I was referring to an earlier incident:
View attachment 2754992
Maybe I should clarify that in my previous posts I'm mainly focusing on what I think made the McMichaels and Bryan decide to chase Arbery.
I don't agree with MSM that their only motivation was racism where some dumb rednecks were going to hunt a black man just for being at the wrong place
and the wrong time.
It was a string of events that was building up for several months where a neighborhood becomes more and more wary, They get a feeling that police won't do anything about it. I can imagine that after those guns were stolen they became suspicious and paranoid of about everything and add to that a Greg McMichael being informally ‘deputized'.
Here is a gift from me to you: Saint Maud and Comrade Maud the revolutionary.
View attachment 2755098 View attachment 2755099
I'm not saying they were racist. I'm not saying Aubrey should be deified either. I'm saying he didn't deserve to be chased down and shot.
The MSM narrative is not one I'm parroting or justifying. They might have had good intentions. But you know what the road to hell is paved with. They were ignorant, reckless and possessed no understanding of the law. A retired deputy thought he still had cop powers and that is the most fucking obnoxious shit in the world. You're not a cop anymore. You don't get to posse up.
My entire point is that they had no fucking idea what they were doing and it lead to a man dying. Maybe there was a build up, but Aubrey didn't know that. There's no evidence he was even there before the day he was killed. They had no consideration of what they were doing. They
thought he was the suspect they saw previously. That doesn't matter. They don't have a warrant. They don't get to investigate. He wasn't on any of their properties.
You cannot run someone down because you think they're the same guy. That's an incredibly dangerous line of thinking. And even if you feel the cops aren't doing anything, that doesn't give you the right to block someone off.
The McMichael's broke the law that day, Aubrey did not. And that is why they were convicted. The only thing you can make a case for is trespassing, and that's a misdemeanor, which means citizen's arrest doesn't apply either. And he wasn't trespassing. The property was open, there was no indication that he wasn't supposed to be there (Fencing, no trespassing signs, etc.). He simply looked around and left.
"In this case." I'll beg to disagree based on the owners putting up cams and reporting trespassing in the neighborhood countless times.
I'll agree he didn't deserve to die, but that also attributed to his own poor judgement. You assume that if he had remained calmed and talked to them they still would have shot him, and there's no evidence to support that. However, once he grabbed that gun that flew out the window. Just because legally he didn't have to abide by them telling him to stop didn't mean common sense wise it was smart to dash for the shotgun and try to wrestle it, if you can't see why that's dumb as well, then no wonder black people will continue to die in such escelations.
I'm going to disagree, intent is based on details surrounding a suspect or person of interest, he was a career criminal who was known to steal, and for all intents and purposes it's easy to read between the lines he would have done it again or was doing it for obvious intent of theft or stealing. Just because he didn't take anythign at that time isn't instantly due to that not being the intent or motive, but merely could be because there was nothing too valuable at the sites.
Yes, so many people look around at those sites, despite no evidence put forward and people constantly calling cops for trespassing in the area due to such events. It was just a national past time, despite no one ever blogging about it or ever recording doing such things openly. Weird how that works huh?
I don't need to put him on trial, he found himself incompetent when he did dumb ass moves, and paid the price to other people pulling dumb ass moves. Simple as is.
I don't know how to say this any clearer, but Aubery was NOT trespassing. Why do you think people put up fencing and 'No trespassing' signs? Its because if they don't, its not considered trespassing. A career criminal? The dude was a petty shoplifter and had one instance of trying to get inside of a house. 'Career criminal' implies, you know, that's how they make their money. Not to mention his mental illness. He could have just been a klepto for all anyone knows. You cannot speculate about his intent, because there's nothing to prove it one way or the other. The evidence is that he looked around and left.
And nobody knew who Aubrey was. You can't look at shit after the fact. The entirety of court cases are in the moment. In that moment, did they know who Aubrey was? No. In that moment, was Aubrey committing a crime? No. In that moment, was Aubrey acting unlawfully in any way? No. This is all that matters. It is completely their fault that he died. They were the aggressors. They didn't know who Aubrey was or any of his facts. They cornered a mentally ill man and constantly escalated the situation until it was out of their control. They weren't police. They had no authority to do what they did and even if Aubrey was trespassing, which he wasn't, they'd still be wrong because Citizen's Arrest requires a felony-level charge. So they'd still go to jail.
Again, they were completely ignorant of the law, had no idea what they were doing, and didn't even claim Citizen's Arrest until after the fact as their defense. They initially claimed self-defense, but that went out the window once they were the aggressors. Because if you are wrong about a Citizen's Arrest, you are responsible for any crimes you committ in the process of that arrest. False Imprisonment being one. They were wrong. This is why you call the police, because if you are wrong, there's a huge risk to you.
www.tmz.com
