Georgia 'LYNCHING' citizen fatally shoots unarmed black man ... Video Emerges, Grand Jury to Convene



The fatal shooting of Ahmaud Arbery -- a 25-year-old black man out for a jog when he was chased and killed -- was caught on video, prompting a call for a grand jury to review the case.

Arbery's death is being referred to as a modern-day lynching, as he was unarmed when he was gunned down in Brunswick, GA on February 23 by a white citizen named Travis McMichael ... who has not been arrested or charged. He also happens to be the son of a former district attorney investigator.

As you can see in the video, Arbery was jogging when he was stopped by McMichael and his father in a white pickup truck. McMichael was armed with a shotgun. Arbery appears to attempt to run around the truck before he and McMichael start grappling.

After at least 2 shots, the men continued struggling over the gun ... until Arbery stumbles away, shot in the mid-section, and then collapses to the ground. He was later pronounced dead.
94a5b7dd35e448f585d3b6ecf3e83e3e_md.jpg


McMichael has not been charged in the shooting ... reportedly because he and his father, who was in the back of the truck, claim they were trying to make a citizen's arrest. They claim Ahmaud fit the description of a suspect in a string of recent break-ins in the area.

After the emergence of the video, D.A. Pro Tempore Tom Durden has decided the case "should be presented to the grand jury of Glynn County for consideration of criminal charges against those involved in the death of Mr. Arbery.”

Ahmaud's family says the use of deadly force was unnecessary.

Here's the statement from the district attorney who was brought in to oversee the case and decide how and whether the case should be prosecuted.
EXRhs2vXkAINOAA.jpg


Attorney Lee Merritt, who represents Arberys mother, claims "The series of events captured in this video confirm what all the evidence indicated prior to its release— Ahmaud Arbery was pursued by three white men that targeted him solely because of his race and murdered him..."


EXRmSCPXsAYkx0v.jpg


==============

Imagine being hunted by two fat hillbillies in a truck.
 
Last edited:
Storming off like this is very teenage girl of you.
Who’s ’storming off’? I’m still here, just declining to engage with TechPriest until he stops talking about feels and starts dealing with facts.
The fact that he‘s slid into ad homs and racial abuse of other posters confirms exactly what I thought of him. He’s not worth debating because he’s dishonest, a hypocrite, and a hysterical hyperbolist.
None of these things are endearing to someone pursuing a grown-up discussion.
 
Who’s ’storming off’? I’m still here, just declining to engage with TechPriest until he stops talking about feels and starts dealing with facts.
The fact that he‘s slid into ad homs and racial abuse of other posters confirms exactly what I thought of him. He’s not worth debating because he’s dishonest, a hypocrite, and a hysterical hyperbolist.
None of these things are endearing to someone pursuing a grown-up discussion.
This is a semi anonymous web forum sir. I'm not sure what you expected. Something about if you want to see a man's true face give him a mask?
 
Who’s ’storming off’? I’m still here, just declining to engage with TechPriest until he stops talking about feels and starts dealing with facts.
The fact that he‘s slid into ad homs and racial abuse of other posters confirms exactly what I thought of him. He’s not worth debating because he’s dishonest, a hypocrite, and a hysterical hyperbolist.
None of these things are endearing to someone pursuing a grown-up discussion.
Holy fucking shit go back to Reddit. I even added a hyperlink for you.
 
Who’s ’storming off’? I’m still here, just declining to engage with TechPriest until he stops talking about feels and starts dealing with facts.
The fact that he‘s slid into ad homs and racial abuse of other posters confirms exactly what I thought of him. He’s not worth debating because he’s dishonest, a hypocrite, and a hysterical hyperbolist.
None of these things are endearing to someone pursuing a grown-up discussion.
you're declining to engage with @Techpriest because you have no valid rebuttal because you're objectively incorrect in your assertions. not only that, but trying to engage people like you who, when faced with facts, twist and deny them to suit whatever racial biases you seem to have, is a completely meaningless endeavor.

if you want an adult discussion, you're in articles & news, retard, you're not getting one.
 
Who’s ’storming off’? I’m still here, just declining to engage with TechPriest until he stops talking about feels and starts dealing with facts.
The fact that he‘s slid into ad homs and racial abuse of other posters confirms exactly what I thought of him. He’s not worth debating because he’s dishonest, a hypocrite, and a hysterical hyperbolist.
None of these things are endearing to someone pursuing a grown-up discussion.
FACT - Past convictions are irrelevant. When the McMichaels first saw him, Arbery was doing nothing illegal and was in the process of doing nothing illegal at the time of the killing
FACT - These three idiots did not meet the standards for a citizens arrest
FACT - These three idiots are now all facing life in prision.
FACT - You are coping and seething
 
It NEVER gets better from here. Welcome to the never ending ride. The downward spiral of the West. What's best yet is that this isn't even as bad as it gets. It HAS to get worse from here.
oh no three white men got convicted for killing a black man in cold blood after failing to cover it up
how will the west ever recover???
 
Citizens have a right to protect their neighborhood and stop crime. The McMichael family didn't "lynch" Aubrey. They shot him in self defense after he lunged at them to take their weapon. The jury was just afraid of the massive chimpout if they ruled not guilty. "They should have done things differently" Sure, you can argue that but it doesn't matter. They were within their right to attempt to stop the "jogger who dindunuffin."
Sure.

People have a right to liberty and freedom of movement, as well. They have a right to self defense. This being said, do I think Arbery was a thief? Yes.

But that does not matter to the facts in this trial. Additionally, what legal authority do you derive your privilege to stop and question someone? What force is authorized if they refuse your commands?

Their has to be a limiting principle or we will get crooks saying they are part of the community patrol to stop and rob people because they look suspicious.

If you see a burglary in progress at your neighbors house and shoot a nigger as they are leaving with an arm full of loot, that is one thing. This was chasing someone down based on a credible past history of theft. It's crosses too many lines for me.
 
Last edited:
Back