Kyle Rittenhouse Legal Proceedings - Come for the trial, stay for….

What do you think will happen?

  • Guilty on all charges

    Votes: 282 8.8%
  • Full Acquittal

    Votes: 1,077 33.7%
  • Mistral

    Votes: 264 8.3%
  • Mixture of verdicts

    Votes: 479 15.0%
  • Minecraft

    Votes: 213 6.7%
  • Roblox

    Votes: 132 4.1%
  • Runescape

    Votes: 203 6.3%
  • Somehow Guilty Of Two Mutually Exclusive Actions

    Votes: 514 16.1%
  • KYLE WILL SUBMIT TO BBC

    Votes: 35 1.1%

  • Total voters
    3,199
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Of course I go to youtube and they've got the usual media bullshit plastered to the top of their home page in the "breaking news" section, but Today really stands out as especially shameless.
View attachment 2735679View attachment 2735680
Huber, the poor innocent "victim", gets a bright smiling photo showing what an innocent angel he was.
Meanwhile they deliberately pick the ugliest shot they can find of Rittenhouse and subtly darken it so he straight up looks like one of the people from that twilight zone episode with the masks.
View attachment 2735688

Seriously, these people are beyond the pale.
i would go downvote all of the suggested Jewtube videos
 
IF KYLE WAS BLACK!!!!
View attachment 2735654
View attachment 2735656

Lol, no. If Kyle were black, and literally nothing about this case was different, he still would've gotten a not-guilty verdict, because all evidence in the case points to Kyle defending his life from a group of retards attacking him.

The only thing that would change is that retards like you would be calling him an "Uncle Tom" with "internalized white supremacy."
This case has been mentioned before, but it bears repeating. Here's your black Kyle.


Killed police with an illegal firearm (that he's facing separate charges for), still got off on self-defense, on the same day no less. I guess he's lucky he didn't cross state lines.
 
Ok we all know people defending the pedo are out in full force but this dude is going way beyond most of the others, straight up trying to say kiddie diddling isn't all that bad. Ngl shit makin me MOTI. This dude has to be some kind of psyop or a pedo
20211120_134224.jpg
20211120_140136.jpg
20211120_140115.jpg
20211120_140230.jpg
20211120_140203.jpg
20211120_140308.jpg
 

Attachments

  • 20211120_134108.jpg
    20211120_134108.jpg
    516.7 KB · Views: 58
  • 20211120_134054.jpg
    20211120_134054.jpg
    396.8 KB · Views: 49
  • Screenshot_20211119-183327_Chrome.jpg
    Screenshot_20211119-183327_Chrome.jpg
    589.8 KB · Views: 34
  • 20211120_134302.jpg
    20211120_134302.jpg
    366 KB · Views: 35
  • 20211120_134352.jpg
    20211120_134352.jpg
    341.5 KB · Views: 78
There were plenty of ways he could have incapacitated Blake without shooting him 7 times (mostly in the back). He could have used a taser; he could have shot him in the leg.

Did any of those scenarios involve someone having their back turned while the other person already had a gun trained on them?

When a child is about to be kidnapped or approached with a deadly weapon, it is weapons free no matter what. Blake was tased twice, he cut the wires with the knife. Shooting in the leg kills people via blood loss, movies don’t know shit about guns. Only “safe“ place to shoot someone is the hip and that is only because it will merely cripple someone. Most places can kill without medical attention.

Shooting in the back is fair when kids could die if you don’t. Toss the Hollywood logic.
 
Eurofag here so bully me, but I have a question. As one user has pointed out before, doesn’t President Biden‘s statement on Kyle Rittenhouse’s veredict violate the separation of powers? Is there no type of legal impediment that prevents a member of the executive from ruling a decision of the juridiary? It doesn’t seem correct to me that a member of the government can rule on judicial decisions.
 
Of course I go to youtube and they've got the usual media bullshit plastered to the top of their home page in the "breaking news" section, but Today really stands out as especially shameless.
View attachment 2735679View attachment 2735680
Huber, the poor innocent "victim", gets a bright smiling photo showing what an innocent angel he was.
Meanwhile they deliberately pick the ugliest shot they can find of Rittenhouse and subtly darken it so he straight up looks like one of the people from that twilight zone episode with the masks.
View attachment 2735688

Seriously, these people are beyond the pale.
A court of law determined they were not victims. They were assailants. Hope Kyle sues these smear merchants.
 
Of course I go to youtube and they've got the usual media bullshit plastered to the top of their home page in the "breaking news" section, but Today really stands out as especially shameless.
View attachment 2735679View attachment 2735680
Huber, the poor innocent "victim", gets a bright smiling photo showing what an innocent angel he was.
Meanwhile they deliberately pick the ugliest shot they can find of Rittenhouse and subtly darken it so he straight up looks like one of the people from that twilight zone episode with the masks.
View attachment 2735688

Seriously, these people are beyond the pale.
Just another nail in the coffin of the media. Anyone with one functioning brain cell has long been aware of the deceptive practices of the media over the last God knows how long.
 
Eurofag here so bully me, but I have a question. As one user has pointed out before, doesn’t President Biden‘s statement on Kyle Rittenhouse’s veredict violate the separation of powers? Is there no type of legal impediment that prevents a member of the executive from ruling a decision of the juridiary? It doesn’t seem correct to me that a member of the government can rule on judicial decisions.
biden can talk about liking or not liking a courts ruling as much as he wants. separation of powers just means he can't overrule it, or order the judge to rule a certain way, or shit like that.
 
Eurofag here so bully me, but I have a question. As one user has pointed out before, doesn’t President Biden‘s statement on Kyle Rittenhouse’s veredict violate the separation of powers? Is there no type of legal impediment that prevents a member of the executive from ruling a decision of the juridiary? It doesn’t seem correct to me that a member of the government can rule on judicial decisions.
It's EXTREMELY frowned upon to comment on someone before their trial, which Biden did.

After it's done it's done, unless he's slandering him it's not unusual for presidents to comment on trials after the fact, Trump did it iirc
 
protecting their own
I'm not going to say every single leftist is a pedophile who beats their wife/mother/grandmother but their leaders and top activists are and the rest are just dumb enough to go along with it
Basically what you said - the hypothesis that a significantly greater amount of pedophiles and domestic abusers identify as hard left wing as opposed to another other part of the political spectrum, and that a greater portion of left is ok with their behaviour than the right is simply bc they're on the same side.

We've all seen it. How many far left activists have priors for sexual crimes with children or domestic abuse. The assailants in this case sure support the idea.

Far left ideology always ends up with "I should be able to have sex with whoever I want, regardless of their age or whether they consent, and if you want to stop me you're evil"

Historically this happens on the far right too, but currently lefties are dominating the fields of pedophilia and domestic abuse
 
we have seen in the past, during segregation, that they can in fact form families, develop economies, schooling, improve themselves, and thrive. how did all of that just... fall into disarray? it's not *all* gone, but... it's not common to see anymore.

They were sabotaged. Not even joking or exaggerating, it was deliberate, and intentional.

As I understand it, the Great Depression tore the heart out of the black community. They had been very successful in the manufacturing, construction, and maintenance fields. The problem is that those industries fucking cratered during the Depression. In general, Black families operated as extended units, and with the main breadwinners effectively unable to translate their skills to other fields and out of work, the communities that were centered around them fucking collapsed.

It's at this point in our story that along comes a spider, or in this case, the establishment Dems of the time. They did not like that the black families were integrating and doing well; they were staunchly traditional and this made them a very strong oppositional block. Seeing an opportunity, the Dems of the time pushed hard on programs like Welfare, setting them up in such a way that they seemed helpful on the surface of it all, they were actually expressly intended to kneecap the black community's recovery. Shithead grifters whose sole response to every crisis was "Blame Whitey" thrived in this environment, and it was this critical lynchpin that started the ball rolling on a lot of the problems we see today.
 
Irish, Germans (lots), Italians, Polacks each unable to speak English, wearing funny clothes, many with a love of alcohol which agitated Anglo originated Americans, yet overall it worked. Part was the 'melting pot' idea which is now super racist, but also the likes of light bulb heads from the horn of Africa. Some places have lots of those useless people.
What did all of these people have in common? They were all Europeans who today we classify as "white". Interesting how that works out but after centuries the only ethnic groups capable of co-existing with each other are the ones that came from Europe (or in rare cases Asia). It's almost like white Anglos have more in common with a white German than some Swahili nigger from nig-land and can thusly co-exist better together. For the vast majority of America's existence it was overwhelming "white" and now as it grows less and less white it becomes less unified.

I wonder what the problem is?
 
Basically what you said - the hypothesis that a significantly greater amount of pedophiles and domestic abusers identify as hard left wing as opposed to another other part of the political spectrum, and that a greater portion of left is ok with their behaviour than the right is simply bc they're on the same side.

We've all seen it. How many far left activists have priors for sexual crimes with children or domestic abuse. The assailants in this case sure support the idea.

Far left ideology always ends up with "I should be able to have sex with whoever I want, regardless of their age or whether they consent, and if you want to stop me you're evil"

Historically this happens on the far right too, but currently lefties are dominating the fields of pedophilia and domestic abuse
I think it has more to do with people on the far left/right are fucking braindead and care more that you're on their side than if you're an absolute horrific trash fire of a human being.

All sins are forgiven if you're one of the 'Good guys'
 
As big of a win as this is, you have to wonder how this would have played out had some of the details been different.

What if the shooting wasn't so well documented on video?
Mark Richards straight out said that without the video evidence it would've been Kyle's word against everyone else's and he'd probably be going to prison for the rest of his life.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back