US Denver State Board Drops ‘Sex Offender’ Term Calling It A Negative Label - The board that sets state standards voted today to change the term “sex offenders” to reflect so-called “person-first” language.

SEX-OFFENDER-LABEL-6PKG.transfer_frame_2153.jpeg

The way sex offenders are labeled is changing in Colorado. The board that sets state standards voted today to change the term “sex offenders” to reflect so-called “person-first” language.

The Sex Offender Management Board, which is made up of everyone from public defenders to prosecutors, sets standards and guidelines for treatment providers so the new terminology will only be used in that context. It doesn’t change the term sex offender in law or the criminal justice system but some worry it’s a step in that direction.

“I’m involved today after hearing that it would be improper or offensive in some manner for me to refer to the man who raped me, as a sex offender.”

A rape survivor, Kimberly Corbin is among those who spoke out against changing the term sex offender to something less stigmatizing, saying labels based on traits people can’t control is one thing, “It’s very, very damaging for those who people who are labeled when it has to do with gender, race, sexuality, ability, but those are not their choices, the biggest thing for me is these are choices that sex offenders make.”

Derek Logue says he shouldn’t have to carry the label for life, “Referring to me by a label for something I did half my life ago is inappropriate and downright offensive.”

He argued “client” would be a better term.

Public Defender Kathy Heffron agreed, “It takes into consideration the uniqueness of individuals who are receiving treatment.”

“Client” is one of five options the board considered.

Supports of the change in terminology argue it will reduce recidivism. Opponents say it will only reduce accountability, noting victims and survivors live with their label for life.

In the end, the board voted 10-6 to go with “adults who commit sexual offenses.”

“I think this strikes a balance that honors the impact to victims and recognizes the current and ongoing impacts of sexual assault but also avoids the labeling term that has negative impacts on those who commit sex offenses.”

Jessica Dotter with the Colorado District Attorneys’ Council worries the change won’t end with the Sex Offender Management Board, “I’m concerned that the use of person-first language generally is an intent to remove accountability from offenders and to diminish the experience of the victims”

Last year, lawmakers considered a bill that would have, among other things, eliminated the term “sexually violent predator” from statutes but they ended up pulling it. Meanwhile, a task force charged with sentencing reform is considering asking the legislature to change terms like “defendant,” “convict,” and “felon” to “justice-involved people.”

Ironically, the Sex Offender Management Board will not drop “sex offender” from its name because only the state Legislature can change the name of the board.


 
Derek Logue says he shouldn’t have to carry the label for life, “Referring to me by a label for something I did half my life ago is inappropriate and downright offensive.”
Derek Logue was arrested for molesting an 11 year old girl when he was 22. He served a little over 3 years in jail.
I think that carrying the label of child rapist is a very small punishment for what he did.
 
Derek Logue was arrested for molesting an 11 year old girl when he was 22. He served a little over 3 years in jail.
I think that carrying the label of child rapist is a very small punishment for what he did.
Child sex offenders deserve to have their skin pulled off, not given some vague "person of color" weasel-worded title to assuage their feelings.

This has convinced me that the slippery slope is real beyond the shadow of a doubt. Anyone advocating for this change is a child molester, real or "aspiring", and deserves to be garroted with a rusty piano wire.
 
Does the sex offender registry even work? Do all of these restrictions even keep sex offenders from reoffending?
Yeah. The registry promotes community awareness of potential threats and it keeps the offenders out of jobs where they might prey on people.

This alone limits the victims they would normally have access too.

To misquote the late RBG:
"Removing these restrictions because of low reoffending rates is like throwing away your umbrella in a rainstorm because you are not getting wet."
 
Last edited:
Label them with their exact crimes then.
Let us tell the difference between "person that publicly masturbated while high on crack" and "person that anally raped three eight year olds"
The crack masturbator could, feasibly, turn his life around. Just keep him away from nose candy concentrate.
The latter should be nailed to a cross.
 
Yeah. The registry promotes community awareness of potential threats and it keeps the offenders out of jobs where they might prey on people.

This alone limits the victims they would normally have access too.

To misquote the late RBG:
"Removing these restrictions because of low reoffending rates is like throwing away your umbrella in a rainstorm because you are not getting wet."
Does it though? To me if a sex offender wants to reoffend they can just go to a school and kidnap a kid with ease. It seems more like gun laws where if a felon really wants a gun its stupidly easy to get one.

It doesnt help that cities are lax in enforcing these restrictions either.

Id be interested in seeing studies done to see if the number of sex crimes went down when they started these registries back in the 70s.
 
Back