Kyle Rittenhouse Legal Proceedings - Come for the trial, stay for….

  • 🔧 At about Midnight EST I am going to completely fuck up the site trying to fix something.

What do you think will happen?

  • Guilty on all charges

    Votes: 282 8.8%
  • Full Acquittal

    Votes: 1,077 33.7%
  • Mistral

    Votes: 264 8.3%
  • Mixture of verdicts

    Votes: 479 15.0%
  • Minecraft

    Votes: 213 6.7%
  • Roblox

    Votes: 132 4.1%
  • Runescape

    Votes: 203 6.3%
  • Somehow Guilty Of Two Mutually Exclusive Actions

    Votes: 514 16.1%
  • KYLE WILL SUBMIT TO BBC

    Votes: 35 1.1%

  • Total voters
    3,199
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Take your guess, they from Milwaukee or Chicago?

577432120.jpg
 
/kyle/ - 19th century asymmetrical warfare general



Hell, with these standards of behaviour and "proof" of guilt in a televised setting with the world watching, I would not be comfortable supporting fines from day-to-day courts, let alone the death penalty. America and Europe may as well just ask newspaper owners what the penalty for each individual case should be, and apply that - it's just as fair, it doesn't waste the talents of clever people who need to memorize laws and procedures which don't matter anyway, and it offers some transparency in a way the current system doesn't.
Hey, don't you know the only job of judges in a DEMOCRACY it to legislate off the bench using flimsy interpretations of the the law?
 
Not sure if this is true or not, and not sure if already posted, but here it goes:

View attachment 2729478
Really hoping that's not true, because it would have meant that we were far too optimistic about the average individual. It goes without saying that the prosecution case was a Krause sized pile of shit, filled with shoddy witnesses, dirty to blatantly ridiculous tactics and lacking either the facts or the law on their side. That is not opinion, it is objective that their case was garbage. If they had a stronger case in fact or law, they would do a better job that relying on 240p footage to set up a bogus narrative of provocation while withholding the better footage.

If it is deadlock 6-6, then people put way too much stock in the average person being able to see through the bullshit of the prosecution to cover for their weak case.
 
It feels like some screwball 80s comedy where everyone involved has been paid off to lose, so as the trial progresses they're constantly coming up with increasingly crazy gambits to tank their own side.

Oh me. Oh my. You just hit the nail on the head. I can see it now...

A broadway show. We could call it, I don't know?

THE PROSECUTORS

A LAW SCHOOL SCANDAL

We might even be able to shoehorn in a bit of Adolf Hitler (dumbguy and evo will be cockahoop about this)!

I can see it now. The lights, camera, action -

Capture1e.PNG



Whaddya say?

Capture1.PNG



Uh?

Capture1a.PNG



What could go wrong?

Capture1b.PNG



Not just a film, but a musical!

It'll never catch on. It's bound to fail. Nobody would ever buy that shit! It's perfect.




Let's just assume that for a moment, you are a dishonest man...

The shooping possibilities are endless with this one.

Capture1c.PNG



Capture1d.PNG
 
Really hoping that's not true, because it would have meant that we were far too optimistic about the average individual. It goes without saying that the prosecution case was a Krause sized pile of shit, filled with shoddy witnesses, dirty to blatantly ridiculous tactics and lacking either the facts or the law on their side. That is not opinion, it is objective that their case was garbage. If they had a stronger case in fact or law, they would do a better job that relying on 240p footage to set up a bogus narrative of provocation while withholding the better footage.

If it is deadlock 6-6, then people put way too much stock in the average person being able to see through the bullshit of the prosecution to cover for their weak case.

Hyperreality means that the jury wasn't watching the trial, it was watching the trial's coverage as digested by the media (I don't believe for a second all jurors abstained from television and social media in the entire period of the trial), and the real trial that happened in the media before the jurors ever met. Tucker showed some MSNBC guy talking of Republican political violence and mentioning Rittenhouse, saying that the entire Trump presidency was nothing but antisemitic and racist terror attacks by emboldened Trumpists. This is more real to people than the fires in their cities. Baudrillard was right.
 
Both parties agreed and the judge gave her permission to take the papers with her so imo nothing of that is going to happen.
No, the defense didn't verbally object but even the judge pointed out Richards was shaking his head. For Richards that was an unbelievable outburst of emotion. Lunchbox and Flufferboy didn't respond at all.

It's just another fuckup by the Judge.
 
Hyperreality means that the jury wasn't watching the trial, it was watching the trial's coverage as digested by the media (I don't believe for a second all jurors abstained from television and social media in the entire period of the trial), and the real trial that happened in the media before the jurors ever met. Tucker showed some MSNBC guy talking of Republican political violence and mentioning Rittenhouse, saying that the entire Trump presidency was nothing but antisemitic and racist terror attacks by emboldened Trumpists. This is more real to people than the fires in their cities. Baudrillard was right.
Near guaranteed that they not abstain from media and stick solely to what was said in the trial, especially for a case as high profile as this. Jurors are notoriously bad and do all sorts of ridiculous shit completely unrelated to the trial.

The two I remember is one case where the jurors could not decide, so they used a fucking ouija board to help them come to their conclusion, and the other one was the case was so boring that the jury decided to hold a sudoku competition in the middle of the trial. The judge even complemented the jury on being so active in their "note taking" prior to finding out about their little competition. Now those cases are the extreme, but doing things like going home and doing "research", probably the norm for a lot of these jurors.
According to this 12% of all UK jurors admit to doing own research at home, in all likelyhood it is far higher than that, how many jurors will admit to not following the rules laid out? Now imagine it being in woke 2021, with the internet, in a high profile case that is being followed around the world?
 
Now those cases are the extreme, but doing things like going home and doing "research", probably the norm for a lot of these jurors. According to this 12% of all UK jurors admit to doing own research at home, in all likelyhood it is far higher than that, how many jurors will admit to not following the rules laid out? Now imagine it being in woke 2021, with the internet, in a high profile case that is being followed around the world?
i wouldn't even call it doing research in this case because even if they just do nothing at all and simply go about their normal daily routine at home in between trial sessions, that still means that they're exposed to media propaganda. radio in the car while driving, TV running in the background at home while doing chores, news app on phone visible whenever they text or call someone, etc. and then there's stuff like radio or TV being blasted at you in public places too. to prevent the news from tainting the jury, you would have to basically lock them up in juror prison for the full duration of the trial - and that might still not be enough in a case like this because the situation was already getting broadcast across the world the day it happened, which was a full year before jury selection even began.
 
Something just occurred to me. After seeing the prosecution’s behavior in this trial, I no longer believe in the death penalty.
Unless there's like 4k video of the defendant raping a baby and you can see the persons face clearly and they shout out "My name is John Smith and I'm raping a toddler!" I pretty much agree. This shitshow has somehow made prosecutors jump above politicians, glowies, and pedos in my "groups that should be fed into a woodchipper feet first" list.
 
Oh me. Oh my. You just hit the nail on the head. I can see it now...

A broadway show. We could call it, I don't know?

THE PROSECUTORS

A LAW SCHOOL SCANDAL

We might even be able to shoehorn in a bit of Adolf Hitler (dumbguy and evo will be cockahoop about this)!

I can see it now. The lights, camera, action -

View attachment 2730497


Whaddya say?

View attachment 2730498


Uh?

View attachment 2730500


What could go wrong?

View attachment 2730501


Not just a film, but a musical!

It'll never catch on. It's bound to fail. Nobody would ever buy that shit! It's perfect.




Let's just assume that for a moment, you are a dishonest man...

The shooping possibilities are endless with this one.

View attachment 2730505


View attachment 2730507
producers copy2.png
 
Towards the end of the war, in particular, they made some really dumb strategic decisions though. For instance, there wasn't really anything stopping the confederate army from just taking a sharp southeast turn at Gettysburg and sacking both Washington and Baltimore, which would have been something the Union would likely not have been able to recover from.
The whole thing was motivated by dumb strategic decisions, though. They thought their near-monopoly on the production of cotton as a raw material made the rest of the world dependent on them to the point that the Brits and French would actually side with them over the North.

This was dunderhead bullshit and that, of course, never happened. The rest of the world just decided to cope with somewhat higher cotton prices.

Cotton was definitely an important commodity in the world economy, but not important enough to piss off the North.

Also does Binger just piss you off so much with his appearance and voice you can't even stand to listen to anything he says and would just almost automatically disagree with it no matter what it was? God I hate this whiny little bitch boy so much.
 
Ey yo buddies. I was involved with a civil suit where Schroeder was the presiding Judge. He fucked me on a technicality that was poorly written.

Wisconsin is one of the most cucked states there is when it comes to legal proceedings. As far as I know its the only state in the union where civil judgements are collectible for 20 years.

Schroeder ran and was elected as a democrat in the 70s.

I HIGHLY DOUBT!!!! that he would mistrial with prejudice.

Kenosha is owned by the antaramian family. Schroeder knows he can't touch binger or lunchbox, he's not going to blow up national news with how corrupt binger and lunchbox were.

Here are some scenarios.
  1. Judge pushes jury to deliberate once Friday morning. If no movement, he rules on mistrial action and offers to grant mistrial without prejudice to defense. Retrial gets kicked back to schroeder.
  2. Kyle gets a split decision on a conviction because Omega Karen won't shut the fuck up and the men want to go home. <----- Schroeder gives him 5 years as a "lenient" sentence, slaps him on the back and says good luck in your appeal young man. Legally schroeder could not certify the verdict and rule on a mistrial motion at that stage, which would be the right thing to do given the SHIT SHOW that this trial was. But I think for self preservation he would just accept the verdict and give a long speech about how its a travesty of justice but the jury decided and we have to have faith in the jury.
  3. Hung Jury, Schroeder can dismiss with prejudice here, but he won't.
Schroeder was initially enjoying the media attention he was getting. If the case gets retried it goes back to schroeder. My hopes are not high for intervention here - and we can just simply pray that the men in that room have the balls to tell the bitch to shut the fuck up.
 

EXCLUSIVE: Anti Kyle Rittenhouse protestor, 20, who was arrested outside Kenosha Courthouse was once charged with making terrorist threats against his former high school​

  • Anthony Chacon, 20, was arrested Wednesday outside the Kenosha Courthouse and now facing charges of battery, disorderly conduct and resisting arrest
  • DailyMail.com can reveal that Chacon was once charged with making terrorist threats against his former high school
  • In September 2019, he posted a picture of himself pointing a gun on Snapshot, along with a message threatening his high school in Paddock Lake, Wisconsin
  • The case was eventually dismissed and Chacon pleaded guilty to a lesser charge of disorderly conduct
  • Video taken by DailyMail.com showed Chacon on Wednesday, wearing a F**k Kyle T-shirt, Simpsons backpack and Chicago Bulls beanie
  • He was seen clashing with prominent Rittenhouse supporter Emily Cahill on the courthouse steps before his arrest

View attachment 2730449



---



Bari Weiss says Democrats and mainstream media convicted Kyle Rittenhouse on a campaign of lies to suit their liberal agenda before the case went before a jury​

  • Bari Weiss, writing on her Substack newsletter Common Sense, laid bare some of the lies told by the media and Democrats about Rittenhouse
  • She said she'd been led to believe Rittenhouse was a racist vigilante out for blood on August 25, 2020, when the trial evidence suggested otherwise
  • Rittenhouse does have a connection to Kenosha - he worked there in a sports center at the time and his father, grandma, aunt, uncle and cousins lived there
  • He wasn't driven across state lines by his mother carrying an AR-15 as had been claimed, but stayed the night with a friend beforehand
  • Weiss said media and Dems like Cori Bush and Ayanna Pressley ignored the facts to rush to judgement
  • The jury in the Rittenhouse case has now been deliberating for two and a half days
  • Weiss quit The New York Times last year after growing tired of its left-wing bias for cancel culture
  • She is now starting a new university in Austin to counteract woke colleges across the country
View attachment 2730457



---



Portland REFUNDS the police: Department gets an extra $5.2M as city faces greatest cop shortage in decades and record number of homicides this year after slashing $15M from the budget as part of Defund the Police movement​

  • City Council voted Wednesday to add back $5.2M of the $15M it cut last year
  • The 'defund the police' budget slash got rid of school and transit officers
  • Portland broke 66 homicides this year, the highest number since 1987
  • City officials are considering bringing back retired cops amid a staff shortage
  • Other cities, like LA and NYC, are also adding money back into police coffers

fda6c11a9a10791e6ae442f3a595e7e7b75e420d.avif


Sorry to be a double-posting faggot but that kid not being in jail while a kid who said a fucking joke of turning his school into gravel literally in Runescape got like 8 years fills me with a very distinct sort of rage. Imagine getting thrown into jail for most of your 20s for a joke you make in Runescape while trash like this making potentially credible threats don't have shit done to them.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back