Science More women are giving birth after uterus transplants — and experts say they could even be put in men


When Chelsea Jovanovich was 15, she learned that she didn't have a uterus.

That was a result of her having Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser (MRKH) Syndrome, a rare congenital disorder that is estimated to occur in 1 in every 4,500 females. Such a diagnosis meant she'd never be able to carry a pregnancy on her own; her only options would be adoption or surrogacy. Jovanovich said it wasn't until she got married and started thinking about having a family of her own that really came to terms with the reality of not having a uterus and started to investigate other options. Jovanovich and her husband, Jake, considered a gestational carriers. They even approached a close friend about it, but ultimately realized the arrangement likely wouldn't work.

"It was a lot harder on me emotionally as I got into my child-bearing years," Jovanovich said. "Your friends are having babies, and you can't. It was pretty hard and I went through some rough patches."

Nearly out of options, Jovanovich learned about the possibility of a uterus transplant, which is when a person receives a uterus transplant from a living or deceased donor. The surgery of a transplant from a living person remains rare and is still in early clinical trial stages; to date, only 20 have been performed in the United States as of April 2021. Fifty had been performed around the world through April 2019.

Unphased by the experimental nature of the surgery, Jovanovich decided to try her luck, and applied to Penn Medicine's Uterus Donation program which began in 2017. To her surprise, she was accepted and matched with a donor. In February 2020, she successfully received a uterus from a woman named Cheryl Cichonski-Urban, who had already given birth to two healthy babies. After a successful transplant, Jovanovich underwent in vitro fertilization. In a uterus transplant, the fallopian tubes of the donor are part of transplantation— and it all paid off. On May 18, 2021, Jovanovich gave birth via a C-section to a healthy baby boy thanks to Urban's uterus.

Her son, Telden, was the first baby to be born from a live donor at the Penn State program. Of the 70 uterus transplants that have ever occurred globally, only a handful of babies have been born from both living and deceased donors. Despite the rarity of the procedure now, it could be a process that becomes more common in the future for women who have Uterine Factor Infertility (UFI), which is a form of female infertility that affects as many as 5 percent of reproductive-aged women worldwide. Those with UFI cannot get pregnant because, like Jovanovich, they either lack uteri or their uterus doesn't function properly.

"[A] uterus transplant is the only option that allows women with UFI the opportunity to carry and deliver their own babies," said Kathleen E. O'Neill, MD, MTR, co-principal investigator of Penn Medicine's Uterus Transplantation for Uterine Factor Infertility (UNTIL) trial. "Women with UFI have limited pathways to parenthood."

Dr. Aimee Eyvazzadeh, a reproductive endocrinologist based in the San Francisco Bay Area, told Salon despite recent successes, the world is likely still "far away" from a uterus transplant to be offered as an option at a fertility clinic.

"It's cost-prohibitive and most people won't have the funds to pay out of pocket for a uterine transplant," Eyvazzadeh said. "Given the risks associated with transplants, I don't see fertility clinics adopting this as a new procedure they will offer; it's a high risk procedure with a lower rate of live birth compared to IVF with a gestational carrier with a much higher cost."

Indeed, uterus transplants are costly because they are long and invasive processes that can require around 100 medical professionals (as happened with Jovanovich's transplant). If a transplant is successful and the recipient gives birth, the uterus is removed after child-bearing is complete. Doctors estimate a uterus transplant would cost up to $200,000, and are not apt to be covered by insurance — and then there are the risks to consider. As with many organ transplants, the recipient must take immunosuppressive medications to help the body accept the new organ, which can cause diabetes or renal damage in the long-term. There is also no guarantee that such a transplant will lead to a successful pregnancy.

"Graft failure is also a complication of uterine transplants," Eyvazzadeh said. "A little less than one-third experience graft failure; the transplant doesn't 'take' in a little less than a third of transplant recipients."

Eyvazzadeh said she was basing this number on a study published in February, 2021, in the peer-reviewed journal Obstetrics & Gynecology. In 2019, the Washington Post reported on one woman's journey to getting a uterus transplant who nearly died from a life-threatening Candida infection. It turned out that the uterus implanted in her body came from a Candida infection in her donor's bladder.

Eyvazzadeh added that the risks and cost do not mean the transplant won't become a more common operation in the future. Surprisingly, she thinks uterus transplants could become an option for an unexpected population: men.

"I predict with our aging population, and the rise of infertility, we will need men to share the burden of growing our population," Eyvazzadeh said. "While some people may think this is far-fetched, it is not for the near future; I predict in maybe 200 years from now, it will be a reality."

Transgender female patients will also be another group of people to benefit from the research into uterus transplants.

"Transgender females are also good candidates," Eyvazzadeh said. "I am not aware of a transgender female having a uterine transplant yet."

Indeed, many doctors believe a uterus transplant could work for a transgender woman.

However, as with most surgeries and procedures that involve a uterus, Eyvazzadeh said to "absolutely" expect many future debates.

"Anytime a treatment involves a woman's uterus, there will definitely be a debate especially when it involves IVF," Eyvazzadeh said. "As with all new technology, they will get safer and more effective and ultimately more cost effective."
 
hahaha okay let's play make believe and that this will work. And that somehow we find the drugs to make this work as with other organ transplants. And that those drugs totally won't kill the baby and the person but will enable a healthy full term pregnancy.

I wanna see those male hips give birth. I want it streamed live and please give advance notice so I can plan for the delivery of :popcorn:

Spoiler- they could get 2 amholes this way as in birth - women often make the decision to "cut or tear"

What is Vaginal Tearing?​

A vaginal tear is a laceration to the perineum (the area between the vagina and rectum) that occurs when the baby is pushed out. The tears are spontaneous, meaning a doctor didn't make a cut. "During birth, the vagina has to stretch enough to allow a baby, whose head is the size of a cantaloupe, to come through it," says Sherry Ross, M.D., an OB-GYN and women's health expert at Providence Saint John's Health Center in Santa Monica, California. "Hopefully, the vagina will stretch just enough without tearing, but often a tear does happen.

Unfortunately, the odds of getting a vaginal tear are fairly high: First-time moms have a 95 percent chance of experiencing some form of tearing during delivery, since the tissue down there is less flexible. The good news? "Typically, after your first vaginal birth, your tissue is more flexible so tearing becomes less likely," Dr. Ross says.
/SPOILER]
 
Lmao, even if the workaround for sticking a baby in there was some plastic womb bag with the fetus already growing inside, the stark contrast between natural gestation and (abominable) artificial gestation is gonna turn a lot of people off to the idea to begin with. The difference in how the babies gestate is way too stark a contrast for people to not question the ethics of it without coming off as the disingenuous "trans women are real women" crowd. I don't know about the rest of you, but that's ten times more disturbing than men making axe wounds.

Also, there's like a 100% chance these trans designer babies all turn out deformed from the uterus rejecting the host and getting infected.
 
"Your doctors were so preoccupied with whether or not they could, they didn't stop to think if this would end with them being thrown into oceans with millstones around their necks."
When I was promised mad scientist shit as a kid it was cool robots and dinosaurs. Not convincing young women to chop their tits off and young men to glue them on.
 
Personally, I can't wait for troons to start blowing their life savings on more unnecessary and life-threatening cosmetic surgeries, then becoming suicidally miserable when they realize their life is ruined. It's obvious that they don't understand biology, so why not let the backyard butchers capitalize on that lack of understanding? It's like they're trying to defeat each individual point of what constitutes males and females in biology just to win the "real woman" argument. I wouldn't be surprised if they resort to stuffing premies up a tranny's stinkditch and letting them push it out just for the technicality of, "See, I gave birth! I'm a real woman, guys!" They already shoot them up with estrogen until they lactate and let them put that nasty shit in an innocent infant's mouth, so unbirthing and rebirthing probably aren't far off.
 
Look, I'm not an expert, especially not in biology. But from what I can tell about the human body, from being in one for quite a while, is a lot of functions are built in and just known by the every part of it. One reason trans women will never be women is because the brain/body sees your nouveau vagina as a gaping wound between your legs and does everything it can to close it up. So following this line of thinking, okay, let's just put a womb inside a male body. What plumbing are you going to hook it up to? How are you going to tell the naturally occuring male body and hormones that it is not a foreign object that needs to be removed? Even if you were to implant an embryo in the womb, how would you convince the body to pass nutrients to the womb to feed the "clump of cells"? Hell, our "medical science" can't even fix an organ that suffers from situs inverses; if someone has a reversed organ, you can't put a normal one in there, because valves and connectors and shit don't line up; and that's for organs that can be successfully transplanted.

Do explain Mr. Butcher Doctor.

You can't...

This whole thing fails on multiple levels, even if you put an embryo in a womb transplanted in a male body, it would never develop properly due to needed ing a specific hormonal environment.

And you would have to keep the troon that was transplanted on powerful ass immunosuppressants for the rest of his life, or else his immune system would immediately try and violenty destroy the foriegn object... which would probably set off a cytokine storm of epic proportions if it happened and would pretty much guarantee the agonizing death of the troon.

And of course the immunosupressants would mean the troon would get infected by literally anything super fucking easily.

Also as you've noted, the male body does not have the infrastructure in place to support a uterus.
 
You KNOW these uterusues will be obtained through shady means.
If you're so desperate to hide from the truth that you'll mutilate your genitals, you're probably also desperate enough to buy black market organs. A lot of them will probably be sold the uterus of a pig or cow, but nobody will notice because it wasn't going to function in their body no matter where it came from.
 
Indeed, uterus transplants are costly because they are long and invasive processes that can require around 100 medical professionals (as happened with Jovanovich's transplant). If a transplant is successful and the recipient gives birth, the uterus is removed after child-bearing is complete. Doctors estimate a uterus transplant would cost up to $200,000, and are not apt to be covered by insurance — and then there are the risks to consider. As with many organ transplants, the recipient must take immunosuppressive medications to help the body accept the new organ, which can cause diabetes or renal damage in the long-term. There is also no guarantee that such a transplant will lead to a successful pregnancy.
And people think this is a good idea why, exactly? This is some mad scientist with unlimited budget shit.
If this comes to pass I will no longer be an organ donor. I don't want my uterus going into some troon who will likely just die of a massive infection because male bodies are not meant to carry female organs. Miscarriages that cannot be expelled without surgery are likely to kill off a few troons if pregnancy is even possible in the first place.
Kiwifarmers kill troons even in death. That's metal af.
 
"I predict with our aging population, and the rise of infertility, we will need men to share the burden of growing our population,"
You know people talk of science and religion like the two are at odds.
The irony is the greatest acts against God coincidentally often happen to be in greatest defiance of nature.

Something something those declaring themselves wise became fools...
I wouldn't count on it. Look up the history of gender-delusions.
They've been killing insane faggots on the operating table for nearly a hundred years, and are none the wiser.
"Listen Bigot, I'm going to the first assigned-XY-at-birth female lady to get real lady parts implanted in me! Sure everyone else assigned-XY at birth to undergo this before me has died, but I will be the first! Imagine how many ass-pats and affirmation points I'll get from being THE FIRST true & honest transwomyxn to have a functioning uterus!"

Personally, I can't wait for troons to start blowing their life savings on more unnecessary and life-threatening cosmetic surgeries, then becoming suicidally miserable when they realize their life is ruined.
Jokes on you, troons already do that.
 
You know people talk of science and religion like the two are at odds.
The irony is the greatest acts against God coincidentally often happen to be in greatest defiance of nature.

Something something those declaring themselves wise became fools...

"Listen Bigot, I'm going to the first assigned-XY-at-birth female lady to get real lady parts implanted in me! Sure everyone else assigned-XY at birth to undergo this before me has died, but I will be the first! Imagine how many ass-pats and affirmation points I'll get from being THE FIRST true & honest transwomyxn to have a functioning uterus!"


Jokes on you, troons already do that.
That's why I said "more."
 
"It's the story of Frankenstein. A man who attempted to create life in his own image...without first reckoning upon God."

Last I checked, in the original novel, the creature was pretty chill and actually had some sort of inherent morality until it realized everyone hated him for no reason other than his looks and that he was alone.

Even then he only got violent after the doctor refused to create a companion for him to keep him from being completely fucking alone.

Poor guy just wanted love in a world that refused to give him any.

God had nothing to do with it, Except if you count Victor Frankenstein as the creatures god... in which case he is a shitty god.
 
Last edited:
Last I checked, in the original novel, the creature was pretty chill and actually had some sort of inherent morality until it realized everyone hated him for no reason other than his looks and that he was alone.

Even then he only got violent after the doctor refused to create a companion for him to keep him from being completely fucking alone.

Poor guy just wanted love in a world that refused to give him any.

God had nothing to do with it, Except if you count Victor Frankenstein as the creatures god... in which case he is a shitty god.
It's from the intro to the 1931 film. It doesn't necessarily match up to the novel, where the narrative thrust essentially involves Victor not taking responsibility for his creation and abandoning it after its creation.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: BlerdBjern
Last I checked, in the original novel, the creature was pretty chill and actually had some sort of inherent morality until it realized everyone hated him for no reason other than his looks and that he was alone.

Even then he only got violent after the doctor refused to create a companion for him to keep him from being completely fucking alone.

Poor guy just wanted love in a world that refused to give him any.

God had nothing to do with it, Except if you count Victor Frankenstein as the creatures god... in which case he is a shitty god.
Shelley wanted to name the monster Adam, so yeah, Victor is supposed to be an incompetent god wannabe who overstepped his bounds.

Also, the creature learned morality from eavesdropping on a Christian family he lived below.
 
I will not take the female organs.
 
So which do you think trannies will start suing people over first: the inevitable deaths that result from this mad science experiment, or the sane medical professionals refusing to do it?
 
"I predict with our aging population, and the rise of infertility, we will need men to share the burden of growing our population," Eyvazzadeh said.

This is legit a synopsis to a few fujoshit mpreg manga that I see ads for on illegal manga reading sites. I wish I was lying.

So which do you think trannies will start suing people over first: the inevitable deaths that result from this mad science experiment, or the sane medical professionals refusing to do it?
I'm going to put 5USD and the lint in my pocket on the medical professionals that refuse to do it.
 
Back