Kyle Rittenhouse Legal Proceedings - Come for the trial, stay for….

[Oxous]

I am more shocked CNN decided to interview Richards.

Well MSNBC going full uber exceptional individual over this trial helps CNN a lot.

You say. Joy Reid was on CNN an hour ago comparing Rittenhouse to a slave catcher.

 

[JoyfulDarter]

There were plenty of ways he could have incapacitated Blake without shooting him 7 times (mostly in the back). He could have used a taser; he could have shot him in the leg.

I really wish you had been there instead, then Kyle could have filled you full of lead and we wouldn't have to see your dumb fucking posts. Kill yourself, faggot.

 

[Tactical Wizard]

I only run red dots. There is only plan A. Plan B is for pussies.

A rifle with no backup irons is no rifle at all.

 

[Dumb Bitch Smoothie]

I would be rather careful about that. You never know. Could be a nasty play. Keep in contact, find where he is, suddenly suddenly truck of antifa goons show up at his doorstep.

She's hot as shit, yeah, but in a position like his, gotta think with your head and not your cock.

If that's your definition of hot... yikes lol

She looks like the kind of bitch that doesn't shower as a mark of feminism.

 

[Czechem Republic]

Haven't seen this yet here, but have a salt collage from the halls of orangemangood.win:

 

[Sammich]

Ladies and gentlemen, you have done me proud in this thread.

I am a Kenosha native. I spent decades there. Born and raised. I can tell you almost anything you want to know about it. I graduated from the high school that Kyle was evilly scrubbing graffiti off of. I lived at one point roughly 300 feet away from the car lot that was burned, and a block away from everything else that took place that night. I paid speeding tickets in the exact same courthouse that the chimps and chimp-adjacent were trying to break into last year, and which coincidentally hosted this very trial. I watched my fucking cuty burn, I watched a bunch of opportunistic domestic terrorists loot my city with impunity to "raise awareness of systemic racism" sparked by a shooting that had nothing to do with it before anyone even had the facts, and I watched with even greater sorrow as an innocent kid who was there trying to do good, trying to actually stand up for his community, was branded a vile white supremacist who "crossed state lines" (Kenosha sits directly on the border, and his town sits directly on the other side of it) with the intention to kill - as opposed to, as multitudes of videos from a multitude of sources demonstrated - fought back against the most clear-cut case of self-defense that has ever been captured on video.

This case hit extremely close to me. That was my high school. On two different occasions, once for about 16 straight years, Sheridan road (where all this took place) was directly behind my home. I walked those blocks, down that road, a hundred times. If I were still living there, I could have watched everything from my window. I know Kenosha. I AM Kenosha. I know what the town is normally like, where the problem areas are, I've watched the exponential growth of the town (in particular the influx of surrounding Milwaukee and Chicago trash) of the last twenty years. I've watched my friends and family move away one by one because they're tired of the kind of shit that took place last year. If not for the fact that much of my family is buried there, the town isn't the same. But it's still MY town.

I don't have a stake in the gun debate. I don't have any strong political affiliations. What I care about is justice, decency, and common sense. This case should never have been brought to trial. It was a 17 year-old kid whose brain won't be fully developed for another decade, trying to do right by a community that he loved, and getting assaulted by all manner of scum as a result. He defended his life. The state tried to say that we don't have a right to defend ourselves when people are trying to kill us. The jury let them know that, even in a society that is more exceptional now than it's probably ever been, that this is not a right to be taken away.

The Kyle Rittenhouse trial is the second most important trial in the state's history (after the 1851 case that abolished the state's death penalty). The media, in particular the left, has tried to distort what a multitude of sources, including video evidence, have proven to be concrete, inarguable fact. And throughout it all, almost all of you were smart enough to see through the bullshit and not be swayed.

I am proud of you. I am legitimately proud of you. Thank you for supporting Kyle, my city of Kenosha, and simple fucking common sense.

Thank you for the kind words, I am sorry your community burned last year, and it gives me a huge white pill knowing folks like you are out there. Your community did good with this trial, good on those jurors and good on you!

 

[DelusionTree]

There were plenty of ways he could have incapacitated Blake without shooting him 7 times (mostly in the back). He could have used a taser; he could have shot him in the leg.

Did any of those scenarios involve someone having their back turned while the other person already had a gun trained on them?

Shooting someone in the leg is still deadly force and can be lethal you brainlet.
Also shooting Blake was completely justified considering he was armed and trying to fucking flee in a vehicle full of children.

 

[anionfarflung]

Just a friendly reminder: Kyle isn't old enough to drink. Ergo, he can't celebrate properly. Ladies, gentlemen...we must celebrate properly for him. It's a sacrifice I'm willing to make.

He can drink with a parent present in Wisconsin, apparently. Some woketards were mad that he was drinking when he was at that bar with "proud boys."

 

[With My Dick]

How we doing tonight mother fuckers?

Been drinking since about an hour after the verdict was announced, and my feelings are mixed.

That the complaint was brought at all proves political meddling in the criminal justice system. That it was allowed to proceed to trial indicates a judge who was overly-deferential to the DA's office. The "you're right on the line, buster!" bluster during the trial does not speak against that, either.

Despite those handicaps and despite extremely clear video evidence, it still took two weeks of testimony and a week of deliberations to decide that the clearest-cut case of self-defense I've ever seen captured on video from many angles was indeed self-defense.

All of the above is worrying. If it had been some 35-year-old who had seen action in Kandahar instead of cherubic Kyle Rittenhouse, what would have happened?

So yes - don't get me wrong. I am very, very relieved that the jury eventually saw what I saw and handed down a full acquittal. I believe Kyle Rittenhouse acted with restraint and discipline. He only fired when in danger, and he stopped firing or refrained from firing when he perceived he was in no danger. He retreated in all situations during which he was allowed to retreat, and therefore there is no case for fucking murder you goddam overreaching dipshit ADA cunts. You work for the state, you pathetic know-nothings! Not the goddam mayor! Having the mayor's nephew sitting at your table the entire trial makes you look like stooges!

Ahem. I thought the slimy tricks the prosecution tried to use were well outside the standard of slimy tricks a prosecution was allowed to use, and I hope they receive sanction for their behavior during this trial. I thought the defense read the jury better than the prosecution did, and presented very well on cross and close.

And I feel very, very happy that the system saw fit to recognize that a citizen merely attempting to help his community should not be set upon by thugs and monsters with no recourse. Forget all the macho bullshit and the LARPing - this boy had people baying for his blood as he was trying to run to safety. He was threatening exactly zero people and running for help. He was knocked about the head and threatened with a pistol for this, and he still didn't go all Let The Bodies Hit The Floor on a crowded street.

Justice was done. A young man has his life back. This is the sort of thing liberals should be celebrating. I don't know if I can call myself a liberal, but I am definitely celebrating.

 

[anionfarflung]

Imagine being such a nigger you look at a Jewish child molester and two white wife beaters and somehow think they're black. Is this Negro blind?

I don't know how well his eyes function, but genetic statistics would tell me his IQ is mostly likely 85 or below.

 

[Jet Fuel Johnny]

There were plenty of ways he could have incapacitated Blake without shooting him 7 times (mostly in the back). He could have used a taser; he could have shot him in the leg.

>The bullet enters the back of his thigh, shattering the femur. Bone shrapnel shreds the femoral artery. Blake bleeds out in 90 seconds.
>The taser hits what is possibly a meth/crack/PCP enraged violent knife wielder running at a car he has stolen that is occupied by a woman and child. The taser does nothing. A woman is stabbed brutally to death.

SHOOT THEM UNTIL THEY DROP AND PUT ONE IN THE FUCKING HEAD!

Did any of those scenarios involve someone having their back turned while the other person already had a gun trained on them?

Turning around to run at a car where your two attempted victims are currently located does not mean you don't get ventilated.

Go suck criminal cock somewhere else.

 

[Soycast Guy]

Kyle is a pretty cute boy honestly. I'd suck him off as a celebration.

Nigga what

 

[Some JERK]

View attachment 2733942
I'll roll the dice. It breaking is more likely.

I respect your grit to thumb your nose at Murphy's Law in a life or death situation.

 

[Sailor Kim Jong Moon]

There were plenty of ways he could have incapacitated Blake without shooting him 7 times (mostly in the back). He could have used a taser; he could have shot him in the leg.

Did any of those scenarios involve someone having their back turned while the other person already had a gun trained on them?

Eurofag, please shut the hell up. “Could’ve shot him in the leg” - bitch what? There’s a car with a kid in it. You’re aiming for the biggest target. Not small targets that move rapidly and might not even stop him from kidnapping a child at knifepoint. Life isn’t a movie.

Tasers don’t work very effectively and when someone poses a deadly threat (he did to that kid and potentially the officer with the knife) you don’t take chances.

Jacob Blake is lucky to be alive at ALL because his death would be justified.

Please stop watching movies and go touch grass.

 

[Titos]

I dont understand the focus on assault rifles by some, those should be legal too and them not beeing legal is just like pissing on the constitution...

They're retards who don't know shit about guns and think a gun being full auto is going to somehow make it more dangerous despite it probably making it less dangerous since most people can't be accurate for shit with full auto. There's a reason most soldiers don't use the full auto function outside of suppression.

 

[italianuploader4]

Vrillenhouse let's go

 

[Suburban Bastard]

There were plenty of ways he could have incapacitated Blake without shooting him 7 times (mostly in the back). He could have used a taser; he could have shot him in the leg.

Police shout "center mass" for a reason

 

[DumbDude42]

he could have shot him in the leg

this is getting close to "why didn't he just shoot the knife out of his hand!" territory lol

even if we ignore the impracticality of it, shooting someone in the leg doesn't accomplish much because it does not reliably incapacitate them or prevent them from doing whatever it is they're currently doing, also it can still kill due to heavy blood loss

 

[make_it_so]

I'm seeing a lot of anger about the justice system. People saying that juries don't work. I wonder what in the fuck they believe would be a good alternative.

Whatever gets them the result they want.

 

[Trianon]

I'm glad leftists are feeling "unsafe." The law on peaceful assembly is for their protection. They can't simply do whatever they want and expect to be protected, just as Kyle wouldn't have been right to shoot indiscriminately and expect the law to be on his side. But he was the one who knew the law, knew his rights, and acted only within those limits. Some people have to have the benefit of the law proven to them before they'll abide by it.