Kyle Rittenhouse Legal Proceedings - Come for the trial, stay for….

What do you think will happen?

  • Guilty on all charges

    Votes: 282 8.8%
  • Full Acquittal

    Votes: 1,077 33.7%
  • Mistral

    Votes: 264 8.3%
  • Mixture of verdicts

    Votes: 479 15.0%
  • Minecraft

    Votes: 213 6.7%
  • Roblox

    Votes: 132 4.1%
  • Runescape

    Votes: 203 6.3%
  • Somehow Guilty Of Two Mutually Exclusive Actions

    Votes: 514 16.1%
  • KYLE WILL SUBMIT TO BBC

    Votes: 35 1.1%

  • Total voters
    3,199
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
BLM riots are, arguably, more political terrorism than they are protests. The proof of this is in how people in all walks of life, including the government and justice system, become frozen in fear of them. Protests are meant to be a deterrent to poor behavior, yes, but the riots arguably inspire terror as their main goal, and manipulate people via fear.

That's because it's a complex thing to leave the door open to 'well you can violently rise up and fix the government if something goes wrong'. There's plenty of discussion via letters and diary entries from the founding fathers about this very matter because of it. The end conclusion was basically 'if you succeed in rising up and overthrowing the government to reinstitute the constitution as it was written, you were right to, if you fail to do so, you were wrong to try'. It's nonsensical, but so is the fact that the founding fathers staunchly believed in inalienable rights for the people that essentially extended to 'the government can't tell you to do anything' but then still had prisons and police that inherently violate those rights. For a functioning society to exist, certain compromises in their idealism must exist.


There's steps between 'violent revolution' and 'picketing with paper signs'. My point is that a violent protest is within the rights intended by the founding fathers, provided it is actually a protest and not a looting riot where the people attending it actively don't care about the alleged reasons for the riot (see: early on in 2020 when the Floyd family asked for the riots to stop, and the protestors wearing George Floyd shirts said 'this ain't about him').
Not political terrorism, just terrorism. They do it in pursuit of a political goal, and they use fear and intimidation. That's actual Terrorism right there.
 
I don't know about you but I've been watching Who Shot Mr. Burns? on the side. Still a fine couple of episodes.
When we were shopping memes during the last day of the trial itself I made this.

gunt who shot mr burns.png
 
I actually think there are a lot of good people in the justice system. I believe the right thing will be done. No need to worry so much.
Your optimism is appreciated. But if only you knew how bad things are.

It’s not a matter of bad or good; it’s just incompetence. It’s not even malice that drives them so much as incompetence and fear of change. The worst thing that can happen in any department is hiring just one person with any degree of malice. Because they have free reign to fuck everything up and everyone else is too stupid, ignorant, or lazy to handle them. And that ignorance extends from the bottom all the way to the top.

The most common words you hear in any of these jobs is “that’s not my job/responsibility” and they will absolutely abuse that sentence for everything from making important decisions, down to making coffee. Its hard to be optimistic when you’ve watched people intentionally retard themselves to avoid minimal extra work.

Source: I’ve worked for the government, so I’ve been jaded for a long time.
 
I've decided I don't like any of them. Even if I agree with their politics, they're all scummy, self-absorbed lawyers who enjoy the smell of their own farts. I'm done with them after this trial.
Noo you don't get it, he's not like other lawyers! Just one more $50 superchat and he'll notice me. Maybe he'll even hang out with me if I buy him that expensive RGB catgirl headset off his Amazon Wishlist. Wait, he doesn't have a boyfriend right?
 
Some of these arguments are so fucking stupid. It's like when everyone was arguing Trayvin Martin wasn't attacking Zimmerman because he bought skittles earlier in the day. I swear some people are just exceptional.
Aah yes, skittles...

I remember the various phrases over the years:

Murdered for skittles and ice tea

Murdered for selling CDs

Murdered for loose cigarettes

Murdered for a fake $20


If only it was that simple.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back