had a call for video evidence of Lefty. There is a significant gap here, but I think I can guess why. I'd propose the Karen's did what Karen's do, realize they are losing so they move the goalposts to another fight. So each individual charge becomes a battle. Eventually though, they run out of room.

Cue the call for the drone footage, the only ace in the whole for the prosecution. The only way to try to regain footing with the original Pedobaum charge.

I'm worried because I have no idea how do you beat a Karen outside of literally beating one. They're extremely privileged and stubborn, it's impossible to argue with them.

 

[FamicomGorby]

This is something id like a lawfag to clear up. If the jury acquits on some charges but hangs on others, only the hung ones can be retried correct?

Yes the ones that the jury was hung on can be retried, the ones where there was a verdict cannot be retried.