US As Joe Biden Turns 79, a Panic Over Kamala Harris

Article Archive

As Joe Biden Turns 79, a Panic Over Kamala Harris​

1637448049849.jpeg
President Joe Biden gestures towards Vice President Kamala Harris in the State Dinning Room of the White House on Nov. 6.

PHOTO: ALEX BRANDON/ASSOCIATED PRESS

President Biden’s 79th birthday Saturday is the key to understanding the Democratic alarms this week about Vice President Kamala Harris. Is her approval rating as terrible as the surveys say? Is she being unfairly sidelined by the White House? That fretting is really about Joe and 2024.

Democrats are slowly figuring out that Mr. Biden is unlikely to seek a second term, especially as voters conclude by watching him that he’s struggling under the burdens of the job. During the 2020 campaign, questioning his pep was treated as taboo ageism, despite the obvious change in his vigor compared with his 2012 debate against Paul Ryan.

But 58% of voters now say Mr. Biden is “too old to be President,” including 27% of Democrats, according to a recent Harvard-Harris poll. Meantime, 53% of voters “have doubts” about whether he is “mentally fit to serve,” including 16% of Democrats. On Friday Mr. Biden received an annual physical. We hope he passed with flying colors and will go on to enjoy the same longevity as Jimmy Carter, now 97.

Speaking of Mr. Carter, though, here’s what he said in 2019: “If I were just 80 years old, if I was 15 years younger, I don’t believe I could undertake the duties I experienced when I was President.” Mr. Biden will be 82 in 2024. Democrats were content to overlook this when their goal was evicting Donald Trump. But that’s done. Mr. Biden’s utility to Democrats will fall further if his $4 trillion spending bill passes, especially if Republicans retake Congress in 2022.

So who’s on deck? Ms. Harris isn’t proving to be a compelling answer, hence the panic. Her approval rating is on a journey to the center of the Earth, with one poll lately pegging it at 28%. A CNN report this week aired griping from Ms. Harris’s circle that she isn’t being set up to succeed. Her communications director is on the way out.

It’s true that Mr. Biden has asked Ms. Harris to take the lead on tough issues: immigration and the border, plus the voting bills in Congress, which won’t pass. Other Vice Presidents have also struggled to find their role, especially when the man in the Oval Office knows his own way around town.

White House press secretary Jen Psaki said that criticism of Ms. Harris is tinged with sexism and racism, particularly from “some in the right wing who have gone after her because she is the first woman, the first woman of color” to serve as Vice President. Sorry, a vast right-wing conspiracy doesn’t produce a 28% approval rating. Only Ms. Harris can do that, and her struggles to appeal are hardly new.

She dropped out of the 2020 presidential race before the first votes were cast. She was polling seventh in South Carolina, where most of the Democratic primary voters are black. The party nominated Mr. Biden as a caretaker President with the sole job of beating Mr. Trump. As a concession to identity politics, Mr. Biden pledged to pick a woman Vice President, and then he settled on Ms. Harris.

Perhaps Ms. Harris can turn things around. Meanwhile, look for Democrats to praise Amazon’s new Pete Buttigieg documentary.
 
Kamala is a genuinely evil person and I hope she never attains the presidency.

And FFS her whining this week is making me dislike her even more than I had thought possible.

You're the vice president; suck it up.

Mark my words: Her whining about how she's not being treated fairly is indicative of a profound character flaw that has been apparent since the beginning of her career. It's a failure to take responsibility and a willingness to throw other people under the bus, and this is a lot of what people on the left hated Trump for.

Some enterprising reporter needs to walk around downtown Sacramento and ask various service workers what they think of her. I heard a really awful story about her (PM me for details), and there's no doubt in my mind that she's gotten people fired for being insufficiently deferential.
She's had a bad reputation for years.
 
If Biden isn't running in 2024, and if it's clear that Kamala doesn't have a shot, who runs instead?

AOC will also be 35+ and eligible to run, and since this is 2024 DNC, they could throw a drag queen or troon in as VP, and they'd be stacking up "firsts ever" points.
the problem with that is if biden doesnt run again, it shows a lack of confidence in their own party and its leader.
thats why it was a mistake for an old demented man to run in the first place, with the most unlikeable woman ever at his side.
also AOC will be eligible but being barely eligible isn't enough.
republicans have at least a few people in mind who'd seem well liked enough they could win.
DeSantis for instance. especially with all these endless booster shots. people are getting fucking tired of the Wu Flu restrictions and CRT being shoved into kids minds.
 
I don't want our stickers back in the Thunderdome anymore, I need me a set of irl self inking stamps to :late: these mother fuckers in real life. Which probably just proves I need more puzzle pieces.

Stamp merch when?
overdue.png
Biden is still insisting he'll run for re-election and the DNC is still insisting they'll back him against any challengers. The only way someone else has a chance at the nomination is if he dies. The DNC is so consistent about digging their heels in and refusing to learn from their mistakes, I would be shocked if they didn't continue pushing Kamala no matter what her approval rating. They're right, the public is wrong. Eat your vegetables. It's Her Turn. They'd probably try to balance her out with another white guy. My guess is Pete Buttigieg, because they seem to get off on forcing the people their own party rejects back down their throats, instead of just putting forward a likable candidate. Regardless of who they end up with, I predict they'll back Biden for too long, then be forced to change their campaign last minute and it will be a fabulous shitshow.
 
I'd love for her specifically to become the first female president because she would be an unpopular failure and it would teach at least some people a lesson about identity politics. The people who would learn nothing would just be a never-ending source of cope, seethe, and salt.
Kamala will be the Ghostbusters 2016 of Presidents.
 
But how? She’s a woman and black!
She was also infamous as a prosector, something that doesn't really endear you to the African-American community (and which Surf Mommy blew her up over.) The only Democrat in the 2020 pool that polled lower with blacks than her was the out-and-proud faggot.

On the other hand, I kind of understand her complaint. She was on a winning* presidential ticket, and her boss is obviously senile, but she's still being sidelined except for meaningless soundbytes ("first woman ever to hold presidential power! Edith Wilson could not be reached for comment.") It must be frustrating, being this close to the big chair and still unable to close the deal.

Of course, this should be an object lesson on why using people as stepping stones and not caring how you look can wind up biting you in the ass. The opposition likes her less than smallpox, and her own party only has a slightly better opinion of her. Image matters.

*I wonder if it's occurred to her that if she were at the top of the ticket, there isn't enough "election fortification" on earth to get her over the line. If she has, it has to sting.
 
Good. Dems made their bed and now they should sleep in it dealing with an increasingly senile POTUS and an unlikable whore as next up to bat.

Haven't these retards learned from having to tard wrangle the Squad the last few years?

But 58% of voters now say Mr. Biden is “too old to be President,” including 27% of Democrats, according to a recent Harvard-Harris poll. Meantime, 53% of voters “have doubts” about whether he is “mentally fit to serve,” including 16% of Democrats. On Friday Mr. Biden received an annual physical. We hope he passed with flying colors and will go on to enjoy the same longevity as Jimmy Carter, now 97.
I never put stock in polls but these are big numbers.
 

>"Democrats are slowly figuring out that Mr. Biden is unlikely to seek a second term"

Then they're even bigger morons than previously expected, as he was dropping hints about this in late 2019.

JOE BIDEN HINTS HE’D BE A ONE-TERM PRESIDENT
Political kryptonite, or strategic genius?
BY ERIC LUTZ
DECEMBER 11, 2019
Image may contain Clothing Apparel Human Person Finger Suit Coat Overcoat Thumbs Up Vehicle and Transportation

Joe Biden arrives at a December campaign stop in Iowa. SCOTT OLSON/GETTY IMAGES

Although he’s been the most consistent frontrunner of the 2020 Democratic field, Joe Biden has struggled to unite the party around him.
His record and his centrism have earned him a massive eyeroll from progressives, and his unceasing parade of gaffes have made even some moderates wary.
He’s staked his candidacy on what he says is his unique ability to defeat Donald Trump—but at least some Democratic voters are wondering what would happen afterward.
Is Biden too old, at 77, to be up to the task of governing? And isn’t it about time for the ex veep and others of his generation to, in the words of Eric Swalwell during one of the early primary debates, to “pass the torch”?

Biden may have come up with an answer. Sources familiar with his thinking told Politico he may seek to allay such concerns by indicating he’d only serve one term, allowing a new generation of Democratic leaders to rise once he’s attended to the business of ousting Trump.
By positioning himself, explicitly or implicitly, as a temporary caretaker of the White House who can clean up the mess the last guy made and get out, he may be able to win over some who are unexcited or uncertain about a Biden presidency.
“This makes Biden a good transition figure,” one prominent Biden adviser told the outlet. “I’d love to have an election this year for the next generation of leaders, but if I have to wait four years [in order to] get rid of Trump, I’m willing to do it.”

Biden maintains that he’s in good health, and he’ll challenge you to a push-up contest if you don’t believe him. Still, Biden would be the oldest person elected president. “If Biden is elected, he’s going to be 82 years old in four years and he won’t be running for reelection,” the campaign adviser told Politico.
According to one school of thought, acknowledging that up front—and even making it part of his sales pitch—could work well for Biden.
As one strategist told Politico, “a one-term pledge would be viewed as an act of selflessness, putting the country ahead of any ambition.”
Others close to Biden, however, are concerned that an official pledge could make him a lame duck from the outset.
“It accentuates your weakness,” former Hillary Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta told the outlet. “It doesn’t fix it.”

As a middle ground, then, Biden has reportedly signaled to advisers that he would “quietly indicate that he will almost certainly not run for a second term while declining to make a promise.” (His campaign contends he’s doing no such thing; Biden communications director Kate Bedingfield tweeted, “this is not a conversation our campaign is having and not something VP Biden is thinking about.”)
“I think he should make the [one-term pledge] privately to himself and his wife and no one else,” a prominent strategist said. “You can’t let the cat out of the bag.”
For many of the progressive voters who oppose his off-the-cuff, middle-of-the-road candidacy, no pledge, private or public, will be enough to bring them on board, especially as candidates they prefer, like 78-year-old Bernie Sanders and 70-year-old Elizabeth Warren, also reach an age where another run may not be feasible.
But in reassuring voters that his grip on power wouldn’t be too tight, Biden could shore up some support among his skeptics, as Nancy Pelosi did last year when she agreed to term limits on House leadership in exchange for taking back the gavel as House Speaker.
Pelosi effectively cleared her path to party leadership in doing so; Biden may be hoping a similar move will do the same for him.
 
Good. Dems made their bed and now they should sleep in it dealing with an increasingly senile POTUS and an unlikable whore as next up to bat.

Haven't these retards learned from having to tard wrangle the Squad the last few years?


I never put stock in polls but these are big numbers.
If he was planning on running for a second term, shouldn’t he be campaigning already? Or at least starting to be ready for the next term in office?
 
But 58% of voters now say Mr. Biden is “too old to be President,” including 27% of Democrats, according to a recent Harvard-Harris poll. Meantime, 53% of voters “have doubts” about whether he is “mentally fit to serve,” including 16% of Democrats.
Let me do some napkin math real quick. These numbers would suggest that a decent chunk of the base of THE MOST POPULAR PRESIDENT OF ALL TIME did not consider him too geriatric when voting for him, but do less than a year into his term. That would imply these people are astonishingly retarded, even by clown world standards, or maybe something fishy went on with the voting. HMMMMMMM.
 
Let me do some napkin math real quick. These numbers would suggest that a decent chunk of the base of THE MOST POPULAR PRESIDENT OF ALL TIME did not consider him too geriatric when voting for him, but do less than a year into his term. That would imply these people are astonishingly exceptional, even by clown world standards, or maybe something fishy went on with the voting. HMMMMMMM.
republicans might not have considered him too old, just the wrong person to run and be in charge.
Democrats thought he was obviously who should be in charge at the time, and his age. well orange man bad, so its okay.
 
View attachment 2737940
Biden is still insisting he'll run for re-election and the DNC is still insisting they'll back him against any challengers. The only way someone else has a chance at the nomination is if he dies. The DNC is so consistent about digging their heels in and refusing to learn from their mistakes, I would be shocked if they didn't continue pushing Kamala no matter what her approval rating. They're right, the public is wrong. Eat your vegetables. It's Her Turn. They'd probably try to balance her out with another white guy. My guess is Pete Buttigieg, because they seem to get off on forcing the people their own party rejects back down their throats, instead of just putting forward a likable candidate. Regardless of who they end up with, I predict they'll back Biden for too long, then be forced to change their campaign last minute and it will be a fabulous shitshow.
Any way it goes, the GOP gets an open invitation to waltz away with the presidency and we get to see the Dems splinter over it.
 
I'm very scared of do-nothing Kamala. Maybe she's only doing nothing to remain inconspicuous? Either way, I don't see her doing anything with the presidency other than paying lip service to cameras every so often.
She's been sidelined for being a retärd.
Kamala and lip service are not things I want to read in the same sentence.

Yeah, it’s best not to think what kind of service those lips rendered.
It's not a coof mask with her, it's a chastity belt.
 
Good. Dems made their bed and now they should sleep in it dealing with an increasingly senile POTUS and an unlikable whore as next up to bat.

Haven't these retards learned from having to tard wrangle the Squad the last few years?


I never put stock in polls but these are big numbers.

Good lord, imagine a DeSantis/anyone vs Kamala/anyone 2024. Imagine that spread.

It’d make Mondale feel better, wherever he is now.
 
Back