Megathread Tranny Sideshows on Social Media - Any small-time spectacle on Reddit, Tumblr, Twitter, Dating Sites, and other social media.

"Puberty blockers are completely harmless!"

"No they're not."

"Well the harm doesn't matter because it's still a better option than suicide!"


View attachment 2734857
archive / link

Imagine being told that you had a serious disease that required medication and surgical interventions that destroyed your health, up to and including amputations of body parts. Imagine being told that you needed these amputations and surgeries or else you would die. And imagine growing up after that and finding out that it was not true. You did not need those medications or surgeries. You were never in any danger of dying. You were lied to by the people who should have protected you.

That is what is happening to these kids. There is literally nothing that backs up these "transition or suicide!" assertions. "Trans kids" weren't killing themselves en masse for all of history up until children's gender clinics started springing up.

And in the rare case these teenagers do kill themselves it's because they have been told that their lives are literally worthless if they don't transition ASAP and pass flawlessly (which they never will, anyway).

From the looks of it, this woman has been going through a private doctor to obtain blockers for one of her kids:

View attachment 2734867
archive / link

She spends most of her time screeching about TERFs on twitter, I guess it must help to silence the little voice in her head that's asking her to think about what she is doing to a poor child.

I though Helen Webberly and Gender GP was banned from practicing
 
We wrap up trans visibility week with tranny day of remembrance and blame it all on the farms.
Screen Shot 2021-11-20 at 8.18.28 AM.pngScreen Shot 2021-11-20 at 8.18.47 AM.pngScreen Shot 2021-11-20 at 8.19.03 AM.png
 
Triple posting is lame. There's an edit button for a reason.
C2053F21-BEFA-42B4-A2A9-82DD3E4A11AB.png

The bio trans community is still going at it hard. They continue to get "bio terfs" or "b-terfs" banned. Twitter keeps saying their tweets don't violate TOS.

And now this bit of hilarity.

I love these guys. I wish Twitter had a winner react.
 
BA few posters here have pointed out that we owe this entire insanity to sex becoming commonplace and less taboo, and for a minute I didn't see anything unusual about that statement, like "that sounds about right!"But then I started thinking about it and...did porn really become commonplace?
This is cited by quite a few Reddit troons. A dozen would bring up being exposed to sissy porn/ hentai at a young age. It’s more like it isn’t more common place, it’s more easily available.

That goes for high traffic places like Twitter and Reddit too. If you aren't looking for porn it's hard to see anything sexual in those places, despite the massive digs of porn, exhibitionism and degeneracy we are seeing here on the daily.
If you lurk art Twitter (a lot of younger people do) it’s easy to look at sfw art and then be recommended art from a nsfw account. I don’t know too much about Reddit, but what I do know is that nsfw communities are really easy to walk into.

I think the problem is that sex is driven into dark corners to get it out of advertiser/moral guardian sights, and it's festering inside those dark corners.
What you’re seeing is the two faced corporate approach to advertising— safe for work for families on TV and espouse paternal tactics to appeal to conservatives, BUT also support marginalized troons on Twitter away from boomers.

This gives me a new theory. I wonder if this insane amount of fetishy degeneracy is a side effect of sweeping the lewd under the rug.
I’d say it comes from sweeping social gate keeping under the rug. Less people are inclined to reprimand some bizarre fetished tranny because they don’t want to be cancelled.
I think about it, the more it seems to fit the "actors" we are seeing here. We got hypersexed predatory figures (groomers), and tons of sex-starved victims…
Again, I think this was made much more available to the public eye by social media. They feel comfy knowing Twitter/Reddit will duly ban anyone who has the foresight to know something is up by screaming “TWANSPHOBIA” or whatever. I mean, it takes a certain abusive personality type as well as a proper lack of restraint/ ethics/ boundaries to create a groomer, and it’s not like they aren’t gonna groom without the internet.
 
View attachment 2734967
>I would love to walk through a store without being a zoo exhibit for everyone to stare at
View attachment 2734968
View attachment 2734971
Their posting history:
View attachment 2734969

Not gonna make it.

View attachment 2734974View attachment 2734975
These are taken one year apart. Nice stuffed bra buddy

This one is still crying about the Chappelle special, give it a rest man.
View attachment 2734983
View attachment 2734984
Holy Testicle Tuesday! Groucho Marx called, and he wants his eyebrows back.
 
Last edited:
Wow, I remember this one from some thread on botched transitions (as if any of those axe wounds with skin band-aids aren't botched). If I remember correctly, it has to shit on a colostomy bag, right?

I even remember the channel going missing at one point, making me think a certain statistic might've gotten a little bit higher, but I guess not.

By the way, here's a funny little video title.

:story:
Yep, it is doomed to use those awful things forever. Would not wish that fate on anyone tbh.
No, wait, this would be the perfect punishment for Yaniv, and Tommy, and Gibbes, and Greta.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: behindyourightnow
She retweeted an article that dared to ask "Why can't we say 'woman' anymore?" (it's paywalled) and didn't bow down and apologize when they went after her. Thus Atwood was declared persona non-grata and now Twitter users are allowed to go after her on their little TERF hunts despite her being the writer of that terrible, terrible overrated story.
Late, but anyway: as much I loved original, so I hated that self/fiction of Testaments of hers. C’mon, she retconned herself for the series sake, which already butchered material by virtue of going further the first book.
Anyway, that book was a testament (hehe) to her changing views; or at very least, eagerness to show the public whatever is “in the right” right now.
Boy she bit herself by that retweet.
It’s never enough for them. One rt - okay, maybe lady old and frail in the brain department? But she managed to scree herself further when she answered in the replies that “<author> isn’t terf, read the article first”
Puff, gone.
And I’d cheer her up for that, but then she pulled ultimate 1984 with “Do it to Julia Joanne! Do it to Julia Joanne! Not me! Julia Joanne! I don't care what you do to her. Tear her face off, strip her to the bones. Not me! Julia Joanne! Not me!
And off to the drain she went then.

Nice job mother of ‘handmaidens’. Show them, that no one’s safe.
 
Hm, there's something about your comment that bothers me somehow.
A few posters here have pointed out that we owe this entire insanity to sex becoming commonplace and less taboo, and for a minute I didn't see anything unusual about that statement, like "that sounds about right!".

But then I started thinking about it and...did porn really become commonplace? Thinking about daily life and interactions I think I'm seeing the entire opposite. I think the problem is that sex is driven into dark corners to get it out of advertiser/moral guardian sights, and it's festering inside those dark corners. That goes for high traffic places like Twitter and Reddit too. If you aren't looking for porn it's hard to see anything sexual in those places, despite the massive digs of porn, exhibitionism and degeneracy we are seeing here on the daily.

This gives me a new theory. I wonder if this insane amount of fetishy degeneracy is a side effect of sweeping the lewd under the rug. Troons, being natural perverts, go venture the seedy places that don't moderate pornography, being exposed to hardcore degenerate fetishes right away (probably from already trooned out mods, specially if they forbid complaining about their favorite loli furry vore fetish or whatever), and egged (no pun intended) on to indulge in debauchery. Once their defenses have eroded and they befriended other degenerates the egg can be cracked and expand to more public places like twitter, where they'll inevitably meet the rest of the cult where posting le girldique to scare the TERFs is considered stunning and brave (yet it's isolated from "normie twitter" unless it's time to cancel someone).

I could be terribly off, but the more I think about it, the more it seems to fit the "actors" we are seeing here. We got hypersexed predatory figures (groomers), and tons of sex-starved victims that can evolve into new groomers (even unknowingly, just spouting the mantras with enough conviction can be enough to convince someone of weak will within earshot), and fresh batches of perverts looking for a fix, arriving when their community starts banning degeneracy because of optics or because they have to follow Google's rules for inserting ads. It kind of makes sense in clown world and even makes sense for the fujo>FtM pipeline. Can't help but wonder if this is holds any water.
The change in delivery medium is important. The big dopamine trigger is novelty, and the pipeline from haram glimpses of skin to softcore porn to hardcore to extreme freak shit is the brain seeking novelty. But the nature of physical media actually gatekeeps you from going too far in your formative years: if you're a horny teenage boy and the porn out there is all in magazines or on tape/DVDs, first off you have to actually *find* it, which means steal it, and if you do it's all you have until you find some more. And seeking real world experiences isn't all that difficult in comparison. So there's no rapid escalation. You're likely going to give your dopamine circuits time to reset when you get bored of the Victoria's Secret catalogue. High speed internet + tube sites change all that: endless stream of novelty, zero downtime, incredibly easy to access.

So, yeah, porn is probably fucking up people's brains. That being said, there's a lot of factors that might be equally or even more important. I view this stuff (and woke shit in general) as a sort of religious orthodoxy, and there seems to be a lot of variables involved in its ascendancy. Garbage ideas percolating out from academia, economic stagnation, corporatisation and monopolisation of the internet, polarisation and narcissism incentivised by the internet, print media declining and being replaced by click/outragebait, algorithm-driven content, the decline of religion in the western world (I say this as an atheist)... all kinds of stuff.
 
Since this thread is still being featured on the front page, I'll drop this classic gem.
View attachment 2734977
Who is the professor in this video? I wasn't aware that some of these theorists looked upon pedophilia/incest favorably.
When I think of celebrated academics who have controversially supported pedophilia, I normally think of Jacques Derrida, Michel Foucault, and Allen Ginsberg.
 
Who is the professor in this video? I wasn't aware that some of these theorists looked upon pedophilia/incest favorably.
When I think of celebrated academics who have controversially supported pedophilia, I normally think of Jacques Derrida, Michel Foucault, and Allen Ginsberg.
Derrick Jensen, pro-environmental long form essayist who writes rant books that are pretty good, and notorious troon hater. i have a couple of his books on my shelf right now

edit: late lol
 
Derrick Jensen, pro-environmental long form essayist who writes rant books that are pretty good, and notorious troon hater. i have a couple of his books on my shelf right now

edit: late lol
I didn't think it was possible for someone who is "pro-environmental" to be this based.
The modern environmental movement is full of trannies and doomsday prophets.
 
Back