Kyle Rittenhouse Legal Proceedings - Come for the trial, stay for….

What do you think will happen?

  • Guilty on all charges

    Votes: 282 8.8%
  • Full Acquittal

    Votes: 1,077 33.7%
  • Mistral

    Votes: 264 8.3%
  • Mixture of verdicts

    Votes: 479 15.0%
  • Minecraft

    Votes: 213 6.7%
  • Roblox

    Votes: 132 4.1%
  • Runescape

    Votes: 203 6.3%
  • Somehow Guilty Of Two Mutually Exclusive Actions

    Votes: 514 16.1%
  • KYLE WILL SUBMIT TO BBC

    Votes: 35 1.1%

  • Total voters
    3,199
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.

GoFundMe to Allow Rittenhouse Fundraisers After Acquittal​

(archive)
GoFundMe will allow fundraisers for Kyle Rittenhouse now that he’s been acquitted, the company said Friday.

The fundraising platform said it banned Rittenhouse fundraisers before because its terms of service “prohibit raising money for the legal defense of an alleged violent crime.” That was the same thing a GoFundMe spokesperson told The Epoch Times last year.

In addition to removing fundraisers that were launched for the teenager’s legal defense, the company removed “hundreds of others” last year that were unrelated to him, it said in a blog post that sought to respond to heightened criticism in the wake of the acquittal.

“If someone is acquitted of those charges, as Rittenhouse was today, a fundraiser started subsequently for their legal defense and other expenses would not violate this policy. A fundraiser to pay lawyers, cover legal expenses, or to help with ongoing living expenses for a person acquitted of those charges could remain active as long as we determine it is not in violation of any of our other terms and, for example, the purpose is clearly stated and the correct beneficiary is added to the fundraiser,” GoFundMe said.

The platform has been accused of taking sides because it has allowed numerous other fundraisers for people accused of violent crimes to remain on the platform.

For instance, a fundraiser remains up on GoFundMe for Marc Wilson, a Georgia man accused of gunning down a teenager last year. Another one was set up for Zachary Alexander Karas, who was charged by the Department of Justice for possessing Molotov cocktails.

GoFundMe did not respond to a request for comment.

The company previously called Anthony Huber, who struck Rittenhouse with a skateboard before being shot, a “hero who gave his life attempting to take down a gunman in Kenosha and save others” in promoting a fundraiser for Huber’s girlfriend and stepdaughter.

A crowdfunding rival to GoFundMe, GiveSendGo, meanwhile, let campaigns for Rittenhouse remain on their site.

One has raised over $610,000.

“GiveSendGo is committed to giving both sides of the political culture in our society an equal chance to let their voices be heard. We will not be removing this campaign,” a spokesperson for the website told The Epoch Times in an email last year.

Rep. Ken Buck (R-Colo.), who sits on the House Judiciary Committee, said Friday that he would be probing the situation.

“GoFundMe will be hearing from me very soon,” he said in a statement. “I have a lot of questions.” [delete]

Other technology platforms also took action against Rittenhouse-related activity.

Twitter and Facebook didn’t allow numerous posts expressing support for the teen, who a jury found did not commit any of the crimes he was charged with after shooting three men in Kenosha, Wisconsin, on Aug. 25, 2020.

Rittenhouse said he shot them in self-defense after they attacked him, and the jury agreed.

Twitter and Facebook have not said how they will treat the matter moving forward and did not return requests for comment.
 
The stuff I hear about SNL lately makes their skits seem angy and butthurt.
Not gonna take the time to cite sources right now, but SNL has gotten bad enough that even a lot of establishment comedians shit on them for being painfully unfunny. Even lefty rags like The Onion can still make good punchlines. SNL is just Sunday choir for neolibs.
 
Thats not a precedent, illegal backroom agreements aren't law. If there is evidence and they are found out, those same officials are fucked.

Your last paragraph is just stating what I already said, just like in a riot, or the grocery store, or in your bedroom, people have the right to defend themselves. Nothing has changed. A guilty verdict would have changed that, it would have made anyone going to a riot unable to defend themselves because for some reason a riot is a bad place and suddenly that means just going there means you gave up some of your rights.

Let me put it another way: who's going to charge the rioters? The same DA dropping charges for arson, vandalism, assault, and illegal weapon possession? A guilty verdict wouldn't have meant jack shit for rioters, because laws don't mean jack shit for rioters, because antifa runs the DA's office. What a guilty verdict would have meant is that anyone being targeted by rioters would have no right to self defense. Obviously, if a rioter armed with an AR-15 blows away someone trying to defend his property with a gun, the DA would not charge him with a crime and drop charges on self-defense grounds.

I feel like this is a bit unrealistic in comparison to the local Dem politicians being afraid of the power structure the antifa people have that helps them promote themselves. There was the weird BAMN school teacher that basically promoted violence against all political enemies and she couldn't even get in serious trouble with anyone as she had people that would promote the idea she was a victim of Tucker Carlson and right wing nazis. Journos also help a great deal in creating a political environment where it'd hurt Dem politicians to go after many of these people because the nature of their crimes doesn't get honestly reported.
When antifa riots started in Minneapolis, the mayor called out the riot cops...to go into the suburbs and shoot homeowners sitting on their porches with less-than-lethal rounds to drive them back in side and make sure they couldn't interfere with the riots. So no, Democratic officials aren't just scared and nutless. They--or at least certain key ones in important positions--support the riots.
 

GoFundMe to Allow Rittenhouse Fundraisers After Acquittal​

(archive)
GoFundMe will allow fundraisers for Kyle Rittenhouse now that he’s been acquitted, the company said Friday.

The fundraising platform said it banned Rittenhouse fundraisers before because its terms of service “prohibit raising money for the legal defense of an alleged violent crime.” That was the same thing a GoFundMe spokesperson told The Epoch Times last year.

In addition to removing fundraisers that were launched for the teenager’s legal defense, the company removed “hundreds of others” last year that were unrelated to him, it said in a blog post that sought to respond to heightened criticism in the wake of the acquittal.

“If someone is acquitted of those charges, as Rittenhouse was today, a fundraiser started subsequently for their legal defense and other expenses would not violate this policy. A fundraiser to pay lawyers, cover legal expenses, or to help with ongoing living expenses for a person acquitted of those charges could remain active as long as we determine it is not in violation of any of our other terms and, for example, the purpose is clearly stated and the correct beneficiary is added to the fundraiser,” GoFundMe said.

The platform has been accused of taking sides because it has allowed numerous other fundraisers for people accused of violent crimes to remain on the platform.

For instance, a fundraiser remains up on GoFundMe for Marc Wilson, a Georgia man accused of gunning down a teenager last year. Another one was set up for Zachary Alexander Karas, who was charged by the Department of Justice for possessing Molotov cocktails.

GoFundMe did not respond to a request for comment.

The company previously called Anthony Huber, who struck Rittenhouse with a skateboard before being shot, a “hero who gave his life attempting to take down a gunman in Kenosha and save others” in promoting a fundraiser for Huber’s girlfriend and stepdaughter.

A crowdfunding rival to GoFundMe, GiveSendGo, meanwhile, let campaigns for Rittenhouse remain on their site.

One has raised over $610,000.

“GiveSendGo is committed to giving both sides of the political culture in our society an equal chance to let their voices be heard. We will not be removing this campaign,” a spokesperson for the website told The Epoch Times in an email last year.

Rep. Ken Buck (R-Colo.), who sits on the House Judiciary Committee, said Friday that he would be probing the situation.

“GoFundMe will be hearing from me very soon,” he said in a statement. “I have a lot of questions.” [delete]

Other technology platforms also took action against Rittenhouse-related activity.

Twitter and Facebook didn’t allow numerous posts expressing support for the teen, who a jury found did not commit any of the crimes he was charged with after shooting three men in Kenosha, Wisconsin, on Aug. 25, 2020.

Rittenhouse said he shot them in self-defense after they attacked him, and the jury agreed.

Twitter and Facebook have not said how they will treat the matter moving forward and did not return requests for comment.
im off to send him couple hundred bucks towards a bigger gun
 
This mindset is what disturbs me the most about the radical left. They'll build up a caricature of their rivals and opponents while giving the outward appearance of caring about rules and norms. And when they don't get what they want, they fall back on their incorrect assumptions about the people they disagree with and pretend that they are grudgingly betraying their beliefs and descending to the level of their rival in order to fight that rival on equal footing. In reality their rival wasn't a gun-toting maniac looking for people to shoot; but now the useful idiot is that kind of person based on a complete lack of understanding.
 
I would assume that what you're saying applies to the US with regard to segregation and separation.

To that, I can't say anything. Some posters have said that American blacks are uniquely bad - do you also think that's the case? When does "low socio-economic conditions/bad parenting" end and "niggers" begin?

I'm going to have to assume you come from a nice, cushy European country based on your posts- so let me put it to you this way:

You know all the worst aspects of obnoxious American tourists? The kind who go to France and bluntly tell the French residents that their cheese is shitty because it's not Pasteurized?

Imagine that but coming from a group of people who have one of the worst crab-bucket mentalities on the planet (getting a college education, starting a business, and getting married all get American Blacks derided as "acting white" by their peers and sometimes even the target of gang violence)

Then combine that with no sense of identity or cultural and historical background to speak of (even the worst of the worst African migrants and refugees have a sense of tribal identity and more often than not a history they can identify with- ex. Ethiopians and the Kingdom of Axum/Coptic Christianity, Somalis and Sunni Islam/The Ajuuraan Sultanate, etc.)- and then add in the fact they have been mommy-coddled by the Federal Government since even before the Civil War thanks to moron liberals.

Obviously I don't think I need to tell you that American Liberalism is very different from European Liberalism in the sense that American Liberalism evolved through comfy tea parties in Upstate New York cottages, whereas European liberalism evolved through revolutions against Reactionary Monarchies and constant bloodshed. Well-off American Liberals quite literally view minorities more or less as their "pets" (there was a big backlash from liberal elites against working-class blacks who voted against fag marriage in California), and they will unironically view Blacks moving into upper-middle class suburbs or gated communities as weird novelty of sorts the way a Norwegian might view a Moose on the side of the road as he's driving.
 
Last edited:
Tell me you don't know what you're talking about.

fmec5gqfb7a.jpg

Grace Randolph is a bona-fide moron, but this is exceptionalism squared. Everything about it is wrong, but the last tweet is just the epitome of cognitive dissonance.

She was, and still is disturbed and scared by someone cracking some jokes (though I'm not sure why he thought it was necessary considering how much of a joke the marches in question were), but she doesn't think you're allowed to defend yourself against people who threaten fatal harm and act on that threat, people who hit you over the head while uour down, and people who put a gun to your face.

Confirmation that Hollywood and it's insectoid-brained parasites are still on the side of pedos and women abusers despite the MeToo posturing.
 
When antifa riots started in Minneapolis, the mayor called out the riot cops...to go into the suburbs and shoot homeowners sitting on their porches with less-than-lethal rounds to drive them back in side and make sure they couldn't interfere with the riots. So no, Democratic officials aren't just scared and nutless. They--or at least certain key ones in important positions--support the riots.
The suburbs are the last place that I would expect to find people with the kind of will or balls to give out free "One Way Ticket to Hell" compared to rural areas or some town with a strong community.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Matt Damon
Oh shit. I missed this press release. Anyone know what Joy Reid said on this???View attachment 2737658
This feels like some left-wing Q equivalent bullshit... Like, an active attempt to get a conspiracy into the air to see how many dumbshits will believe it.

Has anyone found any footage of the verdict that shows Binger's face? God I want to see that so badly.
Sadly, not of his face. But we do have an image of him at the moment the verdict was read.

Fuck Binger.jpg
 
I haven't read the last 600 pages--does Gaige Grosskreutz work for the ACLU in some capacity? I heard this rumor and can't figure out how to confirm it.
He said so in court: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bv21bE9PWtE&t=2454s

Can someone link me the arrest records of pedobaum and Huber?
I can't find the arrest records, but I had these two articles saved which might help:
 
I'm going to have to assume you come from a nice, cushy European country based on your posts- so let me put it to you this way:

You know all the worst aspects of obnoxious American tourists? The kind who go to France and bluntly tell the French residents that their cheese is shitty because it's not Pasteurized?

Imagine that but coming from a group of people who have one of the worst crab-bucket mentalities on the planet (getting a college education, starting a business, and getting married all get American Blacks derided as "acting white" by their peers and sometimes even the target of gang violence)

Then combine that with no sense of identity or cultural and historical background to speak of (even the worst of the worst African migrants and refugees have a sense of tribal identity and more often than not a history they can identify with- ex. Ethiopians and the Kingdom of Axum/Coptic Christianity, Somalis and Sunni Islam/The Ajuuraan Sultanate, etc.)- and then add in the fact they have been mommy-coddled by the Federal Government since even before the Civil War thanks to moron liberals.

Obviously I don't think I need to tell you that American Liberalism is very different from European Liberalism in the sense that American Liberalism evolved through comfy tea parties in Upstate New York cottages, whereas European liberalism evolved through revolutions against Reactionary Monarchies and constant bloodshed. Well-off American Liberals quite literally view minorities more or less as their "pets" (there was a big backlash from liberal elites against working-class blacks who voted against fag marriage in California), and they will unironically view Blacks moving into upper-middle class suburbs or gated communities as weird novelty of sorts the way a Norwegian might view a Moose on the side of the road as he's driving.
Thank you for your perspective, I appreciate it.
 
Thank you for your perspective, I appreciate it.
No problem. Ultimately, I see alot of similarities between the United States and Austrio-Hungary- and I think the United States will eventually either peacefully or violently collapse by the end of the 21st century due to many of the same issues the Hapsburgs faced with their own "shining city on a hill"- especially given the fact our leaders more or less pissed away world history's first example of worldwide hegemony during the time period of 1991 to 2021. Now, we are staring down the barrel of a Chinese Century and a possible military alliance that will be the Warsaw Pact on Bath Salts (if the Shanghai Treaty Organization woos Turkey to the point they leave NATO it's more or less the start of Cold War 2.0- except this time not even Europe wants to deal with the Americans anymore)
 
This mindset is what disturbs me the most about the radical left. They'll build up a caricature of their rivals and opponents while giving the outward appearance of caring about rules and norms. And when they don't get what they want, they fall back on their incorrect assumptions about the people they disagree with and pretend that they are grudgingly betraying their beliefs and descending to the level of their rival in order to fight that rival on equal footing. In reality their rival wasn't a gun-toting maniac looking for people to shoot; but now the useful idiot is that kind of person based on a complete lack of understanding.
I've previously said I lurked some commie reddits and they literally believe they are the warriors of light that will fullfill humanities destiny of becoming communist (because muh Hegel and a drunk 19th century santa clone said so). Moral standards do not apply to them and those tgey deem their enemies are fighting not only history but a beckoning utopia.
They are also explicitly against morality and humab rights, viewing them as obsoleteconcepts of a dying capitalist order. Honor is deeply reactionary anyway, that's why you see so many scummy tactics employed by them.
What makes this iteration of leftist lunatics so disgusting, crass and crazed is the phrase 'socialism or barbarism'. In their minds capitalism has expired and will now produce a series of crisises that and impoverish vast swath of the population. That will lead to the inevitable revolution or if it faily, failed states and barbarism. The latter part is amplified by their climate hysteria, which makes them extra rabid.

Tldr: They think they have ö a heavenly mandate to bring about utopia and don't believe in honor or virtue. If they fail humanity dies.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back