Kyle Rittenhouse Legal Proceedings - Come for the trial, stay for….

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What do you think will happen?

  • Guilty on all charges

    Votes: 282 8.8%
  • Full Acquittal

    Votes: 1,077 33.7%
  • Mistral

    Votes: 264 8.3%
  • Mixture of verdicts

    Votes: 479 15.0%
  • Minecraft

    Votes: 213 6.7%
  • Roblox

    Votes: 132 4.1%
  • Runescape

    Votes: 203 6.3%
  • Somehow Guilty Of Two Mutually Exclusive Actions

    Votes: 514 16.1%
  • KYLE WILL SUBMIT TO BBC

    Votes: 35 1.1%

  • Total voters
    3,199
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Journoswine are a threat to due process.

View attachment 2731092
"Levitz"

Every. Single. Time.

eh.png
 
Without prejudice is automatically part of the motion, the judge can grant the mistrial but not the prejudice.
Hm, then what circumstances or timeline would allow the judge to grant it with prejudice? Because clearly we’re in the awkward time where the jury could theoretically make a ruling before the judge declares mistrial, or vice-versa, and I’ve not untangled the legal results of either outcome.

Edit: and also, which motion for mistrial takes priority: the written one or the verbal one yesterday.
 
The word Karen is so exceptional primarily because of how mainstream and popularized it became - causing its meaning to be diluted and it to be used in a much broader number of situations than intended. For the redditor types, Karen typically means anyone(see: Male Karen) you disagree with that has qualities that directly clash with Reddit ideology.
It's funny because a lot of that pushback came from the Karen meme perfectly describing them and they don't like it. Mask Karens across the country HATE that they can't scold people over masks anymore. It's why they wanted that particular aspect of clown world to never end.
 
After a jury finally reaches a verdict, how much paperwork do they have to fill out in Wisconsin before it gets delivered to the judge?

Wisconsin shouldn't be different than any other state. There should be a verdict form with blanks to note guilty/not guilty as to each count, and the signature of the foreman at the end. In this case, probably 3 pages or so.
 
Hm, then what circumstances or timeline would allow the judge to grant it with prejudice? Because clearly we’re in the awkward time where the jury could theoretically make a ruling before the judge declares mistrial, or vice-versa, and I’ve not untangled the legal results of either outcome.

Edit: and also, which motion for mistrial takes priority: the written one or the verbal one yesterday.
Whichever the judge picks first, usually its order of severity though. Timeline... god knows. Circumstances, where the prosecution has fucked up so hard they deserve a slap. Really, -these- circumstances. Switching to doing this in paper only was smart, limits the prosecution's response and means the judge doesn't have to be mean to them on camera.

they were told msnbc was following them.
But that wasn't coverage. She said the coverage was insane.
 
Weird. I suddenly tripped a nearby Geiger Counter upon seeing that headline.
The actual article is worse. It's basically some journo subhuman gritting his teeth and saying that yes, what Kyle did was probably legal but it shouldn't be because it's unfair and American self defense laws are too permissive and are leading to cops and white racists armed with AR-15 weapons of war that can legally murder black people like it's 'the wild west'.
 
The word Karen is so exceptional primarily because of how mainstream and popularized it became - causing its meaning to be diluted and it to be used in a much broader number of situations than intended. For the redditor types, Karen typically means anyone(see: Male Karen) you disagree with that has qualities that directly clash with Reddit ideology.
This too. Karen no longer holds any meaning, and in this situation it doesn't even make much sense. Wouldn't someone closer to college age be more likely to be anti-gun or make a rash decision regarding someone else's life? I'm not interested in forming a competing theory about the jury/juror, but that informal speculation is about as valid as what was offered by Posobiec and the GriftTubers.
 
im sure we'll get an appeal 5 years dowm the line.
Probably one of the worst things about Kyle's situation.
If he gets a compromised verdict, he could be sitting in prison for years before an appeal, maybe a year if he is extremely lucky, up to ten years if he isn't.

Also the Wisconsin Appeals court could just decide to skip it, Appeals courts across the country skip worthy appeals all the fucking time.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back