🐱 Google erases part of LGBTQ+ community in new online glossary project - Guess bi is a little too straight for them

CatParty

A new online tool designed to help mainstream, freelance and even LGBTQ+ journalists navigate definitions of what can be a complex world of LGBTQ+ vernacular, left out definitions of bisexuality and pansexuality in a new Google “LGBTQ+ language initiative.

The Google News Initiative announced the project in partnership with VideoOut, titled the “LGBTQ+ language and media literacy program, last week in a press statement. According to the company, they partnered with Men’s Health magazine to “help contextualize the research and data in the program.”


The tool, a glossary of 100 words that used the company’s Google Trends to track the popularity of LGBTQ+ terminology and definitions, was created with the assistance of several queer PhD linguists.

However, in a review of the glossary today, Friday, Nov. 26 the terms and definitions for bisexuality and pansexuality were missing.

According to the Google release: “It’s a way to understand the LGBTQ+ community, and hopefully, it will transform the way journalists – and all of us – write and talk about LGBTQ+ people.”

Jordan Reeves, the Executive Director of VideoOut, an LGBTQ+ nonprofit and the founder of VOE, a production company centering LGBTQ+ narratives in television and film, answered the self-asked question of; “WHY WOULD VideoOut, an LGBTQ+ nonprofit, partner with Men’s Health magazine?”

“So many people assume that Men’s Health is only for cisgender, heterosexual, masculine presenting men. I’m here to tell you, as a queer trans nonbinary human, that’s false.”

According to a recent Gallup poll, “One in six [U.S.] adults in Generation Z identifies as LGBT.” At the same time, a GLAAD report found 45% of non-LGBTQ+ people in the U.S. say they’re confused by the different number of terms to describe individuals who comprise the LGBTQ+ community.

In a response to late Friday evening, Jordan Reeves, the Executive Director of VideoOut in a direct message on Twitter told the Blade:

“Recently we launched The LGBTQ+ Language and Media Literacy Program, a living and breathing resource that we will continue to add to over time. We left out some terms and phrases at launch — bisexual, for example — that should have been included from the very beginning!

We are keenly aware of bi-erasure and the persistent confusion around bisexual identity. We are sorry we didn’t include it at luanch, but we are adding it (along with pansexual) very soon. We started with 100 entries (definitely not a comprehensive list…yet), and we are really excited to add entries as the community gives us feedback and suggestions.

We are really proud of the depth and breadth of terms that exist in the resource and hope it continues to be more and more useful as we add to it.

We’ll also be adding features so that this resource is the most useful for anyone using language about the LGBTQ+ community. If there are other words you can think of that we’ve left out, or ways to make the tool more dynamic, let us know and we’ll queue them up to be added!”
 
  • Informative
Reactions: IAmNotAlpharius
“So many people assume that Men’s Health is only for cisgender, heterosexual, masculine presenting men. I’m here to tell you, as a queer trans nonbinary human, that’s false.”

Millions of years of evolution. Lifeforms struggling to survive and evolve. Volcanoes. Ice ages. Floods. Apes walking upright. Using tools. Walking on the moon. All leading up to this sentence. (:_(

I once read an article stating that gay men often bought magazines like this because they could do so without judgement or outing. If you want to look at pics of hotties with abs without anyone finding out you are in the closet, men's health, fitness and sporting mags are the way to go.
 
Well honestly, it's not like they really care about bi erasure. They get pissed at you if you are bi but are dating/marrying the opposite sex. I think what they are really mad about is the exclusion of pansexuality because that hurts tranny feelings.

Although the term pansexuals stupid in itself. It pretty much means you are bi but will fuck trannies. But if trannies are real women and men and biology is transphobic then why would you even need a term other than bisexual in the first place?
 
"don't be evil"
They're programming people now, retooling the algorithm of society to suit their search engine / vaunted ad company agenda.
“So many people assume that Men’s Health is only for cisgender, heterosexual, masculine presenting men. I’m here to tell you, as a queer trans nonbinary human, that’s false.”
You're a retard. Homosexuality is not homogenderality. You and Google can go to hell with your homophobic dystopia project, but you just came from there.
 
The tool, a glossary of 100 words that used the company’s Google Trends to track the popularity of LGBTQ+ terminology and definitions, was created with the assistance of several queer PhD linguists.
There are only two kinds of sex: heterosexual and homosexual. Either both sexual organs involved in coitus are the same or different, and when they're different, it's always a penis and a vagina. There are no more options involved. The rest is just mental illnesses.
 
Bisexuals are a threat to the "validity" of transpeople and othergendered people, it's hard to believe leaving them out is anything other than intentional. Trannies especially really hate them it seems, because even bisexuals don't want to fuck them.
 
"don't be evil"

They're programming people now, retooling the algorithm of society to suit their search engine / vaunted ad company agenda.

You're a retard. Homosexuality is not homogenderality. You and Google can go to hell with your homophobic dystopia project, but you just came from there.
I believe it was Samuel J. Hyde who spoke of state enforced fagshit. Google's monopolistic manipulation of search algorithms has already had devastating effects for the western world, and most don't even question the narrative. Ever do a Goolag image search for, "Happy White American Couples"?
Conclusions about the Search Engine Manipulation Effect (2015).jpg
 
Whoever the HR drone that authorized this is doesn't understand how these people work. 100 words isn't enough, 1,000 words won't be enough, 1 million words won't be enough. The best thing you can do is let them burn themselves out protesting instead of adding fuel to the fire with organizational compliance.
 
Having talked to several people of "non binary" status; I've come to the conclusion there is no such thing as gender. Just your biological sex.
What these people want to term as genders and sexualities are just their depraved desires to satiate the carnal lusts deep in them.

John Money deserved a shotgun.
 
Depends. All bisexual women are straight women pretending to be LGBT for clout, and all bisexual men are gay men who don't want to come out of the closet.
It's easier for a woman to eat minge than it is for a man to come back from playing ticklebooty.

There's commitment in the latter, but not the former.

Well, it's not like the concept of sexual orientation as we know it is much older than the 1600s 1860s, anyhow. I repeat the (likely) words of the priests who listened to the confessions of intractable homosexuals prior to that time: "Stop inhaling dicks and procreate with your wife like God intended".

...and for the lesbians it's more like "...what are you... how are you having sex, exactly? Fine, whatever, stop doing that and... procreate, or something. I'm completely befuddled right now. 'Tribadism'...? What?"
 
Last edited:
Well honestly, it's not like they really care about bi erasure. They get pissed at you if you are bi but are dating/marrying the opposite sex. I think what they are really mad about is the exclusion of pansexuality because that hurts tranny feelings.

Although the term pansexuals stupid in itself. It pretty much means you are bi but will fuck trannies. But if trannies are real women and men and biology is transphobic then why would you even need a term other than bisexual in the first place?
Super bi
 
Back