"No known aptitude for fighting and killing."
So wild guesses then.
Thanks.
Handwriting style. I know I've seen a lot of people's handwriting and never seen a man's handwriting look like that but plenty of woman's that look similar. All that's missing is the hearts over the 'i'
Useless info, but people used that sort of deck for cartomancy before they started using tarot decks in the early 1900s. Not that cartomancy is anything good…
Yeah, these guys think 54 is certainly the foreman for some reason too. The rumors being presented as fact thing is getting out of hand.
because the jury note describes them as the presiding juror -- i.e. foreman -- ffs
I'm very skeptical of claims that you can tell where a person grew up, what their political affiliation is, and whether they like sushi more than tacos just by looking at their handwriting--but oddly enough, you can almost always tell whether they are a boy or a girl.Decide for yourself if a man wrote this:
Look, there's been wild speculation on a bunch of shit. There are people convinced this bitch is a pharmacist and tons of other things. Missed one confirmed fact.
Dunno. I saw a lot of messy handwrithing from women and accurate writing from men. I don't want to play a guessing game with no fucking purpose other than flooding a thread and creating more meaningless pages.
This start to remind me of Twitter.
I mean it's more interesting and compelling than anything else being brought up right now
The jury evidence request form has a line specifically saying 'presiding juror' and her number filled in. It's posted in the thread. The 'presiding juror' is literally the foreman. There is no rumor or speculation over that fact.
You can tell that wherever she grew up they didn’t teach her how to fucking write legibly. That’s chicken scratch to me.
You can tell gender pretty reliably, but from what I've seen everything else in handwriting analysis is a pseudoscience.
You can tell they're either a woman or a fag because they draw 7 without the cool line going through it which makes it look like a backwards F.
I thought about this before... That perhaps the evidence they were requesting was actually meant to convince the guilty holdouts ("you saw him lift his gun? You mean this blurry video that their expert couldn't even really testify to?", etc.)
Stranger things have happened (take-out jury instructions, anyone?) but that would mean the judge and various other gov't employees working on the weekend so I would say "no" would be the way to bet.
It was speculation by Barnes on Racket's stream. He said that the woman who joked about the judge not being able to tell if any of them sat on his chair was probably the foreman, because the type of juror to make a joke like that is the 'leader' type that would inevitably snatch up the foreman position. He also said she was a major threat to Kyle because she's probably one of those Yankee aristocrats that all live along the lake, one of the original settlers descendants that are basically New York liberals in the midwest. I think he was basing THAT part of speculation how she spoke to the judge (older man in position of authority that she joked around with as an equal).
