Kyle Rittenhouse Legal Proceedings - Come for the trial, stay for….

What do you think will happen?

  • Guilty on all charges

    Votes: 282 8.8%
  • Full Acquittal

    Votes: 1,077 33.7%
  • Mistral

    Votes: 264 8.3%
  • Mixture of verdicts

    Votes: 479 15.0%
  • Minecraft

    Votes: 213 6.7%
  • Roblox

    Votes: 132 4.1%
  • Runescape

    Votes: 203 6.3%
  • Somehow Guilty Of Two Mutually Exclusive Actions

    Votes: 514 16.1%
  • KYLE WILL SUBMIT TO BBC

    Votes: 35 1.1%

  • Total voters
    3,199
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Fantasy. There is no such thing. As long as white and black exists there will be black areas and white areas, black culture and white culture, black churches and white churches, black schools and white schools. You've never been to the US. You don't understand. You will if you pursue this fantasy of integration.
we need to bring back seperate but equal. only this time make it actually equal instead of what it was before.
 
Counterpoint: Very rich, very small. The US is approximately 13500x bigger. The poor people in SG live in MY where their government has to deal with them.
You forget authoritarian , has literally death penalty for drug charges, also no niggers or nigger like ethnicities. They are also mix of various asian ethnicities which anyone has worked even with the most nigger ethnicity of them all the phlipinoes will tell you they are bug men to the point of self destruction, you can literally set a rule about throwing your kid into moloch fire and they will all follow it without blinking. Every single multi ethnic state that was remotely successful was rulled by brutal dictator that kept everyone in check , this was true for iraq during sadam Hussein rule, libia and Yugoslavia.
 
And who violently hate pajeets. Last election the street shitter leader of the Worker's party made accusations about the nation being racist. In response the deputy prime minister basically came out and said that Singapore will never have a minority prime minister

Nobody said that we'll never have a minority prime minister lol and the leader of the Worker's Party didn't make that accusation. Someone dug through the old social media posts of a new candidate from the Worker's Party and found some racially insensitive content. She's shit anyway, just got in trouble for making false claims about the police mishandling rape reports. She's the daughter of the richest Malay man here, never had a job before and tries too hard to be AOC.

People online don't like pajeets but not "violently", and only those immigrant ones from India

Dems are really cranking up their anger at Rittenhouse now. It's wild. The lies are off the charts.

  • DCCC chairman Democratic Rep. Sean Patrick Maloney: "It’s disgusting and disturbing that someone was able to carry a loaded assault rifle into a protest against the unjust killing of Jacob Blake, an unarmed Black man, and take the lives of two people and injure another - and face absolutely no consequences,"
  • DCCC senior adviser of strategic outreach Dyjuan Tatro: "no justice, no peace."
  • Tato: "I do not believe that convictions equal justice. But I am convinced that the “not guilty” verdict constitutes a great injustice today. The American legal system is rooted in racism and functions to uphold white supremacy."
  • Rep. Eric Swalwell: "We have more peaceful marching to do," Swalwell wrote. "To where? Every ballot box across our land. Lace up."
  • Texas Dems: "RELEASE: #Rittenhouse Acquittal Establishes White Conservatives and Vigilantes Seeking Violence are Protected in Today’s America "
  • Mayor Bill de Blasio: “Anthony Huber and Joseph Rosenbaum are victims. They should be alive today. The only reason they’re not is because a violent, dangerous man chose to take a gun across state lines and start shooting people. To call this a miscarriage of justice is an understatement.”
  • Cori Bush: "The judge. The jury. The defendant. It’s white supremacy in action. This system isn’t built to hold white supremacists accountable. It’s why Black and brown folks are brutalized and put in cages while white supremacist murderers walk free. I’m hurt. I’m angry. I’m heartbroken."
  • New York Attorney General Letitia James: "This is a dark day for our justice system. As a lawyer, I respect jury verdicts. But this is yet another reminder that our system needs to be uprooted and reformed."
  • Cuomo: “Today’s verdict is a stain on the soul of America, & sends a dangerous message about who & what values our justice system was designed to protect. We must stand unified in rejecting supremacist vigilantism & with one voice say: this is not who we are."
  • Representative Carolyn Bourdeaux: "The acquittal of Kyle Rittenhouse is an example of why the nation must re-examine self-defense laws in our justice system. When you seek out violence wielding a dangerous weapon, there should be accountability for deadly results."
  • Congressman Andy Levin: “If you need a stunning example of white privilege, please see Kyle Rittenhouse’s verdict."
  • Derrick Johnson, NAACP: "This justice system has once again showcased that there is a system within the system that consistently slaps “other”communities on the wrist and sentences black communities to profiling and despair. Today that system has failed us, right on schedule."
  • Jerry Nadler: “This heartbreaking verdict is a miscarriage of justice and sets a dangerous precedent which justifies federal review by DOJ. Justice cannot tolerate armed persons crossing state lines looking for trouble while people engage in First Amendment-protected protest."
  • Congressional Black Caucus Chairwoman Joyce Beatty called the result “unconscionable." "The ludicrous claim of self-defense is on par with the abhorrent behavior displayed by the prosecution and the judge. It is time for criminal justice reform, and it is beyond time for gun reform," she added. "While today is filled with disappointment, we must continue to champion justice and gun reform, and condemn vigilantism so this never happens again."
  • Rashida Tlaib: “Our justice system is broken. It protects white supremacy. The two people who were killed deserved justice and so did our communities who continue be targeted with violence like this. “This painful verdict sends a horrifying message that bringing violence to a protest for racial justice is acceptable. It's incitement, not justice.”
  • Ayanna Pressley: “Racism & white supremacy remain the bedrock of our legal system."
  • Elizabeth Warren: "There are two justice systems in America. It’s time to dismantle systemic racism & fundamentally transform our broken justice system."
  • AOC: "What we are witnessing is a system functioning as designed and protecting those it was designed for. My heart still breaks for the communities and families whose grief now compounds, and the countless others who will be denied and deprived in similar scenes across the country."
  • Jayapal: "I'm heartbroken. If we're ever going to tackle racial injustice in America, we have to admit our justice system isn't working for Black, brown and Indigenous people. Then, we have to transform it. It won't be easy but I'm committed to organizing alongside you to make it happen"
E: more

  • Nebraska Senator Megan Hunt: "Kyle Rittenhouse is a white supremacist murderer, all of the tough guy congressmen who say they want him to be their intern love it, the justice system is working just as it was designed to, and the courts continue to be debased by right wing opportunists. It is what it is"
  • Jaime Harrison, DNC Chair: "Justice is not always just. There is certainly pain in today's verdict, and we must not forget it as we press on in the necessary work to ensure a better, safer future and a more equitable justice system—one that treats every American with fairness and dignity under the law."
  • Senator Tammy Baldwin: "[Rittenhouse] took the law into his own hands, killing two people and injuring another. They were victims of gun violence and too many families have lost loved ones to these tragedies. I understand why people believe that justice was not served in this case, because I feel the same way."
  • Governor Tony Evers: "No verdict will be able to bring back the lives of Anthony Huber and Joseph Rosenbaum, or heal Gaige Grosskreutz’s injuries, just as no verdict can heal the wounds or trauma experienced by Jacob Blake and his family."
  • Lt. Gov. Mandela Barnes: "The presumption of innocence until proven guilty is what we should expect from our judicial system, but that standard is not always applied equally. We have seen so many black and brown youth killed, only to be put on trial posthumously, while the innocence of Kyle Rittenhouse was virtually demanded by the judge."
  • Julian Castro: "You know damn well that if Kyle Rittenhouse were Black he would have been found guilty in a heartbeat — or shot dead by cops on the scene."
  • Governor Gavin Newsom: "America today: you can break the law, carry around weapons built for a military, shoot and kill people, and get away with it. That’s the message we’ve just sent to armed vigilantes across the nation."
They've jumped the shark. I've never seen Democrats like this before. They're completely detached from anything resembling facts and current events.



yikes
 
That's a pretty massive oversimplification. There are plenty of fully integrated communities. Hell, one of the major complaints of black & hispanic peoples who are third or forth generation US citizens is that they are totally alienated from the supposed 'cultural identities' the modern diversity fanatics keep shrieking they should embody. You seem to forget also that America used to be the melting pot of all melting pots. The US is an integrated culture. That's a simple fact. When cultures are allowed to intermingle naturally and without external radical bodies screeching that everyone stay in their own lane, then composites emerge extremely fast. Even the hardcore southern states were well on their way towards natural integration until CRT reared its ugly head.

A minor but significant example would be 'Black Wall Street' that modern SJW lunatics harp on about being such a fantastic thing. Yes, it was a black-owned space where black people could exceed the low standards set upon them by white society, and it did promote positive social growth, allowing many black businessmen to escape the ghetto and get their feet on the bottom rung of the capitalist ladder. But saying that it ended because it was burnt down by jealous white assholes is a complete fantasy. It got rebuilt and grew bigger... then it ended when desegregation happened. The entire independent black infrastructure was voluntarily dismantled by its creators in order to integrate into pre-existing white-built infrastructure, because there simply wasn't a need for it anymore.

We live in a clown world where people think that arbitrary societal concepts trump practical wisdom. But they don't. They never have. If you want to see true 'privilege' as the modern liberal loonie would define it, it's the privilege to exist in a society that places your cultural heritage above your need to eat food and earn a living. In every single case where non-integrated, non-radicalized communities have faced a choice between 'clinging to what makes us, us' and 'having something to eat', they've chosen the latter. Integration is that simple.
"melting pot of melting pots"

Of whites (jokes of how the Irish and Italians are nonwhites aside).

There were considerably fewer nonwhite immigrants in the past. The few that were lucky enough to get in and make a living in America were the ones with a strong work ethic and were the ones who wanted to integrate. The key was that the US was highly selective in who they chose to take in.

Now there's an active policy in places like Mexico and other nonwhite majority countries where they're dumping the people they don't want into the US. I liken it to the idea of Muslim immigrants: liberals like to think of Muslims as the diligent middle-class, soft-spoken and educated integrated citizens. But the bulk of what they get are complete mongoloids with a fervent religious bent.
 
I agree emotionally.

Counterpoint: Singapore. Pretty sure that's a democracy and it's definitely a diverse multicultural country. It's also authoritarian AF which looks like what's necessary for diversity + democracy to coexist together.
Singapore worked because of its sedition laws that threw everyone who advocated for class struggle and race war in prison where they get their asses beaten with bamboo. That's the sole reason why Singapore not only hasn't become a socialist shithole like almost every big city, but also became one of the most prosperous and civilised nations on earth, way more than the US. Problem is that Singapore has recently abolished the very law that saved it from socialism, thus permanently singing its own death warrant.
 
I'd like to see a citation for that fact, please.
Well, ignoring historical political results, it's a scientific fact that brain structure has a systematic relationship with political opinion
The brain differs between the different races, so what this study tells us even though it never measures race is that the the difference in genetic influence on your brain will influence your political beliefs.

Now this is the point where people will mention, "Oh well this black guy is based conservative, and there's plenty of soyboy white people voting for gibs"
And that's true, but these are exceptions that prove the rule. No one said blacks can't be smart or have a brain structure more similar to a white person, the racial differences within can be greater than the variance between the averages, but in larger population the systematic relationship between brain structure and political opinion will be a factor
 
if the genetics are close enough you can through education ensure that the electorate has a fairly equal foundation. But it's a statistical fact that the more distanced two people are genetically, the more distant their political preferences will be as well. A Dutchman and a Englishman are close enough genetically that with the same education they will have almost the exact same view on the world.
It has very little to do with genetics, a dutchman and an englishman may adhere to any number of different ideologies despite having very similar genetics, whether either of them will be conservative or liberal or something else entirely comes down to a cointoss. A pakistani, an arab and a chechen are very different genetically but will generally agree on politics because they overwhelmingly agree on the same ideology.

it's a scientific fact that brain structure has a systematic relationship with political opinion
Brain structure is not inherently linked to genetics, although it's influenced by it. Correlation != causation. People use this same logic to justify trooning out.
 
The North American Pavement Ape is sui generis. Definitely uniquely bad.

They will all rob, rape, murder and commit arson.

The African American nigger will do all of this while being obnoxious in the most American of ways, though.

That's why I say they are unique, but not uniquely bad.
 
Is Judge Schroeder's "day of reckoning" the one Papa John warned us about?
Something happens in Wisconsin and they burn down a building in Oregon.
We didn't have riots but during the Summer of Love my small Alabama city had demonstrations because some yank cop "killed" an addict. Several murals and pretty graffiti on the sides of buildings got defaced with "BLM" shoddily spray-painted in black over it.
 
Even discounting genetic differences, the only way races exist is for people to be separated, which means that they'll have different cultures, which means they will have different values, which means they'll have different expectations of whatever passes for government in their minds...which, surprise, means different political preferences.

Also, Singapore isn't remarkable for having one party in power since 1965. Many US cities have had one party in power since that time. Baltimore, Chicago, Detroit, and Milwaukee haven't had Republican mayors since Singapore was founded, to name a few.
 
It has very little to do with genetics, a dutchman and an englishman may adhere to any number of different ideologies despite having very similar genetics, whether either of them will be conservative or liberal or something else entirely comes down to a cointoss. A pakistani, an arab and a chechen are very different genetically but will generally agree on politics because they overwhelmingly agree on the same ideology.


Brain structure is not inherently linked to genetics, although it's influenced by it. Correlation != causation. People use this same logic to justify trooning out.
Individual englishmen and dutchmen might differ wildly, but gather them into a large enough group and the difference in opinion gets washed away by the averages. Just look at northern and central european politics, there might be different parties, but in effect the differences between the government and opposition is so minuscule that elections are mostly just a formality with a changing of faces.
On the other hand I don't think I've ever seen a muslim nation remain peaceful when there are multiple ethnic groups present. Look at Afghanistan and how the nation is divided between the Pashtuns in the south, and the Tajiks in the north
 
Yes, in Portland. Their Justice Center got trashed.
And windows were broken too. But what do you expect? It's Portland, and it's a shithole run by shit people with no balls.
1637424346090.png
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back