Kyle Rittenhouse Legal Proceedings - Come for the trial, stay for….

What do you think will happen?

  • Guilty on all charges

    Votes: 282 8.8%
  • Full Acquittal

    Votes: 1,077 33.7%
  • Mistral

    Votes: 264 8.3%
  • Mixture of verdicts

    Votes: 479 15.0%
  • Minecraft

    Votes: 213 6.7%
  • Roblox

    Votes: 132 4.1%
  • Runescape

    Votes: 203 6.3%
  • Somehow Guilty Of Two Mutually Exclusive Actions

    Votes: 514 16.1%
  • KYLE WILL SUBMIT TO BBC

    Votes: 35 1.1%

  • Total voters
    3,199
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
uyguighi.JPG
 
He's done more to help others than most people have.

We know he was cleaning graffiti off of the walls and has shown a lot of interest in being in emergency services. In any other time period, someone like him would be universally seen as a genuinely good person, especially after unintentionally killing a pedophile and a rapist.

We might have projected a lot of our own politics onto him, but that's only because "I go out of my way to help people in ways that actually help them and not just to virtue signal" is something only a white supremacist would say these days.
Any time you talk about "improving your community" that doesn't involve mass importation of fighting age men or abolishing the police, it's a far-right dog whistle for nationalism you chud.
 
Don't forget we have another one of these. In Austin, Texas, rioters surrounded and blocked in Daniel Perry as he tried to drive down a street. An antifa goon with an AK-47, Garrett Foster, approached the car, raised his rifle and pointed it at Perry, and Perry shot him to death with a 9mm and drove away. Perry's been charged with murder, and his pretrial either just happened or is still underway.

As with Rittenhouse, this should be an open-and-shut self-defense case in Texas. Under Texas "castle doctrine" law, the fact that Perry was engaged in lawful behavior, unlawfully trapped in his car by a mob, and threatened with a firearm gave him the right to use deadly force in his self-defense. We need to win both these cases. It can't ever be in question whether you can use force to defend yourself from people attacking you.
Garrett Foster is pretty much what the media said Rittenhouse is: affiliated with an extremist ideology, deliberately instigating conflict and inserting himself into dangerous situations, doing stuff that wasn't his business. He was videoed earlier that night boasting that nobody would have the balls to fight back against antifa. Like Kyle, he was armed with an AK-47 automatic assault machine gun loaded with FMJ hollowpoint shells, just like the "video-game" toys that teenagers play with nowadays. I don't think he crossed state lines but that would be the kicker.

The guy who killed him was an uber driver on the job. Could be a leftist himself for all I know.

The media coverage:

At the time of his death, according to his mother, he had been pushing the wheelchair of his fiancée Whitney Mitchell, 28, a quadruple amputee.
According to witnesses and Austin’s police chief, a car drove down the street toward protesters and began honking its horn vigorously. Foster approached the car to speak with the driver, who then opened fire, fatally striking him.
Apparently the murderer was trying to run down a group of peaceful protestors when Foster approached him to peacefully speak to him, also he was assisting his disabled Black girlfriend who he heroically cared for.

Jury selection was underway as of a couple days ago. Now that the Butcher of Kenosha has been set free to kill again, Austin-dwellers will likely feel additional pressure to Send a Message.
 
Citizens who openly carry firearms “think that they are making the situation safer, but they are making it much more dangerous."
Prepare for incoming dissonance.
In front of the Ultimate Convenience Center, protesters set a dumpster on fire. After a member of the group at the gas station put it out, a demonstrator hurled a flagpole like a javelin. A man in a “Black Lives Matter” mask racked his pistol; another man said, “I say we jack them and take they guns."
I wonder who that could've been. I don't think Ziminski was wearing a mask though.
Anyone spot this in the gas station footage?
Are these idiots really so out of touch with America that they think Rural Wisconsin men having a beer with their parents is something unusual?
Yet they think nothing of smoking a joint/bowl with their parents. I've heard plenty millennials & zoomers talk about it in the same light as having a first beer with their them; along with evaluating/grading their parents based on if they share weed with them.

I seem to have missed the point where parents smoking dope with their kids isn't problematic.
 
God, I love how scared these people are :story:

They should all be glad the trial turned out the way it did. If the justice system tried to tell Americans they couldn't legally defend themselves from murderous shitlib mobs, it's not like people would have meekly submitted to the SocJus beatings and destruction. They just would have realized there was no reason to hold back in those dangerous situations because you're going to jail no matter what you do or don't do.
 
Woke up this morning with an idea. A site called Rittenhouse Case Myths or something like that which is just a simple single-page site which starts with a paragraph-length description of what happened that day and then a list of oft-repeated mistruths, linked via floating table of contents, with sourced deboonkings based on trial testimony, public records, etc. I even started writing up a list of the myths to debunk. It'd all be in a Git repo so people could propose changes via issues and pull requests and such. Maybe even have a contact page which features some of the salty email I'd be sure to get. Eventually as I woke up more I realized writing this up would take a long time (and I'm fortunate to have almost more paid work in my inbox than I can handle at the moment), make me a target for extremists, and probably utterly fail to change anyone's mind. Still, here's what I had in my list so far, just in case someone else wants to do anything with it.
  1. Rittenhouse killed two (or three) black men
  2. Rittenhouse crossed state lines with his rifle
  3. It was against Wisconsin state law for a 17-year-old like Rittenhouse to carry an AR-15 rifle
  4. The full-metal jacket ammunition loaded into the AR-15 rifle was unusual or intentional
  5. Rittenhouse had no connections to Kenosha, WI and no reason to be there
  6. Rittenhouse went to Kenosha, WI for the sole reason of attending the “riot”
  7. Rittenhouse fired aimlessly into a crowd
  8. Rittenhouse had a duty to retreat before defending himself and did not do so
  9. Rittenhouse’s mother drove him across state lines
  10. The prosecution may be able to appeal their loss in the case
  11. The AR-15 is an "assault rifle"
  12. The AR-15 is a military-grade weapon
  13. The AR-15 is a machine gun or a fully-automatic rifle
 
God, I love how scared these people are :story:

They should all be glad the trial turned out the way it did. If the justice system tried to tell Americans they couldn't legally defend themselves from murderous shitlib mobs, it's not like people would have meekly submitted to the SocJus beatings and destruction. They just would have realized there was no reason to hold back in those dangerous situations because you're going to jail no matter what you do or don't do.
I don't know what's to be afraid of. If you don't walk up to some law-abiding citizen with a gun and start trying to grab it while shrieking "SHOOT ME NIGGER" over and over again, your odds of being shot by them are pretty low.
 
Yep, the media is once again lying as much as it can about this case to poison the public against the person who was actually aggressed. They typically don't mention the AK-47, or if they do, it's to emphasize that Foster was "open carrying legally." Once you point a gun at somebody, you're not "open carrying." You're "brandishing." Maybe the Foster case needs a separate thread.
 
I wonder if its a conspiracy that the pros basically decided to fuck up on purpose to allow Kyle to go free and go after the others just for helping Kyle like Dominic Black. Its probably a conspiracy though, given how incompetent and straight up malicious these two were. I imagine future defendents will bring up the Kyle trial against Binger and that fat tub of lard.

Richards mentioned or implied that he was a former prosecutor himself and knew Binger and was surprised at him going full exceptional individual in his attempt to win. That is probably why Richards maybe didn't say much because he was just in awe at how full exceptional individual could one go.

Also this gem lol, apparently the niggress from Baltimore is butthurt over the prosecution mentioning that the pedo wigger's criminal acts and racial slurs were brought up by the prosecution.


View attachment 2740481



View attachment 2740479
What a fucking joke. She needs to shut the fuck up and deal with Baltimore's crime. She obviously cannot; one reason the place is a total shithole.
 
Just saw a Rittenhaus interview quote:
“I’m not racist, I support BLM”

I mean I kind of get not racist. But saying you support BLM is where I’m going to say goodbye to my continuing following the Rittenhaus drama. So many of us racists went to bat for you defending you while faggot BLM literally was terrorizing you and those “peaceful protestors” in the media were calling for you to be thrown in jail.

Why the fuck would you even utter such a retarded, faggot atement?

Just how I feel. Looks like the honeymoon is already over, took surprisingly short time too.
 
Just saw a Rittenhaus interview quote:
“I’m not racist, I support BLM”

I mean I kind of get not racist. But saying you support BLM is where I’m going to say goodbye to my continuing following the Rittenhaus drama. So many of us racists went to bat for you defending you while faggot BLM literally was terrorizing you and those “peaceful protestors” in the media were calling for you to be thrown in jail.

Why the fuck would you even utter such an exceptional, faggot atement?

Just how I feel. Looks like the honeymoon is already over, took surprisingly short time too.
Because he's a dumb idealistic kid and probably doesn't realize there's "BLM the concept" vs "BLM the Neo-Marxist front: Race War division."

More importantly, if I was in his shoes and needed to just absolutely fuck the left in the head, I'd be shouting shit like "KYLE RITTENHOUSE SAYS TRANS RIGHTS" whenever I had an interview or microphone just to cause cognitive dissonance in them.
 
Just saw a Rittenhaus interview quote:
“I’m not racist, I support BLM”

I mean I kind of get not racist. But saying you support BLM is where I’m going to say goodbye to my continuing following the Rittenhaus drama. So many of us racists went to bat for you defending you while faggot BLM literally was terrorizing you and those “peaceful protestors” in the media were calling for you to be thrown in jail.

Why the fuck would you even utter such an exceptional, faggot atement?

Just how I feel. Looks like the honeymoon is already over, took surprisingly short time too.
Why won't you?

It's a great way to cover your ass. Even libertarian groups will say something similar but add on that the wider issue is police brutality / abuse instead of a specific racial issue.
 
Just saw a Rittenhaus interview quote:
“I’m not racist, I support BLM”

I mean I kind of get not racist. But saying you support BLM is where I’m going to say goodbye to my continuing following the Rittenhaus drama. So many of us racists went to bat for you defending you while faggot BLM literally was terrorizing you and those “peaceful protestors” in the media were calling for you to be thrown in jail.

Why the fuck would you even utter such an exceptional, faggot atement?

Just how I feel. Looks like the honeymoon is already over, took surprisingly short time too.
As others said, I wouldn't take it personally. Betting good money that he was instructed to say so on live TV for the purpose of optics.

Bear in mind, he's still only 18. He might have led a charmingly innocent life, but that doesn't mean he's wise to the ways of the world yet.
 
I don't know what's to be afraid of. If you don't walk up to some law-abiding citizen with a gun and start trying to grab it while shrieking "SHOOT ME NIGGER" over and over again, your odds of being shot by them are pretty low.
Yeah it's a once in a lifetime that you would actually get shot eh?
 
As others said, I wouldn't take it personally. Betting good money that he was instructed to say so on live TV for the purpose of optics.

Bear in mind, he's still only 18. He might have led a charmingly innocent life, but that doesn't mean he's wise to the ways of the world yet.
He was definitely coached. Compare the videos of him talking normally at the riots to him answering Binger's questions with "I did what I had to do to remove the threat" over and over. On that Fox News clip he's using the same hesitant, trying-to-remember-the-exact-words voice he did on trial.

That's not to say he's not being truthful. He might mean what he says, but the words he's using aren't his.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back