Megathread Tranny Sideshows on Social Media - Any small-time spectacle on Reddit, Tumblr, Twitter, Dating Sites, and other social media.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
For the life of me I do not understand how, but somehow a harmless interview with Korn's ex drummer resulted in a tranny flooded comment section. :story:

Link

IMG_20211124_123222.jpg


6'4, beat their asses. So ladylike, wow.
 
The only studies that have shown that that is risky were pretty shady statistically and other huge studies have shown no effect.
I think I've mentioned this before, but those are in reference to red blood cells, which do not carry antibodies. However, blood plasma does. The Canadian blood donor registry still stands by the pregnant woman thing in 2020: https://www.blood.ca/en/stories/convalescent-plasma-and-women

Red blood cells tend not to be sexed per se, and can be given to both sexes and across the races - but even then there are still minute and essential differences. The plasma of pregnant women contains antibodies that cause TRALI in males, and that is why it's deadly.

When researching it, you'll find a LOT of stuff regarding convalescent plasma and how pregnant women are barred from donating if they have the HLA antibodies. If they test negative, they can donate.
 
Are you truly poor if you're still able to spend money on hormones and film yourself on tiktok?

View attachment 2747370




This delusional young woman seriously named herself Adonis? How bloody delusional can you be :lit:
 
I agree porn is harmful but mayyyybe we should not take the words of a manipulative sociopath at face value. He was clearly just looking for something external to blame.
Bundy’s interview with James Dobson, an evangelical preacher, was a publicity stunt for Dobson’s Focus on the Family org.

There is very little in Bundy’s background to suggest porn consumption has anything to do with his crimes and he never pulled the porn card until he his execution date was set in stone— not even in the Chi Omega trial where he acted as his own attorney. It wasn’t until the 80s and the issuing of the Meese Report that porn became a mainstream scapegoat that opportunistic criminals started using it (truthfully or falsely) as an excuse.

I do wonder how many infamous past serial killers would’ve gone the troon route today to gain extra privileges while incarcerated. Richard Speck did it in the 90s; Dennis Rader infamously crossdressed as part of his fetish. Probably add Jerry Brudos to the list too.

ETA Speck not Stark
 
Last edited:
From Women are Human:

21 House Republicans Seek "Compromise" in Support of Transgender Legislation​


Article below:
US — . Twenty-one Congressional Republicans are seeking to make a backdoor deal with transgender campaigners, supporting a bill that would prohibit discrimination on the “basis of […] gender identity,” even “while providing certain benefits and exemptions to religious providers.” Recent incidents that received national attention have stirred up increased public interest in the potential ramifications of the bill becoming law.

The Fairness For All Act (FFA), which was introduced to the House by Republican Utah Congressman Chris Stewart on February 26, 2021, will amend Section 201 of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to include gender identity, along with sex and sexual orientation, as a protected class. The bill also seeks to expand the public accommodations to which anti-discrimination laws would apply.

If passed into law, the FFA would prohibit establishments that providing services or accommodations to the public to treat individuals differently on the basis of declared gender identity. Among those bound by the bill would be retailers, places of exercise, recreation or amusement, providers of medical, mental financial or transportation services and any organization receiving federal funding, including educational institutions and religious corporations.

The FFA grants exceptions for religious institutions, which would continue to be permitted to take gender identity into consideration during the hiring process, and would not be subject to the law’s speech regulations:

The bill (1) exempts a church or religious organization from claims of employment discrimination because of sexual orientation or gender identity under specified circumstances; and (2) prohibits sanctions for certain employee speech regarding the employee’s religious, political, or moral beliefs in the workplace.
Priests, pastors, rabbis, imams and ministers would not be required to provide marriage or mental health services under the FFA, except in the event that the individual seeking counsel does not present an imminent danger to self or others.

The FFA “preserves the Religious Freedom Restoration Act so it can continue to protect the First Amendment right of all persons to freely exercise their religion,” says Rep Stewart’s press release advertising the bill.

While Republicans who back the FFA have described it as an alternative to the Equality Act that would protect religious liberty while safeguarding women, lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender-identifying individuals from discrimination, recent events have sparked a renewed outcry over what the proposed “compromise” could actually mean for the rights of girls and women.

In July 2021, there were massive protests in Los Angeles after a man who exposed his naked body and erect genitals in the women’s section of Wi Spa was defended by staff, transgender campaigners and the mainstream media. As public outrage grew, the media and transgender campaigners began suggesting there had never been a male patron in the women’s section, and the incident was a hoax. It later came to light that the man was convicted sex offender Darren Agee Merager, who identifies as a woman. Mr Merager was ultimately charged with several felony offenses of indecent exposure after four women and a minor girl filed a complaint about the incident.

More recently, a young girl was violently rapedin a Virginia school restroom by a male student who identifies as “gender fluid” and was wearing a skirt at the time of the attack. The incident, which took place in May, came to public light in October. Despite sending an email to the school board in May notifying them of the sexual assault allegation, Loudoun County Public Schools Superintendent Scott Ziegler claimed during a meeting in June: “We don’t have any record of assaults occurring in our restrooms,” and “the predator transgender student or person simply does not exist.” When the father of the rape survivor attempted to correct the misinformation, Supt Ziegler had him arrested for disorderly conduct, and threatened other enraged parents with punishment. Students, parents and staff say Supt Ziegler hid the incident so the transgender restroom policy would be pushed through, and have since been staging protests calling for his and the school board’s firing. The male student has since been found guilty of the restroom attack, and admitted guilt in the sexual molestation of another girl in the classroom of a school he was later transferred to. The media is now calling the male student a “boy” and the mother is now insisting her unnamed son “is not transgender” but experiments with wearing clothing made for both sexes.

In addition, the public is getting a closer look at how gender identity policies may affect female sports, especially following the lift last week by the IOC of a testosterone restriction for male athletes competing in women’s sports at the professional level. Many social media users are calling it “the end of women’s sports,” suggesting the women’s category may as well be done away with altogether.

With the pending deal between Democrats and some Republicans, it is unknown whether girls and women will be left out in the cold.

Yikes.
 
Five years ago, she expressed a very different view:

🍿

She was forced to post that, so as to be allowed to attend the Feminist Porn Awards, which removed the "best lesbian feature" award rather than give it to her and gave "best lesbian short" to a movie featuring two morbidly obese women, one of them an amputee, getting each other off. The stump went exactly where you did/didn't want it to go. Lily Cade enjoyed that movie, shown on a big screen, the same way that she enjoyed Rotten.com and ISIS recruitment videos. Behold, the ruin of the world!

Lily Cade's line was "no fat chicks and no aftermarket pussy." The sociopath whorebreakers and soulless money men respected this line. Queer porn did not. Courtney Trouble hated Lily Cade because Lily Cade called her fat, which she did and didn't, depending on how you see the world. "I can't use your look," said Lily Cade, meaning you're a disgusting fat cunt and then, when pressed, kicked it up the chain, knowing the man whose money financed what she believed with all her stupid heart was "her art" used to be the biggest cocaine dealer in LA, fucked teenage whores on the regular, and would not draw a meaningful distinction between Courtney Trouble and a Large White Sow. He was just as fat and ugly as Courtney, but a pig with money doesn't have to fuck sows and neither does male talent who shows up on time to work and sober and keeps wood no matter how horrible the skank smells. Lily Cade knew she was a pig, and she liked it.

Lily Cade is at least three layers of persona, on top of the woman who created that persona: the writer/director, the actress, and the characters the actress played. She is best known for "Officer Cade" (a rapist cop, though it was played for laughs. The girls always, usually but not always "women of color" always like it despite their initial protest at being busted on spurious charges, such as wearing slutty clothes or disobeying signs) and "Heartbreaker" (supposedly a superhero, whose power is mind control - think gender swapped Kilgrave, though she did not encounter Jessica Jones until after making the movie). Lily Cade thought she was an artist, and she didn't know that porn was used to jerk off. Once she found out, she accepted it, because what other job was going to support a "three new girls a week" habit? She saw the end user the same way everyone else in porn does, as marks, sheep to be bled, idiots too stupid to see the layers of artifice and ruin. She had more respect for them than is typical. She thought they would use the videos to learn how to have sex. Most porn is either sociopath whorebreakers (older content) or gay escorts on erection drugs to suffer through sex with women (new content) fucking women who hate sex. Lily Cade's content was not this.

Many of the users, instead, used the videos to imagine themselves as lesbians. More than once, Lily Cade was provided the evidence of a dick that had been sacrificed upon her altar. Routinely, men came up to her and mincingly told her about their shameful pegging fantasies. Lily Cade told all men that wanted her to peg them that she would rather kill them. None of them feared her until she actually got violent. Lily Cade defended herself with knives, karate chops to throats, her fists, and a superior knowledge of body positioning that left men unconscious in the street, surprised that "try it again and I'll choke you out" was not a sensual experience. She liked the sound a head made when it hit pavement, but only when it was justified.

Lily Cade is "a dead whore" because the woman who played her hasn't in many years, until this blog rant. That woman owned the content library, for which she sold her soul, and lazily marketed it. She had more or less left porn before some girls complained that she didn't stop when they didn't like it, even though they did not tell her "no" and continued to play along for the cameras. Lily Cade could have showed all the pictures and videos of these incidents, which she still has, but fell upon her sword instead, because it was the right thing to do. If she could not read a bitch, she ought not to fuck them. She left and now lives a much, much better life post porn. She has complicated emotions about her ten year tour of duty.

Lily Cade's rants were serious and not serious, inspired, certainly, but constructed with all those layers of persona in mind. Lily Cade did it for the lulz, always, and these rants represent her sense of humor. Lolol Great Replacement. Suck my blue rubber balls.

The woman who played Lily Cade intended the rants to afflict the comfortable and comfort the afflicted, to move the needle, to push back against the mountain of "burn TERFs" crap, to wake up the right and direct their energies toward a useful cause since they will win the next cycle anyway, and to speak about spiritual warfare. Deep in her dark heart, she would love to see Fallon Fox die for beating women with the sanction of the power structure, but she also feels that way about many politicians, heads of corporations, child molesters, and anyone who annoys her. The dark heart rules her no more than it rules someone who posts "pedos get the wall" or "chomos get the rope" or "lock her up" on 4chan, she is just better at upsetting people than the average blog troll. Her better self wants trans people to get off the Internet and get help. She is also mentally ill, obviously, but most people who meet her like her and don't notice that she is crazy because she has done a lot of work on herself.
 
Trans ideology is based in hardcore misogyny. It is based on reducing womanhood down to misogynistic stereotypes drawn straight from pornography, the presumption that men can understand womanhood sufficiently to become one, the pervasive idea that women are merely sex objects, etc. Excessive pornography use has a lot to do with "teaching" these men those stereotypes... and then they lose sensation from that stuff and move onto, say, sissy porn, where they're taught that embodying those stereotypes will make them women. And so on.
nah
trannyism isnt based on misogyny. at least, not intentionally
a common trait among trannies is the idea that all men are evil and obsessed with violence and they "arent" (lol) therefore they MUST be women
Yikes, can't blame him. Redditors weren't having it, those guys are nuts.



Hilarious how "trans agenda" is on the same level of conspiracy as holocaust denial in this conspiracy theories chart circulating around.

View attachment 2747326
call me insane but the us government and companies absolutely make up a lot of this conspiracy shit to muddy the waters of the real stuff
epstein island was a conspiracy theory for years, yet its proven to be true
funny how pizzagate in on there as well, as there is certaintly NO EVIDENCE connecting the democratic party and pedophillia
 
Pretty much everything about trannies is extreme maleness, from terminal coombrain to threatening/committing suicide when they don't get what they want, to blaming and projecting their faults on women.
yes, no woman would EVER do any of these things.
Trannydom, and by extension transsexualism, predates feminism. You will always find men cross dressing and acting as prostitutes throughout history; Eleanor Ryker (sic) was one in the Middle Ages. He escaped jail because he portrayed himself as a woman vs being an openly gay man.
thats not remotely the same thing
they were pretending to be women because they HAD to. this is like saying mulan is trans
 
I grabbed this from Women Are Human.


This followed Bill C-16, which promised 2 years of jail for anyone caught misgendering. The Canadian public largely did not know about this and an Angus Reid poll showed 80% of Canadians supporting trans rights. I'm not sure how many were polled exactly, but I do remember it being used to show how important the Bill was.

So, even in personal emails these laws will make you a criminal.

You can thank Morgane Oger for this, because closing down a rape shelter wasn't enough for the fucker.
I was interested in that 80% thing and took a look at it for myself. My internet ripper wouldn't let me open the PDF online and downloaded it, which ironically made it easier to crop.

Anyway.
Presented for your displeasure. If anyone wants all three PDFs they're on the Angus Reid website or I can upload em.
data sample lmao.png

thats not how data collecting works but okay.png


80% of the 1416 people they bothered to ask- but the data doesn't add up correctly at all.
But that does sound about right. A FRACTION OF 1 PERCENT OF THE 38 MILLION PEOPLE OF CANADA ARE OKAY WITH TRANNY BULLSHIT, THAT MEANS EVERYONE IS OKAY.

Edit for the fraction of 1 : 0.0037% of 38,000,000
 
Last edited:
Masculinity hasn't been "attacked", though. Not really. Masculinity and masculine men are still idolized in society, etc., it's just that there has been a widening exception for more and different expressions of masculinity and ways to be a man, and more pushback against the more toxic aspects of traditional masculinity (misogyny, domestic abuse, etc). Trans ideology doesn't really have anything to do with that.

The only idolized form of masculinity nowadays is either having a masculine physique or being very ruthless. But male bravery, for example, is actively discouraged by the elite class. By male bravery I mean a man who is a loner but so obsessed with an idea/thought/principle etc. that he's even risking his life for this. I'm not sure if this is a innate feature of some men or just a feature of history where male bravery was more applauded than female bravery, there are at least enough examples of women showing a loner mentality and being very brave, even if somewhat rarer. I do think, however, there is also a female trait that has been actively (even if not consciously) surpressed.

I do agree with Baron-Cohen that male autism might be an extreme form of a masculinized brain. It's interesting to me that the idea of overanalyzing the content of a word is often attributed to women. But I do disagree, since it was mostly men who began applying critical theory to language, not women. And I do think that autistic men and women are the worst when it's about overanalyzing the meaning of a word, since they are easily overwhelmed when a word is too ambiguous or is strongly defined by pragmatism/context. Not a long ago there was a autism conference in Germany and a professor actually left the conference because he was constantly interrupted by autistic men. What was their problem? Well, he used the phrase "people with autism" instead of "autistic people" and they became very angry of this. They thought that people with autism was not accurate enough, becauuse autism is a part of their identity. Only then I learnt that there are actually many autistic people who are so preoccupied with language. Now, we also see a lot of women who are constantly arguing about what a word means or why a certain word shouldn't be used.

My "hot take" is, however, that most women in higher positions also tend to be more autistic/has more autistic traits than the average woman. And don't get me wrong, it's good that there are people who can be hyperfocused on one subject, are very conscientious and are more focused on details than the bigger picture. But I do think that there is actually an opposite of autistic traits/autism and it's not neurotypical people, but actually a hyperfeminized brain. And with a hyperfeminized brain I do not mean people who are stereotypically girly, love to socialize and show hysterical behaviour. A hyperfeminized brain would mean someone who might be worse with details, but very good at finding connections between subjects that might seem unrelated superficially and also a person who's not obsessed with one single subject, but a person who knows a lot about different things and connects them, even though this person might have less detailed knowledge about a single subject. It's also not really necessarily to call autism a form of masculinized brain and the "anti-autism" a trait of a feminized brain. What I mean, is that the hyperfocus towards details will be more common in men, whereas seeing the big picture more common among women. And all those traits will be on a spectrum from a very autistic brain to a very "anti-autistic" brain. What I assume is that women and also men who are big picture thinker are actually less likely to achieve high positions. Those people will be accused of being sloppy, untalented and illogical. In reality, those people aren't sloppy, but just don't think that paying attention to every detail is necessarily, they aren't untalented, but people who know a lot of different subjects and if they're a genius, might create something entirely new. Somebody who knows basically everything about American history might from the outside be more competent than a historian who has a more broad knowledge about world history, but might not be able to show off some trivial factoids about history. Those people might also be called illogical because they might believe in something, which the more autistic side of the spectrum will criticize until they find certain details that might contradict each other. There are some studies that show that autistic people tend to be less religious/spiritiual than non-autistic people. Furthermore women tend to be more religious/spiritual than men. Calling somebody illogical because she/he is spiritiual itself will be from the perspective of the logic bros without understanding that spirituality might be far bigger for this person than a science project and might make sense for them in the bigger picture, but not necessarily if you look at the details.

And I do think that we see this trend very well in troonerism. Those people (mostly men) will write out entire lists of spectrum to determine your "gender". If you have Klinefelter syndrom, you aren't a real man anymore, if you're infertile as a woman, you might actually be intersex! Hence for them it isn't contradictory that somebody might be socially female, but physiologically male. Even worse, they will claim that a women without ovaries or a men with an underdeveloped penis contradict biological sex, because one detail is off. On the other hand, a person who might think "big" will automatically see that this is bullshit and a women who doesn't have ovaries or a XX-man doesn't negate biological sex at all. So I do think it's interesting that it's mostly men and some elite women who actually think that a man can literally become a woman, whereas the great masses of women automatically see that this makes absolutely no sense.

Now, I'm not sure if there is really this wide spectrum and men tend to be on average more on the detail focused side and women on the bigger picture side. And most people will also not be on the extremes, but more somwhere in the middle. And to be honest, the idea just came up some weeks ago when I had to read some literature about autism at university. But if just marginally true, I do think that a lot of big picture thinkers will be disadvantaged in a more and more bureaucratized, regulated and stiff society, where big picture thinkers aren't really welcomed.

If we would see some persons as examples for this spectrum, I would classify people like Bill Gates, Elon Musk and Mozart etc. as people focused on details. On the other side of the spectrum, we would have big picutre thinkers like Hegel and Camille Paglia. Hegel tried to describe the entire history of civilizations and how the Prussian revolution was actually the end of history. He had a very broad knowledge of different cultures, everything from ancient Mediterranean civilizations like Egypt and Greece to Chinese and Indian civilizations. He tried to distill his knowledge in one progressive history and such an effort shows how he tried to concentrate on the big picture, not on small historical details or getting preoccupied by a short period of time. Camille Pagila tried something similar in Sexual Personae.


I don't necessarily disagree with all of your factors (though I think the anime watching is more of an issue than the video games), but I think you missed the single biggest one: Pornography. Trans ideology has risen roughly at the same rate at which extreme, violent pornography has become more and more easily accessible. It's a known, studied phenomenon that repeated porn use correlates with use of more and more extreme pornography as the brain gets less and less stimulus out of the same old material. Repeated porn use also correlates with the development of paraphilias, which autogynephilia is one of. The ability to access the most degrading, misogynistic torture porn you can imagine in seconds on your cellphone for free and the encouragement, particularly among liberal feminists, to watch for hours a day has contributed to any number of problems faced by modern men and boys (see: the rise in ED experienced by increasingly younger men who are addicted to porn, younger and younger male children raping their female classmates and little sisters, etc), trans ideology among them.

Oh yes, I forgot porn! Especially sissy porn might have greatly contributed to the increase of troonerism among males.


Trans ideology is based in hardcore misogyny. It is based on reducing womanhood down to misogynistic stereotypes drawn straight from pornography, the presumption that men can understand womanhood sufficiently to become one, the pervasive idea that women are merely sex objects, etc. Excessive pornography use has a lot to do with "teaching" these men those stereotypes... and then they lose sensation from that stuff and move onto, say, sissy porn, where they're taught that embodying those stereotypes will make them women. And so on.

It has definitely very strong misogynistic traits. The worst thing in my opinion is that discussing a problem like the overproportional abortion of unborn girls in countries like Armenia will actually have to compete with discussions about male computer programmers about their gender dysphoria and how evil transphobic society oppresses them.


Hilarious how "trans agenda" is on the same level of conspiracy as holocaust denial in this conspiracy theories chart circulating around.

Screenshot 2021-11-24 18.08.45.png

Some of them aren't even conspiracies, but just truths that have been exaggerated. George Soros was already mentioned. Cultural marxism actually exists, even though it isn't called like this and some right-wingers use it as a catch-all-phrase for anything they don't like. Bill Gates might not literally want to kill people, but some of his philantropic work was actually directed towards lowering the fertility rate of African countries.

Most people also don't literally think that there are some trans overlords who planned this all. But there is enough proof that the trans lobby receives incredible amount of donations every year and troonerism was highly advertised by mainstream media. Just 10 years ago nobody gave a fuck about those freaks and suddenly they are everywhere. Women's and gay rights were processes of more than a century, yet men in dresses just became mainstream now and more often than not they get away with things like rape or even murder, something that would never be allowed for any other group, no matter if it's a minority or majority group.
 
Last edited:
The only idolized form of masculinity nowadays is either having a masculine physique or being very ruthless. But male bravery, for example, is actively discouraged by the elite class. By male bravery I mean a man who is a loner but so obsessed with an idea/thought/principle etc. that he's even risking his life for this. I'm not sure if this is a innate feature of some men or just a feature of history where male bravery was more applauded than female bravery, there are at least enough examples of women showing a loner mentality and being very brave, even if somewhat rarer. I do think, however, there is also a female trait that has been actively (even if not consciously) surpressed.
sigma male
 
YOU. DUMB. BITCH.
I have been telling this in the past, and I'll repeat: terfs are just broken clock showing right time. It's YOUR deranged ideology that was built on manhate, hating masculinity, suppressing natural male sexuality, feminizing boys, and creating a message of men bad girls good that cauzed shit you've gotten into. Trannies are product of feminism and progressivism. Go and suck girl dick, you've earned it. The only real reason terfs are terfs is because of man hate. They hate mtf because they were men, they hate ftm because they ditched sisterhood. Terfs don't belong anywhere, because you're bunch of mongloid retards who can't take accountability for the product of your ideology.
In a fight of terfs vs tranies I would like to see them both cemented in a ditch.
reeeeeee reeeeeeee

have sex incel
 
"Decriminalize
everything starting with sex work drugs immigration
and poverty. Open the borders. Abolish private
property."

Wasn't aware poverty was a crime. Yes, let's make poverty legal.

Abolishing private property seems like a bad idea though. But what do I know?

Late on this so apologies and ignore my off topic sperge but I never understood this mentality. Sometimes I look at the bastardization of political theories they throw together and laugh; I saw "anarchist-communist" yesterday. It is like Vaush and "libertarian socialist".

hqdefault.jpg


I mean, I know they are troons and understand their politics from Tumblr, Twitter threads and YouTubers (and carefully approved ones, as opposed to being an adult and challenging themselves by going across a variety of sources) so I am probably being a bit of a prick at this point but these are people who really are obsessed with micro identity upon micro identity even if it makes no sense in practical application. I mean, an anarchist has more in common with a libertarian in terms of ideology than a socialist, or a communist but they are obsessed with just taking words and distorting them into whatever they like the sound of.
 
Back