Wuhan Coronavirus: Megathread - Got too big

[Zbk3VmLfujjzjxBd43tL]

Forms themselves can't demand anything. Some HR / lawyer drone wrote that hoping the text would put you off. Force the cowards to make the demand to your face, then tell them no. Don't let paper boss you around. Make them interact with you, because they'll lose.

I can confirm. Tomorrow marks four weeks since I received a second text saying I needed to tell my work my vaccination status (I think the form was different this time). Didn't say shit. I've heard nothing since, not from my boss or HR. I'm not saying shit until I'm told I need to do it "or else."

Everyone should have a plan for what to do when this shit comes their way. A plan on how you'll get out of the mandate, a plan on what to do if/when you get fired (and make sure you don't quit or let them suspend you, make damn sure you are terminated), all of that.

There don't need to be talking points. Covid goes away whenever the government and media say so.

It's been mentioned here, but the mindset of "zero deaths" is taking hold among the bureaucracy. Not just from Fauci's flu, but from ALL causes. The best example just for the name alone is "Toward Zero Deaths", a traffic safety group who managed to slip some shit in the recent 1.2 trillion dollar infrastructure bill (with the support of the Brandon administration) that requires all new cars by the end of this decade to have some weird fucking cameras that monitor the driver in case they're too tired/drunk/whatever.

But you're seeing it as an outgrowth of Fauci's flu. Look how the CDC wants everyone to permanently wear masks because it stops the flu, colds, etc. Those kill thousands of people a year after all, and we can't have that. Most importantly, if less people get sick, that means Mr. Noseberg can hire an extra hooker for his yacht. You don't want to stop your boss from making more money, right? That stock price MUST go up along. That GDP MUST go up. If it doesn't, the people who matter (like hedge fund managers and government bureaucrats) will cry, and we can't have that.

There remains a real possibility that OAS/ADE causes a mass die-off that will be impossible to cover up, and there is no question that will be spun to the public as a "deadly new strain", but that has not happened so far.

Right now it's just being blamed on "muh delta strain" which works since it has a scary name and most people don't know it's an order of magnitude less dangerous than the original (which already wasn't much of a dangerous virus). Once a new strain emerges they'll be sure to market that as the cause of the "pandemic" and blame (You) for continuing the "pandemic of the unvaccinated". This is probably the deadliest moment globally since some countries will likely have police and soldiers forcibly vaccinating people while other countries will send you to a camp.

On the bright side, it took a bit over a year for politicians (like governor Abbott in Texas) to start dropping restrictions based on how failed they were, so this might play out with the "vaccines" come spring 2022 or whenever it's politically acceptable (probably based on a drop in case numbers). A politician can say "well, we did our part, vaccines and natural immunity have won!" Well, we can hope. It might just be they drop all restrictions, declare the scamdemic over, but say "well, we need to keep watching public health, so these temporary health passports are now permanent."

Next year is going to be just as bizarre as this year was, mark my words.

 

[DavidS877]

It's been mentioned here, but the mindset of "zero deaths" is taking hold among the bureaucracy. Not just from Fauci's flu, but from ALL causes. The best example just for the name alone is "Toward Zero Deaths", a traffic safety group who managed to slip some shit in the recent 1.2 trillion dollar infrastructure bill (with the support of the Brandon administration) that requires all new cars by the end of this decade to have some weird fucking cameras that monitor the driver in case they're too tired/drunk/whatever.

Portland has been doing that shit for years with "Vision Zero" for traffic deaths. You know a great way to make sure there are fewer traffic deaths? Remove almost all the officers patrolling traffic and reduce speed limits. Well, that's the Portland solution at least.

 

[a terminal posture]

Judge in the federal mandate case (HEARING ON MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION EXCERPT - COURT'S RULING
BEFORE THE HONORABLE T. KENT WETHERELL, II UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE) lays down some serious facts:

"Here, I find that enjoining the hospital's policy pending final disposition of this case would not be adverse to the public interest because, based upon the unrefuted medical testimony which I find to be credible that I have in this case:
First, although the COVID threat has not completely dissipated, the case numbers are down significantly and are continuing to decline particularly here in Florida.
Second, most people who get COVID have mild to no
symptoms.
Third, the mortality rate is only half a percent, and it's ten times less than that for people without other health conditions or risk factors.
Fourth, there's significant and legitimate bioethical concerns about mandating the COVID vaccines because there's growing evidence that the relatively low benefits of the
vaccines are not significantly outweighed by the associated risks. Indeed, one of plaintiffs' medical experts testified that statistically the COVID vaccines are, quote, "the most
dangerous vaccines ever created," unquote, because their adverse incident rate is nearly twice the rate of other diseases.
Fifth, the vaccines are unnecessary for persons who
have previously had COVID because they have natural immunity
that provides equivalent or greater protection against severe infection than the vaccines. And according to one of
plaintiffs' medical experts, quote, "if you have had COVID, there is no legitimate reason to be vaccinated," unquote.
Sixth, unlike other diseases for which a vaccine is the only effective treatment option, there are multiple effective outpatient treatment alternatives available to prevent or treat COVID, including the ivermectin and monoclonal
antibodies.
And perhaps most importantly, the unrefuted evidence in this case shows that the vaccines simply do not accomplish the purpose of the policy that it's aimed at achieving; that is, quote, "keeping everyone safer," because, again, they do not protect people from contracting the virus, nor do they prevent people from getting the virus.
In short, although it is not for the Court to say whether the vaccine mandate is in the public interest, the Court can and does determine based upon the unrefuted and persuasive medical evidence before the Court and the considerations listed above that it would not be adverse to the public interest if the policy was enjoined while this case ran its course.
On this point, it is noteworthy that the recently
enacted OSHA and CMS rules do not take effect immediately as one would expect if indeed the public interest would be adversely impacted by further delays in vaccinations."

20211110 - Ascension Injunction Ruling Excerpt.pdf

Shared with Dropbox

www.dropbox.com

This is the most sane thing I've ever heard coming from a US government official about COVID. There may be hope yet.

 

[Look over there]

I can confirm. Tomorrow marks four weeks since I received a second text saying I needed to tell my work my vaccination status (I think the form was different this time). Didn't say shit. I've heard nothing since, not from my boss or HR. I'm not saying shit until I'm told I need to do it "or else."

Everyone should have a plan for what to do when this shit comes their way. A plan on how you'll get out of the mandate, a plan on what to do if/when you get fired (and make sure you don't quit or let them suspend you, make damn sure you are terminated), all of that.

I am so glad I've been a remote worker, since long before Covid was even a thing. I've now even got to the point of being a moderator on the internal work forums, and it's hilarious to just shut vaxtards down and lock their threads. Work isn't the place to discuss that shit, for me.

 

[talk sh1t]

The court document with regards to FDA asking for 55 years to release Pfizer's vax data

Where did you get that document from?

I looked through the document but could not find anything pertaining a 55 years delayed release of data. But maybe I missed it cause it's a long legal document, the likes of which I'm not used to reading.

It's a request dated mid-September (almost a month after FDA approved the Pfizer vaccine in the U.S.) by a group of scientists requesting the FDA to expedite release of Pfizer's vaccine data under the Freedom of Information Act. The request is then rejected by the FDA, as can be read in the last page.

What this is, however, is a good summary of "skeptical scientists". One pro vaccine argument I often hear is that if there were really problems with the them, we'd be hearing members of the medical and scientific community ringing some bells. Well this document contains a lot of references to precisely such cases, as the authors of the request make their case by listing many instances of medical professionals and affiliates raising arguments about the alleged net benefits of the Pfizer vaccines.

These are the authors of the request, who identify as the non-profit "Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency". They include Aditi Bhargava who speaks in a video someone posted in this thread a couple days ago. I searched a few random names from this list just to make sure they're not all made up people, they all seem to check out and have a profile at their institution's website.

Spoiler

PHMPT’s members include:
a.
Aaron Kheriaty, MD
Professor of Psychiatry, UCI School of Medicine
Director, Medical Ethics Program, UCI Health
b.
Harvey Risch, MD, PhD
Professor of Epidemiology
Yale School of Public Health
c.
Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH, FACP, FACC,
FCCP, FAHA, FNKF, FNLA, FCRSA

d.
Carole H Browner, PhD, MPH
Distinguished Research Professor
UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine
e.
Peter Doshi, PhD
Associate Professor, Pharmaceutical Health Services Research
University of Maryland School of Pharmacy
Baltimore, Maryland, U.S.A.
f.
Linda Wastila, BSPharm, MSPH, PhD
Professor, Pharmaceutical Health Services Research
University of Maryland School of Pharmacy
g.
Andrew Bostom, MD, MS
Associate Professor of Family Medicine (Research)
The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University
h.
Erick H. Turner, MD
Associate Professor
Oregon Health & Science University
i.
Aditi Bhargava, PhD
Professor Emerita
Department of ObGyn and Reproductive Sciences University of California
San Francisco
j.
Joseph A. Ladapo, MD, PhD
Associate Professor of Medicine
Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research
David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA
k.
Gabe Vorobiof, MD FACC FASE
Director, Adult Non-Invasive Cardiology Laboratories
UCLA Cardiovascular Center
Associate Clinical Professor of Medicine
David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA
l.
Donald W. Light, PhD
Professor of Comparative Health Policy and Psychiatry
Rowan University School of Osteopathic Medicine
Glassboro, New Jersey, U.S.A.
m.
Allyson M Pollock, MBChB, FRCPH, FRCP (Ed) FRCGP
Clinical Professor of Public Health
Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University
Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
n.
Anthony J. Brookes, PhD
Professor of Genetics
University of Leicester
Leicester, United Kingdom
o.
László G. Boros, MD
Scientific Advisor
SIDMAP, LLC and the Deutenomics Science Institute
p.
Angela Spelsberg, MD, SM
Comprehensive Cancer Center Aachen
Aachen, Germany
q.
Christine Stabell Benn, MD, PhD, DMSc
Professor of Global Health
University of Southern Denmark
Copenhagen, Denmark
r.
Peter Aaby, MSc, DMSc
Head of Bandim Health Project, Guinea-Bissau
University of Southern Denmark
Copenhagen, Denmark
s.
Ulrich Keil, MD, PhD, FRCP (London)
Professor Emeritus
University of Muenster
Muenster, Germany
t.
Barbara Mintzes, BA, MSc, PhD
Associate Professor, School of Pharmacy
The University of Sydney
Sydney, Australia
u.
David Healy, MD FRCPsych
Professor of Psychiatry
McMaster University
Ontario, Canada
v.
Tom Jefferson, MD MRCGP FFPHM
Senior Associate Tutor
University of Oxford
w.
Byram W. Bridle, PhD
Associate Professor of Viral Immunology
Department of Pathobiology
University of Guelph, Ontario
x.
Peter C. Gøtzsche, Professor, DrMedSci, MD, MSc
Director
Institute for Scientific Freedom
Copenhagen, Denmark
y.
Janice E. Graham, PhD, FRSC, FCAHS
Division of Infectious Diseases
University research Professor
Dalhousie University
z.
Justin Lee
Associate Editor
Arc Digital
aa.
Serena Tinari
Co-President, Re-Check, Investigating and Mapping Health Affairs
bb.
Catherine Riva
Co-President, Re-Check, Investigating and Mapping Health Affairs
cc.
Dr. Ira Bernstein, MD
Dept. Family and Community Medicine
University of Toronto

dd.
Dr. Ondrej Halgas, PhD
Biomedical Researcher
University of Toronto
ee.
Prof. David Menkes
Associate Professor
University of Auckland
ff.
Dr. Peter Abdelmalak
Adjunct Professor
McMaster University

 

[chiobu]

Where did you get that document from?

I looked through the document but could not find anything pertaining a 55 years delayed release of data. But maybe I missed it cause it's a long legal document, the likes of which I'm not used to reading.

It's a request dated mid-September (almost a month after FDA approved the Pfizer vaccine in the U.S.) by a group of scientists requesting the FDA to expedite release of Pfizer's vaccine data under the Freedom of Information Act. The request is then rejected by the FDA, as can be read in the last page.

What this is, however, is a good summary of "skeptical scientists". One pro vaccine argument I often hear is that if there were really problems with the them, we'd be hearing members of the medical and scientific community ringing some bells. Well this document contains a lot of references to precisely such cases, as the authors of the request make their case by listing many instances of medical professionals and affiliates raising arguments about the alleged net benefits of the Pfizer vaccines.

These are the authors of the request, who identify as the non-profit "Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency". They include Aditi Bhargava who speaks in a video someone posted in this thread a couple days ago. I searched a few random names from this list just to make sure they're not all made up people, they all seem to check out and have a profile at their institution's website.

Spoiler

PHMPT’s members include:
a.
Aaron Kheriaty, MD
Professor of Psychiatry, UCI School of Medicine
Director, Medical Ethics Program, UCI Health
b.
Harvey Risch, MD, PhD
Professor of Epidemiology
Yale School of Public Health
c.
Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH, FACP, FACC,
FCCP, FAHA, FNKF, FNLA, FCRSA

d.
Carole H Browner, PhD, MPH
Distinguished Research Professor
UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine
e.
Peter Doshi, PhD
Associate Professor, Pharmaceutical Health Services Research
University of Maryland School of Pharmacy
Baltimore, Maryland, U.S.A.
f.
Linda Wastila, BSPharm, MSPH, PhD
Professor, Pharmaceutical Health Services Research
University of Maryland School of Pharmacy
g.
Andrew Bostom, MD, MS
Associate Professor of Family Medicine (Research)
The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University
h.
Erick H. Turner, MD
Associate Professor
Oregon Health & Science University
i.
Aditi Bhargava, PhD
Professor Emerita
Department of ObGyn and Reproductive Sciences University of California
San Francisco
j.
Joseph A. Ladapo, MD, PhD
Associate Professor of Medicine
Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research
David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA
k.
Gabe Vorobiof, MD FACC FASE
Director, Adult Non-Invasive Cardiology Laboratories
UCLA Cardiovascular Center
Associate Clinical Professor of Medicine
David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA
l.
Donald W. Light, PhD
Professor of Comparative Health Policy and Psychiatry
Rowan University School of Osteopathic Medicine
Glassboro, New Jersey, U.S.A.
m.
Allyson M Pollock, MBChB, FRCPH, FRCP (Ed) FRCGP
Clinical Professor of Public Health
Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University
Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
n.
Anthony J. Brookes, PhD
Professor of Genetics
University of Leicester
Leicester, United Kingdom
o.
László G. Boros, MD
Scientific Advisor
SIDMAP, LLC and the Deutenomics Science Institute
p.
Angela Spelsberg, MD, SM
Comprehensive Cancer Center Aachen
Aachen, Germany
q.
Christine Stabell Benn, MD, PhD, DMSc
Professor of Global Health
University of Southern Denmark
Copenhagen, Denmark
r.
Peter Aaby, MSc, DMSc
Head of Bandim Health Project, Guinea-Bissau
University of Southern Denmark
Copenhagen, Denmark
s.
Ulrich Keil, MD, PhD, FRCP (London)
Professor Emeritus
University of Muenster
Muenster, Germany
t.
Barbara Mintzes, BA, MSc, PhD
Associate Professor, School of Pharmacy
The University of Sydney
Sydney, Australia
u.
David Healy, MD FRCPsych
Professor of Psychiatry
McMaster University
Ontario, Canada
v.
Tom Jefferson, MD MRCGP FFPHM
Senior Associate Tutor
University of Oxford
w.
Byram W. Bridle, PhD
Associate Professor of Viral Immunology
Department of Pathobiology
University of Guelph, Ontario
x.
Peter C. Gøtzsche, Professor, DrMedSci, MD, MSc
Director
Institute for Scientific Freedom
Copenhagen, Denmark
y.
Janice E. Graham, PhD, FRSC, FCAHS
Division of Infectious Diseases
University research Professor
Dalhousie University
z.
Justin Lee
Associate Editor
Arc Digital
aa.
Serena Tinari
Co-President, Re-Check, Investigating and Mapping Health Affairs
bb.
Catherine Riva
Co-President, Re-Check, Investigating and Mapping Health Affairs
cc.
Dr. Ira Bernstein, MD
Dept. Family and Community Medicine
University of Toronto

dd.
Dr. Ondrej Halgas, PhD
Biomedical Researcher
University of Toronto
ee.
Prof. David Menkes
Associate Professor
University of Auckland
ff.
Dr. Peter Abdelmalak
Adjunct Professor
McMaster University

Got it from reddit

r/LockdownSkepticism - Comment by u/sasha_baron_of_rohan on ”FDA Asks Federal Judge to Grant it Until the Year 2076 to Fully Release Pfizer’s COVID-19 Vaccine Data”

128 votes and 130 comments so far on Reddit

www.reddit.com

 

[talk sh1t]

@chiobu

You should also post the actual document that mentions the 55 years.

https://www.sirillp.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/020-Second-Joint-Status-Report-8989f1fed17e2d919391d8df1978006e.pdf

Archived here: https://archive.md/9gKmh

Take from the website of Siri Glimstad, the law firm which is operating on behalf of that group of scientists for transparency.

It's an ongoing legal battle, it seems.

These are the arguments of the FDA for refusing to immediately release all the Pfizer data they based their decision on:

- It's a 329'000 page document, and the FDA FOIA department (who are in charge of releasing requested data to the public) is staffed by 10 people and currently have a backlog of 400 other FOIA requests.

EDIT - I forgot to mention (thanks @SCSI) that a big reason why they can't release it is because it contains a lot of privileged information. This is raw clinical data that contains private patient info.

- They asked the plaintiffs to narrow down their request to more specific records, but apparently the plaintiffs refused to do so.

- Thus the FDA will only be able to release the data at a rate of 500 pages a month (@Virgo), so that the last batch will be released sometime in the year 2076. Aha! I hear you say, surely there'll be already enough juicy stuff popping up much earlier than that since they're not actually withholding the whole data until 2076. But a proper independent evaluation of this data is not appropriate until the whole set of 329'000 pages is released, rendering the partial dataset released earlier technically useless. Probably because the very last page of the mammoth document that they decide to release in 2076 contains a notary approved statement that "Everything in the previous 328'999 pages was a lie lololol I was only pretending to be retarded".

Now the counterargument is based on two points:
- The FDA still managed to assess this gigantic 329k page document in 108 days (time elapsed between Pfizer's release of the data and the FDA's approval in mid-August 2021). Now it takes them 55 years to process it for public release? (EDIT - this discrepancy is probably due to the fact that in the 108 days of assessment, the FDA didn't have to worry about censoring the private ID data of patients. Think of the legal shitstorm if they made publicly available a document where they missed even a single row in a table which contains someone's complete name right next to their gonorrhea diagnosis).
- The FDA was well aware of the public interest surrounding this case and should have been prepared for a request of data release by concerned citizens,

Well, as the on-screen text at the end of an episode of my favorite series once read: "To Be Continued".

 

[Gorilla Tessellator]

@chiobu

You should also post the actual document that mentions the 55 years.

https://www.sirillp.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/020-Second-Joint-Status-Report-8989f1fed17e2d919391d8df1978006e.pdf

Archived here: https://archive.md/9gKmh

Take from the website of the law firm which is operating on behalf of that group of scientists for transparency.

It's an ongoing legal battle, it seems.

These are the arguments of the FDA for refusing to immediately release all the Pfizer data they based their decision on:

- It's a 329'000 page document, and the FDA FOIA department (who are in charge of releasing requested data to the public) is staffed by 10 people and currently have a backlog of 400 other FOIA requests.

- They asked the plaintiffs to narrow down their request to more specific records, but apparently the plaintiffs refused to do so.

- Thus the FDA will only be able to release the data at a rate of 500 pages a month, so that the last batch will be released sometime in the year 2076. Aha! I hear you say, surely there'll be already enough juicy stuff popping up much earlier than that since they're not actually withholding the whole data until 2076. But a proper independent evaluation of this data is not appropriate until the whole set of 329'000 pages is released, rendering the partial dataset released earlier technically useless. Probably because the very last page of the mammoth document that they decide to release in 2076 contains a notary approved statement that "Everything in the previous 328'999 pages was a lie lololol I was only pretending to be exceptional".

Now the counterargument is based on two points:
- The FDA still managed to assess this gigantic 329k page document in 108 days (time elapsed between Pfizer's release of the data and the FDA's approval in mid-August 2021). Now it takes them 55 years to approve it for public release?
- The FDA was well aware of the public interest surrounding this case and should have been prepared for a request of data released by concerned citizens,

Well, as the on-screen text at the end of an episode of my favorite series once read: "To Be Continued".

Me thinks that if enough stink is raised around the issue, the faster documents will get produced. I am glad it is showing up in media.

 

[talk sh1t]

Me thinks that if enough stink is raised around the issue, the faster documents will get produced. I am glad it is showing up in media.

That's the website of the law firm, not really media. I doubt it'll be brought up in mainstream outlets before the legal matter is settled.

 

[NoReturn]

Got another one for the list. Boomer woman, got shingles after shot #1 and is now in the hospital unable to keep food down after the booster.
Anyone got thoughts on what happened to her?

Spoiler

This isn't the close person I mentioned earlier, just another one I've heard about throughthe grapevine.

 

[Fanatical Pragmatist]

Got another one for the list. Boomer woman, got shingles after shot #1 and is now in the hospital unable to keep food down after the booster.
Anyone got thoughts on what happened to her?

Spoiler

This isn't the close person I mentioned earlier, just another one I've heard about throughthe grapevine.

Did she have shingles previously? I.e. dormant but not in a "flare up"?

 

[CashMoney!]

My body and its long term health is worth more than 20 dollars, motherfuckers.

 

[talk sh1t]

vv This is a bit of a half-assed spergy post so skip ahead if you're not in the mood vv

To me and based on my rudimentary understanding of it, this whole Covid vaccination thing is an example of chaos capitalism, which Naomi Klein summarizes in her book Shock Doctrine (from 200.

Now here's an article (Al-Jazeera, dated Feb 2021) invoking the concept of chaos capitalism, but not for the exact same reasons I would have...

What the vaccine debacle tells us about predatory capitalism

The botched COVID-19 vaccination campaign is a great illustration of why our current capitalist system does not work.

www.aljazeera.com

What the vaccine debacle tells us about predatory capitalism | Corona…

archived 18 Nov 2021 21:10:45 UTC

archive.md

Here are the main points:

- Privatization of medical research is counter-productive and ultimately inefficient because it prevents collaboration. At the same time, private companies still receive public money, e.g. Moderna got 2.5 Billion from the US gvmt so far.

- Market rules result in only richer countries being able to afford vaccination prevention.

- Developing countries will end up facing damages of $4.5 Trillion as a consequence of being grossly unvaccinated.

Basically not affording to be vaccinated is putting developing countries at an even larger disadvantage than before the Covid crisis, and this will benefit the elite ruling class. Hence the invocation of chaos capitalism.

Now, opposers of the vaccinations are also invoking the concept of chaos capitalism, but for different reasons, as far as I understand:
The Covid crisis emerged, a few enterprising corporations seized the chance to make a few bucks and released a more or less effective* and safe** emergency remedy that quickly became subject of legal mandates. The shocked population didn't have time to properly assess the situation and just kind of went with it.
Also, as a consequence of lockdown measures (not really of the vaccine), opposers argue that corporations are pillaging the market spaces of small enterprises.
*tbc **tbc

I'm kind of thinking out loud and just rambling now, maybe someone more intelligent can carry on?

 

[NoReturn]

Did she have shingles previously? I.e. dormant but not in a "flare up"?

That's my guess; that it was dormant and "came back" or she had it and didn't know.

 

[Escaped Abortion]

View attachment 2728879

My body and its long term health is worth more than 20 dollars, motherfuckers.

You would think they would be going up in value, not down, but we had offers of $50-$100 this summer.

Also, someone I know a bit is going to poison her kid in a few days. Honestly, myocarditis would probably be a more merciful death than being raised by her, but we'll see.

 

[Protistology]

Got another one for the list. Boomer woman, got shingles after shot #1 and is now in the hospital unable to keep food down after the booster.
Anyone got thoughts on what happened to her?

Spoiler

This isn't the close person I mentioned earlier, just another one I've heard about throughthe grapevine.

And anything that a healthy immune system protects against without you even noticing. Herpes, shingles, mono, etc.

View attachment 2727028

 

[jje100010001]

Got another one for the list. Boomer woman, got shingles after shot #1 and is now in the hospital unable to keep food down after the booster.
Anyone got thoughts on what happened to her?

Spoiler

This isn't the close person I mentioned earlier, just another one I've heard about throughthe grapevine.

Which shot did she get?

The thing I've heard is that shingles (as a viral infection) can be caused by a compromised immune system; something similar could be happening due to the booster.

 

[Super-Chevy454]

Some so-called "fact checkers" tried to debunk a suicide letter who came from a German doctor who said he couldn't live anymore with these lies.

Watch out for this supposed anti-vaccination farewell letter from a German doctor | tellerreport.com

German police deny the existence of the letter, which qualifies the anti-Covid-19 vaccines as "genocide". It has been circulating online since the death, on November 2, of Doctor Thomas Jendges

www.tellerreport.com

German police deny the existence of the letter, which qualifies the anti-Covid-19 vaccines as "genocide". It has been circulating online since the death, on November 2, of Doctor Thomas Jendges

Dr Thomas Jendges, who ran a major hospital in Chemnitz, a city in East Germany, died by suicide on November 2.

• Since his death, a supposed farewell letter has been circulating on social networks.
  The doctor reportedly wrote there that he could no longer "live with the lies to citizens and patients" about vaccines against Covid-19.
• The Chemnitz police deny to
  20 Minutes
  the existence of such a letter.

“I can no longer live with the lies to citizens and patients, [telling them] that vaccines would be harmless.
These words would be those of the farewell letter from a German doctor, Doctor Thomas Jendges, who died on November 2 in Chemnitz, a city in western Germany, near the Czech border.
The rest of the text qualifies vaccines against Covid-19 as “genocide” and “crime against humanity”.
The doctor would explain there to have chosen to put an end to his days because he "could not condone such a crime on behalf of the federal government, the regional government and their henchmen".
This supposed farewell letter is shared on Facebook, after the German newspaper
Bild
wrote an article on November 3 about the death of this doctor, who ran the Chemnitz hospital.
The death had been made public the day before by the town hall of this city in East Germany.

The Wayback Machine have one copy of the German article in question.

Chemnitz: Klinik-Chef Dr. Thomas Jendges stürzt in den Tod

Chemnitz trauert um den Chef des Chemnitzer Klinikums Dr. Thomas Jendges (55).

www.bild.de

 

[teriyakiburns]

Which shot did she get?

The thing I've heard is that shingles (as a viral infection) can be caused by a compromised immune system; something similar could be happening due to the booster.

Shingles can also crop up if you had the chicken pox vaccine as a child. It's a weakened live virus vaccine, not de-activated, so it will infect you and remain dormant in your nervous system despite generating an immune response. If you're later under severe stress, or you become immunocompromised, it can re-activate.

This is actually one of the reasons I'm not taking these vaccines. There were very early reports of shingles flare ups, which indicated it was causing some sort of systemic stress, and now there's evidence of it utterly fucking the immune system as well, which would also increase the chances of shingles activating. For me, personally, that would be somewhat problematic, so I would prefer not to take the risk.

 

[NyQuilninja]

Expect to hear a lot more of this in the days and weeks to come.

Archived