Kyle Rittenhouse Legal Proceedings - Come for the trial, stay for….

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What do you think will happen?

  • Guilty on all charges

    Votes: 282 8.8%
  • Full Acquittal

    Votes: 1,077 33.7%
  • Mistral

    Votes: 264 8.3%
  • Mixture of verdicts

    Votes: 479 15.0%
  • Minecraft

    Votes: 213 6.7%
  • Roblox

    Votes: 132 4.1%
  • Runescape

    Votes: 203 6.3%
  • Somehow Guilty Of Two Mutually Exclusive Actions

    Votes: 514 16.1%
  • KYLE WILL SUBMIT TO BBC

    Votes: 35 1.1%

  • Total voters
    3,199
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
At this point I'm expecting the Karen to get in touch with the media herself and start revealing information about any juror that's on Kyle's side.
This kind of thing is something I've been thinking about a lot too. How much some jurors might be preparing for their five minutes of fame after the trial ends. Making the rounds doing interviews on every major liberal news network like the Chauvin jurors. Already now, in the moment, sort of imagining themselves as leads in a story and acting that out instead of just objectively, humbly, and anonymously doing their job. At least one in twelve has to have an ego, ruined by social media, hungry for attention, wanting to feel important.
 
I, Hypocrite has two videos which are about 25 minutes each. They're highlights of the case which mostly involved the prosecutors eating shit anyway.
Here's the first one:
Even searching for the exact title didn't bring it up on YT for me, classy YT, classy.

You delivered exactly what i wanted, down to the length. Thanks man.
 
Richards seems like a nice guy. But you need a scumbag lawyer to fight a scumbag lawyer. Fact is, when it comes to defense, you want to scummiest guy you can find. You need them to pull every trick in the book they have. Period. The state has too much of an advantage otherwise.
I'd always want Saul Goodman over Matt Murdock.
 
This weaselly headline. Why even report on it if you have to spin it this hard?
View attachment 2728965
Variety got roasted hard last month for massively mischaracterizing and lying about stuff that went on at the anti-Dave Chapelle protest. They literally described a guy who was attacked by a pro-trans mob as attacking the mob and left the tweet up for at least a day or so before relenting after being called out by actual journalists. Their MO is to lie, knowing that most people won't bother to check so long as what they read fits their priors.
 
Then.

94FC61C8-3866-42BE-8E1D-739913708568.jpeg

Now.

5B4BE087-A8FB-447C-9C5F-A9BE357B1790.jpeg

HODL!!!
HODL you cowardly dogs!!!
HODL!!!
 
I mean I'll come up with a different take. These riots are actually bottled up millennial/zoomer rage and anger. Imagine being so terminally on-line the only time you get out is for a BLM rally. Imagine you're a loser on everything in life. Now go to a BLM rally, protest, maybe destroy some shit then maybe just maybe you might have your sins forgiven, be given money and gibs, BLM is just an excuse to keep millennials thinking racism is the worst problem in America so they don't focus on the fact most millennials will die lonely, broke, and destitute meanwhile babyboomers will have all their wealth taken by the government/corporations/schemes when they die.

In the big think if you can focus that millennial loser anger on some trivial culture war and convince them to troon out and sterilize themselves they're more likely to off themselves then pick up a gun and foment a "revolution" so to speak.
TDLR
"Racism" is a religion that brings meaning to their worthless lives.
 
Tin foil hat

These policies, programs, and riots are meant to drive blacks even further into poverty and despair while increasing resentment. Instead of correctly identifying the policies/rioting as the problem, wypipo will be scape goat. By then enough affirmative action hires will have minorities & ideologues in place to change the foundation of law and rights.

Race war 2030!
Identity politics are also rolled out whenever the people in power want the dumb masses to be distracted. You can make valid arguments about niggers, jews and even wypipo but that just makes this distraction tactic even more effective since it isn't technically ever "wrong." The problem is it keeps the general population from asking about things like Fort Knox being empty or the trillions of dollars that went missing prior to 9/11 i.e. shit that actually matters.
 
This kind of thing is something I've been thinking about a lot too. How much some jurors might be preparing for their five minutes of fame after the trial ends. Making the rounds doing interviews on every major liberal news network like the Chauvin jurors. Already now, in the moment, sort of imagining themselves as leads in a story and acting that out instead of just objectively, humbly, and anonymously doing their job. At least one in twelve has to have an ego, ruined by social media, hungry for attention, wanting to feel important.
It's why we need 11-1 to count or have some sort of binding order that they're not allowed to profit off of their service like criminals can't profit from their crimes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dry roasted
Tin foil hat

These policies, programs, and riots are meant to drive blacks even further into poverty and despair while increasing resentment. Instead of correctly identifying the policies/rioting as the problem, wypipo will be scape goat. By then enough affirmative action hires will have minorities & ideologues in place to change the foundation of law and rights.

Race war 2030!
in 2030 i will be too old for race warring. give a boomer a break will ya? race war NOW
 
I have to dismiss the rumors because they are unfounded. That being said, my own demographics analysis says its not impossible.

The problem is, all these rumors started swirling around the same time, which indicates a single source. The earliest source is the reddit post whose credibility is "Bro, trust me".
My personal guess is that it's not completely made up out of whole cloth but that Barnes saw someone like that in jury selection and decided with no real proof that it must be that bitch holding everything up, he knew it!
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Foreverial
They absolutely did not. The push for mistrial was barely there, they let in evidence that should have never been allowed. They allowed the prosecution to flat out LIE without even raising an eyebrow... need I go on?
They pushed for mistrial. Quite a bit.
Majority of the times they objected the Judge let the Pros go on
They ripped the Pros to pieces?

Again, the problem was always going to be the jury. And it is.
Juries are going to be an issue going forward snd no one is ready to deal with it.
 
Richards seems like a nice guy. But you need a scumbag lawyer to fight a scumbag lawyer. Fact is, when it comes to defense, you want to scummiest guy you can find. You need them to pull every trick in the book they have. Period. The state has too much of an advantage otherwise.
It's a microcosm of why moderate, right, conservative normies are getting their asses kicked. They think there's still some inherent value in "playing fair" and that history will vindicate them. Not realizing that the other side WANTS THEM DEAD.
 
My personal guess is that it's not completely made up out of whole cloth but that Barnes saw someone like that in jury selection and decided with no real proof that it must be that bitch holding everything up, he knew it!
He wasn't around for jury selection, he got shitcanned before it occured.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back