Waukesha, WI, Parade Vehicle Attack - Suspect is Darrell Edward Brooks, currently in custody.

Who's responsible?

  • Glowies

    Votes: 196 9.4%
  • Incel

    Votes: 57 2.7%
  • Truck of Peace

    Votes: 222 10.6%
  • BLM

    Votes: 708 34.0%
  • Retaliation for Kyle's Acquittal

    Votes: 539 25.9%
  • Minceraft

    Votes: 128 6.1%
  • Alt-Right Nazi Gamergater Chud

    Votes: 108 5.2%
  • Other (please specify)

    Votes: 127 6.1%

  • Total voters
    2,085
You forgot the exception for the (((fellow whites))) and the italians.
Did you know that the I in AIPAC stands for Italy?


Shotcut is the worst video editing suite ever made.
If you keep at it maybe you can make some shekels from it.
 
If the left taught me anything during the Rittenhouse trial, its that those open carrying blacks are being provocative and thus deserve to be lynched by a mob of white people.
Better yet, drop them in an area of Hispanic majority in Chicago or let that job to the Roof Koreans.

Edit: The staff of American Thinker did a good summary of the Waukesha massacre.
November 23, 2021

The Waukesha massacre picture begins to emerge​

By Andrea Widburg

At this time yesterday, as I wrote about what happened in Waukesha, I knew only that a Black man with dreadlocks driving a red SUV had slammed into Waukesha, Wisconsin’s Christmas parade, killing multiple people and injuring dozens more. Twenty-four hours have revealed significant new information, all of which points to the fact that, when leftists control the criminal justice system, innocent people will die.
We’ve learned that Darrell Brooks, the man behind the wheel of that car has an endless rap sheet in Milwaukee going back more than 20 years, including such things as drug possession, strangling and suffocating someone, battery, sex offenses, illegal firearm possession (as a convicted felon), resisting arrest, and beating up and then running over the mother of one of his children.

This last offense saw Brooks getting arrested just last week and charged with five counts—one of which was bail jumping. With his record, one would think that his bail would be high—or maybe, like those January 6 protesters rotting in jail without bail on charges of trespassing and “parading”, Brooks would be denied bail entirely. That, however, is not how Milwaukee’s District Attorney, John Chisholm rolls.
The thing about Chisholm is that he’s one of those prosecutors who won his elections thanks to substantial help from George Soros. Aside from inflammatory tweets about January 6 in which he calls for fire and brimstone to rain down on the protesters—statements he was not obligated to make sitting in his little corner of Wisconsin—Chisholm has repeatedly made clear that he believes his obligation as the prosecutor isn’t to enforce the law but is, instead, to protect wrongdoers from law enforcement, all in the name of equity and social justice:

Unsurprisingly, Chisholm is a fan of San Francisco’s Chesa Boudin, a hard-left, Soros-sponsored District Attorney:
 
Last edited:
This sentence:
>In an interview, Rider, who'd been away on a hunting trip and was watching football when the crash occurred, said he had no idea about what had just happened blocks away.
>He said he invited Brooks inside and gave him a jacket, made him a sandwich and let him use his phone.
>"All of a sudden, I look outside my street and I see a few cop cars drive by and I'm getting extra nervous," he said.
A good Samaritan. Imagine if Brooks was armed. Jesus.

View attachment 2744092
Some people are too nice for this world.
 
Sure, question, if a nigger ran through your kids and put them in the ICU, would these two shoot him, or defend him?
In my experience niggers, even the "good ones" will inherently defend nigger behavior no matter how bad or unforgivable it was 9 times out of 10. If only whites had that much tribal instinct and circle the wagons when one of their own was in peril. Instead whites in the US and Europe will flirt with the idea that violent blacks are justified due to slavery that happened over 100 years ago.
 
The “race war” will just be white people being victimized regularly like normal but with some racial slurs thrown in. And of course some terrorist attacks and rioting against white.This will all be swept under the rug or shrugged off or justified.
that's not a race war.
thats just open hostility.
what you just described is the event that needs one more despicable thing to happen to white people to spark a race war.
if a black terrorist blows up a white daycare or something.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Green Man
In my experience niggers, even the "good ones" will inherently defend nigger behavior no matter how bad or unforgivable it was 9 times out of 10. If only whites had that much tribal instinct and circle the wagons when one of their own was in peril. Instead whites in the US and Europe will flirt with the idea that violent blacks are justified due to slavery that happened over 100 years ago.
It's something which whites in general seem to struggle with, a few exceptions in mind.

It's an idea which IS present in certain communities - for the USA, Mormons spring to mind, in the UK, Irish Travellers and Northern Irish do it - but is not present among English.

This is why I can't stand "this is one of the good ones" - no. That isn't how wars work, unfortunately, and even if the guy in the other trench is sound, he still has a gun and he still wants to protect himself and his family. Events beyond either of your control have lead to a situation where one of you may die, and self preservation is not a crime.

Your personal opinion of it doesn't matter - even if the guy you're fighting is a good guy, his mate might not be, and likewise, you might find yourself fighting alongside disagreeable people. But without them, you might get shot in the back.
 
Sure, question, if a nigger ran through your kids and put them in the ICU, would these two shoot him, or defend him.
Oh, they would defend him of course. How long do you think armed niggers can be around each other in close proximity before one of them starts shooting the others? I know enough to keep my family from clear and obvious dangers, but anyone dumb enough to be near that powder keg prob not someone with my interests at heart and niggers with guns and no whites to support them is a self solving problem.
Did you know that the I in AIPAC stands for Italy?
Got to kill jesus and make the jews the fall guy, named africa after the general who conquered it, vespasian, openly racist, blacks love em for it, gabagool. the eternal romans the true shapeshifter
 
that's not a race war.
thats just open hostility.
what you just described is the event that needs one more despicable thing to happen to white people to spark a race war.
if a black terrorist blows up a white daycare or something.
Knowing and understanding niggers, it will likely be a group of "teens" who are in their early twenties who kidnap and rape/torture some white schoolkids on camera. Niggers will spread it, praising these actions, claiming the victims said "nigger" or something.

Then, as I've mentioned before, it will cause small groups of people to start taking direct action, beginning phases of apolitical violence which will quickly "line up" between factions and political groups will attach themselves to each side.

Extreme brutal violence is seen as normal by niggers but is extremely disturbing to whites, and that cultural divide will remind everybody why the KKK formed in the first place.
 
You guys are getting caught up in the weeds. The real question is when and what the retaliatory attack will be.
I am going to go down two routes - false-start and start.

False-start is an El Paso style lone-wolf attack, highly politically motivated and clear. This has no stopping power, the individual responsible will have very little effect outside of politics.

Start is a small group of serious adult men with strong offensive capability, but no clear political motive. Just a group of dudes who clearly retaliate, but don't mention any specific political cause.

This already happened and nothing happened.

That's how I know niggers - and nothing happened that time, correct.

I am going to go down two routes - false-start and start.

False-start is an El Paso style lone-wolf attack, highly politically motivated and clear. This has no stopping power, the individual responsible will have very little effect outside of politics.

Start is a small group of serious adult men with strong offensive capability, but no clear political motive. Just a group of dudes who clearly retaliate, but don't mention any specific political cause.


That's how I know niggers - and nothing happened that time, correct.
The reasoning behind the two is that a politically motivated terrorist wants to be caught - their political stunt requires they be heard by an audience, and to do so, they need to be named and captured.

The latter will have no clear political cause because they wanted revenge and importantly, wanted to escape - anybody who sympathises will see that the state is not invulnerable, and that they can get away with it - at which point, the victims of the retribution will close ranks, seeing that the police can no longer protect them and quickly radicalise out of fear - since the people who just attacked them are still out there.

Likewise, there will be a breaking of the landscape of fear among whites - people who were afraid of being called racist, for fear it could get them hurt, will realise that they can be as racist as they want with no repurcussions, causing a similar cascade effect. Realising that the people are still out there will make people more confident that they are not alone in their beliefs.
 
You guys are getting caught up in the weeds. The real question is when and what the retaliatory attack will be.
Theres not going to be. the whites who would do something have relocated away from them and the people who maintain, and keep everything going for them who were capable have left or been replaced for diversity. so at a certain point failure hits critical mass and theres not enough food, meds, power, no fire dept to keep it going,. but there is that nigga down the block who always has good you can rol up on real quick. theyll have got what they wanted an all black life but the monkeys paw effect means now your surrounded by niggers.
 
That's how I know niggers - and nothing happened that time, correct.

What you don't understand is that nothing will likely ever happen because the American Nigger that does this sort of heinous crime doesn't leave it's stronghold, and the types of whites you want making a move on them won't leave their stronghold, tend to not give a shit about whites who willingly live in urban strongholds and in most cases don't even hear or pay attention about these crimes.

Most white militants are content to let niggers kill themselves in their urban shitholes and let the whites dumb enough to live in urban shitholes get killed as well as long as they are left the fuck alone. US white militants are far more Randy Weaver types than IRA types.

Basically, you understand the American Nigger, but you don't understand the American White.
 
Last edited:
I think we’re over the target on this guy being either racist against white people or a black supremacist. How do I know? The media is throwing out the carrot of talking about Brooks’ ridiculously low bond and allowing criticism of that. “The criminal justice system failed” goes towards their narrative, they don’t want anyone bringing their attention to critical race theory or the problem of black crime in this country. Brooks’ opinions aren’t any different than like Nick Cannon’s, Nick Cannon is just rich af and doesn’t need to take out his rage on a Christmas parade.
 
Back