California water districts to get 0% of requested supplies in unprecedented decision


Water agencies in drought-stricken California that serve 27 million residents and 750,000 acres of farmland won’t get any of the water they have requested from the state heading into 2022 other than what’s needed for critical health and safety, state officials announced on Wednesday.
It’s the earliest date the department of water resources has issued a 0% water allocation, a milestone that reflects the dire conditions in California as drought continues to grip the nation’s most populous state and reservoirs have dropped to historically low levels.
State water officials said mandatory water restrictions could be coming and major water districts urged consumers to conserve.

“If conditions continue [to be] this dry, we will see mandatory cutbacks,” Karla Nemeth, director of DWR, told reporters.
The low allocation, while unprecedented, doesn’t mean Californians are at risk of losing water for drinking or bathing. The State Water Project is just one source of water for the 29 districts it supplies; others include the Colorado River and local storage projects.
The state will provide a small amount of water for health and safety needs to some of the districts that asked for it. But they won’t get water for any other purpose, such as irrigation, landscaping and gardening, which consume significant amounts of water.

The State Water Project is a complex system of reservoirs, canals and dams that works alongside the federal Central Valley Project to supply water up and down the state of nearly 40 million people. Lake Oroville, its largest reservoir, is only 30% full, about half of what it normally is this time of year.
Districts that rely on the state have a maximum amount they can request each year and the allocation represents how much the state can give based on available supplies.
The percentage may be adjusted in early winter and spring depending on how much snow and rainfall the state receives. Last year, the state’s second-driest on record, districts’ allocation went from 10% in December down to 5% by March. The only other time since 1996 that districts have been granted nothing was in January 2014, during the last drought.

The metropolitan water district of southern California is the state’s largest customer and it supplies water to about 19 million people. A third of its supply comes from the state. The district declared a drought emergency in November and mandated that people conserve water, a message its leaders emphasized on Wednesday. It will get some water for health and safety purposes.
“The dramatic reduction of our northern California supplies means we all must step up our conservation efforts,” Adel Hagekhalil, the district’s general manager, said in a statement. “Reduce the amount you are watering outside by a day, or two. Take shorter showers. Fix leaks. If we all do our part, we’ll get through this together.”
While the district as a whole has access to water from other sources, like the Colorado River, some of its member agencies in Los Angeles and Ventura counties rely almost exclusively on state supplies. Three of those districts issued a joint statement calling on residents to reduce the water they use on outdoor projects like landscaping.

“This certainly isn’t what anyone wanted to hear,” said Jay Lewitt, president of the Las Virgenes municipal water district, which provides water for 75,000 people.
The state water allocation typically, but not always, goes up from the first December estimate to May, after winter storms that replenish snowpack water supplies have ended. But state water officials warned that dry times will probably continue, creating a tough year ahead. The state has so far failed to meet a goal California’s governor, Gavin Newsom, set in July of a voluntary 15% reduction in water use.
Nemeth, the DWR director, said the state could set mandatory restrictions if local districts don’t set their own and if the voluntary efforts still fail to meet the goal. The state water resources control board recently proposed emergency regulations that would ban certain “wasteful” practices such as watering lawns when it’s raining or washing cars with nozzles that don’t automatically shut off.
 
At this rate, water rations will be tighter in Cali than on Ceres.

Isn't it amazing how the wealthiest state in the union resembles a third world kleptocracy more than anything else?
Their economy is the fifth in the world (or whatever the claim is), but when adjusted for promised pensions and other shit, the state is bankrupt. It's also full of retard conservationists who get ideas that lead to "unexpected" consequences or just implemented poorly. They also have the largest fucking coastline of every state in the union, but refuse to use desalinization, because it'd fuck up their beautiful coastline; instead they'd rather drain every possible water source, to include ones across state lines, dry.

The low allocation, while unprecedented, doesn’t mean Californians are at risk of losing water for drinking or bathing.
You won't lose it, the price will just go up. Way to soften that blow, propagandist.
 
California has deliberately put themselves into a hole to make their citizens think things are worse than they are.

A single modern nuclear plant could provide water via desalination, produce clean hydrogen fuel, and solve most of their energy crisis.
Instead they're deliberately and purposefully shutting down their last nuclear plant, and destroying several hydroelectric dams and their reservoirs.

They're digging their own grave.
 
California has deliberately put themselves into a hole to make their citizens think things are worse than they are.

A single modern nuclear plant could provide water via desalination, produce clean hydrogen fuel, and solve most of their energy crisis.
Instead they're deliberately and purposefully shutting down their last nuclear plant, and destroying several hydroelectric dams and their reservoirs.

They're digging their own grave.
It proves that ecotards have no business managing the environment. Give them paradise and they’ll make a desert.
 
There is a lack of electricity as well.
Start having 12hour brownouts every day to save energy and the water problem will go away.
Without electricity, the pumps that pump the water wont run either.

:insert that meme with eddie murphy tapping his finger on his forehead:
 
They also have the largest fucking coastline of every state in the union, but refuse to use desalinization, because it'd fuck up their beautiful coastline; instead they'd rather drain every possible water source, to include ones across state lines, dry.
LA gets it's water from all the way on the other fucking side of the state, i hate the coast
 
Time to make that money water bore drillers, If you can afford the Biden diesel prices for your rigs.
watermin.png
 
At this rate, water rations will be tighter in Cali than on Ceres.

Isn't it amazing how the wealthiest state in the union resembles a third world kleptocracy more than anything else?
The problem is literally just water management. Retarded Californians grow shit like almonds when almond trees require 50 US gallons of water a day. They do this in a state which has more people than anywhere else in the US which is also half a fucking desert. Yeah no fucking shit there's problems with water. Not to mention Silicon Valley, which produces tech products, which, shocker, take a lot of water to manufacture. They started this 100 years ago when they paved over all of their wetlands. Sins of the father and all that.

You see, back in the interwar era, the 1910s-20s, California was experiencing a population boom, and the state commissioned some big brains to come up with solutions to the looming water problem. The majority of the commission wanted to build a sustainable aquaduct system that would tap thousands of square miles of local wetlands (without damaging them), which would've provided enough water to maintain the population boom for a hundred years.

The other members of the commission wanted to dam up a beautiful state park and fill.it full of water, because it was cheaper. Naturally the state went with the cheaper option, and then proceeded to sell the wetlands to the corpos that came up with the cheaper option. The corpos then ripped up and paved over the wetlands.

Californians need to stop calling it a grave. It's the future they chose.
 
The problem is literally just water management. Retarded Californians grow shit like almonds when almond trees require 50 US gallons of water a day. They do this in a state which has more people than anywhere else in the US which is also half a fucking desert. Yeah no fucking shit there's problems with water. Not to mention Silicon Valley, which produces tech products, which, shocker, take a lot of water to manufacture. They started this 100 years ago when they paved over all of their wetlands. Sins of the father and all that.
Why exactly DO they grow so many almonds in California? Something about the soil/weather? Is there not a better place to do it?
 
Why exactly DO they grow so many almonds in California? Something about the soil/weather? Is there not a better place to do it?
Subsidies. The US government subsidizes growers and almonds are a huge cash crop. For scale, California produces 60% of the world's almonds. There are objectively better places to grow almonds, but those places aren't in the US. Italy specifically grows almonds well and they aren't turbo retarded when it comes to water management.

Edit: California farmers can get fucked. I hate hearing about the "poor based California farmers trapped behind enemy lines while the government keeps taking their water which destroys their livelihood."

Lmao almonds are virtually the only crop that is responsible for the extreme water stress, and almonds are purely a cash crop. Almonds growers make money hand over fucking fist while simultaneously digging illegal wells and overtapping water supplies which leads to aquifer collapse (basically if you tap an aquifer too low, the denser rock above the aquifer will crush the lower water bearing soil, so it can't fill back up) all because they aren't satisfied with a fuckton of money, they want TWO fucktons. They do this while bitching to conservatives in DC and the rest of the country about muh ebul librels that are destroying their little family farm.

Don't get me wrong. Fuck California. I want to build a wall and make Californians pay for it, but almond growers will be the first faggots up against that wall.
 
Last edited:
The problem is literally just water management. Retarded Californians grow shit like almonds when almond trees require 50 US gallons of water a day. They do this in a state which has more people than anywhere else in the US which is also half a fucking desert. Yeah no fucking shit there's problems with water. Not to mention Silicon Valley, which produces tech products, which, shocker, take a lot of water to manufacture. They started this 100 years ago when they paved over all of their wetlands. Sins of the father and all that.

You see, back in the interwar era, the 1910s-20s, California was experiencing a population boom, and the state commissioned some big brains to come up with solutions to the looming water problem. The majority of the commission wanted to build a sustainable aquaduct system that would tap thousands of square miles of local wetlands (without damaging them), which would've provided enough water to maintain the population boom for a hundred years.

The other members of the commission wanted to dam up a beautiful state park and fill.it full of water, because it was cheaper. Naturally the state went with the cheaper option, and then proceeded to sell the wetlands to the corpos that came up with the cheaper option. The corpos then ripped up and paved over the wetlands.

Californians need to stop calling it a grave. It's the future they chose.
California produces more food than anywhere else in the US. Something to bear in mind.
California's farms are your food.
 
Back