US Denver State Board Drops ‘Sex Offender’ Term Calling It A Negative Label - The board that sets state standards voted today to change the term “sex offenders” to reflect so-called “person-first” language.

SEX-OFFENDER-LABEL-6PKG.transfer_frame_2153.jpeg

The way sex offenders are labeled is changing in Colorado. The board that sets state standards voted today to change the term “sex offenders” to reflect so-called “person-first” language.

The Sex Offender Management Board, which is made up of everyone from public defenders to prosecutors, sets standards and guidelines for treatment providers so the new terminology will only be used in that context. It doesn’t change the term sex offender in law or the criminal justice system but some worry it’s a step in that direction.

“I’m involved today after hearing that it would be improper or offensive in some manner for me to refer to the man who raped me, as a sex offender.”

A rape survivor, Kimberly Corbin is among those who spoke out against changing the term sex offender to something less stigmatizing, saying labels based on traits people can’t control is one thing, “It’s very, very damaging for those who people who are labeled when it has to do with gender, race, sexuality, ability, but those are not their choices, the biggest thing for me is these are choices that sex offenders make.”

Derek Logue says he shouldn’t have to carry the label for life, “Referring to me by a label for something I did half my life ago is inappropriate and downright offensive.”

He argued “client” would be a better term.

Public Defender Kathy Heffron agreed, “It takes into consideration the uniqueness of individuals who are receiving treatment.”

“Client” is one of five options the board considered.

Supports of the change in terminology argue it will reduce recidivism. Opponents say it will only reduce accountability, noting victims and survivors live with their label for life.

In the end, the board voted 10-6 to go with “adults who commit sexual offenses.”

“I think this strikes a balance that honors the impact to victims and recognizes the current and ongoing impacts of sexual assault but also avoids the labeling term that has negative impacts on those who commit sex offenses.”

Jessica Dotter with the Colorado District Attorneys’ Council worries the change won’t end with the Sex Offender Management Board, “I’m concerned that the use of person-first language generally is an intent to remove accountability from offenders and to diminish the experience of the victims”

Last year, lawmakers considered a bill that would have, among other things, eliminated the term “sexually violent predator” from statutes but they ended up pulling it. Meanwhile, a task force charged with sentencing reform is considering asking the legislature to change terms like “defendant,” “convict,” and “felon” to “justice-involved people.”

Ironically, the Sex Offender Management Board will not drop “sex offender” from its name because only the state Legislature can change the name of the board.


 
Lol, literally "offenders of sex". Congrats on passing an utterly do-nothing law that validates your use in the bureaucracy I guess.
No it does something. It makes it sound like they're being offensive to people who obsess over sex, i.e. Troons.

It makes it harder to identify the rapists and therefore makes it easier for them to catch their prey unaware. Kind of like getting a legal name change, but this affects all of them at once.

"They're not burglars, they just like to borrow things for extended periods of time without notifying the owner"
Literally Sword Art Online logic.
 
It’s the same mentality that convinces them “people of color” and “colored people” are different terms.
Well, they kind of are.

People of Color means non-white, but any time you look at statistics it's blacks. It's the 13% stealing the authority of the 25% when they speak up.

Colored People is clearly just the slave types, no pretense about caring about the other ones. It's an honest term and therefore a superior one.

Tho I have to admit PoC is handy for not abbreviating to CP. Certain types love both Colored People and the other CP so not having to disambiguate is pretty nifty.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Autistic Joe
Derek Logue says he shouldn’t have to carry the label for life, “Referring to me by a label for something I did half my life ago is inappropriate and downright offensive.”
The only thing inappropriate and downright offensive is you didn't get Gary'd, and now you have the gall to cry about your feelings.

“Client” is one of five options the board considered.
Client is what their lawyer and/or their therapist should call them; and you know what, to stay legal, that's what they can be called, right up until their conviction, then they're a sex offender, rapist, child molester, or whatever. No one is gonna point to someone and say "That's him! That's the client who raped me!"

My grandparents had better words for them; usually something like "Disappeared," "Hog food," or "Lynched."

“I think this strikes a balance that honors the impact to victims and recognizes the current and ongoing impacts of sexual assault but also avoids the labeling term that has negative impacts on those who commit sex offenses.”
I understand the sentiment, but let's get something clear; this person is never going to be able to rejoin society. They'll never be able to handle a decent job, especially one that does background checks or at least makes phone calls. You always hear about recidivism rates, because once someone gets out they don't get much assistance to rejoin society; the problem is, even if the legislature does this shit, no one's gonna want them around.

This made me curious so I went looking... Colorado isn't as high as I'd expect it to be with this coming out of their legislature.
 
Back