- Joined
- Sep 11, 2021
The Foreman is anti-Kyle? Oh fuck me
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I don't generally approve of fedposting, but "MSNPC" is the best thing I've seen today.death to all journalists. death to everyone who works at MSNPC
Why would you think that?The Foreman is anti-Kyle? Oh fuck me
MSNBC is REAL DOXkek, MSNBC is officially FAKE NEWS
It hasn't hit peak absurdity?It hasn't been formally denied. I'm starting to wonder if he is waiting for this trial to hit peak absurdity before pulling his raven robes up and projectile-shitting in the Kenosha DA's face.
Barnes just said it on Rackets' streamWhy would you think that?
sending journoscum to stalk the jurors in their top secret busWhat happened with MSNBC?
Yeah, and none of this "the corporate person MSNBC committed a felony". NO, an actual person committed a felony and his boss conspired with him to do so. These are actual crimes.MSNBC committed a felony... that extradition request won't take long.
Also, liar reporter Brian Williams once worked for MSNBC as wellMSBNC were also the ones who broke into that persons apartment on the San Bernadino shooting stream, right? Man, they're really leaning on nostalgia for ratings here.
I'd take everything Barnes says with a grain of salt.Barnes just said it on Rackets' stream
one of their goons was following a jury bus, ran a red light, got arrested.What happened with MSNBC?
A grain of salt that is usually correct.I'd take everything Barnes says with a grain of salt.
Oh. Even if you trust him, he's got no insider info due to his messy breakup with the defense team. He's wild-ass guessing.Barnes just said it on Rackets' stream
The judge lifts his cloak up to produce a machine gun. He points it directly at Rittenhouse before proclaiming "parry this, casual" and filling him with more lead than Flint's water supply.It hasn't hit peak absurdity?
I have no experience with the American legal system (or any legal system outside of drinking in the back of my sheriff's car) but from what little I understand: the judge wants to pile on as much retardation as humanly possible because it makes for an ironclad, appeal-proof mistrial with prejudice. It's the legal equivalent of having a really robust thread about an lolcow with too much evidence compiled to deny they are indeed an lolcow.It hasn't hit peak absurdity?