Kyle Rittenhouse Legal Proceedings - Come for the trial, stay for….

What do you think will happen?

  • Guilty on all charges

    Votes: 282 8.8%
  • Full Acquittal

    Votes: 1,077 33.7%
  • Mistral

    Votes: 264 8.3%
  • Mixture of verdicts

    Votes: 479 15.0%
  • Minecraft

    Votes: 213 6.7%
  • Roblox

    Votes: 132 4.1%
  • Runescape

    Votes: 203 6.3%
  • Somehow Guilty Of Two Mutually Exclusive Actions

    Votes: 514 16.1%
  • KYLE WILL SUBMIT TO BBC

    Votes: 35 1.1%

  • Total voters
    3,199
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
So you mean he actually cared more about his client, the guy who was fucking paying him, not going to prison for life than pushing some giddy ideological crusade that his client didn't even agree with, and getting him sent to prison for life as some kind of bullshit martyr?

And you think it is somehow bad he didn't fuck over his client for political bullshit but instead has a target painted on his back for the rest of his life no matter how "liberal" he actually is (or isn't)?
To tell the truth, I didn't even see this until now when I was reading older pages.

I simply see no good reason for Richards to be against Kyle going on the supposedly-right-wing interview circuit after the trial, which is what I interpreted as what is going on. I'm not sure what the rest of what you're saying is supposed to be about except as a comparison to Lin Wood, which did not figure into my comment.
 
Last edited:
I feel like the 2nd one is a joke but I’m honestly not sure yet. It sounds too much like Kamala Harris type or Hillary Clinton kind of lies.
D2BBD746-EDF1-43C0-9329-BF81163C139C.jpeg
 
I feel like the 2nd one is a joke but I’m honestly not sure yet. It sounds too much like Kamala Harris type or Hillary Clinton kind of lies.
View attachment 2749418
Yeah, that is almost definitely a joke but it's based on an actual "that happened" tweet some Twitter nut made after Trump was elected telling her young child about all the atrocities that would happen under his presidency.

Also so I don't double post, that lady went in hard in the most recent interview with him. Not that I think there should only be softball interviews, it just didn't seem like a good tactic for getting him to answer any of the harder questions, especially coming right off the kid being prepped for his own trial. You catch more flies with honey etc.

It was almost like she was trying to psych him out, like when he says maybe the whole ordeal isn't as big as it feels to him since he's living it and she's like "or maybe it's even bigger than you realize". Jeez lady, harsh realm, seems like a good way to put someone on their guard and answer more hesitantly.
 
Andy Ngo: “Antifa accounts in Portland & beyond are terrified over the Rittenhouse acquittal because they're afraid others will shoot them dead during an attack & have a legal argument for self-defense. They're urging comrades to get guns immediately so they can kill before being killed.”
:story::story:
Tweet
Archive
View attachment 2748157
View attachment 2748159
View attachment 2748160
View attachment 2748161
Please tell me they're winding up for a ghetto October Revolution, I want to see them become a real terrorist group & splattered into paste on the asphalt by the Redneck Guard.
 
He gave them some gibs, just like every other President, when they started rattling their cradle and throwing around their tard toys like the little babies they are. Nothing permanent whatsoever resulted from anything he did. Their bullshit and his own "Little Rocket Man" bullshit were pure kayfabe, put on to fool the rubes.
This is a brainlet take, to be quite honest.

I know you don't like Trump, but I respect you so I'm gonna ask, can you at least be objective about the things Trump has accomplished?
So he basically caved in to them having nukes. That's something no previous President did. That makes him an absolute pussy, the biggest failure of a President we ever had. If we ever take a North Korean nuke, it's thanks to that faggot fat fuck.
Your TDS is by far your only flaw. Didn't North Korea have nukes all throughout the Bush Jr. & Obama presidencies? What country doesn't have nukes at this point? You do know North Korea's nukes are incompetently built and are more likely to hit the ocean than any intended target, right? What's NORAD?

The instant they fire a nuke, everyone will know & everyone will be on their ass like African Bees. North Korea has next to no allies & will be obliterated in retaliation if they actually fire a nuke. Why would North Korea bother to fire a nuke at the United States anyway & not at a closer rival like South Korea or Taiwan?

Let's be real, you hate Trump's meeting with Kim Jong-un not because of what he did while he was there, but because it was Donald Trump doing it. If it were Obama, Hillary or Biden, there'd be no material difference except you'd be singing a different tune because they're establishment Democrats instead of an outsider Republican.
 
Consider for a moment the possibility that your intellectual self may be wrong. Ponder the 0.1% chance that rationalism far too quickly thinks itself a superior judge of right and wrong. Perhaps consider that it's not much of a judge at all, but rather something that listens to and reflects on social pressures and selectively available information; whereas your instincts are, conceivably, grown over eons in the soils of reality.
Oh yes, let's listen to our gut instinct on every moral quandary & act on impulse, just like a felon would.
 
Please tell me they're winding up for a ghetto October Revolution, I want to see them become a real terrorist group & splattered into paste on the asphalt by the Redneck Guard.
Started thinking about this. Of course they are pants shittingly terrified about self defense. Seriously mentally ill people probably wander to protests all the time. And now organizers have to tard wrangle them lest they provoke the right wingers. And the media has cranked the paranoia up to 11 so every person who goes to a protest will be on edge.

Think about it. Rosenbaum kicked off a chain of events that left him (mentally ill person) dead with Huber (piece of shit but could probably still be a useful idiot) dead and Grosskreutz (useful idiot) maimed. 3 to 1 ratio is extremely poor. Imagine if Rittenhouse had back up.

And the right wingers are probably looking for lessons to be learned from the Rittenhouse Case. First thing I thought of was body cams for your militia group. Also training for what to do in case of attack.

Rittenhouse Precedent as they call it royally fucks them. They just aren't sure how deep this goes though.
So not only does she ask probing questions about his PTSD but she tries to get him to divulge info about the prospective defamation suits? And issue an apology to the families of his “victims?”

If the trial wasn’t proof enough of his good heart, this interview is, because I’d be throwing punches in this situation.

Here’s the transcript for those of you who don’t want to listen to this woman’s voice for 45 minutes
News Nation is played on WGN. Basically the poor man's CNN.
I unironically support every Antifa going out and buying a gun.

They're going to start red-pilling themselves before they pull out of the parking lot of the gun store.

"What do you mean I have to sign a bunch of paperwork and get checked out?"

"Why is everyone in this store respectful and nice?"

"I better read up on the laws surrounding guns now so I can be a responsible owner. Wait, why does the piece of plastic you hold the gun with matter if I am committing a felony or not?!"

"Odd, the gun is just sitting there in my nightstand not killing anyone"
Odds are they are going to get the guns illegally for "street cred." They won't practice with it and then be horrified when Cletus takes down six down before they even drew their gun.
 
And the right wingers are probably looking for lessons to be learned from the Rittenhouse Case. First thing I thought of was body cams for your militia group. Also training for what to do in case of attack.
Probably the biggest takeaway is ALWAYS FOLLOW THE BUDDY SYSTEM. Rosenbaum threatened to kill the first person he caught alone and lo and behold, that's exactly what he tried the moment Kyle became separated from the rest of his group.
 
Probably the biggest takeaway is ALWAYS FOLLOW THE BUDDY SYSTEM. Rosenbaum threatened to kill the first person he caught alone and lo and behold, that's exactly what he tried the moment Kyle became separated from the rest of his group.
Never get separated from your bodycam, rifle, or battle buddy. Just simple pro-tips that will help save your ass!
 
Started thinking about this. Of course they are pants shittingly terrified about self defense. Seriously mentally ill people probably wander to protests all the time. And now organizers have to tard wrangle them lest they provoke the right wingers. And the media has cranked the paranoia up to 11 so every person who goes to a protest will be on edge.

Think about it. Rosenbaum kicked off a chain of events that left him (mentally ill person) dead with Huber (piece of shit but could probably still be a useful idiot) dead and Grosskreutz (useful idiot) maimed. 3 to 1 ratio is extremely poor. Imagine if Rittenhouse had back up.

And the right wingers are probably looking for lessons to be learned from the Rittenhouse Case. First thing I thought of was body cams for your militia group. Also training for what to do in case of attack.

Rittenhouse Precedent as they call it royally fucks them. They just aren't sure how deep this goes though.

News Nation is played on WGN. Basically the poor man's CNN.

Odds are they are going to get the guns illegally for "street cred." They won't practice with it and then be horrified when Cletus takes down six down before they even drew their gun.
I thought Rittenhouse's trial did not set precedents, even in Wisconsin, because it's a criminal, rather than civil trial.
 
Oh yes, let's listen to our gut instinct on every moral quandary & act on impulse, just like a felon would.
I'd suggest no such thing. However, ignoring your instincts because of muh enlightenment reason (or in practice selective criticisms of motivated academics/media/entertainment) is equally radical with perhaps even worse outcomes.
 
I thought Rittenhouse's trial did not set precedents, even in Wisconsin, because it's a criminal, rather than civil trial.
Not a legal precedent, but a social one. Now everybody has in their brains, even subconsciously, that going to start fires and attack people at a riot might end up with them getting shot. And the citizen that defended themselves gets off at trial! (The subconscious glosses over the millions in costs and trauma of dealing with taking a life and the trial.) It instills a great hope in the hearts of the common man, and fear in the shriveled lumps of feeling that communist agitators possess.
 
This may be true for your college liberal gf. Somebody 'hardcore' enough to sympathize with antifa and be of age to buy a gun will do something fucking stupid with it or at best stick in a closet for Tyrone to take when he breaks in. And even if they get into it they'll write off most gun people/instructors as right wing nut jobs and stick to getting advice from r/SRA.

I dont want leftists to own guns, partially because a disarmed enemy is good, but mostly because they'll infect the gunindustry with the same rot theyve brought to everything else.
If Antifa starts arming up for protests, it's probably for the best. Here's why.

Their natural habitat is a murky gray area at the boundary between protest, inciting violence and self defense. Their mission is to violently intimidate their political opponents and kill a few when they can, everyone who's paying attention knows this. But their strategy is based around obscuring their real tactics with their violent street operatives hiding behind the facade of a peaceful protest.

That's why they do things like throwing frozen water bottles and hurling bricks from behind umbrellas. They hide their faces and ambush people from behind, always leaving themselves an out where they can say "that wasn't us!"

If they come to protests armed, the whole equation changes. One reason Kyle's case is so damaging to them is that both the prosecution and defense agreed that if you bring a gun to a protest, start a fight and shoot someone, you're responsible. Kyle had to shoot Pedobaum because he was trying to grab his rifle. People have told me that when they carry, they're much less confrontational than they would be otherwise, because if they get into a fight and someone punches them out, that person can take their gun. When carrying, they'd avoid so much as getting into an argument, because when you have a gun any confrontation is potentially lethal.

This turns their whole game upside down. They can bluff and make excuses for violence by masked people, but if those people are armed it takes on a whole different level of severity. If they get into a fight with a "chud" and it's going badly for them, they may be faced with a choice between shooting someone or having their gun fall into the hands of an enemy. If they charge at police while carrying guns those police have a strong justification for opening fire on them. National Guard troops would have to be deployed with live rounds if the Antifa crowd are all carrying guns.

Antifa's model was imported from Europe and it made more sense there because no one can go to a protest carrying rifles in Germany. In a society that allows armed self-defense, their cowardly attacks are a non-starter. If the protest crowd is armed, Eric Clanton's bike lock shenanigans don't work. Michael Reinoehl was a good example of what happens when you add guns to Antifa tactics - they commit brazen murders and then get taken out in a hail of police bullets, because once you start shooting people you can't hide behind "tee hee, we're mostly peaceful."

And the best move for counterprotesters is to start wearing body cams, particularly ones that can be hidden. If Antifa doesn't know which of the people walking around could be recording them, they'll be even more scared to try anything. If there was livestreamed video of them taking the first shots at someone their entire operation would collapse.
 
I'd suggest no such thing. However, ignoring your instincts because of muh enlightenment reason (or in practice selective criticisms of motivated academics/media/entertainment) is equally radical with perhaps even worse outcomes.
That is the logical conclusion of what you're suggesting. I would argue that leftists are already doing exactly what you described, relying on their rationality that Kyle Rittenhouse is indeed a white supremacist instead of referring to the empirical video evidence to see everyone shot was in fact a white man attempting to kill a Spanish minor out of criminal impulse & herd psychology. It's the reason they keep banging on the white supremacy drum even harder since his acquittal & are now calling for a Communist revolution. These people live in a deluded fantasy world concocted out of pure rationality instead of empirical evidence.
 
Let's be real, you hate Trump's meeting with Kim Jong-un not because of what he did while he was there, but because it was Donald Trump doing it. If it were Obama, Hillary or Biden, there'd be no material difference except you'd be singing a different tune because they're establishment Democrats instead of an outsider Republican.
Eh, this is a bit unfair. He just wouldn't go as hard to the mat trying to find something wrong with it, more than anything else.
 
I bet writing this piece of shit made this bitch's twat all wet. Nobody cares, sow.


Reminder that Devon Dunham was recently found not guilty of murder after he sprayed a retired fire chief with bullets because he 'felt threatened' when he was refused a ride and nobody in the media gave a single shit about what kind of 'precedent' that could send.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back