Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey Stepping Down, Report Says

Crux said:
While it disgusts me that everything is blatantly political in these times, does our new dot head curry smelling friend saying the 1st amendment does not apply implicate that they are now officiallly a publisher losing all section 230 protection?
Click to expand...
That's what this pig shit sucking pajeet faggot seems to be suggesting, but who cares? This street shitting incompetent is going to destroy tweeter, that makes him a hero in my book.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Feels
Reactions: The Sacred Chao, BlueSpark, feral cat #6385 and 10 others
AnOminous said:
That's what this pig shit sucking pajeet faggot seems to be suggesting, but who cares? This street shitting incompetent is going to destroy tweeter, that makes him a hero in my book.
Click to expand...
I cant disagree, twater has developed into a cancer, if this elephant driver can force this into the ground its for the betterment of humanity.

maybe the courts will help him find the way, may Joe Biden stepping into showers with young girls will finally break the media dam, who knows
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: From The Uncanny Valley, Iwasamwillbe, Dork Of Ages and 1 other person
So does this mean uppity niggers can no longer get Karens fired for calling the police on them?
No, no I don't think so. It's going to be used to PREVENT you from showing chimpouts.

Not to mention 95% of Twitter is about doxxing and getting the 'tea' on people. You know Chad Loder and Antifash Gordon aren't getting banned anytime soon.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: FoolhardStar, From The Uncanny Valley, DuckSucker and 3 others
Deathfromabove said:
Fuck Jack Dorsey. The hypocrisy from twitter during the 2020 election still amazes me. Questioning the 2020 vote caused a flood of permabans and those smug as fuck fact checker pop ups because it was "a threat to our democracy" meanwhile back in 2016 (and this shit lasted for years) you had celebrities and tens of thousands of people on twitter and reddit openly claiming that Russian bots had infiltrated the west and stolen the election for Trump and that his supporters were also Russian trolls/bots subverting the youth. None of those claims ever had to be fact checked or labelled for peoples safety despite it going to the courts that proved muh Russia was outright lies. It's okay when we lie and cope losing the election by claiming Russian hackers stole it but when the right does it it's a threat to our democracy.
Click to expand...
But arguably that isn't hypocrisy, that's an evaluated response to the threat posed by the disinformation. Twitter is definitely guilty of some selective deafness but its not fair to treat these like equal situations. Not saying Twitter isn't partisan either, but those specific examples are actually good reasons to step in.

The Russia thing did exist, it just wasn't as big a deal as everyone made it out to be. Trump was just seperate enough from events that Mueller likely thought he couldn't risk setting the precedent that you could indict a president or such circumstantial evidence, as that's how they'd all end their terms. The Russian hacking and social media campaign wasn't enough to clinch the numbers, but it looked like a huge upset because the DNC had been horribly dishonest about their polling on Clinton, because Democrats seem to always make the mistake of thinking their voters stand under one banner. The point is, it was real, identifiable thing that happened. How involved Trump actually was, how much it really helped him, we won't know, and that's largely what the story was about.

How did Biden win? That explanation seems to depend on the direction of the wind. Help from China, something to do with Castro, Republican poll watchers betrayal, fraudulent election counting, Trump was going to make a surprise unveiling, JFK was supposed to rise from the dead, Trump's playing the long game, etc, etc. Hunter's laptop hacked the polling stations or something. This is cope. And when you have an ecochamber environment where facts are what you want them to be so long as they contradict the mainstream narrative, you allow for really insane stuff to start motivating people. And of course, liberals chose this time to start introducing racially charged ideology into some of the schools.

Speculating about election interference is one thing, nobody denies Trump got elected. Assertively telling people that the election was rigged and they're all living under illegitimate rule and that they are the enemy, that's how civil wars happen, when one half of a country experiences a completely different reality, a process formerly requiring religion.

The fact is the whole notion of unrestricted free speech wasn't conceived in an environment where everyone on Earth could see and respond to what you say. The peope with the platforms used to be the people who were judged to have a learned opinion on something. I can't really blame their haphazard approach to censorship because its ultimately an acknowledgment that some speech is too dangerous in a world where we can't trust the ordinary civilian to detect nonsense.
 
  • Informative
  • Dislike
  • Like
Reactions: ARghEAT, Seventh Star, AmateurComedicTaxidermist and 4 others
Yeah I suspect the whole "No posting pics of people without their permission" is mostly because they are supremely butthurt over the whole Rittenhouse thing and it was social media videos and pics that help the kid (correctly) beat the rap.

They are doing this so when the pantyfa shit kicks off again, the public won't be able to ID the bastards, nor provide compelling video evidence of people justly defending themselves from the commie pedo hordes.
 
  • Informative
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Coal Burner Account, FoolhardStar, Iwasamwillbe and 9 others
Null said:
View attachment 2759973

if you're not on the fediverse and still actively use twitter i hate you

kiwifarms.cc (weirdos)
poa.st (channers, anime)
freespeechextremist.com (shitposters)
gameliberty.club (gamers+lolicon)
outerheaven.club (gamers-lolicon)
noagendasocial.com (centre left)
leafposter.club (canadians)
spinster.xyz (feminists/terfs)
gleasonator.com (normies)
letsalllovela.in (weebs)
social.anthro.cc (furries) - Known to have manual approvals for bot mitigation.
bitcoinhackers.org (bitcoin maxis)
collapsitarian.io (Anarchists)


View attachment 2759977
Click to expand...
unironically thank you for making me discover the fediverse, it's amazing.
social.anthro.cc has a very cool community
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: Meiwaku, Dork Of Ages, ditto and 3 others
Vect said:
Speculating about election interference is one thing, nobody denies Trump got elected. Assertively telling people that the election was rigged and they're all living under illegitimate rule and that they are the enemy, that's how civil wars happen, when one half of a country experiences a completely different reality, a process formerly requiring religion.
Click to expand...
I'm not sure what point you're trying to make here. Were you not around for the nation wide rioting that happened right after Trump's election and which then picked up again when he was inaugurated? That was actual civil unrest. What do you think fueled that? Mostly it was a tantrum of hatred over Trump but years of media fear mongering about Russian hackers helped plenty. Leftists may not have been as vocal about outright calling Trump's win a lie but they were out on the street burning their cities down screaming NOT MY PRESIDENT by the thousands. And also there was plenty of "Russia stole the election" and "Not my president" sentiment in that too.

We came far closer to a civil war with the endless riots over evil Trump winning then people on twitter questioning if Biden had lied about ballots.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Ashen One, Rivalo, Basic Bleach and 7 others
Deathfromabove said:
I'm not sure what point you're trying to make here. Were you not around for the nation wide rioting that happened right after Trump's election and which then picked up again when he was inaugurated? That was actual civil unrest. What do you think fueled that? Mostly it was a tantrum of hatred over Trump but years of media fear mongering about Russian hackers helped plenty. Leftists may not have been as vocal about outright calling Trump's win a lie but they were out on the street burning their cities down screaming NOT MY PRESIDENT by the thousands. And also there was plenty of "Russia stole the election" and "Not my president" sentiment in that too.

We came far closer to a civil war with the endless riots over evil Trump winning then people on twitter questioning if Biden had lied about ballots.
Click to expand...
Lefties and Righties express civil unreast in different ways.

Lefty Civil Unrest:

1638346402250.png


Righty Civil Unrest:

1638346410187.png


We haven't hit righty civil unrest yet. If they steal the election in 2022 or god forbid 2024, avoid buildings taller than 3 stories until 2030.
 
  • Like
  • Feels
  • Informative
Reactions: Education Lottery, ExsanguinateHorizon, Matt Damon and 13 others
  • Like
  • Feels
  • Agree
Reactions: Woe-B-Gon (TM), Meiwaku, Leaf Wage Slave and 33 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back