Kyle Rittenhouse Legal Proceedings - Come for the trial, stay for….

[Mr Bunny]

Damn it, the Hive has been outdone by the only thing that makes more of itself faster!

Rabbit supremacy is the undeniable truth.

 

[thismanlies]

And there are some KF users mad that we consider this dumbass a lolcow...

If he was more active, he’d be a Fat Rick Thomlinson kind of cow.

 

[Jasper2K]

Were some of the jurors found out or are people just sperging? I hope just sperging lmao

 

[ProtonMailManTheSequel]

Ngl, if this is juror 54 and the defense let her in I’m going to die laughing. Look hereView attachment 2729382I"

I'm surprised she hasn't posted a selfie next to Kyle's mother's pic (and a photo of the jury instructions) on Twitter ranting about how much hotter she is yet. Maybe that's what she has planned for tonight.

 

[thx1138]

I wonder if any women on the jury are of this variety?
View attachment 2729370

Nah. A bitch like this couldn't keep her mouth shut, see the "posts her entire life on IG". Someone like this would be a fucking sieve. Either/both sides would have a mistrial in 5 minutes as soon as this broad touched her iphone 27.

 

[ProtonMailManTheSequel]

View attachment 2729389

sheeeiiiitttt any of u niggas wanna learn bout black peepo n sheit muhfugga

It's not very attractive, is it.

 

[Evo]

Europeans and their inability to spell English properly (colour, honour, favourite) are the cockroaches of the modern world. They haven't been relevant since they bombed their entire continent to smithereens but because they happen to speak English they are given irrelevant seats at any table.

Europe is to the rest of the world what the British monarchy is to Britain.

What? Iran literally relies on E.U. trading to bypass sanctions and keep itself alive, meanwhile most of northern Africa still begs the French for monetary and economic aid - what "rest of the world" are you referring to because as far as I can see, most of anything that isn't Western civilization appears to be absolutely fucking diseased - as for comparisons, we shouldn't draw any comparisons anymore when we have a transsexual as our assistant health secretary and an estimated nearly-20,000 transsexual soldiers in our military.

 

[Make Anime Illegal]

Tbh I question the constitutionality of the provocation laws entirely regardless of prosecutorial video Sasquatches. Ostensibly, you're supposed to have a right to freedom of speech and expression even if the said expression is provocative, though in reality this only works one way. You also purportedly have the right to self-defense, though once again, not really. I fail to see how someone responding violently to your expression of your first amendment rights invalidates your right to self-defense. It creates this massive gray zone wherein the actual powers that be in the JewSA get to arbitrarily choose what is and what isn't a provocation.

Genuinely expressing your opinion wouldn't be provocation of any kind. The issue the jury would be deciding is whether your actual intent of saying what you did was to cause the person to attack you so you could kill them in "self defense."

 

[lolwatagain]

Tbh I question the constitutionality of the provocation laws entirely regardless of prosecutorial video Sasquatches. Ostensibly, you're supposed to have a right to freedom of speech and expression even if the said expression is provocative, though in reality this only works one way. You also purportedly have the right to self-defense, though once again, not really. I fail to see how someone responding violently to your expression of your first amendment rights invalidates your right to self-defense. It creates this massive gray zone wherein the actual powers that be in the JewSA get to arbitrarily choose what is and what isn't a provocation.

Provocation without intent requires an illegal act, i.e. assault or some other crime, not just calling someone a nigger. First amendment protected activity would not trigger the provocation without intent exemption.

And the intent in provocation with intent is the intent to kill someone as a result of a fight. In other words, premeditation.

 

[PorkeyDuck]

Andy Ngô 🏳️‍🌈 on Twitter: "Gaige Grosskreutz, who was shot in the a…

archived 19 Nov 2021 00:38:10 UTC

archive.md

Prosecution's star witness in Kyle Rittenhouse case is a criminal

DailyMail.com has learned Gaige Grosskreutz is a violent career criminal with a laundry list of prior offenses and convictions stretching back more than a decade.

www.dailymail.co.uk

 

[ProtonMailManTheSequel]

and an estimated nearly-20,000 transsexual soldiers in our military.

Most of whom joined solely in the hope of having the government pay to have their cock and balls chopped off.

 

[Jet Fuel Johnny]

estimated nearly-20,000 transsexual soldiers in our military.

We needed to have troops that would be able to withstand the unbridled faggotry of the EU in case we ever go to war with them.

 

[Evo]

Most of whom joined solely in the hope of having the government pay to have their cock and balls chopped off.

I know - it's even more hilarious when they frame themselves as the ultimate patriotic American in very gay interviews with VICE reporters.

 

[mr.moon1488]

Genuinely expressing your opinion wouldn't be provocation of any kind. The issue the jury would be deciding is whether your actual intent of saying what you did was to cause the person to attack you so you could kill them in "self defense."

And that doesn't in reality change anything. Assuming the person does not outright say "I wanted to make him attack me so I could kill him," there's no way to actually know this beyond a reasonable doubt, so it just circles back to a question of what is and isn't considered to be a provocation by the powers that be in the JewSA.

 

[Evo]

We needed to have troops that would be able to withstand the unbridled faggotry of the EU in case we ever go to war with them.

Only 20,000 of them can? Sounds like we need more trannies, JFJ - ladyboy recruitment campaign when?

 

[Make Anime Illegal]

And that doesn't in reality change anything. Assuming the person does not outright say "I wanted to make him attack me so I could kill him," there's no way to actually know this beyond a reasonable doubt, so it just circles back to a question of what is and isn't considered to be a provocation by the powers that be in the JewSA.

Its would be difficult but hypothetically someone could write down in their diary "I'm going to say X to Y so he attacks me and I can kill him!"

 

[mandatorylurk]

Can you link me to a place that explains what a Red Authoritarian and a Yellow Authoritarian are? I'm a sucker for political typologies.

It's a leadership personality thing. There's varying things but this is the one I've always had to deal with in presentations and such. The "authoritarian" is just a qualifier Baris put on to what the Karen's color is.

 

[NJBear]

 

[mr.moon1488]

Its would be difficult but hypothetically someone could write down in their diary "I'm going to say X to Y so he attacks me and I can kill him!"

If they say that then very well, but that's the only way someone could actually prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the provocation was deliberate.

Provocation without intent requires an illegal act, i.e. assault or some other crime, not just calling someone a nigger. First amendment protected activity would not trigger the provocation without intent exemption.

And the intent in provocation with intent is the intent to kill someone as a result of a fight. In other words, premeditation.

>Provocation without intent requires an illegal act
Do you think if the situation was reversed that arson would have actually allowed for this standard to have been met?


The point is that it's clearly a law designed to give undue powers to those who control public opinion and by extension the definition of provocation.

 

[JoyfulDarter]

View attachment 2729432

Don't worry, I've got this one.