Megathread Tranny Sideshows on Social Media - Any small-time spectacle on Reddit, Tumblr, Twitter, Dating Sites, and other social media.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
alot of you are writing with the benefit of hindsight, radical feminists have always wanted to drastically shift the status quo.
for many trans and homosexual rights were part of the progressive agenda which went hand in hand with women's liberation.
many feminists also argued that the main difference in the treatment of men and women was childhood socialisation something which is now a big part of the tranny zeitgeist.
I understand now why feminist would want to distance them selves from the trans movement now that it has had negative effects on women. but I don't see why it's so hard to just admit the part they played in it.
it was the radfems though who were critizising including men in dresses in lesbian spaces or feminist places or whatever already like in 70s or something so blaming radfems for other feminists doings is kinda dumb when they the og tranny haters
 
You know how in some countries with poor sanitation, every so often they have an outbreak of dysentery? This thread is the same way, in that every so often there is an outbreak of 'nasty stupid uppity women are responsible for the behavior of mentally ill men.' Same shit different day.
On god. I won’t bother trying to imagine the autistic mental gymnastics that occurs for these exceptionals to blame a handful of angry lesbians on tumblr for the mfs in this thread jerking themselves off while wearing flower patterned shit-packed pampers. Hilariously bold of them to assume troons give a shit about what a uterus haver thinks anyway.
 
I grabbed this from Women Are Human.

The Canadian government, thanks to Morgane Oger, wants to criminalize ALL hate speech, including things such as saying 'You Will Never Be a Woman' on any social media platform, blog, or personal website.

On November 3, 2020, Liberal Party Member and Heritage Minister Steven Guilbeault introduced Bill C-10 to the House of Commons. While officially the bill is said to be (and I quote) “An Act to amend the Broadcasting Act and to make related and consequential amendments to other Acts”, the Conservatives are calling it “the censorship bill”. Bill C-10 will amend the Broadcasting Act to include internet and digital media.[2] Then, in June of 2021, the Honourable David Lametti, also of the Liberal Party of Canada, introduced Bill C-36, which proposes legislative changes to the Canadian Human Rights Act and to the Criminal Code in order to combat hate speech and hate crimes. According to the Government of Canada, “The bill defines ‘hate speech’ as the content of a communication that expresses detestation or vilification of an individual or group of individuals on the basis of a prohibited ground of discrimination. These grounds of discrimination are race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, age, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression…”[3] and others. Furthermore, “These amendments would apply to public communications by individual users on the Internet, including on social media, on personal websites, and in mass emails. For example, they would apply to an individual publishing a blog or posting on a social media platform. They would also apply to operators of websites that primarily publish their own content but also publish comments by users and visitors, including in articles on online newspapers and in user comment sections.”[4] “Operators of these social media platforms are the subject of upcoming engagement by Canadian Heritage, which will outline a proposed approach to regulating social media and harmful content, including hate speech, online.”[5] Continue reading Gender Critical Feminism Soon May Be Criminalized in Canada | Women Are Human. Read more at: https://www.womenarehuman.com/gender-critical-feminism-soon-may-be-criminalized-in-canada/
This followed Bill C-16, which promised 2 years of jail for anyone caught misgendering. The Canadian public largely did not know about this and an Angus Reid poll showed 80% of Canadians supporting trans rights. I'm not sure how many were polled exactly, but I do remember it being used to show how important the Bill was.

So, even in personal emails these laws will make you a criminal.

You can thank Morgane Oger for this, because closing down a rape shelter wasn't enough for the fucker.
 
alot of you are writing with the benefit of hindsight, radical feminists have always wanted to drastically shift the status quo.
for many trans and homosexual rights were part of the progressive agenda which went hand in hand with women's liberation.
many feminists also argued that the main difference in the treatment of men and women was childhood socialisation something which is now a big part of the tranny zeitgeist.
I understand now why feminist would want to distance them selves from the trans movement now that it has had negative effects on women. but I don't see why it's so hard to just admit the part they played in it.
The problem is that you view feminism and feminists as being homogeneous. Feminism is vast and contains many strands of thought, and feminists aren’t in agreement about much at all. There are Marxist feminists, there are generic liberal feminists(the kind you’re most likely thinking of), there are various shades of radical feminist, etc.

Broadly, tranny rights can be identified with the third wave of feminism, which started in the 80s, was concerned with shit like “intersectionality”, and was significantly less radical than the second wave. Shit like “sex work” and individualism and other liberal issues replaced the old goal of radical women’s liberation. It’s become more popular now with the mass adoption of watered down “woke” ideology.

Radfems often reject many of the third wave’s innovations and support gender abolitionism, biological realism, and other stuff that is anathema to mainstream liberal feminism. Radfems are critical of shit like prostitution, the commodification of sexuality, the commodification of gender identity, and other shit that the mainstream promotes.

Tranny ideologues actually don’t understand the significance of childhood socialization in the same way that radfems do at all. Radfems believe this socialization is what creates what we call gender while trannies believe gender is some sort of inherent quasi-divine state of being and therefore gender expression should be a choice left to the child . They reify essential gender identities while radfems deny them.
 
YOU. DUMB. BITCH.
I have been telling this in the past, and I'll repeat: terfs are just broken clock showing right time. It's YOUR deranged ideology that was built on manhate, hating masculinity, suppressing natural male sexuality, feminizing boys, and creating a message of men bad girls good that cauzed shit you've gotten into. Trannies are product of feminism and progressivism. Go and suck girl dick, you've earned it. The only real reason terfs are terfs is because of man hate. They hate mtf because they were men, they hate ftm because they ditched sisterhood. Terfs don't belong anywhere, because you're bunch of mongloid retards who can't take accountability for the product of your ideology.
In a fight of terfs vs tranies I would like to see them both cemented in a ditch.
So class, as demonstrated here by a presumably right man and by the many examples from left men on Twitter, political alignment doesn't protect men from being misogynistic, so thus radical feminist do not fit squarely in the left/right political spectrum as they are against misogynistic men as a whole.
 
Okay, serious question here...I know that there are no girls on the internet, but for the people who actually are lesbians how bad is the troon encroachment into your dating pool/culture really? Are transbians as big of a plague in your scene as they seem to be?

I have no issues with the LGB part of the alphabet acronym so this is an honest inquiry.
 
Okay, serious question here...I know that there are no girls on the internet, but for the people who actually are lesbians how bad is the troon encroachment into your dating pool/culture really? Are transbians as big of a plague in your scene as they seem to be?

I have no issues with the LGB part of the alphabet acronym so this is an honest inquiry.
It's honestly horrible. I haven't experienced it myself (married) but from conversations with other lesbian women, every dating app lesbians use is absolutely teeming with trans-identified men who identify themselves as "lesbians" and are seeking out lesbian women. Most of my lesbian friends and acquaintances have stopped using these apps altogether because the sexual harassment is so bad from the men there. The ones who stay... it depends. Some get pressured into relationships and sex they don't want to have with men. Some play nice but turn every one of the shits down. Some just ignore them. All of them have it pretty rough.

Offline lesbian groups and meetups usually happen more or less in secret, because otherwise either you have to let the men in and the entire nature of the space changes (and many of the actual lesbian women leave the group) or you have to deal with turning them down and being called "exclusionary," possibly ostracized in your community, possibly losing your job and/or receiving death and rape threats, etc. I know at least one lesbian woman who I met online who got in huge trouble with her local "LGBT" group for trying to organize a lesbian only meetup group. (It's not all bad - there's a lesbian group in my town and to the best of my knowledge, it has never included any men and still exists. Probably just because it's all organized through an email list, though.)

It's really tough. These men are incredibly entitled and sexually aggressive, and they don't take rejection well. A lot of lesbians have had to go "underground" just to be able to meet up with one another without the presence of males. It's so ridiculous. And it makes it so much harder to find community and relationships than it already was - and it was already difficult due to a small population that is really spread out.
 
The problem is that you view feminism and feminists as being homogeneous. Feminism is vast and contains many strands of thought, and feminists aren’t in agreement about much at all. There are Marxist feminists, there are generic liberal feminists(the kind you’re most likely thinking of), there are various shades of radical feminist, etc.

Broadly, tranny rights can be identified with the third wave of feminism, which started in the 80s, was concerned with shit like “intersectionality”, and was significantly less radical than the second wave. Shit like “sex work” and individualism and other liberal issues replaced the old goal of radical women’s liberation. It’s become more popular now with the mass adoption of watered down “woke” ideology.

Radfems often reject many of the third wave’s innovations and support gender abolitionism, biological realism, and other stuff that is anathema to mainstream liberal feminism. Radfems are critical of shit like prostitution, the commodification of sexuality, the commodification of gender identity, and other shit that the mainstream promotes.

Tranny ideologues actually don’t understand the significance of childhood socialization in the same way that radfems do at all. Radfems believe this socialization is what creates what we call gender while trannies believe gender is some sort of inherent quasi-divine state of being and therefore gender expression should be a choice left to the child . They reify essential gender identities while radfems deny them.
I have explained this in detail to this farmer (iirc) on this thread. It's not worth trying to change his mind, just keep giving him the trash react.
Okay, serious question here...I know that there are no girls on the internet, but for the people who actually are lesbians how bad is the troon encroachment into your dating pool/culture really? Are transbians as big of a plague in your scene as they seem to be?

I have no issues with the LGB part of the alphabet acronym so this is an honest inquiry.
Disclaimer: I am not a lesbian, but I have many friends who are. I'm bisexual so I can see what happens on the dating apps.

It's pretty darn bad. Lots of lesbians, especially young lesbians, are pressured to date and have sex with transwomen. Transwomen are everywhere on dating apps and iirc it's rumored that the app HER will somehow make the transbians feel better about themselves because they keep getting rejected on the app. There is no way for a lesbian to say that she is same sex attracted on her dating app profiles without getting banned. Rejecting transwomen irl is much worse as you might be making a narcissistic man angry and he will go out and brand you as a terf. I know from first hand experience that making troons angry as a woman is a bit traumatizing so I bet it is worse if you make them angry by denying them sex.

Even if you do not find a transbian, there are a fair amount of bisexual handmaidens who think they are lesbians that will shame you for not wanting the dick. So not only you have to deal with transbians, you have to deal with women who will call you out as a terf if you say you're same sex attracted. One of my friend said she that dating a female they/them was annoying as the they/them kept stressing that my friend wasn't a lesbian since the two were dating. You can occasionally find this phenomenon when a lesbian dates a ftm.

The offline dating scene for lesbians is hard. There's only a handful of lesbian bars in America. Whats left is queer bars where it's likely you will be shamed for not liking the dick. The lesbians I know don't even bother date or try to covertly sniff out other terfy lesbians on dating apps.

Gender ideology is a cult and for lesbians it's best to not date anyone in that cult as they think that lesbians do not mean women who are same sex attracted. It's straight up homophobia. This is why a lot of lesbians are terfy and have been against transwomen since day one: transwomen have been saying that lesbians are opposite sex attracted.
 
Girl guide tranny's in the news, reddit tranny Aimee Challenor mentioned too.

Girlguides launch probe into commissioner, 58, who identifies as trans after campaigners uncovered 'disturbing' social media messages and pictures including her dressed as a dominatrix and wielding an assault rifle​

  • Monica Sulley took on the role in July, overseeing groups in Nottinghamshire
  • The 58-year-old bus driver's appointment has upset some feminist campaigners
  • They say biological males identifying as women shouldn't have leadership roles
  • Pictures show her in black bondage-style dress and high heels, wielding a whip
Girlguiding bosses have launched an investigation into one of their Commissioners who is a trans woman after she allegedly posed for a saucy picture in a dominatrix-style outfit.

Bus driver Monica Sulley, 58, reportedly became a guiding Commissioner in July this year, overseeing Rainbows, Brownies, Guides and Rangers in Southwell, Nottinghamshire.

Her appointment has upset some feminist campaigners who argue that biological males identifying as women should not be given leadership roles in the movement.

Campaigners delved into her background and unearthed a picture on her Instagram page showing her in a black bondage-style short dress with high heels and wielding a whip.

The picture of her posing in a corridor was captioned: 'Now behave yourselves or Mistress will have to punish you #mistress'.

Screenshot 2021-11-24 15.26.42.png

Another snap showed Ms Sulley dressed in a tight fitting black top and taking aim with what appears to be a fake assault rifle with a holstered handgun hanging from her waist.

She was also seen in a third picture posing with a sword and in a Twitter picture showing off her ample cleavage with the caption: 'Boobs, or did you want to see more?'

Girlguiding which is Britain's leading charity for girls and young women launched its investigation after the pictures of Ms Sulley were revealed by the feminist website 4W.

Angela Salt, the CEO of Girlguiding, said in a statement tonight: 'The safety and wellbeing of our members is our absolute priority.

'We follow rigorous recruitment and vetting procedures, have clear policies, and a volunteer code of conduct which volunteers are expected to follow to keep our members safe.

'Girlguiding is aware of concerns raised. We are looking into this as a matter of urgency and will provide the necessary support and action in line with our compliance procedures.'

A spokeswoman for the organisation said she would not be issuing a statement on behalf of Ms Sulley who is also known on social media as Monica Tetley.

Ms Sulley who describes herself on social media as 'a trans woman married to a wonderful man' declined to comment when contacted by MailOnline.

Her Instagram account has now been deleted and her Twitter account set to private settings.

Girlguiding has described itself in recent years as being a 'girl-only organisation with a trans-inclusive Equality and diversity policy'.

A statement on its website says: 'We treat trans girls and women according to the gender they have transitioned, or are proposing to transition, to. Meaning trans girls and trans women are welcome to be a part of our great charity.

'The benefits to Girlguiding of being fully-inclusive are significant. We recognise the huge impact Girlguiding can have on each young member and volunteer.

'And it's vital that trans girls and women – like all other girls and women – can contribute their experiences, time, commitment and skills to our charity.'


But feminist writer Anna Slatz described Ms Sulley's social media posts as 'disturbing' in her article on the 4W website.

She wrote: 'While Girlguiding framed their policies as being directed towards including and supporting children, they tip-toed around the fact they were also allowing adult males who identified as women to take leadership positions within the organization (sic) in proximity to and control over the youth.'

Ms Slatz added that Ms Sulley's appointment had been 'met with backlash from women's rights activists and netizens concerned over his (sic) inappropriate online behavior (sic).'

She quoted one social media user as questioning Ms Sulley's involvement in Girlguiding, saying: 'Why would you be so insensitive towards women and girls that you would do this? I've managed my whole life without being involved with guiding and I'm a woman, it's hardly traumatic to not be involved.'

Another user said Ms Sulley's appointment was sending a 'possibly harmful' message to girls and young women, as 'it simply demonstrated males would be readily able to gain leadership over females in exclusive spaces simply by identifying as women'.

The article on 4W also revealed that Ms Sulley was one of 2,000 signatories on a letter to Pride in London organisers in 2018 which protested about how radical lesbians had been allowed to stage an anti-trans demonstration during the Pride march.

The lesbians pushed their way to the front of the Pride march behind a giant Rainbow flag to protest that the trans movement was attacking lesbian rights.

The letter which Ms Sulley signed was written by transgender woman and activist Aimee Challenor, a former contender for the deputy leadership of the Green party.

Ms Challenor was suspended by the Green party a month later, over revelations that she allowed her father David to be her election agent for 18 months after he was charged with raping and torturing a ten-year-old.

He was jailed for 22 years after being found guilty at Warwick Crown Court of 'depraved' crimes, including dressing as a baby and tying the girl to a beam, before whipping her and giving her electric shocks.

Ms Challenor later resigned after accusing the Green party of transphobia.

Girlguiding was forced to defend its trans-inclusive policy in September 2018 after it expelled two volunteers who objected to it.

The movement insisted at the time that allowing people who identify as women to join or lead groups did not put girls at risk.

Helen Watts, from Ealing in west London and another volunteer, were expelled after 'a number of complaints' were made about them, the organisation said.

Ms Watts, who has a 15-year history with Girlguiding, told the BBC's World At One programme on Monday that she felt 'a real loss' about being was banned from events and from contacting her group.

She insisted that girls have a right to 'female-only' spaces, particularly when guides and leaders shared lavatories, showers and sleeping accommodation in camps.

Ms Watts added that adolescents coping with changes in their bodies, victims of bullying or harassment by men, as well as girls from some cultural or religious backgrounds might feel shut out by Girlguiding becoming 'effectively a mixed-sex space'.

But feminist writer Anna Slatz described Ms Sulley's social media posts as 'disturbing' in her article on the 4W website.

She wrote: 'While Girlguiding framed their policies as being directed towards including and supporting children, they tip-toed around the fact they were also allowing adult males who identified as women to take leadership positions within the organization (sic) in proximity to and control over the youth.'

Ms Slatz added that Ms Sulley's appointment had been 'met with backlash from women's rights activists and netizens concerned over his (sic) inappropriate online behavior (sic).'

She quoted one social media user as questioning Ms Sulley's involvement in Girlguiding, saying: 'Why would you be so insensitive towards women and girls that you would do this? I've managed my whole life without being involved with guiding and I'm a woman, it's hardly traumatic to not be involved.'

Another user said Ms Sulley's appointment was sending a 'possibly harmful' message to girls and young women, as 'it simply demonstrated males would be readily able to gain leadership over females in exclusive spaces simply by identifying as women'.

The article on 4W also revealed that Ms Sulley was one of 2,000 signatories on a letter to Pride in London organisers in 2018 which protested about how radical lesbians had been allowed to stage an anti-trans demonstration during the Pride march.

The lesbians pushed their way to the front of the Pride march behind a giant Rainbow flag to protest that the trans movement was attacking lesbian rights.

The letter which Ms Sulley signed was written by transgender woman and activist Aimee Challenor, a former contender for the deputy leadership of the Green party.

Ms Challenor was suspended by the Green party a month later, over revelations that she allowed her father David to be her election agent for 18 months after he was charged with raping and torturing a ten-year-old.

He was jailed for 22 years after being found guilty at Warwick Crown Court of 'depraved' crimes, including dressing as a baby and tying the girl to a beam, before whipping her and giving her electric shocks.

Ms Challenor later resigned after accusing the Green party of transphobia.

Girlguiding was forced to defend its trans-inclusive policy in September 2018 after it expelled two volunteers who objected to it.

The movement insisted at the time that allowing people who identify as women to join or lead groups did not put girls at risk.

Helen Watts, from Ealing in west London and another volunteer, were expelled after 'a number of complaints' were made about them, the organisation said.

Ms Watts, who has a 15-year history with Girlguiding, told the BBC's World At One programme on Monday that she felt 'a real loss' about being was banned from events and from contacting her group.

She insisted that girls have a right to 'female-only' spaces, particularly when guides and leaders shared lavatories, showers and sleeping accommodation in camps.

Ms Watts added that adolescents coping with changes in their bodies, victims of bullying or harassment by men, as well as girls from some cultural or religious backgrounds might feel shut out by Girlguiding becoming 'effectively a mixed-sex space'.


 
You know how in some countries with poor sanitation, every so often they have an outbreak of dysentery? This thread is the same way, in that every so often there is an outbreak of 'nasty stupid uppity women are responsible for the behavior of mentally ill men.' Same shit different day.
they seem to believe that a woman's job is to essentially be a glorified tard wrangler for their husbands/boyfriends/men in general. which ironically is something a lot of troons believe as well.
 
Ah, the 'A-spec' community. That takes me back.

I almost got sucked into it a few years ago (I was rather woke myself at the time) so my feelings towards them are less fond.

We must have been in two very different asexual communities, because the one I'm familiar with would never have described platonic attractions as 'tertiary' (implying they are lesser than sexual or romantic – which is considered heresy in that community). Other things that are heresy are the Pride slogan 'Love is Love' (since it excludes asexuals), 'LGBT' without extra letters or the '+' (since it excludes asexuals), and asexual characters getting girlfriends.

There was also a weird hierarchy with aromantic asexuals being extra-super-oppressed by the thing they call 'amatonormativity'. This being a long Latin word for the OPPRESSIVE structure that says it's good (healthy, even) to have a significant other in your life.

Tempting as it is to say the community's died, you can still find folkx like Mikaylamic - an old personal lolcow of mine - moaning about bad representation in Doctor Who (AFAICT, her gripe seems to be that a character remarked it was unusual for a handsome 40-something to be single, which of course is bigotry) and of course... this. And this is just one person out of many. Look around, and you find this community's not as dead as you think.


Spoilered because this is the trans thread, and I don't want to drag it off topic. But it's long overdue that we had ourselves a dedicated thread for these fucks. I'm just too lazy to start it.


Non-binaries still beat asexuals at obsessively creating categories for their identities, although theirs tend to be more art-based than science-based. I'll show you a few if there's interest for them...
Interesting to know they're still around! They seemed to have retreated back to AVEN but I don't really use twitter all that much.

The ones I had the displeasure of encountering were domineering and would bang on about amatonormativity and how actually aces get collectively raped and murdered all the time, but again, most people didn't take them seriously. You could say something like "they're not ace, they just want attention" and you wouldn't be cancelled by rainbow people (and "cishets" didn't even know wtf asexuality was), very different to saying "I think that trans woman is actually a man with AGP' now.

The whole primary/secondary attraction thing had two different definitions, one more in line with what you are saying. Demisexuals used to claim that there was primary sexual attraction - you see someone in the street and find them sexually attractive - and secondary sexual attraction which is when you are in love with someone and then start feeling sexual attraction to them. It's true that when you get feelings for someone you might start finding them way more attractive than you did before; demisexuals claimed they could only feel sexual attraction towards someone once they'd developed a meaningful emotional connection to someone. This got exceptional when you discovered demisexuals who had casual sex and claimed they were able to develop secondary sexual attraction from meeting someone on a night out.
It adds intersex, trans, and black people! A rainbow is not enough to symbolize inclusivity.
It's quite interesting how it came to be. Basically it started with the Philadelphia Pride flag:
download.png

In 2017 this got made by Philadelphia’s Office of LGBT Affairs. Essentially there had been some high profile incidents of racial discrimination in Philly's gay village and at Philly Pride and activists demanded something be done about it. So Philadelphia hired a design agency to make a special pride flag just for Philadelphia, which was ugly but designed to tackle a specific problem. It was unveiled at Philly Pride 2017 rapidly caught on elsewhere.
new-pride-flag-01.jpg

2018 brought us the inclusive Pride flag courtesy of Portland based graphic designer and shitty musician Daniel Quasar, because you can't do anything without centering trans voices. Daniel (he/they) used this design to grift for money, although dupes rapidly popped up.
189533875_2906094233043871_8133455861604650497_n1-e1623080969136.jpg

2019 brought us the Progress Pride flag.
I've known intersex people and they usually want to keep intersex different from LGBT stuff, but as we know from this thread a lot of trans people like to claim that they're intersex.
This one is courtesy of Valentino Vecchietti, she/they, who has never clarified what intersex condition she has and looks like a woman who takes T. She used this flag to grift, got rewarded with a couple of awards and a column in DIVA magazine, and founded Intersex Equality Rights UK (there were already Intersex campaign groups in the UK).
There were no pride parades in 2020 or 2021 due to covid, but since these seem to get made by grifters to get released in time for Pride I guess we can look forward to another more hideous version in 2022.
 
Last edited:
These are two screenshots I feel you guys need to see from @chiobu 's article:
View attachment 2747190
View attachment 2747189
IDEAL ROLE MODEL FOR GIRLS 5 YEARS OLD TO 17 YEARS OLD I'm guessing this is like Girl Scouts but UK
I'm choosing to believe that he doesn't have the good taste to have a picture of Lulu Brooks on the wall and the pig sty in the first picture is his actual home.
 
Trannies are not a product of feminism, completely the opposite in fact. They see womanhood as being a dumb bimbo slut, which is not a feminist or female view of womanhood but a male degenerate one. Pretty much everything about trannies is extreme maleness, from terminal coombrain to threatening/committing suicide when they don't get what they want, to blaming and projecting their faults on women.
It's mostly just male autism. But masculinity has been attacked for a long time, but I really don't think that feminists (with certain exceptions) are to blame for this, since their view of masculinity differs greatly and feminism hadn't that much power from 1990 - 2010. I think a much bigger reason for the decline of genuine masculinity is our modern technology and the fact that many male misfists can't reach the same level of success as in the past, since women compete now as well. There are just some factors that too obviously correlate with troonerism that are ignored by the medical establishment/media: Heterosexuality, bimbo fetish, computer programmer as a profession, addicted to anime and video games, low social competence etc.
I'm not saying that every troon is a computer programmer and loves anime, but at least on Twitter it seems so.

Now, even men with mild autism can improve their lives greatly. Social competence can to a certain degree be learnt and many autists learn to do this (they call it masking, since they try to hide their autistic traits). And even some of the ugliest men look better when they work out and actually take care of themselves. But not so in modern society. A failed man can now just put on a dress and harlequin clown socks and filming himself masturbating in front of a mirror. And we are then supposed to celebrate this as a new kind of social justice movement :story:

Okay, serious question here...I know that there are no girls on the internet, but for the people who actually are lesbians how bad is the troon encroachment into your dating pool/culture really? Are transbians as big of a plague in your scene as they seem to be?

I have no issues with the LGB part of the alphabet acronym so this is an honest inquiry.

I'm not a lesbian myself, but I do hear that it's kind of difficult to find a genuine lesbian now. On the other hand, you have young lesbians who cut off their breasts and pretend to be men.
In the male gaysphere it's a bit different, but you still see the encroachment of trannies. Contrary to lesbian apps, you see some actual male gender goblins who pretend to be non-binary. But they are still male so they're actually in the right spot, even if they look freakish. On the other hand you see (mostly young) trans men and it's just sad. They can barely grow a beard and are mostly around 1.6m/ 5.2 ft tall. The chance of them finding anyone is very unlikely and troon activists will them tell that this is just transphobia and "Look, how much more work we have to do!".
 
they seem to believe that a woman's job is to essentially be a glorified tard wrangler for their husbands/boyfriends/men in general. which ironically is something a lot of troons believe as well.
Listen, their moms failed to make them into chads because they're weak bitches who won't stop riding the cock carousel so all women gotta be like that.

Truthfully, I'm fine with everyone having a bit of a hand in this: general leftist wanting to be supportive, old gays not realizing the agp dragon was coming, TERFs (the true and honest kind) being so batshit that others didn't heed their warnings because they were batshit, doctors wanting to be on the right side of history, munchie moms, bitter men on the internet forming hugboxes that keep those in them depressed, the internet for easier access of porn, coomers for not having the will to climb out, autistic parents for not spedwatching their child, parents who let their kid have reddit/discord/telegram accounts without monitoring them for groomers, corporations looking for the next inclusive cause, drug companies and surgeons looking for payouts, companies pandering to women because women buy things more thus more fake girl power shit, conservative men and women forcing gender roles on their kids too ridgidly or looking for a quick cure for the gay:tm:, liberal parents for letting their minds be so open that their brains fall put and they don't do research, general men and women having basic empathy, and so on.

Femminist being the sole root is silly. Blaming only one part is autistic. The great poo is touched by everyone.
as a faggot, the word queer makes me want to end myself
same with "pride" parades.
There's nothing wrong with not liking either, but the fact that this is a growing sentiment in the LBG across the world is sad. The LGBT falls into the geek social fallacies even if it's not a fandom. I feel, my man.
I'm choosing to believe that he doesn't have the good taste to have a picture of Lulu Brooks on the wall and the pig sty in the first picture is his actual home.
Oh, totally, there's no question. I think he would be too lazy to have "Naughty Corner" in a nice font on a wall with nicely framed pictures and a bar counter. It's not something most have in their homes, but he really doesn't strike one to go above and beyond.
 
It's mostly just male autism. But masculinity has been attacked for a long time, but I really don't think that feminists (with certain exceptions) are to blame for this, since their view of masculinity differs greatly and feminism hadn't that much power from 1990 - 2010. I think a much bigger reason for the decline of genuine masculinity is our modern technology and the fact that many male misfists can't reach the same level of success as in the past, since women compete now as well. There are just some factors that too obviously correlate with troonerism that are ignored by the medical establishment/media: Heterosexuality, bimbo fetish, computer programmer as a profession, addicted to anime and video games, low social competence etc.
Masculinity hasn't been "attacked", though. Not really. Masculinity and masculine men are still idolized in society, etc., it's just that there has been a widening exception for more and different expressions of masculinity and ways to be a man, and more pushback against the more toxic aspects of traditional masculinity (misogyny, domestic abuse, etc). Trans ideology doesn't really have anything to do with that.

I don't necessarily disagree with all of your factors (though I think the anime watching is more of an issue than the video games), but I think you missed the single biggest one: Pornography. Trans ideology has risen roughly at the same rate at which extreme, violent pornography has become more and more easily accessible. It's a known, studied phenomenon that repeated porn use correlates with use of more and more extreme pornography as the brain gets less and less stimulus out of the same old material. Repeated porn use also correlates with the development of paraphilias, which autogynephilia is one of. The ability to access the most degrading, misogynistic torture porn you can imagine in seconds on your cellphone for free and the encouragement, particularly among liberal feminists, to watch for hours a day has contributed to any number of problems faced by modern men and boys (see: the rise in ED experienced by increasingly younger men who are addicted to porn, younger and younger male children raping their female classmates and little sisters, etc), trans ideology among them.

Trans ideology is based in hardcore misogyny. It is based on reducing womanhood down to misogynistic stereotypes drawn straight from pornography, the presumption that men can understand womanhood sufficiently to become one, the pervasive idea that women are merely sex objects, etc. Excessive pornography use has a lot to do with "teaching" these men those stereotypes... and then they lose sensation from that stuff and move onto, say, sissy porn, where they're taught that embodying those stereotypes will make them women. And so on.

I guess that could count as modern technology, but I felt like it should be more emphasized because I truly believe the ready availability of extreme pornography is a huge contributor to the rise of trans ideology.
 
Back